Speaker: HUANG,Wenlian
Speaker: QIN, Mujun
Speaker: Junki Kasano
Speaker: Naomi Sasamori
Speaker: Yusuke Ishimori
Speaker: Kazuki Matui
Bibliographic information:
Massimo Magni, Luigi Proserpio, Martin Hoegl and Bernardino Provera, Research Policy, 38 (6), 1044-1053, 2009 URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004
Speaker: CHENG, Taijun
Speaker: Kazuyuki OTOMO
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Bibliographic information:
McCormack, T., O'Connor, E., Cherry, J., Beck, S. R., & Feeney, A. (2019). JournalofExperimentalChildPsychology, 179, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.005
Speaker: Naomi Sasamori
Speaker: HUANG,Wenlian
Bibliographic information:
Daviddi, S., Orwig, W., Palmiero, M., Campolongo, P., Schacter, D. L., & Santangelo, V. (2022), Individuals with highly superior autobiographical memory do not show enhanced creative thinking, MEMORY，30(9), pp. 1148-1157, PDF: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2094416
Speaker: QIN, Mujun
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Speaker: FUJIWARA, Masayuki
Speaker: Hiroki Yamamoto
Speaker: CHENG, Taijun
Bibliographic information:
Degen J, Tanenhaus MK. Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach. Cogn Sci. 2015 May;39(4):667-710. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12171
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Bibliographic information:
- 呂春燕（2009）「中日移動動詞に関する認知意味論的対照研究日本語のアガル・サガルと中国語の「上・下」を中心に」,広東外国語対外貿易大学博士論文
DOI：https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12622
- Xu (2015) A Study on the Cognitive Semantics of the Modern Chinese Words "Shang" and "Xia". Master's Degree Thesis, Heilongjiang University.
DOI： https://wap.cnki.net/lunwen-1015358190.html
- Feng Xuanyu (2018) The Cognitive Semantics of the words "Shang / Xia" in Modern Chinese ——A Comparative Study of Modern Chinese and Vietnamese language, PhD Thesis, Jilin University.
DOI： https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10183-1018225561.nh.html
- 嚴馥(2020) 「中国語の“上( SHANG)”の複合的語彙ネットワーク」慶應義塾外国語教育研究センター Journal of foreign language education.Vol.17,p.77-100.
DOI：https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050852870536133632
- Yongfei Yang, Chris Sinha, Luna Filipovic(2022) , Sequential Time construal is primary in temporal uses of Mandarin Chinese qian ‘front’ and hou ‘back’ . Language Sciences 95 ,101511.
DOI： https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101511
Speaker: Wenlian HUANG
Speaker: Masayuki FUJIWARA
Speaker: Mujun QIN
Speaker: Naomi SASAMORI
Bibliographic information:
How conceptual blends support sensemaking:A case study from introductory physics
Tor Ole B. Odden, Science Education, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 989-1012, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21674
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Speaker: Shogo HAMADA
Bibliographic information:
Acerbi, A. (2019). Cognitive attraction and online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5, p. 15.
Baumard,N.,Huillery,E.,Hyafil,A.,&Safra,L.(2022).The cultural evolution of love in literary history.Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4),506–522.
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 7313–7318.
Brand C. O., A, Acerbi., A., Mesoudi. (2019) Cultural evolution of emotional expression in 50 years of song lyrics. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 1, e11.
Speaker: Aogu SHIMIZU
Speaker: Mujun QIN
Speaker: Kazuki MATSUI
Bibliographic information:
(1) Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2014). Consequences, Norms, and Generalized Inaction in Moral Dilemmas: The CNI Model of Moral Decision-Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), pp. 343–376.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000086
(2) Jamisona, J., Yayb,T.,Feldman, G. (2020). Action-inaction asymmetries in moral scenarios: Replication of the omission bias examining morality and blame with extensions linking to causality, intent, and regret. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103977.
DOI :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103977
(3) Pletti, C., Lotto, L., Tasso, A., & Sarlo, M. (2016). Will I Regret It? Anticipated Negative Emotions Modulate Choices in Moral Dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1918.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01918
Speaker: Naomi SASAMORI
Bibliographic information:
Křivan, V., Cressman, R., 2020. Defectors’ intolerance of others promotes cooperation in the repeated public goods game with opting out. Scientific Reports, 10, 19511.
(https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76506-3)
Speaker: Shun KUROKAWA
Speaker: Junki KASANO
Speaker: Kazuyuki OTOMO
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Bibliographic information:
Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000086
Speaker: Naomi SASAMORI
Bibliographic information:
Kobayashi, H., & Hashiya, K. (2011). The gaze that grooms: contribution of social factors to the evolution of primate eye morphology, Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 157-165
PDF：<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.003>
Speaker: Hiroki YAMAMOTO
Bibliographic information:
Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen, Peter E. Latham, Andreas Roepstorff, Geraint Rees, Chris D. Frith. Optimally Interacting Minds. SCIENCE, 329 (5995). 1081-1085 (2010)
URL: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1185718
Speaker: Taijun CHENG
Speaker: Misato HOSHIZUMI
Speaker: Mujun QIN
Speaker: Aogu SHIMIZU
Bibliographic information:
Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000086
Speaker: Naomi SASAMORI
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Speaker: Junki KASANO
Speaker: Hiroki YAMAMOTO
Speaker: Masaomi HATAKEYAMA
(Postdoctoral researcher, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland)
Speaker: Yusuke ISHIMORI
Speaker: Kazuyuki OTOMO
Speaker: Wenlian HUANG
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Bibliographic information:
Higginbotham, J. (1994). Mass and count quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 447-480. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00985831.pdf
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Speaker: Yusuke ISHIMORI
Speaker: Taijun CHENG
Bibliographic information:
Stokols, D. (1975), Toward a psychological theory of alienation, Psychological Review, 82(1), pp. 26–44. (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel-Stokols/publication/232512377_Toward_a_psychological_theory_of_alienation/links/0c960531e8eda187bd000000/Toward-a-psychological-theory-of-alienation.pdf)
Speaker: Mujun QIN
Speaker: Kazuyuki OTOMO
Speaker: Misato HOSHIZUMI
Speaker: Naomi SASAMORI
Speaker: Taijun CHENG
Bibliographic information:
1. Ronald K. Mitchell et al., 1997. Toward Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Definition the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, No.4, 853-886. (https://doi.org/10.2307/259247)
