Sustainable Development
Reading For This Lesson
Global Politics by Steven Lamy et al., pp. 364-397
Activating Your Thinking
Of all the things that come from this process [of a visionquest], perhaps the greatest, is the ability to determine how little we actually need to survive. Through forsaking food and feeling the bite of hunger, assuaging it with water and patience, we see how controlled we are by the need to consume. This ceremony shows us that we actually need very little to flourish and that the planet can support us all. There always was and there always will be enough if we return to and obey the original instructions - walk gently upon the Earth and do each other no harm.
One of the greatest fears we carry as a species is the fear of lack, of not having enough. Many people who were adults as I was growing up had lived through the Great Depression of the 1930s. That experience instilled in them the lurking fear of lack and hunger. What this fear engendered in return was a need to work hard and to deliberately stave off that eventuality. When you are always afraid that there will never be enough you act out of fearful energy and there can be no harmony. The fact that there are hundreds of millions of people in our world who chronically don't have enough to eat is testimony to the present of disharmony. People fear. When that energy is pervasive, people suffer. We become so attached to protecting and enhancing our own little corner of the world that we allow ourselves to forget that we are all connected, that we are all part of creative energy and that everything we do or choose affects someone or something else. That’s just how it works. So when we fear lack, we create it. Maybe not in our own lives but certainly in the lives of others. Somewhere on the planet. If fear perpetuates itself then fearful energy perpetuates itself as well, and fearful energy creates disharmony (Richard Wagamese, 2020, One Drum, pp. 147–148).
Barack Obama from A Promised Land (2020) on why we don’t actually do anything substantive about the environment
The BP Oil Pipeline Disaster in the Gulf of Mexico - April 2010
The only way to truly guarantee that we didn’t have another catastrophic oil spill in the future was to stop drilling entirely. But that wasn’t going to happen because at the end of the day we Americans love our cheap gas and big cars more than we cared about the environment, except when a complete disaster was staring us in the face; and in the absence of such a disaster, the media rarely covered efforts to shift America off fossil fuels or pass climate legislation, since actually educating the public on long-term energy policy would be boring and bad for ratings; and the one thing I could be certain of was that for all the outrage being expressed at the moment about wetlands and sea turtles and pelicans, what the majority of us were really interested in was having the problem go away, for me to clear up yet one more mess decades in the making with some quick and easy fix, so that we could all go back to our carbon-spewing, energy wasting ways without have to feel guilty about it.
I didn’t say any of that. Instead, I somberly took responsibility and said it was my job to “get this fixed” (p. 571).
I hope you feel as inspired as I was by Greta's talk and that you will see it one more reason for taking seriously both this lesson and this topic.
Examining the Tragedy of the Commons:
Choose zero, two or six points to be added to your Paper 2. If more than 10 percent of you choose six points, no one will receive any points. If you choose zero points you will cancel out one of the six point choosers, who will receive zero points.
Watch from 42m 15s - end of Our Planet: "Frozen Worlds"
Objectives
This unit focuses on what development means, how it can be pursued and what may help or stand in the way of people, communities and countries becoming better off in a comprehensive sense. Debates surrounding development are examined.
In this lesson we will be discussing material related to the following pieces of prescribed content from the Global Politics Guide:
Sustainable development: role of politics
Factors that may promote or inhibit development: Environmental factors
Different definitions of development, including sustainable development
Lesson Content
The Sustainable Development Goals
Why The SDGs Matter
Guiding Questions:
What was added to the SDGs that wasn't part of the MDGs?
In what ways does Sachs claim that the MDGs were successful?
Explain the four reasons why Sachs believes the setting of goals can important in achieving resolution to world issues?
Why does Sachs think goals are not enough?
Armed Conflict, Environmental Protection and the SDGs
Guiding Question:
In what ways has war perpetuated environmental issues or detracted from countries attempting to meet the SDGs?
Five Reasons to Think Twice About the SDGs
Guiding Question:
Jason Hickel outlines five problems with the SDGs but also offers a solution to each. Using Google Drawings or another Google App create a visual that captures both criticisms and the solutions developed in this article.
