Lorentz transformation is invalid because its prediction of length contraction contradicts exact, measurable results based on the definition of acceleration..  The apparent contraction is different for different observers. (Proof in "178. Distance and Lorentz Transformation" in page "Update")

1. Gauge fields require Lorentz invariance to exist at all

The Standard Model is built from three gauge symmetries:

    SU(3) (strong force)

    SU(2) (weak force)

    U(1) (electromagnetism)

Gauge fields (like photons, gluons, W/Z bosons) are described by vector fields:

Aμ(x)

The index μ is a Lorentz index.

Lorentz invariance is invalid. Therefore:

    You can no longer define a 4‑vector

    You can no longer define a gauge field

    You can no longer define a gauge transformation

    Maxwell’s equations stop being consistent

    QED collapses

    QCD collapses

    The weak interaction collapses

2. Spin stops being well‑defined

In the Standard Model:

    Electrons have spin 1/2

    Photons have spin 1

    Higgs has spin 0

    Gravitons (if included) have spin 2

Spin is defined as a representation of the Lorentz group.

Lorentz invariance is invalid:

    There is no Lorentz group

    There are no spin representations

    “Spin‑1/2 particle” becomes meaningless

    Fermions cannot be defined

    Dirac equation cannot be written

    Pauli exclusion principle loses its foundation

Without Lorentz invariance, electrons cannot exist as quantum fields.

3. Causality breaks

Lorentz invariance is what enforces:

    No signal travels faster than light

    Cause precedes effect

    Quantum commutators vanish outside the light cone

Lorentz invariance is invalid:

    Fields can influence each other instantaneously

    Commutators no longer vanish at spacelike separation

    Microcausality fails

    The theory becomes non‑unitary

    Probability is no longer conserved

The Standard Model becomes mathematically inconsistent.

4. Renormalization fails

The Standard Model is renormalizable because Lorentz invariance restricts the kinds of interactions allowed.

Lorentz invariance is invalid:

    infinitely many new interaction terms become allowed

    the theory requires infinitely many counterterms

    predictivity is lost

    the theory becomes meaningless as a quantum field theory

You cannot compute cross‑sections, decay rates, or scattering amplitudes.

5. Energy–momentum conservation loses its foundation

You don’t need to accept relativity to accept this fact:

    Energy conservation comes from time‑translation symmetry

    Momentum conservation comes from space‑translation symmetry

    Lorentz invariance ties these together into a 4‑vector

Lorentz invariance is invalid:

    Energy and momentum no longer transform consistently

    Dispersion relations break

    Particle propagation becomes ill‑defined

    The concept of a “mass shell” disappears

The Standard Model’s entire particle spectrum collapses.

6. Even the Higgs mechanism stops working

The Higgs field is a Lorentz scalar:

ϕ(x)

Its vacuum expectation value is Lorentz‑invariant:

⟨ϕ⟩=v

Lorentz invariance is invalid:

    Scalars, vectors, and spinors cannot be defined

    The Higgs mechanism cannot give mass to W/Z bosons

    Electroweak symmetry breaking fails

    Weak interactions become long‑range

    The universe becomes unrecognizable

The Standard Model cannot exist because:

    gauge fields cannot be defined

    spin cannot be defined

    causality fails

    renormalization fails

    quantum field theory collapses

Modern physics is built on a ``House of Cards'' of mathematical entities that have never been directly observed as discrete particles.

1) Electricity is a Signal

In Daniell cells, electricity passes through gels where electrons physically cannot move. In subsea cables, signals travel at 200,000 km/s, while electrons can only drift at millimeters per second. This proves electricity is a \textbf{signal transmission} through the atomic medium, not a flow of particles.

2) The Proton Index

Historically, the ``Atomic Number'' was merely a serial index used to organize the periodic table. Mainstream physics mistakenly re-labeled this index as a physical particle count (Protons). This required the invention of the ``Strong Force'' and ``Quarks'' to explain why these imaginary particles don't fly apart.

By removing the electron and proton, we eliminate the need for speculative subatomic forces. The atom is a singular entity with unknown internal states, emitting signals that we perceive as electricity or force.

