Artificial Intelligence was introduced as a design assistant to analyse the existing Stone Memory proposal, identify potential improvements, and explore alternative architectural possibilities. AI was not used to replace the design process, but to expand exploration and support critical decision-making.
AI Design Analysis
ChatGPT Promtpt:
ChatGPT Outcome
Gemini Findings
ChatGPT Findings
AI Concept Exploration
Exploration 01: Massing Development
Orginal massing study
AI Generated massing study
AI was used to explore different interpretations of the original stone massing. The generated options maintained the idea of permanence while introducing carved voids, courtyards, and more porous spatial relationships.
Exploration 02: Material & Atmosphere
The AI exploration expanded the understanding of stone beyond a visual material. It suggested ways stone could influence atmosphere through texture, shadow, temperature control, and interaction with natural light.
Original Design
Original Design
AI helped visualise alternative visitor experiences by exploring transitions between enclosed exhibition areas and open reflective spaces.
Prompt 01: Concept Refinement
This prompt was used to evaluate whether the original stone concept could be developed beyond a visual material into a stronger narrative element.
Prompt 02: Spatial Experience
AI Purpose:
This prompt explored how visitors could experience the building through movement, sequence, and emotional connection.
Prompt 03: Environmental Response
AI Purpose:
This prompt helped identify ways to transform stone from a symbolic material into a functional environmental element.
Critical Selection Process
Although AI generated multiple design possibilities, not all outputs were directly applied. Each suggestion was evaluated based on site context, architectural feasibility, environmental performance, and alignment with the original design intention.
Through the AI-assisted workflow, the design process became more exploratory and iterative. AI provided alternative perspectives that helped identify overlooked opportunities within the original proposal. However, final decisions remained guided by architectural judgement, ensuring that the revised design maintained its connection to memory, place, and user experience.