Expectations for CIS 232 homework assignments

The following were stated for students in the CIS 232 course:

Sometimes, your instructions will contain a lot of details. Get used to it. Make it a habit to read your instructions carefully. If something is unclear, ask for clarification. But don't complain about detailed instructions - coping with details is likely to be a major professional responsibility.

Writing: In general, your writing should be of professional quality. Spelling, grammar, and word usage should be correct and appropriate. Exceptions will be made when reasonable, e.g., if you quote someone who used imperfect grammar.

Students often criticize me for being "harsh and picky" over my concern for writing quality. If this complaint comes prior to the return of your graded homework, please note that those who don't learn to express themselves well may be professionally unemployable. If the complaint comes after the return of your graded homework, please consider the question: Don't you want to learn from your mistakes? Besides, correction and revision are so much easier when you use a computer than via older technologies (typewriters, handwritten documents) that they are regarded as part of good computer usage.

Perhaps of greater importance: Take pride in your work. Earn the right to be proud of your writing.

Arrangement of hardcopy: If you have more than one page, staple your pages together, so that the order of your pages is the order of the problems of the assignment.

Formatting of documents: It's not sufficient to have the "right answers." Your documents should be formatted attractively. This does not mean that you should clutter your document with demonstrations of all the unusual features of your software that you know how to use; rather, it means you should keep your reader in mind as you compose your document, considering how to convey your document's information to the reader in a fashion likely to help the reader understand the document in reasonably natural fashion. Some software-specific tips:

Efficient practices

You should learn to use your own time efficiently. In Excel and in Access, it is often possible to produce "correct answers" in a variety of ways, some more efficient than others. For example, in Excel, you can compute the total of the entries of the cells in the range B2:B16 by any of the formulas

=B2+B3+B4+B5+B6+B7+B8+B9+B10+B11+B12+B13+B14+B15+B16

=SUM(B2+B3+B4+B5+B6+B7+B8+B9+B10+B11+B12+B13+B14+B15+B16)

=SUM(B2,B3,B4,B5,B6,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,B12,B13,B14,B15,B16)

=SUM(B2:B16)

Since use of the fourth of these is far more efficient than the use of any of the first three, the fourth is the one you should expect will receive the most credit. Consider the amounts of work each of these styles of formula would require if, instead of B2:B16, the range of cells to be summed were B2:B5000 (this is not so unlikely; e.g., consider the problem of totaling salaries of employees of a large organization).

Some philosophy of grading

When I write on a submission, it's not always a criticism; and, sometimes when it is a criticism, it is not a deduction from your score. After all, some students would receive negative scores were I to deduct a point for every flaw. However, every flaw is fair game for penalty. I'm sometimes criticized for "taking off for things that were unnecessary." An implication of this complaint is that the complaining student should be graded as highly as other students who did better work; would that not be unfair? It's also important for you to

If I fill your hardcopy with notes on your imperfections, it's not personal, it's not because I crave a reputation as "tough," and it's not because I want to embarrass, intimidate, or depress you; it's because I'm responsible for teaching you, and you're responsible for learning from me. It's also because I want you to be successful in life, and you're more likely to be successful if you learn to improve, in part by learning from constructive criticism.

Among the reasons I'm called "harsh and picky": It's important for students to learn to deal with details and work with precision. This means even minor errors may cost points. If you lose a point over a relatively minor flaw, it's very unlikely to lower your final grade for the course, but the loss of a point should get your attention, so that you learn not to make that error again. Lest it be forgotten: the learning is the primary purpose of the course; the grade is secondary.

I don't owe you a high grade. What I owe you is a good contribution to the totality of your education, and an honest assessment of your work, including constructive criticism of its imperfections. I also owe an honest assessment to everyone who reads or is otherwise affected by your transcript1. I'll be very happy to give you a high grade if you earn it. More generally, I'll give you the grade your work earns, regardless of the class curve. How could an honest professor do otherwise?

Your opinions on sports, politics, and even on me, will have no effect on your grade - only the quality of your submitted work will count in your grade. I work at being fair in grading. I keep notes to make sure that when two students show the same imperfection, they lose the same number of points.

---------------------

1 These include: