🔥🚨EasyKnock Wallstreet & Viola Fintech Backed Funds are evicting families through fraudulent real estate schemes -We’re fighting Back

"Not a Court Win: Unpacking the Arbitration Ruling in :

Jarred Kessler

§

"Feldman & Feldman "

“Arbitration Isn’t Vindication: The Truth Behind Jarred Kessler’s ‘Victory’ Over Feldman & 🧾

In recent statements and interviews, Jarred Kessler, CEO of EasyKnock, has framed the outcome of a private arbitration proceeding with Feldman & Feldman as a definitive legal win—complete with retrospective remorse and self-congratulatory tone. But here’s what the public needs to understand:

This wasn’t a court case. It wasn’t a jury trial. And it wasn’t a public judgment.

It was a private arbitration ruling, one of the most opaque forms of dispute resolution—often designed to minimize public accountability, not maximize it.

⚖️

What Really Happened

Feldman & Feldman, a law firm that once represented EasyKnock, brought serious allegations against Kessler and the company, including claims of nonpayment, breach of contract, and ethical improprieties. Rather than litigating the matter in a court of law, where proceedings would be public and subject to judicial scrutiny, the dispute was resolved through binding arbitration—a private forum that offers no legal precedent and no public record.

The arbitrator ruled in favor of Kessler in certain aspects of the case, which he has since spun into a vindication. But that ruling:

Did not exonerate him of misconduct.
Did not address EasyKnock’s broader pattern of behavior toward homeowners.
Does not equate to a court of law siding with him.

🎭

Remorse After the Fact?

In a particularly tone-deaf twist, Kessler has publicly expressed “regret” about EasyKnock’s past conduct—only after the arbitration was resolved in his favor. This calculated display of remorse appears more like reputation management than genuine accountability.

Let’s be clear:

Remorse isn’t meaningful when it follows a private ruling shielded from scrutiny. It’s especially hollow when:

Thousands of homeowners remain in limbo or have been evicted.
Complaints are still under review by state attorneys general, the FTC, and the SEC.
Consumer advocates continue to raise red flags about EasyKnock’s business model.

🕳️

Arbitration as a PR Cover

Arbitration is a tool corporations often use to:

Avoid public trials,
Suppress damaging evidence,
And control the narrative post-ruling.

Kessler’s statements exploit the ambiguity of arbitration to portray a legal win where there was no real judicial decision.

🚨

The Bigger Picture

This dispute with Feldman & Feldman is not an isolated case. It’s part of a broader pattern involving:

Misleading contracts,
Improper securitization of homesteads,
Deceptive business practices targeting vulnerable homeowners,
And a financial ecosystem of SPVs, hedge funds, and opaque equity schemes.

Whether or not Kessler won an arbitration, he hasn’t won back public trust. And no amount of post-facto remorse can rewrite the record for the families affected.

📌 Bottom Line

A private arbitration award is not the same as a public exoneration.

And Jarred Kessler’s attempt to spin it as such is as tacky as it is transparent.

(hereinafter "website") is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be used for legal advice. Users of this website should not take any actions or refrain from taking any actions based upon content or information on this website. Users of this site should contact a licensed real estate attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse