This page highlights selected work from my time as School Program Manager at The Primary School, a whole-child school model in East Palo Alto that integrated education, health, family support, and trauma-informed care.
In this role, I worked at the intersection of teaching, program design, assessment systems, data analysis, teacher support, and school operations. The projects featured here show how I translated broad school priorities into concrete systems: designing and piloting a benchmark assessment plan, coordinating logistics across teams, creating tools for teachers and leaders, supporting math instruction, managing report card systems, and using stakeholder feedback to improve implementation.
Together, these artifacts reflect the kind of work I am especially drawn to: taking complex, human-centered problems; clarifying what is needed; building organized systems and resources; and helping teams move from good intentions to stronger, more coherent practice.
While I held a wide range of responsibilities as School Program Manager at The Primary School, the most comprehensive project I led was the design and implementation of a benchmark assessment plan for upper elementary and middle school students. I am highlighting that project here because it captures several of the professional strengths that show up across my work: systems thinking, project management, stakeholder collaboration, clear communication, and detailed implementation planning.
The artifacts below demonstrate my ability to:
identify challenges and translate them into opportunities for improvement
gather feedback and incorporate stakeholder voice into decision-making
move between big-picture systems design and highly detailed logistical planning
organize complex information visually so colleagues can understand and use it effectively
build structures that make implementation clearer, smoother, and more coherent for a team
Note: When viewing the artifacts, I recommend clicking the arrow in the top-right corner to open each one in a new window. This will display the design and formatting most accurately.
Table of Contents:
When I transitioned from Lead 4th Grade Math Teacher to School Program Manager, one of my first responsibilities was to carry out a new benchmark assessment plan for the upper elementary grades.
It quickly became clear, however, that the inherited plan lacked a shared vision. Teachers were being asked to administer assessments and collect data, but there was not yet enough clarity around the purpose of the assessments, how the data would be used, or what implementation should look like across classrooms. As a result, the process felt confusing for many stakeholders — especially for the teachers responsible for making it work day to day.
After gathering feedback from teachers, instructional coaches, and school leaders, I asked my supervisor if we could pause the winter round of assessments, step back, and redesign the process more thoughtfully. Although I had not been formally assigned to lead a redesign, I saw a clear need and took initiative to create and facilitate a more collaborative planning process.
I designed a process that brought together the full range of stakeholders involved in assessment and instruction, including 6 lead teachers, 1 instructional coach, 3 middle school design leads, 4 learning specialists, 2 data team leads, and 2 administrators. Across small-group and whole-group conversations, I helped the team clarify the purpose of benchmark assessments, compare possible assessment options, surface concerns, and align around a more coherent plan.
Through this process, the team ultimately decided to use the NWEA MAP assessment as our benchmark tool — a significant shift from where our initial thinking had started. That outcome reflected the value of slowing down, gathering the right voices, and using a structured design process to help a team clarify and refine its thinking.
The artifacts below capture two of the main meetings I designed and facilitated during this redesign process. They demonstrate my ability to identify a systems-level problem, gather stakeholder input, create a clear collaborative process, and move a team from confusion toward shared purpose and implementation clarity.
In this meeting, I facilitated a smaller pre-planning conversation with six school leaders before bringing the full upper elementary team into the redesign process. The goals were to build a shared understanding of why benchmark assessments mattered at TPS and to refine a clear set of assessment options that could be presented to teachers during the larger roundtable discussion.
This step was important because the team needed alignment before asking teachers for input. By clarifying the purpose of benchmark assessments and narrowing the possible paths forward, we were able to make the larger conversation more focused, productive, and respectful of teachers’ time.
In this meeting, I facilitated a full-team roundtable with the upper elementary team, including lead teachers, learning specialists, instructional coaches, and school leaders. Together, we reviewed the refined benchmark assessment “menu,” discussed the strengths and tradeoffs of each option, and considered how each choice would affect students, teachers, data collection, and instructional planning.
The meeting included both small-group and whole-group discussion so that all stakeholders had opportunities to process, ask questions, and share their perspectives. By the end of the hour, the team reached consensus on using NWEA MAP as our benchmark assessment. This outcome reflected the strength of the design process: by creating space for shared understanding, structured dialogue, and stakeholder input, we were able to move from uncertainty to a clear, collective decision.
After the team selected MAP as our benchmark assessment, I led the logistical design and implementation of MAP testing across the school. TPS had experimented with MAP before, but our earlier fall pilot had been messy and difficult to coordinate — especially because many teachers were new to administering the assessment.