There are two options to complete this activity. The Sustainable Development Report is put together by Jeffrey Sachs and his team and it has a really clean interface once you click on "dashboard". The next option is the Sustainable Development Goals Tracker created by the "Our World In Data" team.
Steps:
Take a look at the overall rankings. Who were you surprised to see doing well? Why? Who were you surprised to see doing poorly? Why?
Choose the country you are most interested in digging into how they are doing. Click on the "go to country profile" or "download profile" to answer the questions below.
Which Global Goals seems to be their area of strength? Why do you think this is the case? By exploring some of the specific indicators for these goals, why do you think this is the case?
Where are they performing poorly? By exploring some of the specific indicators for these goals, why do you think this is the case?
Present your findings in a group of 3.
Circular Economy
Ted Talk and New Internationalist Magazine Interview with Kate Raworth
Viewing Questions:
What question does Raworth explain that Walt Rostow failed to answer?
In what ways are we financially addicted to growth?
In what ways are we politically addicted to growth?
In what ways are we socially addicted to growth?
Explain how Raworth's donut economics works.
What type of economies does Raworth suggest that we need to begin to adopt?
Guiding Questions:
What is Raworth's response to developing countries that need to growth to at least get within the shortfall area on onto the donut?
When asked the question, "would people have jobs as we understand them now", as part of Raworth's response, what is she essentially suggesting, though she never comes right out and says it? Hint: we discussed this in the previous lesson.
What sort of policies changes does Raworth suggest that would assist in making for a more sustainable economy?
Is she really just a communist?
Inquiry Activity:
Choose two countries you are interested in researching to see where they are on the donut.
In the New Internationalist's article/interview with Kate Raworth, scroll to the donut model prior to clicking on the "A Good Life For All Within Planetary Boundaries" link above.
Which areas do you think the two countries you have chosen are either at a shortfall and/or within the biophysical boundary/ecological ceiling? What's your rationale?
In which areas do you think the two countries have overshot? Why?
Now, go to the link. You can plot both countries to get a comparison. Any surprises?
Look back at your prognostication in questions 2 and 3. Where were you right/wrong? If you were incorrect, what does it seem you didn't consider?
Donut Economics in Action
Kate Raworth is working with the city of Amsterdam to try to help them implement donut-style economics in a post-Covid-`19 world.
Adbusters Magazine - an excerpt from The Third Force: A Field Guide to a New World Order
Optional TED Talk: A fascinating talk on circular economy.
Viewing Prompt: In what ways are Ellen MacArthur's ideas similar to and different from those Kate Raworth has presented?
Why climate change is, economically a pretty easy fix.
The Right To Be Cold
Guiding Questions:
Explain why it might be argued that civil and political rights, and economic, social and cultural rights are indivisible and interdependent?
According to international law, how are NGOs able to speak to governments about international issues of concern?
Explain the argument that the impact of climate change is a human rights violation, particularly for the Inuit.
Why does Watt-Cloutier believe that the ICC's petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights was ultimately not examined further?
Treaties and Responsibilities
Guiding Question:
How might international treaties be a threat to addressing the climate crisis?
Watch this primer on the prisoner's dilemma before reading the article below.
Guiding Questions:
Explain the three classes of international agreements that the author outlines.
Why are third class international agreements so difficult to negotiate? The author offers several reasons.
In what ways is a realist approach to IR particularly problematic in the case of addressing climate change?
In what ways does Nordhaus* note that a liberal approach to addressing international issues is particularly beneficial?
When a more liberal approach fails, what does the author suggest is the reason?
Why does Nordhaus suggest that taking a "Climate Club" approach to an international climate crisis agreement would be more beneficial than the Kyoto/Paris approaches?
What are the two aspects of the Climate Club approach to an international agreement? Explain how they would work.
How might the climate club approach even speak to realists?
Summarize, as Nordhaus does at the end of the article, the obstacles to getting an international agreement on climate change as well as what needs to be done to address the climate crisis.
