(For Educational and Interpretive Use Only)
Disclaimer:
The following classifications are descriptive, not prescriptive. They are intended to support analytic clarity rather than therapeutic intervention. Inclusion does not imply pathology in the clinical sense, though patterns may appear persistent.
Description
A condition characterized by the subject’s inability to recognize itself as historically situated, resulting in the experience of its own perspective as universal, neutral, or default.
Common Presentations
Confusion when asked to describe one’s own standpoint
Statements beginning with “I’m just being objective”
Discomfort with contextual qualifiers
Associated Defenses
Ego inflation
Denial of contingency
Course Correlation
Weeks 1–2 (Whiteness as norm; Europe before confidence)
Description
A recurrent drive to transform locally derived principles into globally binding norms, often accompanied by moral urgency.
Observed Behaviors
Rapid escalation from “this works here” to “this works everywhere”
Difficulty tolerating plural ethical systems
Persistent invocation of Reason, Progress, or Human Nature
Freudian Reading
Superego externalization
Jungian Reading
Premature individuation claim
Course Correlation
Weeks 3–4 (Universalism; knowledge and classification)
Description
The redirection of coercive impulses into procedural, bureaucratic, or managerial forms perceived as neutral or benevolent.
Indicators
Preference for metrics over judgment
Reliance on process language (“stakeholders,” “capacity,” “best practices”)
Aversion to endings
Secondary Gains
Moral insulation
Diffused responsibility
Course Correlation
Weeks 5, 8, 9 (Colonialism; post-colonial governance; development)
Description
Maintenance of psychic equilibrium through the attribution of irrationality, immaturity, or disorder to external groups.
Typical Statements
“They’re not ready yet”
“It’s complicated”
“Cultural factors need to be considered” (unspecified)
Freudian Reading
Projection
Jungian Reading
Shadow displacement
Course Correlation
Weeks 5–7 (Colonial psychology; decolonization)
Description
A pattern in which institutions repeatedly reenact founding narratives, reforms, or self-critiques without permitting structural resolution.
Symptoms
Endless task forces
Cyclical apologies
Institutional memory without institutional change
Prognosis
Chronic
Non-terminal
Course Correlation
Week 10 (Institutions that cannot end)
Description
An acute reaction to critique experienced not as disagreement but as existential threat.
Clinical Features
Procedural escalation
Appeals to civility
Confusion between criticism and erasure
Differential Diagnosis
Accountability avoidance
Ego boundary diffusion
Course Correlation
Week 11 (Contemporary whiteness and fragility)
(This is the meta-diagnosis.)
Description
A compulsion to apply explanatory frameworks beyond their interpretive capacity, often justified as rigor.
Academic Indicators
Excessive citation density
Framework stacking
Resistance to closure
Self-Referential Note
This manual may exhibit features of TOT.
Course Correlation
Entire syllabus, including this appendix.
The subject displays remarkable resilience and adaptability.
Symptoms persist not due to lack of insight, but due to an ongoing need for reassurance.
None indicated.