Tier 1
Tier 1- Core Support (DCS Teacher Instructional Resources)
All students are to be taught high-quality, explicit core instruction. (See High Leverage Instructional Practices for Special Education and General Education.)
Instruction includes general academic, behavioral (any type/Panorama), and social-emotional instruction and support designed and differentiated for all students.
Core academic instruction will be aligned with the North Carolina Standard Course of Study (NCSCOS)
Core behavioral and social-emotional instruction will be aligned with PBIS expectations.
Tier 1/Classroom instruction and data discussed at weekly/monthly school-based PLC meetings.
Tier 1 should not take the form of unfocused ‘homework help’, test preparation, or reteaching of classroom content
Tier 1 should include differentiation and acceleration for AI (Academically Gifted) and IG (Intellectually Gifted) students
Differentiated Core instruction should be happening through small-group instruction/Guided Reading, etc.
Interventions and Progress Monitoring for mClass, Istation, and other Researched-Based Interventions:
Progress monitor at least once between benchmark assessments for on or above grade level students.
Focus more on Core instruction than progress monitoring if the majority of your students are red or yellow. In this case, if students are not making adequate progress with core instruction, you will need to use Tier 2 and Tier 3 guidelines for progress monitoring.
Know Your Learners: Learner Variability from Digital Promise
Learner Variability is the new norm in classrooms nationwide. Students are more diverse than ever linguistically, economically, and culturally. We will introduce the Learner Positioning Systems (LPS) to explore how to re-think aspects of the education system to address this diversity of learners, including applying learning sciences and research to best support each student. This information will also provide direction for tiered placements in reading and math. Please see the following resources:
*Understanding Learner Variability (Video)
https://digitalpromise.org/2018/08/23/understanding-learner-variability-research-reality/
*Learner Variability Navigator Tool (Cool Tool!)
This online tool translates the science of learner viability into identifying the factors that may attribute to deficits in student learning and connects the factors to create the picture of the whole child: learner, personality, reasons, etc. This tool also offers strategies to address each deficit. Hover over the skill for literacy or math, watch the factors connect. Click on a factor that you notice in your students or a child, scroll down to research-based strategies for that factor. Begin to address the deficit at that area.
Tier 1 Researched-Based Best Practices
Explicit Instruction
Top 10 Evidenced-Based Teaching Strategies for Explicit Instruction
Strategy 1: Clear Lesson Goals
Simply tell students exactly what they will be learning and required to do.
Strategy 2: Show & Tell (Demonstrate the Task)
Tell students what they need to know and show them what they need to be able to do.
Strategy 3: Questioning to Check for Understanding
Use questions and other formative assessments to check that your students understand things.
Strategy 4: Summarize New Learning Through Visual Material
Have students summarize new information in a graphical way.
Strategy 5: Plenty of Practice
Give your students plenty of practice spaced out over time.
Strategy 6: Provide Feedback
Provide students with feedback so they can refine their efforts.
Strategy 7: Be Flexible About How Long it Takes to Learn
Allow time for every student to succeed.
Strategy 8: Create Productive Group Work
Create collaborative groups who are learning together and from each other.
Strategy 9: Teach Strategies, Not Just Content
Teach students strategies' as well as the content.
Strategy 10: Metacognition
Teach children how to monitor their own thinking.
Encouraging Constructive Conversations in Mathematical Discourse
The North Carolina Standard Course of Study encourages building conceptual understanding through meaningful mathematical discourse and requires students to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. However, teachers must first explicitly teach these skills and establish expectations for participation.
The skills students need for productive mathematics discourse involve both knowing how to communicate effectively and knowing the mathematics vocabulary needed for communicating about math. This can be particularly challenging for English learners.
Zwier's work (http://www.jeffzwiers.org (Links to an external site.) provides tools for promoting effective mathematics discourse, including two particular tools relevant for scaffolding academic vocabulary and discourse in mathematics: the Constructive Conversation Skills Poster and the Math Paired Conversation Protocol.
Children follow natural developmental progressions in learning. Curriculum research has revealed sequences of activities that are effective in guiding children through these levels of thinking. These developmental paths are the basis for learning trajectories.
The child or groups of children may require Tier 1 Differentiation. See Tier 1 Differentiation and Classroom Accommodations Review Sheet.
The Role of Assessments
Determine a child’s progress toward standards
Ensure students have mastered the skills they need
Identify needs and assist in planning
Guide instruction and identify where intervention is needed
Enable collaboration and communication between teachers and administrators
Inform decisions
Enable schools to evaluate progress and ensure accountability
Set priorities at all levels – individual, classroom, schools, and districts
Differentiated Assessments at Different Levels
Formative: Are they getting it?
(High Opportunity to Improve Student Learning)
• Given by the teacher during instruction to measure progress (often integrated into the lesson)
• Provides frequent and timely feedback on teaching effectiveness and students’ current
learning
• Small scale assessment that identifies strengths as well as learning gaps to guide responsive
instructional actions (2-3 weeks of teaching the standards)
Interim/Benchmarks: Have they got it?
(Medium or High Opportunity Depending on Implementation)
• Given during instruction to measure interim progress (typically every 6-8 weeks) relative to a
specific goal or standard
• Common Assessments that can be aggregated and reported
• Identifies gaps in learning and timing allow for further instruction before the end of the
9-week period/trimester, semester, or school year
Summative: Did they get it?
(Low Opportunity to Improve Student Learning)
• Graded assessment, often done statewide and used for planning and identifying areas needing
additional focus
• Measures standards-based skills and knowledge at the end of an established time period (end
of year, end of course)
Data-Decision Charts
When a student begins to show difficulty mastering standards at Tier 1, and demonstrating skill deficits, or needing social-emotional behavioral or attendance supports, begin problem-solving (See Data-Based Problem-Solving). If the MTSS team determines supplemental intervention matching is needed through a formal group intervention plan, make sure to send the Parent Notification letters (See Tier II below).
If there are questions, please contact the MTSS District Support team member.
Core Practices and Intervention Matrix