← Chapter 6: Turning Points (1917-1918)
What strategic errors contributed to Germany's defeat in World War I?
Germany made several key strategic mistakes: 1) The Schlieffen Plan, intended to quickly defeat France, failed due to Belgian resistance and British intervention, forcing Germany into a two-front war. 2) Attrition warfare at Verdun depleted German resources without achieving decisive victory. 3) Unrestricted submarine warfare drew the United States into the war against Germany. 4) The Ludendorff Offensive, a last-ditch effort, initially made gains but ultimately failed due to logistical issues and Allied counterattacks.
How did the weaknesses of Germany's allies contribute to their collective defeat?
Germany's allies, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria, were also struggling: 1) Austria-Hungary faced internal collapse due to ethnic tensions and mutinies. 2) Bulgaria was defeated by Serbian and French troops, leading to its surrender. 3) The Ottoman Empire suffered defeats in the Middle East, culminating in its surrender. These collapses left Germany isolated and unable to sustain the war effort.
What economic and military advantages did the Allied Powers have by 1918?
The Allies enjoyed several key advantages: 1) The British naval blockade severely weakened the German economy, causing food shortages and industrial decline. 2) Allied economic mobilization outpaced Germany's, allowing for superior resource allocation and war production. 3) Technological and tactical coordination, including combined arms operations with tanks, artillery, aircraft, and infantry, overwhelmed German defenses.
How did the United States' entry into the war impact the outcome?
The US entry into the war was decisive: 1) The American Expeditionary Force (AEF) provided fresh troops and played crucial roles in key battles, such as the Second Battle of the Marne and the Meuse-Argonne Offensive. 2) The US Navy helped protect Allied shipping from German U-boats, ensuring the flow of supplies and troops. 3) American industrial production significantly boosted Allied war material supplies, outproducing Germany.
How do different historical schools of thought interpret Germany's defeat?
Different historical perspectives emphasize different factors: 1) Realist historians focus on military overstretch, strategic failures, and the collapse of Germany's allies. 2) Liberal historians highlight Allied economic superiority, strategic coordination, and the decisive role of the United States. 3) Marxist historians emphasize the role of economic factors, arguing that Allied economic power and capitalist competition led to Germany's defeat.
What was the significance of the British naval blockade?
The British naval blockade had a crippling effect on the German economy: 1) It restricted imports, leading to widespread food shortages and starvation in Germany. 2) German industrial output suffered due to a lack of raw materials. 3) The blockade contributed to social unrest and weakened German morale, undermining the war effort.
How did the Allies' combined arms operations contribute to their victory?
Allied combined arms operations proved highly effective: 1) The coordinated use of tanks, artillery, aircraft, and infantry allowed for greater offensive power and flexibility. 2) This approach overcame the stalemate of trench warfare and allowed the Allies to break through German defenses. 3) German forces struggled to adapt to this modern form of warfare, contributing to their eventual defeat.
What was the lasting impact of the defeat of Germany and the Central Powers?
The defeat of Germany and the Central Powers had profound consequences: 1) It led to the redrawing of the map of Europe, with the creation of new nations and the collapse of empires. 2) The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh penalties on Germany, contributing to resentment and instability in the following decades. 3) The war's devastation and social upheaval laid the groundwork for the rise of extremist ideologies and the outbreak of World War II.
1914
August: Germany launches the Schlieffen Plan, invading Belgium in an attempt to quickly defeat France. Britain enters the war in response to the violation of Belgium's neutrality. The plan fails, leading to a stalemate on the Western Front.
1916
February - December: The Battle of Verdun, a brutal battle of attrition, takes place with heavy casualties on both sides but no decisive outcome.
1917
February: Germany resumes unrestricted submarine warfare, targeting Allied and neutral ships, including American vessels.
April: The United States declares war on Germany, citing unrestricted submarine warfare as a primary reason.
1918
March: Germany launches the Ludendorff Offensive (Operation Michael), initially gaining ground but ultimately failing due to logistical problems, exhausted troops, and the arrival of American forces.
