White Studies is a program of historical and institutional analysis.
It is not a forum for personal testimony, ethical positioning, or political mobilization.
The program examines how certain frameworks—commonly experienced as neutral, universal, or self-evident—have operated historically as organizing conditions within modern institutions. These frameworks will be treated as objects of study, not as positions to be defended or rejected.
Students are expected to approach the material with analytic restraint.
An inquiry into structures, not identities
A study of function, not intention
An examination of continuity, not progress narratives
A diagnostic exercise, not a reparative one
The course asks how systems stabilize themselves over time, how authority is maintained when it is no longer explicit, and how certainty persists even when it becomes difficult to justify.
This course is not:
A space for confessional reflection
A venue for personal validation
A forum for moral declaration
A debate on individual belief
Expressions of sincerity, outrage, or ethical alignment are not substitutes for analysis and will not be evaluated as such.
Students are expected to:
Maintain analytic distance from the material
Distinguish between description and endorsement
Identify structural patterns across historical and contemporary contexts
Tolerate unresolved questions
Students are discouraged from:
Centering personal experience
Generalizing from anecdote
Resolving tension through universal claims
Treating discomfort as evidence
Discomfort may occur.
It is not itself an analytic result.
Contemporary behaviors, institutions, and practices may be discussed. These are included to demonstrate structural persistence, not to prompt self-assessment or confession.
Students are not asked to locate themselves within examples, nor to declare agreement or disagreement. Recognition is sufficient.
Course discussions and written work should employ:
Descriptive language
Historically specific claims
Conditional statements where appropriate
Students should avoid:
Prescriptive or exhortative language
Appeals to common sense or “everyone knows”
Claims of inevitability or naturalness
Precision is valued over passion.
Grades in this course reflect:
Analytic clarity
Structural awareness
Methodological discipline
Grades do not reflect:
Moral stance
Personal growth narratives
Emotional investment
Students are evaluated on how they think, not what they feel.
White Studies does not aim to resolve the questions it raises.
It aims to make visible the conditions under which those questions are repeatedly deferred.
Students who seek answers may find uncertainty instead.
This outcome is consistent with the program’s mandate.
Issued by:
Faculty of Historical Systems
University of Samara
Office of Academic Programs