Latin American nationbuilding

*note- gov is used as an abbreviation of the word government

  • Some european sates were able to transform themselves into nations through the setup of systems like police and army that would protect them from outsiders and also from internal revolutions

    • They also developed economic institutions that would create the revenue to pay for these things

    • This is where war came in

    • Civil war is obviously not good for the state

    • A lot of the countries were of the belief that war builds nations

  • European wars were often about control of territory

    • Rulers needed armies for this

      • This was the first level of large scale organization

    • Armies need additional organizations that collect taxes

      • States with large armies tuned to a Bureaucracy

        • Bureaucracy: a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives.

      • By 1950

  • A lot of latin american states were built by military regimes

    • Some have hypothesized that this was due to the absence of international wars

      • Military strongmen who used their armies to create strong states that oppressed the people

      • International wars in europe forced states to organize

      • Any international war in Latin america was very short lied

      • They did not get the same opportunities to organize, with armies and bureaucracies and the democratic processes

      • It is often argued that the existence of these miliatry regimes proves the weakness of the state

    • Latin american sates often lacked the capacity to raise ;large numbers of troops, as well as the taxes to pay for them

      • Their armies could not fight long drawn out international wars

    • Geography also paled a big part

      • The borders of many counties were inhabitable

      • Less opportunity as less reason for conflict with external forces

    • There were a lot of civil wars

      • When latin american states finally got a chance to mobilize their armies, it was usually to fight against their own citizens

      • The enemies were not other nations but "those who threatened the social and economic status quo"

        • Often these enemies were indigenous people, or communists

    • The process of was building states doesn’t work unless there was some kind of institutional foundation to build on

      • A lot of latin american nations did not have this

      • Colonization , mostly by spain was designed to make sure that the natives could not put those institutions into place in their homelands

      • Another reason why the setup of these institutions was difficult was because Lot of wars for independence were highly destructive to the region

        • The small scale wars after independence did not require states to develop a tax collection apparatus , which would have allowed them to develop financial structured

          • This is because they had a steady source of revenue, from the export of commodity, they did not need to rely on taxes to fund these small wars

          • Loans were also used to pay for small war

            • Foreign powers were keen to interfere in latin american affairs ex CIA

            • Foreign powers also found interest in the prospect of extracting resources from latin america and keeping the profits in order to pay of these loans

            • They never really needed to tax their populations - not a good thing

              • Without taxes, the state never had to bargain with citizens, citizens did not have any bargaining power over the state , the state was not reliant on them

              • There were no significant positive bonds formed between the population and the government, that usually would be formed through the relationship of citizens requesting something and the gov meeting those demands

              • When a gov doesn't need money from citizens in order to function, the importance of listening to them isn't as stressed

    • International wars are good for developing nationalism

      • This was good for building states

      • Ex 19th century germany

      • Latin american sates were not as nationalist as their european counterparts

    • Latin America's legacy of both racial and class division

      • Rigid hierarchy

        • Spanish born Penninisulares at the top

        • Indigenous people and slaves at the bottom

        • Creoles and mestizos in the middle

      • When latin american countries gained independence, these hierarchies became a source of insecurity

        • Source of anxiety for the new ruling class of creoles

          • The spanish were gone, now the creoles rule

        • Class and racial distinction was intertwined

        • The ruling class feared losing power to the lower classes

        • These divisions prevented the army from bringing people together

          • In other countries, the army is the first place where people with different backgrounds, and from different regions could come together as one, promoting a sense of unity within the nation

          • No opportunity for social classes to mingle

          • Latin american armies were small

            • Social hierarches remained within them

    • Absence of an external enemy also caused a lull in nationalism

      • There was no sense of other that could be used to build up nationalism

    • Latin american countries were often unstable and violent, compered to european counterparts

      • This is likely due to the fact that european states were much richer

      • The european states were much richer due to systems of colonization

      • European sates began their nationbuilding by extracting lots of value from latin american sates as well as african states

      • Latin american states first had to fight brutal wars for their freedom , then try to patch up the damages