September: Bulgaria surrenders after defeats by Serbian and French troops.
October: The Ottoman Empire surrenders after defeats in the Middle East.
November 11: Germany signs the Armistice, ending World War I.
Cast of Characters:
Central Powers:
Germany: Erich Ludendorff: German general who orchestrated the Ludendorff Offensive. Acknowledged the German army's collapse in August 1918.
Austria-Hungary: Faced internal collapse as ethnic groups revolted, contributing to the Central Powers' weakening.
Bulgaria: Surrendered in September 1918 after military defeats.
Ottoman Empire: Surrendered in October 1918 following defeats in the Middle East, including the Arab Revolt.
Allied Powers:
Great Britain: Implemented a naval blockade that significantly weakened Germany's economy.
Effectively mobilized its economy for war, maintaining a steady flow of supplies.
France: Bore the brunt of fighting on the Western Front, including the Battle of Verdun.
Successfully mobilized its economy and coordinated military efforts with its allies.
United States: Woodrow Wilson: US President who led the country into war in 1917.
John J. Pershing: General who commanded the American Expeditionary Force (AEF).
Provided crucial economic and military support to the Allies, tipping the balance of the war.
Deployed over 2 million soldiers to the Western Front, playing a decisive role in key battles.
Serbia: Contributed to the defeat of Bulgaria alongside French troops.
Arab Rebels: Played a crucial role in defeating the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East.
Faisal: Arab leader who led the Arab Revolt.
T.E. Lawrence: British officer who played a key role in supporting the Arab Revolt.
Historians:
Realist School: John Mearsheimer: Argues that the Central Powers' defeat was primarily due to military overstretch and strategic failures.
Liberal School: A.J.P. Taylor: Emphasizes Allied strengths, diplomatic successes, and US intervention as decisive factors in Germany's defeat.
Marxist School: Eric Hobsbawm: Argues that economic factors, particularly Allied economic superiority, were crucial to Germany's defeat.
1. What were the major consequences of World War I?
World War I resulted in widespread devastation, including approximately 10 million deaths and the collapse of major empires like Russia, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. This led to political instability, mass migrations, and the emergence of new nation-states. The war also caused widespread economic hardship and social unrest across Europe.
2. What were the main challenges faced by the peacemakers at Versailles?
The peacemakers, primarily the leaders of Britain, France, and the United States, had conflicting goals. France sought harsh punishment for Germany, Britain desired a more moderate approach, and the United States aimed for a peace based on idealistic principles. Additionally, they had to contend with the complex political landscape of post-war Europe, including the rise of communism and nationalist movements.
3. How did different historical schools of thought view the peacemaking process?
Marxist historians emphasize the role of class struggle and economic disparities in the collapse of empires and the rise of revolutionary movements.
Realist historians focus on the national interests and power dynamics that shaped the treaty negotiations.
Liberal historians argue that the treaty, while flawed, was not excessively harsh and that its failure to achieve lasting peace was due to its weak enforcement.
4. Was the Treaty of Versailles fair to Germany?
The treaty imposed severe penalties on Germany, including territorial losses, disarmament, and significant reparations payments. This was justified by the "war guilt clause," which placed sole responsibility for the war on Germany. Many Germans viewed the treaty as a humiliating diktat, contributing to resentment and instability in the interwar period.
5. What were the long-term consequences of the Treaty of Versailles?
The treaty's harsh terms contributed to economic hardship and political instability in Germany, creating fertile ground for the rise of extremist ideologies like Nazism. The treaty's failure to address underlying tensions and grievances also contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
6. How did the Treaty of Versailles address the issue of self-determination?
The treaty led to the creation of new nation-states based on the principle of self-determination, such as Poland and Czechoslovakia. However, the process was often messy and resulted in the displacement of populations and the creation of new minority groups, leading to further instability in some regions.
7. What role did the League of Nations play in the post-war world?
The League of Nations was created as part of the Treaty of Versailles with the aim of preventing future wars through collective security and diplomacy. However, it was ultimately ineffective in preventing the outbreak of World War II due to its lack of enforcement power and the unwillingness of major powers to fully commit to its principles.
