Narrative reviews are a common starting point for students and researchers exploring a new topic. Unlike systematic reviews with a strict protocol, narrative reviews offer a more flexible approach to understanding a research area.
Key Characteristics:
Broad Topic: Narrative reviews focus on a general area of interest rather than a specific research question.
Informative, Not Exhaustive: The goal is to gain a basic understanding of the topic by reviewing a selection of relevant studies.
Less Structured Approach: There's no predetermined search strategy or set of criteria for selecting studies.
Benefits:
Accessible: Narrative reviews provide a good introduction to a topic, especially for those new to research.
Flexibility: They allow for a broader exploration of diverse perspectives on the issue.
Limitations:
Subjectivity: The selection of studies may be influenced by the reviewer's own biases.
Comprehensiveness: They might not capture the entire body of research on the topic.
Example: A first-year student interested in hospice care could conduct a narrative review to learn about the different types of hospice services and their benefits for patients.
Conducting a Narrative Review (Basic Steps):
Search for Studies: Utilise relevant databases like PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify potential studies.
Identify Keywords: Use keywords from relevant articles you find to refine your search and locate similar studies.
Review and Select: Read the abstracts and select articles that align with your topic of interest.
Summarise and Synthesise: Summarise the key findings from the chosen studies and integrate them into your writing.
Remember:
Narrative reviews don't require strict documentation of the search strategy.
Reference the studies you use for information.
By understanding the strengths and limitations of narrative reviews, you can effectively utilise them as a stepping stone for further research endeavors.