External links:
Peritoneal dialysis simulator and PD course available on OpenPediatrics (free account required)
ASPN Webinar: Initiation, withholding, and withdrawal of dialysis in children
Recommended reading:
Chronic dialysis in children and adolescents: challenges and outcomes 🔓
ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 Update (paediatrics) 🔓
Unique considerations in renal replacement therapy in children: core curriculum 2014 🔓
Table of contents:
Related topics:
Sterile dialysate fluid is introduced into the peritoneal cavity via a catheter and exchanged at intervals
Typically, the dialysate is infused, allowed to dwell for a period of time, and then drained; this cycle is repeated a number of times
Exception: continuous flow peritoneal dialysis
Rather than using an extracorporeal dialyzer/filter, the patient's peritoneal membrane serves as the semipermeable membrane
The presence of small pores aquaporin channels allow water to move through the membrane.
The peritoneum is highly vascular and the presence of capillaries allows for transfer of solutes.
Within the peritoneal membrane (between the abdominal wall and the peritoneal cavity) there are capillaries, lymphatic vessels, and interstitial spaces
These enable the absorption of particles from the dialysate (in the peritoneal cavity) into the rest of the body
The peritoneal capillaries enable the movement of water (by ultrafiltration) into the peritoneal cavity
Transport in PD is an interaction of diffusion, ultrafiltration, and fluid absorption
Large pores (>20 nm [>200 Å] diameter)
<10% of the pores in the peritoneal membrane
Permit transport of proteins (e.g., immunoglobulins) and other large molecules
Can be increased with significant inflammation such as peritonitis
Small pores (4-6 nm [40-60 Å] diameter)
~90% of pores in the peritoneal membrane
Transport most small molecules
Ultrasmall pores (0.3-0.5 nm [3-5 Å] aquaporins)
1-2% of pores in the peritoneal membrane
Responsible for nearly half of water transport
Concentration gradient of solute: dialysate/plasma (D/P) ratio
Mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC)
Effective peritoneal surface area (analogous to the K0A in HD)
Surface area of the peritoneal membrane
Vascularity: how many peritoneal capillaries are in the peritoneum
Diffusive characteristics of membrane for solute in question (permeability)
Varies from patient to patient
Changes in individuals over time
Particle size:
Small molecules diffuse rapidly
Large molecules take a longer time to diffuse across the peritoneal membrane
Osmotic gradient: fluid removal (ultrafiltration) is accomplished using osmotic pressure rather than hydrostatic pressure
The osmotic gradient is created by including an osmotic agent (e.g., dextrose, icodextran) in the dialysate
Increasing the concentration of the osmotic agent generates a greater osmotic gradient and results in more fluid removal
Using dialysate with higher dextrose concentration generates a greater osmotic gradient and results in more fluid removal
Reflection coefficient: how resistant a particle in the dialysate is to being absorbed (i.e., how well it stays in the dialysate), on a scale of 0 to 1
An osmotic agent with a reflection coefficient of 1 would be an ideal osmotic agent: it would draw water into the peritoneal cavity without being absorbed
Ultrafiltration coefficient (of the membrane): depends on the surface area and the number of pores
Hydrostatic pressure
Filling the peritoneal cavity with dialysate increases the hydrostatic pressure
Oncotic pressure gradients
Related to changes of protein levels inside the bloodstream as water is removed from the peritoneal cavities
Peritoneal fluid is absorbed during peritoneal dialysis:
Direct lymphatic absorption
Tissue absorption (into the interstitium) of peritoneal fluid
Fluid absorption limits ultrafiltration and mass transfer
Higher levels of peritoneal absorption reduces the net ultrafiltration
PD is generally the preferred chronic dialysis modality in pediatrics
Depends on patient and family preference, institutional practice and availability
Better outcomes (vs HD) in the US
Gentler fluid removal over longer time period avoids cardiac stunning seen in hemodialysis
Better preservation of remaining kidney function
Better outcomes after kidney transplantation
Better growth
Improved fluid balance
Also reduces need for antihypertensive medications
Daily clearance
Less accumulation of toxins (e.g., phosphorus, potassium) between sessions
Better quality of life
Home treatment (less frequent travel to the dialysis unit)
Self control of the therapy
No needles
Facilitates school attendance/employment
Extended travel is possible
Fewer dietary restrictions
Less technically difficult, especially in babies
Teaching usually takes 3-5 days
Risk of infection: peritonitis, exit site and tunnel infections
Hernias
Decreased appetite
Body image disturbance
Labor intensive
Drawbacks of home PD:
Caregiver burden
Requires a lot of physical space to keep supplies
Requires a savvy family