8. Why is the Treaty of Versailles still a subject of debate among historians?
The treaty's legacy remains controversial due to its complex and far-reaching consequences. Historians continue to debate its fairness, effectiveness, and long-term impact on the course of 20th-century history. The treaty serves as a reminder of the challenges of peacemaking and the enduring consequences of war.
1. What other treaties, besides the Treaty of Versailles, were part of the Versailles Settlement?
The Versailles Settlement encompassed five major treaties:
Treaty of Versailles (1919): Dealt with Germany.
Treaty of Saint-Germain (1919): Dealt with Austria.
Treaty of Trianon (1920): Dealt with Hungary.
Treaty of Neuilly (1919): Dealt with Bulgaria.
Treaty of Sèvres (1920), later revised by the Treaty of Lausanne (1923): Dealt with the Ottoman Empire (Turkey).
2. How did the Treaty of Saint-Germain impact Austria?
The Treaty of Saint-Germain significantly reduced Austria's size and power. It lost vast territories like Bohemia, Moravia, and South Tyrol, leaving it a small, landlocked nation. Austria was also forbidden from uniting with Germany and had to pay reparations and disarm.
3. What were the key consequences of the Treaty of Trianon for Hungary?
The Treaty of Trianon was particularly harsh on Hungary, stripping it of 75% of its territory and two-thirds of its population. Transylvania went to Romania, Slovakia to Czechoslovakia, and Croatia to Yugoslavia. This loss, along with forced reparations and disarmament, fueled deep resentment and a desire to revise the treaty in Hungary.
4. How did the Treaty of Neuilly affect Bulgaria?
Bulgaria faced territorial losses under the Treaty of Neuilly, ceding land to Greece and Yugoslavia. It lost access to the Aegean Sea, hindering its economic development. The treaty also imposed reparations on Bulgaria.
5. What happened to the Ottoman Empire under the Treaty of Sèvres?
The Treaty of Sèvres aimed to dismantle the Ottoman Empire. It partitioned Ottoman territories in the Middle East among the Allied powers and granted Greece control over Smyrna and Eastern Thrace. However, the treaty sparked the Turkish War of Independence, leading to its eventual replacement with the Treaty of Lausanne.
6. How did the Treaty of Lausanne differ from the Treaty of Sèvres?
The Treaty of Lausanne, signed in 1923, was more favorable to Turkey. It restored Eastern Thrace, Smyrna, and some Aegean islands to Turkish control. It also abolished the previously imposed reparations and recognized Turkey's sovereignty over the Straits, though the area remained demilitarized.
7. What were the long-term consequences of these treaties on Europe?
The treaties, particularly those dealing with Austria, Hungary, and Bulgaria, caused significant political, economic, and social upheaval in Europe. They led to the creation of new states with diverse ethnicities, often resulting in internal tensions and instability. The economic burdens imposed on the defeated nations further compounded their struggles.
8. How do different historical schools of thought interpret these treaties?
Realist School: Emphasizes the role of power politics, viewing the treaties as a means for the victors to secure their interests and weaken their defeated enemies.
Liberal School: Believes the treaties, while imperfect, represented a necessary compromise in a complex situation, with the peacemakers striving to apply the principle of self-determination.
Revisionist School: Critiques the treaties, especially the Treaty of Versailles, for their harsh treatment of the defeated powers, arguing they fostered resentment and contributed to future conflicts.
What strategic errors contributed to Germany's defeat in World War I?
Germany made several key strategic mistakes: 1) The Schlieffen Plan, intended to quickly defeat France, failed due to Belgian resistance and British intervention, forcing Germany into a two-front war. 2) Attrition warfare at Verdun depleted German resources without achieving decisive victory. 3) Unrestricted submarine warfare drew the United States into the war against Germany. 4) The Ludendorff Offensive, a last-ditch effort, initially made gains but ultimately failed due to logistical issues and Allied counterattacks.
How did the weaknesses of Germany's allies contribute to their collective defeat?
Germany's allies, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria, were also struggling: 1) Austria-Hungary faced internal collapse due to ethnic tensions and mutinies. 2) Bulgaria was defeated by Serbian and French troops, leading to its surrender. 3) The Ottoman Empire suffered defeats in the Middle East, culminating in its surrender. These collapses left Germany isolated and unable to sustain the war effort.
What economic and military advantages did the Allied Powers have by 1918?
The Allies enjoyed several key advantages: 1) The British naval blockade severely weakened the German economy, causing food shortages and industrial decline. 2) Allied economic mobilization outpaced Germany's, allowing for superior resource allocation and war production. 3) Technological and tactical coordination, including combined arms operations with tanks, artillery, aircraft, and infantry, overwhelmed German defenses.
How did the United States' entry into the war impact the outcome?
The US entry into the war was decisive: 1) The American Expeditionary Force (AEF) provided fresh troops and played crucial roles in key battles, such as the Second Battle of the Marne and the Meuse-Argonne Offensive. 2) The US Navy helped protect Allied shipping from German U-boats, ensuring the flow of supplies and troops. 3) American industrial production significantly boosted Allied war material supplies, outproducing Germany.
How do different historical schools of thought interpret Germany's defeat?
Different historical perspectives emphasize different factors: 1) Realist historians focus on military overstretch, strategic failures, and the collapse of Germany's allies. 2) Liberal historians highlight Allied economic superiority, strategic coordination, and the decisive role of the United States. 3) Marxist historians emphasize the role of economic factors, arguing that Allied economic power and capitalist competition led to Germany's defeat.
What was the significance of the British naval blockade?
The British naval blockade had a crippling effect on the German economy: 1) It restricted imports, leading to widespread food shortages and starvation in Germany. 2) German industrial output suffered due to a lack of raw materials. 3) The blockade contributed to social unrest and weakened German morale, undermining the war effort.
How did the Allies' combined arms operations contribute to their victory?
Allied combined arms operations proved highly effective: 1) The coordinated use of tanks, artillery, aircraft, and infantry allowed for greater offensive power and flexibility. 2) This approach overcame the stalemate of trench warfare and allowed the Allies to break through German defenses. 3) German forces struggled to adapt to this modern form of warfare, contributing to their eventual defeat.
What was the lasting impact of the defeat of Germany and the Central Powers?
The defeat of Germany and the Central Powers had profound consequences: 1) It led to the redrawing of the map of Europe, with the creation of new nations and the collapse of empires. 2) The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh penalties on Germany, contributing to resentment and instability in the following decades. 3) The war's devastation and social upheaval laid the groundwork for the rise of extremist ideologies and the outbreak of World War II.
Watch Armistice by David Reynolds from 22:00 to 34:00, which covers German Army General Ludendorff's final attempt to secure victory in the war.
Watch the first six minutes of Twentieth Century: Make Germany Pay, World Part 2, which provides an overview of the events surrounding the Ruhr invasion (1923) and the period of hyperinflation (1922-23).
The hyperinflation period in Germany occurred during the Weimar Republic in 1922–23. It was an economic disaster that impoverished millions of German citizens and paved the way for the rise of the Nazi Party. During World War I, prices in Germany had doubled, but that was just the start of the country’s economic troubles. The German mark rapidly lost nearly all of its value, with inflation turning into hyperinflation until a pound of butter cost millions of marks.
in 1923, Germany's hyperinflation was so high, the exchange rate went from 9 marks to $1 USD to 4.2M marks to $1 US!!!!
One German worker, who used a wheelbarrow to cart off billions of marks that were his week’s wages, was robbed by thieves who stole the wheelbarrow but left the piles of cash on the curb.