2. Arun A. Elias et al., 2002. Stakeholder analysis for R&D Project management. R&D Management Vol. 32, No.4, 301-310.
(https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00262)
3. Pernille Eskerod et al., Dec 2015/Jan 2016. Project Stakeholder Management – Past and Present. Project Management Journal. 6-14.
(https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21555)
4. Carrie Beam et al., 2022, Best Practice for Stakeholder Engagement for Government R&D Organizations. Engineering Management Journal. 1-20.
(https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2022.2030180)
Speaker: Siri-on UMARIN
Speaker: Wenlian HUANG
Bibliographic information:
X-D., Li, C., Yu, J-R., Wang, S-C., Fan, S-J., Zhang, B-Y., Tao, Y., 2017. A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 420, 12–17.DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.036>
Speaker: Shun KUROKAWA
Speaker: Taijun CHENG
Bibliographic information:
Kano, F., Kawaguchi, Y., & Hanling, Y. (2022). Experimental evidence that uniformly white sclera enhances the visibility of eye-gaze direction in humans and chimpanzees eLife. 11:e74086 PDF: <https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74086>
Speaker: Hiroki YAMAMOTO
Speaker: Aogu SHIMIZU
Bibliographic information:
- Jauernig, J., Uhl, M., & Valentinov, V. (2021). The ethics of corporate hypocrisy: An experimental approach. Futures, 131, 102757.
- DOI：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102757
- Maheshwari, S. K., & Ganesh, M. P. (2006). Ethics in organizations: The case of Tata Steel. Vikalpa, 31(2), 75-88.
- DOI：https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0256090920060205
- Ofurum, U. A., Gabriel, J. M. O., Nkpolu, O., & Harcourt, P. (2019). Multidimensional ethical dilemmas of contemporary organizations: A Literature Review. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 5(3), 7-18.
- DOI：http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.53.2001
- Pan, Q., Liu, X., Bao, H., Su, Y., & He, M. (2018). Evolution of cooperation through adaptive interaction in a spatial prisoner’s dilemma game. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 571-581.
- DOI：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.046
- Sims, R. R. (1992). The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505-513.
- DOI：https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00881442
- Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of marketing, 73(6), 77-91.
- DOI：https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
- Watkins, A., & Hill, R. P. (2005). The impact of personal and organizational moral philosophies on marketing exchange relationships: A simulation using the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 253-265.
- DOI：https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-005-8714-9
Speaker: Yusuke ISHIMORI
Bibliographic information:
Antoniová, Vesna Kalafus. "An onomasiological approach to nominal compound semantics." Word Structure 13.3 (2020): 316-346. PDF: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3366/word.2020.0174
Speaker: Kazuyuki OTOMO
Bibliographic information:
Tore Erdmann, Christoph Mathys, (2021), A generative framework for the study of delusions, Schizophrenia Research, ISSN 0920-9964. PDF: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.048
Speaker: Junki KASANO
Speaker: Haote ZHOU
Bibliographic information:
Birch,S.A.J.& Bloom,P.(2007), The Curse of Knowledge in Reasoning About False Beliefs,Psychological Science,18(5),pp.382-386. PDF: https://minddevlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/The%20curse%20of%20knowledge%20in%20reasoning%20about%20false%20beliefs.pdf
Speaker: Mujun QIN
Speaker: Siri-on UMARIN
Bibliographic information:
K. Rost, L. Stahel, and B. S. Frey, “Digital social norm enforcement: Online firestorms in social media,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 6, Jun. 2016.
Speaker: Aogu SHIMIZU
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Bibliographic information:
Zhuo Jing-Schmidt, Jun Lang, Heidi Hui Shi, Steffi H. Hung and Lin Zhu(2022),Linguistics 60(2): 541–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0198
Speaker: Wenlian HUANG
Speaker: Shun KUROKAWA
Bibliographic information:
RONAI, E., & XIANG, M. (2021). Pragmatic inferences are QUD-sensitive: An experimental study. Journal of Linguistics, 57(4), 841-870. DOI:10.1017/S0022226720000389
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Speaker: Hiroki YAMAMOTO
Bibliographic information:
RONAI, E., & XIANG, M. (2021). Pragmatic inferences are QUD-sensitive: An experimental study. Journal of Linguistics, 57(4), 841-870. DOI:10.1017/S0022226720000389
Speaker: Qingxi LIAN
Speaker: Hiroki YAMAMOTO
Speaker: Taijun CHENG
Speaker: Hiroyuki HOSHI
Speaker: Masayuki FUJIWARA
Speaker: Junki KASANO
Host：Mujun QIN
Participants：Junki Kasano, Naomi Sasamori, Taijun CHENG
Observer：Hiroki Yamamoto, Shun Kurokawa
Host：Kazuyuki Otomo
Participants：Masayuki Fujiwara, Junki Kasano, Naomi Sasamori, Hiroki Yamamoto, Takashi Hashimoto, Misato Hoshizumi, Lian Quanxi
Observer：Shun Kurokawa