However, even with poor educational background (e.g., illiteracy) can be trained to be competent
Anatomical
Multiple prior abdominal surgeries with lots of scarring
Compromised diaphragm with communication between abdominal and thoracic cavities (e.g., diaphragmatic hernia, surgical complication)
Other congenital abnormalities: omphalocele, gastroschisis, bladder exstrophy
≥2 prior episodes of peritonitis
Obliterated peritoneal cavity
E.g., from prior surgeries, trauma, infections
Peritoneal membrane failure
Relative contraindications:
Presence of ileostomies/colostomies
Ideally would locate as far away as possible from the PD exit site to avoid contamination
Infants with significant organomegaly
Impending abdominal surgery
If expecting transplant soon (typically <3-6 months), usually prefer to initiate HD
Significant time investment of planning surgery, waiting for tract to mature, training of patient/family
Lack of appropriate caregiver(s)
Lack of appropriate home environment
For all PD patients on antibiotics, they should also be on antifungal prophylaxis (usually Nystatin 10,000 units/kg/day) while on antibiotics and for 7 days after
This also applies to dental prophylaxis (typically just one dose of amoxicillin given 1 hour prior to dental appointment)
[***graphs]
Treatment of peritonitis
Start empiric IP antibiotics as soon as possible
Allow to dwell for 3-6 hours
Monotherapy with cefepime
If allergy, if not available, or if high MRSA prevalence:
Gram-positive: 1st generation cephalosporin or glycopeptide (e.g., vancomycin)
Gram-negative: ceftazidime, aminoglycoside
Dosing:
Continuously or intermittently
In pediatric we tend to dose continuously
Loading dose with 3-6 hour dwell
Lower maintenance for subsequent dwells
Pathogen-directed therapy
Gram positive (*** ispd 2012)
Length of therapy for specific agents [***]
Culture-negative peritonitis
25-30% of all peritonitis episodes
Without an organism it is difficult to be confident about providing directed therapy
It becomes challenging to provide reeducation for patients and caregivers, as the pathogen usually provides clues as to the etiology
Management:
Empiric antibiotics
Day 3: if improved, then continue for 2 weeks
If on dual therapy, consider discontinuing aminoglycoside and switching to ceftazidime as it has better side effect profile
If no clinical improvement by day 5, then it is considered refractory and the catheter should be removed
Fungal peritonitis
2-8% of all peritonitis episodes
High risk of technique failure
Systemic antifungal therapy: fluconazole
do not use amphotericin
Remoe catheter
Continue treatment for 2 weeks past resolution of symptoms
Need at least 2-3 weeks after removal until catheter can be replaced
Relapsing peritonitis
Definition: peritonitis recurs with same organism within 4 weeks of completion of antibiotic therapy
Reinitiate empiric therapy
Cover for prior organism
Avoid cefazolin monotherapy
Fibrinolytic instillation
Relapsing + tunnel infection, or if second relapse: remove catheter
Indications for catheter removal
Refractory peritonitis
Refractory exit site or tunnel infection
Fungal peritonitis'
Peritonitis + exit site or tunnel infection
[***]bugs
Relapsing with coag negative staph
[***] one more thing
Outcomes of peritonitis
76.6% of infections resolved with antimicrobial treatment alone
59.6% required hospitalization
6% temporary catheter removal
[*** more]
[***who most likely to need cath removal]
Insertion bundle
Intraoperative care
Lateral/downward exit site
Prophylactic preoperative antibiotics [*** ISPD guideline ]
No sutures at the exit site
Postoperative care
No exit site dressing change through POD 7 unless it is soiled/wet
Until exit site healed: sterile dressing change, [***]
Do not use PD catheter prior to 14 days
Training bundle
Qualified RN trains
[***]
Follow up care bundle
Exit site scored per IPPN tool
Review: hand hygiene, exit site care, aseptic connection technique
Ask about touch contaminations/ breaks in aseptic technique
Repeat training every 6 months or after any episode of peritonitis [***]
Peritonitis rates
19 sites participating from inception of SCOPE collaborative since 2011
Very high compliance with follow up care bundle led to significant and
Catheter related infections
Exit site infection:
Definitions:
Peri-catheter swelling, redness, tenderness
Score of 2+ on IPPD tool with an organism or 4+ with/without organism
In adults: purulent draining with or without erythema
Tunnel infection:
Definitions:
redness, edema, tenderness along catheter with or without purulent drainage
Score of 2+
Adults: inflammation or ultrasound evidence of infection along the catheter length
Outcomes: [***]
Progression of the
Risk factors:
Higher IPPN score
Poor compliance with exit site care training (training bundle) or exit site care review (follow up bundle)
Warady BA, Schaefer F, Bagga A, et al. Prescribing peritoneal dialysis for high-quality care in children. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(3):333-340. doi:10.1177/0896860819893805, PMID 32063210
***