The impact of hyperinflation within Germany was uneven. Some profited from it. Adroit speculators like the tycoon Hugo Stinnes made fortunes, and industrialists and landowners who owed money were able to pay off their debts in devalued currency. Others were able to escape the worst - those, for example, whose wealth took the form of property or those with goods or skills which could be readily bartered. Initially the working class suffered comparatively little because trade unions ensured that wages kept pace with rising prices, but as 1923 wore on their position deteriorated. The principal losers in 1923, though, were those with cash savings, many but not all of whom were in the middle class (the Mittelstand). Middle-class savers experienced the trauma of seeing the value of their savings completely wiped out.
Price of bread in Berlin during that period.
December 1918: 0.5 mark
December 1921: 4 mark
December 1922: 163 mark
January 1923: 250 mark
March 1923: 463 mark
June 1923: 1,465 mark
July 1923: 3,465 mark
August 1923: 69,000 mark
September 1923: 1,512,000 mark
October 1923: 1,743,000,000 mark
November 1923: 201,000,000,000 mark
Source A
We were deceived, too. We used to say, "All of Germany is suffering from inflation." It was not true. There is no game in the whole world in which everyone loses. Someone has to be the winner. The winners in our inflation were big business men in the cities and the "Green Front", -from peasants to the Junkers, in the country. The great losers were the working class and above all the middle class, who had most to lose.
How did big business win? Well, from the very beginning they figured their prices in gold value, selling their goods at gold value prices and paying their workers in inflated marks.
... . . You could go to the baker in the morning and buy two rolls for 20 marks; but go there in the afternoon, and the same rolls were 25 marks. The baker didn't know how it happened that the rolls were more expensive in the afternoon. His customers didn't know how it happened. It had somehow to do with the dollar, somehow to do with the stock exchange - and somehow, maybe to do with the Jews.
Erna von Pustau remembering life in Hamburg at the time
Source B
This financial disaster had profound effects on German society: the working classes were badly hit; wages failed to keep pace with inflation and trade union funds were wiped out. The middle classes and small capitalists lost their savings and many began to look towards the Nazis for improvement. On the other hand landowners and industrialists came out of the crisis well, because they still owned their material wealth - rich farming land, mines and factories. This strengthened the control of big business over the German economy. Some historians have even suggested that the inflation was deliberately engineered by wealthy industrialists with this aim in mind. However, this accusation is impossible to prove one way or the other, though the currency and the economy recovered remarkably quickly.
Norman Lowe, Mastering Modern World History (1982)
Source C
On Friday afternoons in 1923, long lines of manual and white-collar workers waited outside the pay-widows of the big German factories, department stores, banks, offices ... staring impatiently at the electric wall clock, slowly advancing until at last they reached the window and received a bag full of paper notes. According to the figures inscribed on them, the paper notes amounted to seven hundred thousand, or five hundred million, or three hundred and eighty billion, or eighteen trillion marks - the figures rose from month to month, then from week to week, finally from day to day. With their bags the people moved quickly to the door, all in haste, the younger ones running. They dashed to the nearest food store, where a line had already formed. Again they moved slowly, oh, how slowly, forward. When you reached the store, a pound of sugar might have been obtainable for two millions; but, by the time you came to the counter, all you could get for two millions was half a pound, and the saleswoman said the dollar had just gone up again. With the millions or billions you bought sardines, sausages, sugar, perhaps even a little butter, but as a rule the cheaper margarine - always things that would keep for a week, until next pay-day, until the next stage in the fall of the mark....
The printing presses of the government could no longer keep pace.... You could see mail-carriers on the streets with sacks on their backs or pushing baby carriages before them, loaded with paper money that would be devalued the next day. Life was madness, nightmare, desperation, chaos.... Communities printed their own money, based on goods, on a certain amount of potatoes, of rye, for instance. Shoe factories paid their workers in bonds for shoes which they could exchange at the bakery for bread or the meat market for meat.
… suddenly, the mark lost its value. The war loan was worth nothing. Savings of a lifetime were worth nothing. . ..
Money had lost its value - what, then, could have value? Of course, many were accustomed to having no money; but that even with money you had nothing.... First the Kaiser gone, then the silver coins with his likeness had gone and unknown faces, sometimes distorted to frightful grimaces by eccentric artists, stared at you from worth less paper notes.
Konrad Heiden