Just as a basketball player can shoot a ball without knowing the physics of gravity, modern scientists can build bombs or transistors without knowing the actual physics of the atom. Utility does not prove the validity of a theory. Mathematical fabrications like c and the Lorentz Transformation] must be discarded to finally identify the true physical nature of electricity, force, and gravity.

Go to "Updates" page for (181.The Grand Reset of Physics) 

 In the 1780s,  Charles-Augustin de Coulomb established law of electrostatics. In 1825,  André-Marie Ampère published law of magnetism. Michael Faraday discovered the electromagnetic induction.  In 1834, Emil Lenz solved the problem of the direction of the induction. From the 1850s to the 1870s, James C. Maxwell put together four equations as the summary of the electrodynamic principle.

Unknown to Maxwell, one equation, Gauss's law, is partially incorrect.

The differential form of Gauss's law is incorrect because the divergence of the electric field of a point charge at the location of the charge is either an invalid number or zero. It can not represent the charge density of that point charge.

Click on the button below (148. Singularity in Maxwell's Equations) for detail.

The radiation of Yagi-Uda antenna is the experimental evidence that the far-field radiation is mainly magnetic field.

Click on the button below (151. Radiation of Dipole Antenna) for detail.

 Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré developed the mathematics of special relativity with time incorporated to space. The space-time geometry was quickly adopted by Albert Einstein in 1905. Modern physics rests on three pillars: The quantum theory, Special Relativity and General Relativity.

In 2026, length contraction was proved to be false and Lorentz transformation has been removed from physics. 

Length contraction violates the definition of acceleration. 

The apparent contraction is different for different observer.

(Click on button "178. Distance and Lorentz Transformation" on "Updates" page  for proof)

In 2019, Einstein field equation was proved to be false representation of energy tensor. 

General Relativity contradicts itself with non-zero energy tensor for vacuum. 

(Click on button "82. Energy Tensor of Vacuum in General Relativity" on "Updates" page  for proof)

Go to "Gravitation" page for more detail.

 In the winter of 1925-26 the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger applied de Broglie's waves  to an equation called the Schrodinger equation which claims that discrete colors of light from matter are due to specific frequencies of electron waves confined in an atom. In March 1926, Schrodinger's and Heisenberg's formulations became quantum mechanics.

However, infinite number of electrons can be emitted from Crookes tube. There is no electron in the tube. Light can be emitted from the atom but light does not exist in the atom. Electron can be emitted from the atom but electron does not exist in the atom.

In 2023, quantum mechanics is proved to be a false speculation on illusive electron.

 (Click on button "131. Electric Current and Electron Beam" on "Updates" page  for proof)

Go to "Electromagnetism" page for more detail.

Frustrated with quantum mechanics, Richard Feynman created QED which applies to the outer shell  of the atom where the electrons are imagined to reside, Since 1925 quantum mechanics had been the dominant theory to the atomic world, universally accepted, but difficult to interpret. "Nobody understands quantum mechanics," grumbled Feynman.

Little did Feynman know there is actually no electron in the atom. Light can be emitted from the atom but light does not exist in the atom. Electron can be emitted from the atom but electron does not exist in the atom. Feynman's frustration with quantum mechanics resulted in QED, another wrong theory about non-existing electron in the atom.

(Click on button "131. Electric Current and Electron Beam" on "Updates" page  for proof)

Go to "Electromagnetism" page for more detail.

Stephen Hawking proposed a theory of "quantum cosmology," which deals with the wave function of the entire universe, and the beginning of time. Hawking explained the theory of cosmology with a union of the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics.

In 2021, the general theory of relativity was proved to be false. Hawking never knew that energy tensor of vacuum in general relativity is not zero. In 2023, quantum mechanics is also proved to be false. There is no electron in any object that can emit infinite number of electrons.

Hawking's quantum cosmology rests on two false theories.

Go to "Gravitation" page and "Electromagnetism" page for more detail.

    A magnetic force should not be re‑interpreted as an “electric” force just because it acts on charges at rest. Gravity can balance a magnetic force but gravity is not magnetic force. So the fact that two forces can oppose each other does not make them the same kind of force. A changing magnetic environment can push charges. That push does not magically become an “electric field.” It is simply a magnetic induction force.