* Take a look at Nordhaus' credentials at the bottom of the article
The Climate Debt
Read up to "Broken Promises" and collect data for the following prompt:
"The world's leaders have agreed that the developed world has contributed to losses experienced by the developing world as a result of climate change. "In many parts of the world, it’s no longer possible to simply adapt to a new climate. It’s not possible, for instance, to adapt if rising sea levels have submerged your entire island or if you have permanently lost your farmland to desertification. Because these losses are disproportionately the consequence of rich countries’ greenhouse gas emissions, those countries are morally bound to help compensate for them. This principle was formally accepted in 2013, when all the parties to the UNFCCC supported the creation of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage Associated With Climate Change Impacts, a forum to discuss the realities of loss due to climate change and ways of addressing those losses."
In this regard, there is consensus that the developed world has significant responsibilities to the developing world. The author of the article also provides a litany of compelling evidence to support this case.
Your job is to read the first part of the article and collect and categorize data to offer a compelling case as to why the developed world has a responsibility to the developing world when it comes to climate change compensation.
The medium you choose to present the data is up to you.
In groups, respond to the first part of question 2 as well as question 3.
The Happy Planet Index
Inquiry Exercise:
Consider what the Happy Planet Index measures. Is it an appropriate index to connect to sustainable development?
What issues/questions to do see/have with the methodology or measurement of the Happy Planet Index?
In what ways is the Happy Planet Index a valuable metric?
Choose two to three countries you are interested in (they may be the same as those you have chosen for previous compare and contrast exercises in this unit). In what ways (if any) are their metrics similar. Why do you think this is the case? In what ways are they different? Why?
Global Politics in Action
Recycling - Optional (both the 3 minute video and article are US-focussed)
Ocean Plastic
Viewing Guide:
While watching A Plastic Ocean collect information you could use in an awareness campaign. What would you want people to know about? Think of facts, causes, solutions and so on. Also consider what images stuck with you most. Which ones would you want to share to try to grab your audiences attention?
Possible Solutions, Possible Problems - After Viewing
In groups, research and brainstorm possible solutions to our plastic pollution problem for the following:
Group # 1: Recycling
Group # 2: Incineration
Group # 3: Biodegradable plastics
Group # 4: Pyrolysis (plastic to diesel)
What are the advantages and disadvantages of each possible solution?
How can we effect change as it relates to plastic consumption?
Read though this article and respond to the following prompt: Is technology the answer to our sustainability issues? What can't technology do as it relates to sustainability?
Other Relevant Articles
Reading Prompt:
Divide yourself into two groups. Choose one of the ecological disasters to read about and then share the W5 of the story to the rest of the group.
Viewing Questions:
Explain the five ways individuals avoid dealing with climate change.
Explain the five ways we might go about addressing climate change.
Guiding Questions (read up to the section that start with, "For all the palm oil that now goes into food...":
In what ways has palm oil been beneficial?
In what ways has it been an environmental disaster?
What are the five reasons palm oil has become so popular?
Videos:
In partner's choose who is going to watch which documentary. While watching the documentary note which Global Politics key concepts the documentary has links to and explain why.
Guiding Questions:
What are the reasons we need to be worried about climate change?
What are the reason why we can be hopeful?
Guiding Questions (the questions are not necessarily in order):
What are the causes of climate change?
What are some of the likely impacts of climate change?
What reasons are there to be hopeful?
Climate Change Denial
Checking For Understanding
Exploring sustainability as a Human Right (see Human Rights Unit)
The Four Possible Futures
Many citizens are now coming to the realization that there are real environmental costs associated with humankind's goal to achieve the good life. Citizens and leaders alike are also now recognizing the potential challenges posed by continuing policies that abuse the delicate ecological balance. These challenges to economic and political scarcity and the good life are explored in this exercise.
Review the different elements of "The Four Possible Futures" on pages 396-397 of the Lamy text.
Which future would be most beneficial to you and your family?
Would this future create a world society within which all people could benefit? Why or why not?
Which future would result in the following conditions:
Full employment
Less air pollution
More time for recreational activities
Less government
Greater equality
More citizen participation
Exploration and use of alternative energy sources
A world economy that encourages equitable and balanced growth
A reduction of waste and overconsumption
Less spending on military
More economic opportunities
Increased conflict
What image of the future is challenged by a more balanced ecological view?
How do these images correspond to the international relations theories we have studied?
Why are environmental issues becoming so significant in international politics?
Is a sustainable development strategy a possibility for the future? Note: sustainable development is usually defined as a process of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.