View the video to catch things you might have otherwise missed, to review, and to gain additional insights that will help you with the questions below.
In the video, Mr. Bruff explores the speculation that Antonio may be gay, which he picks up again in Act 3 scene 2.
There are many interpretive lenses (literary theories or philosophies) through which a reader can derive meaning from a text. After the 1960s, the lens known as post-structuralism or deconstructionism came into vogue in which scholars considered the author to be "dead"; in other words, it didn't matter what meanings the author may have intended to communicate in the text - the text could "speak for itself" and may include meanings that the author unconsciously put in OR that the reader could derive based on connotations of words or the reader's own experience/understanding. In the 1980s, a branch of deconstructionism known as "queer theory" also became more popular in which scholars looked at queer (LGBTQ-etc) representation in texts and how queer folk might be discriminated against, underrepresented, misrepresented, or missing. In some cases, this meant making a case for re-envisioning a character's assumed sexual orientation or gender in light of details others overlooked in previous interpretations. While this has been empowering for many individuals, a huge drawback of this lens is that it ignores authorial intention as well as the historical and cultural context in which the text is written, all of which would greatly influence and limit the accurate meaning of the text.
Certainly, if one looks at the details of Twelfth Night through the lens of current ideology around sexuality and the details of the text, the argument could be made that Antonio is sexually or romantically attracted to Sebastian. However, using this lens ignores the facts that:
a) the notion of sexual orientation - especially as an identity - was not established until the 20th century (at least 300 years after the play was written);
b) in Shakespeare's day, same-sex sexual behaviour was a criminal activity known as sodomy and was punishable by death (in fact, playwright Christopher Marlowe, a contemporary of Shakespeare's, addressed this very thing in his tragic play Edward II);
c) as an extension of b, having a same-sex relationship would have completely violated the Chain of Being and brought chaos into society in Elizabethan thinking; and
d) no same-sex attractions are actually condoned or honoured in the play - they are used to heighten the dramatic tension and for comedic effect.
If we were to assume that Shakespeare wanted to highlight homoerotic love, then he certainly had more of a platform to do so through the interactions between Olivia and Viola, or between Cesario and Orsino, but he uses these to provide commentary on the nature of love as expressed by each gender and, as mentioned, to provide tension and comedy. Moreover, considering the average Elizabethan's repulsion toward and legal punishment of same-sex behaviour, the audience would completely lose any sympathy for Antonio had they understood his love for Sebastian to be sexual in nature. A more reliable interpretation is that Antonio's love for Sebastian is akin to bromance or deep care for him as a person. In many ways, Antonio's love for Sebastian acts as a foil/contrast to all of the other "loves" going on and begs the reader to consider, "What is true love?"
Read Act 2 in Twelfth Night Navigator so that you can better use and understand the original language. As needed, consult No Fear Shakespeare.
A 12th-century depiction of the Wheel of Fortune from the "Garden of Delights" book by Herrad of Landsberg via http://dailymedieval.blogspot.com/2014/10/wheel-of-fortune.html
The quiz will consist of:
Oh Time, thou must untangle this, not I./It is too hard a knot for me t' untie! (2.2.40-41)
—Viola's comment about the love triangle in which she has become involved.
Then come kiss me, sweet and twenty,/ Youth's a stuff will not endure (2.3.51-52)
—The conclusion of the clown's song on the carpe diem (seize the day) theme.
Dost thou think, because thou art virtuous, there shall be no more cakes and ale? (2.3.115-116)
—Sir Toby's mockery of Malvolio's self-important righteousness.
Let still the woman take/ An elder than herself (2.4.29-30)
—Orsino gives love-advice to Cesario.
—The Clown's ironic comment on Orsino's moody taste for melancholy music and love.
She sat like Patience on a monument,/ Smiling at grief (2.4.114-115)
—Viola (in her disguise as Cesario) tells Orsino a story illustrating the constancy of women in love.
Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon 'em (2.5.144-146)
—Malvolio reads from the letter that Maria wrote. He thinks it's from the Lady Olivia and thinks that the greatness of being the Lady's husband is about to be given to him. (Later Malvolio repeats (3.4.41-45) this line to Lady Olivia, and towards the end of the play the Clown mocks Malvolio by repeating (5.1.370-371) it again.)