Creating and updating collection development policies often goes overlooked, particularly in small school libraries. Libraries without collection development policies are like business without business plans.
A library should always have a current collection development policy that outlines the purpose of the collection, provides justification for why materials are included or excluded, contains a procedure to follow in case materials are challenged, defines who is responsible for collection development decisions, and highlights the selection tools that should be used.
Course discussions and completing the following journal assignment has better prepared me to identify the main elements of a collection development policy. If I were to complete this assignment again, I would have liked to practice writing my own library policies.
The responsibilities of a librarian and the format of materials are changing but selection and collection development will remain vital in online environments. Collection development management is the main component of libraries. If there is no collection, there is no library.
Completing the following journal helped me to realize how different medias can complement or even replace books. It is a reflection on how digital resources may be considered superior or inferior to print materials, how providing media options may benefit individuals with different learning styles, and what the future holds for collection development.
I have seen many awful library books in school libraries. They are usually in a collection or series of books that are the same size and look the same but have different titles like, Internet, Space, Robots, Weather, etc. Many books like this are not deselected due to time constraints, public displeasure, or sanctity of the collection. It’s possible the book was in a series donated to the library by a parent or community member which would also make discarding it difficult.
Responding to course discussions has helped me to understand the reasons why some books stay in the library forever and also highlighted the importance of regularly evaluating the library collection while making deselection decisions. I can't imagine having any personal challenges with regards to deselection itself. For me, it would be challenging and frustrating if there was an emphasis being placed on numbers or if I had no time during the school day to evaluate and deselect.
The method called CREW (Continuous Review, Evaluation, and Weeding) integrates selection and acquisition, cataloging and processing, circulation and reference into one smooth, streamlined, and ongoing routine that assures that all required services are completed effectively. This method makes it easier to routinely remove outdated and unused materials from the collection while also learning where the collection has gaps or needs new items. MUSTIE is the acronym for six negative factors that make books and other materials prime candidates for weeding. If it's MUSTIE, you must weed it!
Selection tools are helpful resources like magazines that contain lists of books pertaining to a specific subject. They should be objective and free from bias in their book reviews. One example is Voice of Youth Advocates (VOYA), a journal owned by Scarecrow Press and published bimonthly. It is the only magazine that focuses on informational needs of teenagers and addresses librarians, educators, and other professionals working with young adults. It is a useful tool for librarians and other educators serving young adults. Blogs, like BookBitch created by librarian Stacy Alesi, can also be created for use as selection tools. After reviewing her blog I am considering the other potential uses for this online portfolio in the future such as adding a section for book reviews or professional updates.
If a user is having difficulty finding information on a topic, I would suggest they use a free web resource rather than the library databases. This could happen if someone is researching a relatively new subject or one that hasn’t been researched in depth. For example, if a patron was having difficulty finding scholarly articles on COVID-19 I might suggest they try searching Google Scholar or Wikipedia since both have a lot of current information the library databases might not have available yet. It's crucial that librarians teach users methods of evaluating a work to determine its reliability due to excessive misinformation flooding the web. The ACCORD methodology for resource evaluation was formulated by librarians at Ithaca College and uses the following criteria: