The Dispute of Function Axes

Axis Typing is Fallacious

"People can't be defined by letters let alone functions."

The conflicts between axes pairing within its axiom.

Lately, I've been thinking of "what-if's" theory and or scenario of MBTI functions which might sound a tad confusing or perhaps incomprehensible. A presumption that they, people, do stereotype the functions by the axis typing as these people externally are looking at neither letters nor functions but axes. I presume this system has gone wrong, deliberately misused, overly abused or perhaps twisted for the sake of typists advantage in asserting their engaging argument while it's not merely the actual case; people do like stereotype functions by archetypal traits, simplify the importance of four functions to specialize them altogether. This has been a plague for the most of MBTI community since the first time this system had been invented and thus populated by Beebe's shadow functions and I wasn't unlucky to escape from these engraved traps.

However, it's never enough as I'd have to encourage people in knowing how functions can be misunderstood as 'that one' or 'another' when it comes to using the axiom of functions. Yes, it's particularly about how inaccurate the axis typing is. As some may overlook for the accuracy of axes by looking at the significant influence of functions to be involved in the typing process. Letters might not be that important more compared to functions, let alone axes of functions, but both "speak towards each other". MBTI actually started as the commonly known as 4-Letters before adopted the Jungian Cognitive Functions to establish their system, which has caused a lot of diversities instead of advantages to understanding MBTI by JCF thus, turned the internet school everywhere in websites, while the implementation depends on the writer.

Thought of functions in the stack

Rational
Fi (Introverted Feeling) - proceeds simultaneously with N, but contradicts S.
As Fi has the sense of the idealism when it strives for the vivid impression. This would fit the inherent of the Intuition (N[e]), in which, it's constantly wandering for the exploration of feelings as it temps on seeking the truth in a worthwhile. Hence then, the Sensation (S[e]) inability to discern the vivid image or concept of time would be a mass disadvantage for Fi as it would be sticking with the current moment or reality instead of developing their thought. Se refrains from the inventive thought, being a doer instead of creator, and would terminate the development unless when their Intuition comes altogether to perceive them though with such a narrow view of the impression according to the abstraction they've made to be received by the idealism. While the Sensation in INFP would regress the quality of Fi due to self-impression, melancholy, and perceptions in which guided by the past for the future.

Ti (Introverted Thinking) - proceeds simultaneously with S, but contradicts N.
Ti has a sense of own logic in which works by retaining substantial references to achieve the exactitude of deductive thinking. This suits the nature of the Sensation (S[e]) which constantly looking for the concise concept of logic, verily seeking for the reliable raw data, and thus learning by hands-on experience to react on the environment as it wants the sensation of deduction. This would be against the nature of Intuition (N[e]), as INTP adheres themselves to the truth, in which has a sort of deviations according to the puzzled logic to build of own conceptual construction freely due to how mere the importance of exploring experience but patterns for the auxiliary Intuition. But theirs continues the Sensation as a way to assert their deduction, thus would increase the progress of Ti but as if the Sensation comes to aid the process, it would consume the accuracy of premise or belief due to its rigidity of Si to illustrate their thoughts. Therefore, Intuition on ISTP would eliminate the importance of sensation, give the established concept of logic.

Te (Extroverted Thinking) - works simultaneously with N, but contradicts S.
Te has a judgement of the productivity, actively absorbing facts, resources, and references to induce their attitude of logic, in which is extraverted. This would fit the inherent attitude of the Intuition (N[i]) in which has the sense of obligation rather than Si which rather is amending the rules. Hence then, the efficiency of Te would produce innovative ideas for Ni due to how much the idiosyncratic of pattern in which it already has and will be more to have a likelihood in asserting themselves to reach the pretentious goals of their life. However, this might go wrong for the Sensation (S[i]), as it has the firm structure over the impression, sealed themselves from ideas, and influenced by their own perception or self-experience. Si would terminate the importance of efficiency as the necessity and more so perceiving facts for the expectations for the mission rather than goals for the vision. Hence then, ESTJ needs the Intuition to activate their mind in breaking down the logic of productivity, thus works with what already said to be a valid, proven and therefore reliable or trustworthy as a function rather than in initiating things that deem to be unnecessary for them. Hence then, the Sensation of ENTJ would include the raw data of sources, thus relishing the sensation of experiences and duplicated it to use it in their daily life.
Fe (Extroverted Feeling) - proceeds simultaneously with S, but contradicts N.
Fe has the justification for external bits of warmth, objectively processing the societal environment while also seeking the persona for themselves in the outer environment. This fits the nature of the Sensation (S) which has the sense of self-impression while supporting others to fulfil their desire to the benevolent development of significant contribution in their daily life, and the act of being selfless would fit for Si due to their firm structure over the rules, and might well work when it comes to sizing-up people for being obedient to the rules. This wouldn't go well for Intuition (N) due to how mere the importance of structure for Ni, as it has the self-idea or pattern to object within the fact solely to blend with others without having the authority over their external feelings, let alone trying to be an obedient support for others. Hence then, Ni would terminate the importance of a firm structure over the reliant with others, given their intention to help people isn't due to the willingness to support, but it's more so to gain the edges over the others while Se would fit more for Fe due to the sense of enjoying the external environment means Fe and Se will work together to absorb the outer environment yet oddly in a different way as Se would absorb the raw data of stuff around them while Fe absorbs the external environment of feelings. In fact, ESFJ has Ne in their stack to create the instability over the choices, reluctantly being assertive, or to be honest with their intention of stuff as Ne absorbs the external environment's patterns.

Irrational
Si (Introverted Sensing) - proceeds simultaneously with F, but contradicts T.
Si has the internalized structure of the environment, creates the importance of rigorous "methodical" approach when it comes to the subjective equality and justification. This works for the nature of F[e] better as the Extraverted Feeling emphasizes the equality of societal environment while also supports the arrangement of group identity and thus might become the caretaker of people bits of warmth to restrain the order they already have made. This combination creates the valuation of society ethical rules to engage themselves more throughout the social setting better, which also means that the Introverted Sensation flows well with Extraverted Feeling. However, the nature of Si contradicts the exactitude nature of Extraverted Thinking in terms of researching sources for their manufactured Si structure, as Si can't absorb the sources but only from their impression regarding the attuned things around them, while might also have the sense of melancholia due to how monotone Introverted Sensation is when it comes to perceiving the environment in common. Hence then, Te would regress the quality of justification which Si already has to fit in the order. However, as ISFJ has Ti on their stack, this would contradict the nature of Si as well due to the exactitude of structural thought in sense of the consistent mind, stays objective, and refrains from the particular personal feeling.

Se (Extroverted Sensing) - proceeds simultaneously with T, but contradicts F.
Se has an expertise to absorb the raw sources around them as it absorbs the environment as what it is, the quietest form of extraversion in terms of the function indeed. The excitement of enjoyable pleasure while having the reactive nature over the one's environment itself. This shows the quality of relishing experiences for applying logics, which means ESTP works better for the combination; Extroverted Sensation has the typical measure of Extroverted Thinking yet not limited to the applicable knowledge and the substantial logic - it's somewhat a bit rather specific or broad than those stuff-- it absorbs everything from the current environment to give the edges over "resources" of the system. This contradicts Introverted Feeling as it "only" has the measurement of feeling which doesn't give any beneficial traits apart of their personality - unless when they use their Extroverted Thinking, which also implies the maximum absorption of data by both Se and Te to form the automated logic and sustainable appliance in knowledge according to the "common" ethical sense of Introverted Feeling.
Ni (Introverted Intuition) - proceeds simultaneously with T, but contradicts F.
Ni has the ability to divide the importance of reasoning, having the advanced movement towards situational basis or the time on itself, while man marking the linear lie as a direction for projecting their goals and achievements for their own life. These traits would be suitable for INTJ better whom may have a firm decision due to their judgmental approach or in other words, their Extroverted Thinking function. The appliances of knowledge would be useful to process their logical work of an automated system for the better usage in terms of efficiency. Hence then, the manufactured logical process and the importance of straight reasoning into a conclusion over a perspective by the cause and effect reasoning would help them to cooperate in a case-by-case basis according to their Ni. This somehow contradicts Fe, as the Extroverted Feeling morphs towards the environment while the use of their deep insight to apply the humanity universally. However, their Thinking helps the evasive nature of Fe to apply their mechanical works of logic, form opinions in a greater usage to be accurate and consistent with Ti while will also have the efficiency and productivity but with the help of practice. Hence then, the Feeling of INTJ itself contradicts Ni, as it has the self-reliant attitude towards the feeling and personal values, but not for their logic.
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) - proceeds simultaneously with F, but contradicts T.
Ne has everything it takes to be a sum of surprises as the whole. It has the beneficial understanding over possibilities, capturing impulsive momentum, while also having the outbursts and high level of energy to relish the experience with their sophisticated and well-distinguished energetic approach. This fits very well with the Feeling (F[i]) function of ENFP, it values the irrational which happens around them, while using their Feeling for the edge of connecting with others, while feeling the amiable and treasurable pleasures of someone else. Their scattered inherent to perceive the world reassures their maintenance of personal values to have their ideas worked altogether while bonding with people around them. This doesn't seem to fit T[i] as the logical function, as it has the importance over rational approach when it comes to breaking down their logic, while using the edges creativity to enhance their readily structured logic, activating the atrocious and unthinkable ideas yet without the existence of known and applied facts. However, Fe helps them from leaning their subjectivity to the objectivity when it comes to the group values, as it resemblances people around them, as to Te of ENFP, this means the contradiction over the general purposes of Ne in common, as it creates the efficacy without the consistent values of logic.

"However, to keep in mind is that, this premise might flow vastly different by the axes of functions. As the axiom remains to determine the importance of functions attitude to form the accuracy of each function axes, which means, it could flow otherwise according to the direction of function."

- SiNe axis flows well with TeFi (ISTJ/ESTJ) rather than FeTi (ISFJ/ESFJ)
  In fact that Si is detail-oriented, structured by the continual repetition of habit in a sense of experience and has the view that would create a better common sense with Te than Fe, as it's only signified by the judgmental attitude and the transcendent divination of rules. It also would contradict Extroverted Feeling as it doesn't have the sense of judgmental attitude to the rules despite keeping things as equal rather than mixed as it's subjected. The sense of fairness in Si-F pairing really doesn't fit the recognition of sources as it relies upon the significance of the warmth in the external environment.

- NeSi axis flows well with TiFe (ENTP/INTP) rather than FiTe (ENFP/INFP)

Technically, as Ne is idea-oriented, influenced by possibilities in which require specific connection of patterns to fit in the external environment. This would be better for TiFe axis as it has the capability of breaking down the order to prevent the confusion of time inside their mind, as Ne is devote themselves to get confused by their own thought, while the extroverted feeling has the role of detached feeling, this would make a better pairing compared to FiTe axis. The sense of personal values would contradict the purpose of Ne as it's the function to formulate and establish the route of creativity, while Te would reduce the importance of ideas by relying on external sources.

- NiSe axis flows better with FeTi (INFJ/ENFJ) than TeFi (INTJ/ENTJ)

As Ni is depth-oriented, impressed by the indirect cause and effect of time, while deductive by attitude, and the forecast of visionary perception. This generates a better fusion with FeTi axis compared to TeFi, and which? As Fe has insignificant importance to purpose but the group values, this would create a wide array of ideas (Ni) as the altruistic attitude (Fe) to involve themselves to share the messages and would achieve this by developing own structural logic to the societal environment and apply their knowledge for the importance of humanity (Ti). This contradicts Te as it has the mere importance of structural logic in a system and would be stumbled by the narcissism of logic due to Fi as the pairing. This would stutter the idea of Ni which has a magnificent vision for the quintessence.

- SeNi axis flows well with FiTe (ESFP/ISTP) rather than Ti/Fe (ESTP/ISTP).

As Se is present-oriented, affected by the momentum movement of environmental awareness while also grounded by the property in which phenomenon demonstrates the stuff as if the scalar/vector measure has and or transports mass and or energy and/or momentum to exercise their reactive reflection. This would create a solid mixture of FiTe rather than TiFe axes. Fi would fit into the known values to have the sense of being in the present, understanding the reasoning of living, while the idealistic thought could impose the nature of the tangible tendency to achieve their demand. Te in the axis would produce the importance of external sources to the importance of raw data occupied by Se while it fetches the raw information of stuff to be utilized for the hands-on involvement. This axis contradicts TiFe as it would jeopardize the importance of facts while creating own structural logic from conjecturing materials, while Fe would absorb the environment but doesn't fit the nature of Se to absorb the raw data. It would constitute the brute of references being delivered by Se.