🔎 Fraudulent Transfers: EasyKnock → Nese Property Management

📅 Timeline of Events

• 11/28/2022 – Contract signed between homeowner and EasyKnock Inc.

• 10/24/2024 – A new entity called Nese Property Management LLC is registered in Delaware.

• December 2024 – EasyKnock publicly claims it is “no longer operational.”

• 2025 – Evidence surfaces that EasyKnock is still operating under the name Nese, with the same employees, contracts, and contact points.

❗ What’s the Problem?

Our contract is with EasyKnock — not Nese.

Yet:

• We received invoices labeled “EasyKnock DBA Nese Property Management”

• Staff such as Robert Neville, Rhonda Gasler, Avery Waters, and Brook Lativa appear to still operate under the new name

• No notice was given to homeowners about any transfer of responsibilities

• There was no consent, no consideration, and no public disclosure

This is a classic red flag of a fraudulent business transfer.

⚖️ What Law Was Violated?

EasyKnock’s transfer of operations to Nese Property Management violates the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) — adopted in Texas and most U.S. states (also known as the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act in some jurisdictions).

🧨 1. 

Actual Fraud – Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud

Texas Business & Commerce Code § 24.005(a):

“A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent… if the debtor made the transfer with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor.”

Why this matters:

Homeowners like us are creditors — we have a binding agreement with EasyKnock.

They transferred operations to avoid liability, while pretending to be out of business.

⚠️ 2. 

Constructive Fraud – No Equivalent Value & Insolvency

Texas Business & Commerce Code § 24.006(a):

“A transfer is fraudulent if made without receiving reasonably equivalent value… and the debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result.”

Why this matters:

EasyKnock gave away key responsibilities to Nese without compensation or public notice — and likely while insolvent.

🚩 3. 

Badges of Fraud Under § 24.005(b):

The law lists factors that suggest fraudulent intent. Here’s what applies:

• ✅ Transfer to insiders (same staff, same control)

• ✅ Concealed transfer (no notice to homeowners)

• ✅ Transfer after lawsuit/claims arose

• ✅ No equivalent value received

• ✅ Debtor became insolvent afterward

👁️‍🗨️ What This Means for You

If you signed a contract with EasyKnock, your legal rights may be at risk.

A company cannot hide its liabilities by shifting your property or servicing agreements to a shell entity without your knowledge or consent.

This isn’t just unethical — it’s illegal.

📢 What We’re Doing

We’ve filed suit in federal court and are actively pursuing claims under:

• The Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act

• The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act

• State homestead protection laws

• Violations of federal consumer protection laws

✅ What You Can Do

• Check your documents — Are you being contacted by Nese instead of EasyKnock?

• Document everything — Emails, invoices, names.

• Reach out — We’re forming a coalition of affected homeowners. Contact us directly for case info or how to join.

📝 Sample Document Evidence

✅ Invoice: Labeled “EasyKnock DBA Nese Property Management”

📧 Email Trail: From Robert Neville, still using EasyKnock-related contacts

📄 Public Records: Nese registered shortly before EasyKnock announced shutdown

🔍 Employee Overlap: Staff remains the same under the new name