Latest Updates

Faraday's law, originally formulated for conducting circuits, was generalized to a local field law in empty space for Maxwell's equations. This generalization is an assumption, and that without it, the vacuum wave equation and the constant speed of light do not follow in the usual way.

This generalization is the critical point where a law about circuits is mixed up with a theory about vacuum, leading to the wave equation and a universal speed of radiation.  Faraday's law is not for vacuum. The electromagnetic wave equation is invalid because of the invalid generalization.

A plasma ball produces unstable, branching plasma streamers, while a Crookes tube produces a directed electron beam. These differences clarify why the current inside a plasma ball cannot be an electron beam. 

Mainstream physics claims to describe the electron, but in practice it has replaced the classical electron with a completely different entity - a non-particle field state - while still using the same name. To avoid conceptual confusion, a new name is given to this entity as the Atomic Charge Mode (ACM).

The discovery of the nucleus depends critically on the momentum of projectile.

If Rutherford had used protons, the nucleus would have remained hidden to him because proton backscattering is essentially zero. Low momentum probe reveals less while high momentum probe reveals most internal structure of the atom. 

The atom is not what Rutherford thought as mostly empty. The scattering pattern implies a possible layer structure inside the atom.

KPFM data shows the Carbon atoms and C-C bonds are all measured as positive. If a "chemical bond" were always and exclusively a negative electron cloud, a KPFM tip passing over that bond would always detect a negative potential. 

The fact that KPFM detects a positive potential over the bonds in Hexafluorobenzene provides a direct experimental counter-example.

There is no electron cloud in the bond. There is no electron cloud in the atom.

Electric current is not a flow of pushed matter. It is a propagation of a state, not a transport of mass. Emission of electrons from an atom does not prove electrons sit inside the atom.

 A flame blower emits flame, but the flame is not inside the blower. Emission alone is not proof of internal structure.

The Skin Effect is the experimental evidence that the field is a surface phenomenon. The standard "Volume" version of Maxwell's laws inside a wire is indeed a mathematical extrapolation that does not represent physical reality.

Faraday's Law is not for an internal field but the surface charges.

Ampère's Law of the magnetic field is the "external partner" to the surface vibration, not a result of a bulk internal flow. 

The electricity is a transverse surface wave and heat is a byproduct of atomic fluctuation— While standard textbooks use "internal fields" to explain these, the experimental data often points directly to surface-dominated transport and vacuum-based energy flow.

The theory of general relativity is reformulated to make the metric the only fundamental field. The Einstein field equation is taken as the sole physical postulate, and the stress--energy tensor is not an independent physical object. Instead, the energy tensor is defined geometrically as the quantity proportional to the Einstein tensor. Lorentz transformations are removed from the tangent space, eliminating the usual assumption of local Minkowski structure. 

The resulting theory is a closed geometric system in which all physical content is encoded in curvature. This framework is equipped with several standard solutions, including Schwarzschild, FLRW, and plane-wave geometries. Conservation laws, geodesic motion without Lorentz symmetry, and the prospects for quantization in this geometric-only framework are all included

Length contraction is a frame-dependent effect. It only occurs when you view an object in motion relative to you. It doesn't affect the object in its own rest frame. The apparent contraction is not real. It can be measured with a train carrying two passengers. The distance between two stationary passengers inside the train never changes. 

This distance as measured from the ground can be calculated with the definition of acceleration and velocity. The calculation shows that the distance is identical in the rest frame of the train and the rest frame of the ground. There is no contraction in any frame.

Just as a basketball player can shoot a ball without knowing the physics of gravity, modern scientists can build bombs or transistors without knowing the actual physics of the atom. Utility does not prove the validity of a theory. Mathematical fabrications like $c] and the Lorentz Transformation must be discarded to finally identify the true physical nature of electricity, force, and gravity.

A luggage on a train platform can be seen moving by the passengers inside the train. The picture of a camera is distorted if the camera is shaken. Both demonstrate the existence of the apparent speed.

Light has a true speed c only in the rest frame of its source. Other observers see an apparent speed that depends on their motion. Two identical pendulums demonstrate that the simultaneity is conserved in all frames. Two identical microwave ovens demonstrate that there are two different speeds for microwave in the rest frame of each oven. One is the apparent speed. The other is the actual speed.

Albert Einstein had the wrong idea to introduce time dilation only to keep the speed of light constant. If we instead treat light's speed as “actual” in the source frame and “apparent” in others, time dilation isn’t needed. The physical reality of the timing overrides the mathematical "postulate" of constant light speed. If the periods are identical but the distances are different, then the speed mathematically must be different.

The "mainstream" physicist tries to play the role of the "basketball player who thinks he's a physicist". They invent a complicated story (Special Relativity) involving the warping of time and the constancy of c to explain a simple geometric event. However, the "warping of time" is just as much of a speculation as the "quark." 

Classical electromagnetism introduces the idealization of a ``point charge,''  leading to the Coulomb field.

This field diverges at r=0, but no physical object is known to possess zero spatial extent. Electrons, protons, ions, and macroscopic charged bodies all have finite size or finite charge distributions.

Therefore, the singularity at the origin is not a feature of the physical world but a consequence of an unphysical mathematical idealization.