For my 4-Axis project i chose to build a hammer. I went through ideas like a video game weapon or something functional, but finally, i settled on a hammer.
For my initial design, I wanted to create a hammer with both functional and aesthetic features. I added a detailed grip pattern on the handle using a series of evenly spaced grooves. This not only improves the user’s grip but also adds visual interest to the part. I filleted the edges of the hammer head to give it a smooth, clean appearance and to reduce sharp transitions that could weaken the part, or potentially cause injuries.
To ensure everything fit within the stock material, I carefully adjusted the overall size and left a 0.400" gap between the part and the stock border. This provided enough clearance for the cutting tools to operate safely without damaging the part or the fixtures. For the tab placement, I used larger tabs around the hammer head for extra stability, since it has more mass and needs to remain securely in place during machining. Along the handle, I alternated smaller tabs to hold the part while still allowing the intricate grip details to be machined cleanly.
The frame around the part helped keep it secured and well-supported throughout the process. Overall, this setup allowed me to cut the part safely and efficiently while achieving a clean, finished result.
As part of our overall machining plan, we intended to use a dovetail cutter to create a dovetail joint in the stock, which would allow the part to be securely attached to the trunnion for 4-axis machining. However, I did not include the dovetail feature in my initial design. This would later change in my redesign, where I integrated the dovetail geometry to better align with our fixture and setup strategy.
As you can see, my final design is much more visually appealing and refined. I decided to completely restart the project from scratch because the original model had become too complicated and difficult to manage. With help from my teammates at AMLA, I was able to clean up my workflow and rebuild the project efficiently. Surprisingly, I completed the redesign in about 20 minutes compared to the full day it took to conceptualize and build the original hammer. That felt like a major personal milestone, as I could clearly see my growth in efficiency and proficiency with 3D modeling tools.
For the final version, I removed the complex grip design from the handle. While it was a cool concept, it would’ve been difficult and time-consuming to program and machine. Ironically, the simplified version ended up looking much cleaner and more professional. I also optimized the tab placement with input from my shop floor manager, who pointed out that my original tabs were inconsistent and excessive. With his guidance, I minimized the number of tabs and placed them more strategically, improving both the part’s stability and the machining process.
Additionally, I smoothed out the transition between the handle and the hammer head, opting for a more minimal and cohesive connection. This subtle change significantly improved the overall aesthetic of the design. In the end, the redesign wasn’t just about making the part easier to machine—it was a reflection of how much I’ve improved as a designer and machinist.
Since we aren’t using a vise to hold the part, we designed a custom setup that secures the stock directly to the 4-axis trunnion using a dovetail. The part is held firmly in place by bolts that clamp directly onto the bottom of the part, providing a very secure and rigid hold. This low-profile setup is ideal for 4-axis machining because it leaves the sides and top fully accessible for cutting.
To make sure the part stays perfectly aligned and doesn’t shift during machining, we added precision pin holes to the bottom of the stock. These pins ensure the part is located in the exact same spot every time and prevent any lateral movement. I programmed the dovetail and pin holes together, making sure they were properly spaced and positioned to match our trunnion setup.
We machined the dovetail and pin holes while the part was held in a vise. This included facing operations to square the stock, followed by a dovetail cutter to shape the underside. The facing, pin holes, and the dovetail cutting processes were hand-coded. Using a real 4-axis trunnion during setup allowed us to verify alignment and ensure that the part would seat consistently and securely.
For the CAM process, I used a combination of toolpaths to ensure both efficient material removal and a smooth final finish. I started with adaptive clearing to remove the bulk of the material quickly and efficiently, especially in deeper areas where roughing was needed. This allowed me to maintain consistent tool engagement and reduce machining time.
To smooth out the contours and eliminate the visible steps left by the flat end mill, I used parallel finishing passes along the outer surfaces. This gave the part a much cleaner and more refined appearance. For the curved and detailed edges, I used a ball nose end mill, which helped blend transitions and create smooth surface finishes that would have been difficult to achieve with a standard flat tool.
Lastly, I used a ramp toolpath to finish off the side profile of the part. This approach allowed the tool to gradually descend into the material, reducing tool load and leaving a cleaner surface along vertical or angled walls.
Before cutting the part, we touched off all our tools and the part to ensure all of the toolpaths were accurate. We then started cutting the part using the following toolpaths:
Face cut (2" face mill): To create a flat reference surface on one side of the part.
Adaptive cut (3/8" end mill): To remove the bulk of the material quickly and efficiently.
Adaptive cut (1/4" end mill): To reach into smaller gaps and clear out remaining material.
Parallel toolpath (1/4" ball nose end mill): To smooth the edges of the hammer and the connector to the handle.
Flow toolpath (1/4" end mill): To finish the sides of the hammer cleanly without cutting through the tabs.
These toolpaths also ran on the other side of the part, making it symmetrical.
After we blew the part with air to clear the chips and coolant, i cut the tabs using pliers and it did a cool little vibration on the last tab. We then took it out of the stock and used a 90 to debur that tab off of the hammer, since my tabs were a bit big, it took a little while of aggresive sanding to bring those scars down. After all of the tabs were barely noticable, i then placed the hammer into the vibra-burr for a couple hours to finish it off.
This hammer has definitely been my favorite project of the year. I’m really proud of how it turned out, and it’s something I’ll hold onto for a long time.
Check out the file!