To make the spring rollout smoother, I stepped into the role of “MAP playmaker,” coordinating the many operational details required for successful implementation. This included working with the technology team to organize a schoolwide WiFi stress test, collaborating with learning specialists to create teacher-friendly systems for assigning and tracking student accommodations, building clear spreadsheets and planning tools, and training teachers in the technical steps of MAP proctoring.
The artifacts below demonstrate my ability to create and communicate a clear, comprehensive implementation plan in collaboration with colleagues. During the spring MAP administration, I received strongly positive feedback from teachers and school leaders about how much smoother and clearer the process felt compared with the earlier pilot.
Note: Student names and identifying information have been removed from the artifacts.
I created this playbook as a centralized guide for all logistical details related to MAP administration, including classroom environment resources, make-up testing plans, accommodation tracking, proctoring guidance, and family report resources. To make the document easy to use, I organized the topics into a clear table of contents so teachers and leaders could quickly navigate to the information they needed.
The purpose of the playbook was twofold: first, to create a user-friendly resource that staff could consult throughout the testing window; and second, to build a thorough implementation guide that a future School Program Manager could inherit, adapt, and improve in future years.
Note: Links within the playbook are not publicly viewable. If there is a specific linked resource you would like to see, please contact me.
This spreadsheet was designed to help team members quickly identify when and where students were testing during the MAP administration window. It served as a shared source of truth for testing schedules, student groupings, and logistical coordination across classrooms and staff members.
The “Make-Up Tests” tab is a particularly strong example of my ability to organize highly detailed information and translate it into an actionable plan. By tracking which students still needed to complete assessments, identifying available testing windows, and clarifying who was responsible for each next step, I was able to turn a complex logistical challenge into a clear, delegated, and manageable process.
This spreadsheet served as a team communication tool for assigning and tracking testing accommodations for students with special needs. It centralized accommodation information in one shared location so that any staff member involved in MAP administration — including make-up test proctors — could quickly identify the supports each student needed before testing.
The purpose of this tracker was to make the accommodation process clearer, more consistent, and less dependent on any one person’s memory or availability. By organizing the information in a shared, accessible format, the team could better ensure that students received the appropriate supports across testing settings.
One pain point from the fall MAP pilot was that many teachers were new to the assessment and had not had enough time to learn the technical details of proctoring. To address this in the spring, I created a more robust training system that included professional development sessions, office hours, and the slide deck below.
The goal was to make teachers feel confident and prepared before testing began. The resources walked staff through the technical steps of proctoring, clarified common troubleshooting issues, and gave teachers a place to return to if they had questions during the testing window. I received strongly positive feedback from staff on the usefulness of these supports, and MAP testing ran much more smoothly during the spring administration.
My classroom experience helps me create student-facing materials that are clear, developmentally appropriate, and emotionally supportive. Because I had administered MAP directly to TPS students as a 4th grade teacher, I understood not only the technical steps of testing, but also the student experience of preparing for and taking the assessment.
I created this slide deck for teachers to duplicate and adapt for their own classes. It includes visual instructions to help students understand what to expect, as well as emotion regulation supports such as deep breathing, positive self-talk, and reminders for managing frustration. The goal was to help teachers introduce MAP in a way that felt calm, clear, and student-centered.
This document served as a centralized note-catcher for a schoolwide WiFi stress test before MAP administration. It gave teachers clear instructions, synchronized the testing window, and created a structured place for each classroom to record start/end times, number of students participating, WiFi performance, and any technical issues that surfaced.
The purpose was to proactively identify and troubleshoot technology problems before the official MAP testing window. By collecting classroom-level observations in one shared document, the team could see patterns across grades, follow up on specific issues, and make the real testing experience smoother for students and teachers.
This document is a sample agenda from a recurring Tech Team meeting I organized and led as School Program Manager. Although it is not exclusively about MAP testing, I included it here because it demonstrates how I organize complex, cross-functional conversations with leaders from across the school, including school administration, finance and operations, IT, outside technology consultants, and program leadership.
The agenda was designed to clarify roles, surface needs, track updates, and identify next steps across several interconnected technology priorities: WiFi and infrastructure, student device use at home, internet safety and privacy, digital citizenship, and online learning programs. It shows how I use meeting agendas not just to list topics, but to create shared understanding, document decisions, assign responsibilities, and move complex work forward across teams.
One of my favorite kinds of professional work is curriculum design. I enjoy analyzing a range of curricular resources, identifying the strongest ideas within them, and adapting those ideas to meet the specific needs of a particular group of students. I also care deeply about the usability of curriculum materials: organizing lesson plans, slide decks, and student resources in ways that are clear, accessible, and easy for teachers to implement.
Once we selected MAP as our benchmark assessment, teachers repeatedly requested a short curriculum that would help students build both the technical and emotional skills needed for testing. This included strategies for regulating stress, using positive self-talk, crossing out incorrect answer choices, using scratch paper effectively, and approaching challenging questions with confidence.
The artifacts below contain the full curriculum I designed in response to that need. Drawing inspiration from fellow educators and adapting resources to fit our students and context, I created nearly 20 lesson plans, 20 lesson slide decks, and accompanying student resources. Together, these materials reflect my ability to turn a practical need into a coherent, student-centered learning experience that teachers could use and adapt across classrooms.
I developed nearly 20 lessons, each with a teacher plan, lesson slides, and student-facing materials, and created this document to centralize access to the full set of resources in one location. The at-a-glance format gives teachers a bird’s-eye view of the lesson sequence so they can adapt the curriculum to their students’ specific needs, pacing, and classroom context.
This document also helped codify TPS’s broader vision for standardized test preparation: why test-taking skills matter, how to approach testing with a balanced mindset, and how to support students without overemphasizing test performance. At the end of the document, I also identified recommended next steps for future school leaders to further develop and refine the curriculum in the years ahead.
This lesson was designed for the SEL thread of the test-taking curriculum. It teaches students how to notice negative self-talk and practice replacing it with more constructive, encouraging self-talk — a skill that supports students during assessments, but also extends well beyond testing.
The lesson builds on a video from the YouTube channel SEL Sketches and extends the video’s central metaphor. I often use visual metaphors with younger students because they make abstract social-emotional concepts easier to understand, remember, and apply.
As with many of my lessons, this one also includes opportunities for movement, discussion, and peer learning. I believe students need regular practice with oral communication and active listening, and that social engagement helps them deepen their understanding by learning with and from one another.
Most teacher-facing instructions are included in the slide deck’s speaker notes, but the lesson plan also includes additional resources to support interactive pair/share structures. This particular resource comes from Responsive Classroom and offers practical discussion routines that teachers can use not only for this lesson, but across many lessons and classroom contexts.
Including this kind of support reflects one of my goals in curriculum design: to make materials easy to implement while also strengthening the quality of student interaction, oral communication, and peer learning.
This is a simple worksheet, but it serves several important purposes. It gives students a brief pause to move, interact with peers, and generate their own examples of positive self-talk in a concrete, memorable way.
The page also acts as a bridge to the following lesson, where students use their ideas to create a class positive self-talk wall and participate in additional hands-on SEL activities that tap into their creativity. Together, these resources help students move from understanding the concept to practicing and internalizing it.
The testing strategies strand of the curriculum includes both general and subject-specific strategies. This lesson teaches students how to use scratch paper to track their thinking during a multiple-choice math assessment.
Many of my lessons begin with a “What do you notice?” prompt to encourage observation, discussion, and discovery-based learning. In this lesson, I intentionally included a scratch paper sample from a college student for students to study as a model. As a math teacher, I know that young students often assume that “doing it all in your head” means you are smarter or better at math. I wanted to challenge that misconception by showing students that even adult learners use tools to organize their thinking. The goal was to help students understand that scratch paper is not a sign of weakness — it is a strategy that supports careful reasoning, problem-solving, and accuracy.
Another recurring request from teachers was for a bank of practice questions that students could use to apply specific test-taking strategies. To support this need, I compiled collections of sample questions that aligned with the strategies taught in the curriculum.
Most lesson plans in the Test-Taking Strategies strand link directly to the relevant resource bank, allowing teachers to select practice questions that best fit their students’ needs, grade level, and instructional goals. This made the curriculum more flexible and easier to differentiate across classrooms.
One teacher went out of her way to thank me for creating the curriculum and highlighted this lesson in particular. After her 3rd grade students completed the official MAP math test, she sent me this photo of a student’s scratch paper — evidence that the student had applied a strategy they had never used before during a multiple-choice test.
The teacher also shared that teaching the lesson gave her new insight into her students’ needs and helped her think about how to adapt the strategy for her classroom. This is the kind of curriculum impact I value most: not just creating resources for teachers to use, but designing materials that help teachers notice student thinking more clearly and build from it.