    Maxwell’s framework mathematically merges induction into an “electric field” because it’s convenient for unification. But physically, that move creates conceptual confusion:  A magnetic force that acts on charges at rest is still magnetic.  Calling it “electric” just because it is non‑motional is a choice, not a necessity. It hides the fact that induction is fundamentally magnetic in origin. The introduction of G field fixes this confusion:

    B = static magnetic field

    v × B = motional magnetic force

    G = induction magnetic force (from changing magnetic conditions)

No electric field needed.

No Lorentz mixing needed.

No “E = −∂A/∂t − ∇φ” needed.

Just magnetic physics.

Maxwell’s curl E is a mathematical device:

∇×E=−∂B/∂t.

But this equation does not tell you what E is physically. It only tells you how it behaves. The thing that curls when B changes is not an electric field. It is a magnetic induction field G. This restores physical clarity:

    Magnetic forces come from magnetic causes.

    Induction is magnetic, not electric.

    The “circulating push” in a transformer is magnetic, not electric.

    The force on charges at rest is magnetic, not electric.

This is exactly the kind of conceptual separation Faraday himself wanted. This eliminates the need for Lorentz transformations Lorentz transformations were introduced because Maxwell’s equations mix E and B in a way that breaks Galilean relativity.

With G field replacing E field:

    There is no E.

    There is no mixing.

    There is no invariant speed.

    There is no need for spacetime rotation.

    Magnetic induction is handled by G, which is Galilean.

So the entire motivation for Lorentz transformations disappears. With E field removed :

    Faraday’s experiments are respected

    induction is unified

    magnetic forces are magnetic

    Galilean relativity holds

    no electric field is needed

    no Lorentz transformation is needed

G field is the magnetic induction force field that appears when magnetic conditions change, pushing charges even when they are at rest. Simple, physical, and experimentally grounded.

The radiation of Yagi-Uda antenna is the experimental evidence that the far-field radiation is mainly magnetic field.

The voltage distribution of a half-wavelength dipole antenna represents the fundamental resonance of standing wave. The electric field from the voltage distribution is given by Coulomb law. The magnetic field from the current distribution is given by Biot-Savart law. The electric field diminishes more than magnetic field over distance. The far-field radiation is dominated by magnetic field.

The radiation pattern of a half-wavelength dipole antenna is different from the intensity pattern of Poynting vector derived from the electromagnetic wave predicted by Maxwell'sequations which are mathematically incorrect due to singularity.y.

Singularity occurs in differential equations at the locations of point charge and electric current.

Volume integral can not be evaluated if point charge is included. Surface integral can not be evaluated if electric current is included.

Maxwell's equations can not be applied to the physics for point charge nor electric current because of singularity.

Electromigration is excellent proof that there is no electron in electric current.

A copper strip is connected between an anode and a cathode. With constant electric current, the locations of voids and hillrocks on the copper strip contradict the prediction of the hole-electron theory. A chlorine atom on silicon surface is pushed away by the tip of STM only if negative voltage is applied to the tip.

These two examples prove that electromigration is not the result of the mechanical collision between electrons and atoms. There is no electron in electric current.

An isolated system of simple harmonic oscillation (SHO) is placed in the y-direction and observed in the x-direction in another inertial reference frame. Two competing theories are used to calculate the total energy of SHO.

The calculation proves that the theory of relativity violates conservation of energy while Newton's law is compatible with the conservation law of energy.

The unique property of the side-coupled cavity at Fermilab requires the synchronous particle to travel from one cell to next cell in exactly one cycle of RF oscillation. With velocity in each cell precisely determined, the acceleration can be calculated.

The representation of force can be derived from the conservation law of momentum.

The calculation of both acceleration and force confirms that the electric force in the side-coupled cavity is inversely proportional to both speed and gamma of the particle. The electric force diminishes when the speed of particle reaches the speed of light.

Newton's law and the theory of relativity are applied to the elastic collision between two objects of random mass. The conservation law of energy and momentum is the basic requirement for the collision. 

The calculation of velocity confirms that Newton's law is compatible with the elastic collision but the theory of relativity is not.