PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE.
The first time Appellant clearly understood that the magistrate’s judgment was deliberately caused by fraud was after the circuit court issued orders to affirm it. This couldn’t be possible if the circuit court reviewed Appellant’s exhibits. Ergo, the circuit court never reviewed Appellant’s exhibits. But Appellant filed her exhibits a month prior to the hearing, and confirmed at the hearing that these exhibits are the same exhibits as were admitted, reviewed and authenticated by the magistrate. Appellant proffered these exhibits one by one to the magistrate in Plaintiff’s opening statement (M2). Verily, simply reviewing Appellant’s exhibits provides complete evidence that they are the original Plaintiff’s exhibits (M2). The circuit court orders stated that all of Appellant’s exhibits were reviewed. Yet the circuit court orders affirmed the fraudulent magistrate’s judgment (E9). But it couldn’t be possible if Appellant’s exhibits were actually reviewed.
This meant an egregious massive fraud was committed to affirm the fraudulent magistrate’s judgment. But why would so many people expand such admirable efforts to affirm a judgment of such meager monetary value? Appellant fought this judgment not only because Appellant is actually poor, but because it penalized Appellant for conducting her business honestly, and rewarded Respondent for defrauding Appellant and damaging Appellant’s property. By doing so, the magistrate’s judgment subjected Appellant to an increased risk of similar plunder. And since Defendant was closely affiliated with the local mafia, who systematically plundered Appellant’s condo since her relocation, the magistrate’s judgment was thus forcing Appellant to forfeit her right to own her condo for the benefit of the local mafia. Then the only reason so many people expanded such admirable efforts to cause the affirmative circuit court decision was that they colluded with this local mafia, or were part of it.
This was such an unconscionable violation of the American Constitution. The discovery of this fraud was devastating. “No one will help you here”, recalled Appellant. How can Appellant ever win against this brutality? Appellant was broken to the core. Appellant has a neurological disability and, in addition, has developed severe anemia, lung damage, and much more in the four years since relocating to Myrtle Beach (A4), (A6). Fighting this legal battle was excruciating. The pain and fog of the severe anemia made functioning nearly completely impossible. Yet Appellant must fight it. The fraudulent circuit court order was shocking for the number of lies it contained, the lies both copied from the fraudulent magistrate’s summary verbatim and invented anew in the circuit court order (E9). Now, both the circuit court order and the magistrate’s judgement proved to be not only fraudulent but criminal, because they specifically penalized Appellant for not allowing strangers into her home (E9), (E10), (E11), (A7), under the pretext of negotiating ‘fixes’ or “curing defects”, - whereas Appellant (Plaintiff) provided both the circuit court and the magistrate court with the evidence of Defendant enjoying full unfettered access into Plaintiff’s home, inspecting his installation thoroughly, and making several stunning admissions (E12). Plaintiff even explicitly informed the magistrate that Defendant tried to intimidate Plaintiff into dealing with strange unknown people, which is the only people to whom Plaintiff refused access:
I informed [Defendant] of these problems, and on November 16, a week after his installation, he came to inspect it. During his inspection, [Defendant] said that "this is normal'', and admitted that they didn't prepare the concrete subfloor. […] During his inspection, [Defendant] admitted that they did not roll the installation, which is one of the most crucial manufacturer's requirements, and finally agreed to return my money. Please see Folder #4 for the audio record of [Defendant’s] inspection and admissions. The following day [Defendant] changed his mind and tried to intimidate [Plaintiff] into accepting his installation [as is] and into dealing with strange unknown people.
(E11, p.1).
The magistrate actually asked Plaintiff about this at the proceeding, and Plaintiff confirmed that Defendant tried several times to intimidate Plaintiff into speaking with people Plaintiff doesn’t know and has never seen, and that Plaintiff refused to see these people.
Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains direct evidence of Defendant enjoying full unfettered access to Plaintiff’s condo, inspecting it, and making various admissions, only some of which are listed above. One of Defendant’s admissions was that he doesn’t know how to remedy his failed installation. Another Defendant’s admission was that he is not the owner of Carpet King & Flooring. This was shocking news to Plaintiff, and the same evidence on Plaintiff’s (Appellant’s) flashdrive proves Plaintiff had been convinced Defendant was the owner of his company because Defendant represented himself to Plaintiff as the owner. Defendant tried to intimidate Plaintiff into allowing his father to come and negotiate a fix, which Plaintiff did refuse because Plaintiff entered into the contract with Defendant, who represented himself as the owner of Carpet King & Flooring, and because Plaintiff had never seen Defendant’s father in her life.
If the circuit court was impartial, it would have had to review Appellant’s flashdrive and hear the evidence of Defendant’s inspection and Defendant’s fraud.
Defendant’s fraud is even evident in Defendant’s own answer:
I had my father, the owner, contact [Plaintiff]. He called her to try to schedule an appointment to inspect the installation to rectify any issues and she refused to have him go to her home and inspect the install. He then told her we can’t resolve any issues if she won’t let us to.
(A7, p.2),
which confirms Defendant’s efforts to intimidate Plaintiff, for Defendant had already inspected his installation, and therefore Plaintiff was not obligated to allow any other persons to inspect Defendant’s installation in her home, especially completely unbeknown to her persons.
The evidence on Plaintiff’s flashdrive shows Defendant defrauded Plaintiff from the beginning when he made an offer to complete the “LVT glue down installation” of “Shaw Prime Plank” and represented himself as the owner of a flooring company with particular expertise in glue down installations, - for the evidence on Plaintiff’s flashdrive proves that Defendant had almost no idea how this particular installation is done (see Folder 1 on Appellant’s flashdrive for Defendant’s offer E176, which is also found on page 1 of the rightmost document filed in the entry for magistrate’s return, E4). Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains more evidence of Defendant’s fraud. When Defendant inspected his installation, he admitted to not knowing how to fix it, as well as made multiple other admissions, some of which Plaintiff explicitly conveyed to the magistrate in her opening statement (E11) when she proffered the audio recording of Defendant’s inspection.
And now the circuit court order penalized Appellant for not letting Respondent’s “company have access to her home” (E9).
But there is no evidence to support this allegation. Even Defendant himself has never alleged anything in those words. Where did the circuit court get the idea? Where did the circuit court get the wording for this idea? Who wrote that circuit court order?
On the other hand, Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains direct conclusive evidence that Defendant: (1) had full access to inspect his installation; (2) admitted to not knowing how to remedy it; and (3) tried to intimidate Appellant into allowing strangers into her home.
With no evidence in support and direct conclusive evidence in opposition, the circuit court order still penalized Appellant for not letting Respondent’s “company have access to her home”. This meant only one thing – the circuit court order was forcing Appellant to allow strangers into her home, that is, to forfeit her right to be safe in her home.
Earlier, the magistrate’s summary penalized Appellant for the same transgression: for “denying [Defendant] access”, and for “not allowing him to complete repair work”.
But there is absolutely no evidence that Defendant was ever denied access to Plaintiff’s home. To the contrary, Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains evidence of Defendant enjoying full access to Plaintiff’s home, inspecting his failed installation, and admitting to not knowing how to remedy it.
Plaintiff’s flashdrive also contains evidence that Plaintiff indeed refused Defendant’s suggestion to patch up the peeling planks individually. But that was because Defendant failed to install the entire area properly, in compliance with the installation requirements. Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains conclusive evidence of it, from four different sources. Since Defendant failed to install the entire area properly, patching the numerous lifting planks was not going to remedy the failed installation, which required a specific preparation protocol stipulated in the official installation instructions (E11). That is why Plaintiff indeed refused Defendant’s suggestion to patch up the individual lifting planks, and Plaintiff’s flashdrive contains the evidence of Plaintiff explaining this to Defendant, and Defendant finally agreeing, and therefore agreeing to return Plaintiff’s money. Plaintiff’s exhibits, both flashdrive and paper, also contain evidence that the massive failure which occurred in the first two weeks following Defendant’s installation, cannot be squeezed into the definition of defect to be repaired, as stipulated by the South Carolina regulatory standards document. All of this evidence was admitted, reviewed, and authenticated by the magistrate, and explicitly described in Plaintiff’s opening statement (E11).
With no evidence in support and direct conclusive evidence in opposition, the magistrate’s judgment penalized Plaintiff for “denying [Defendant] access”, and for “not allowing him to complete repair work”. This meant only one thing – the magistrate’s judgment was forcing Plaintiff to allow fraudulent strangers into her home, and to allow fraudulent contractors to damage her condo and still pay them for it. Effectively, the fraudulent magistrate’s judgment was forcing Plaintiff to forfeit her right to own her property and to be safe in her home.
Appellant is not a trained attorney. The shock of all this injustice was devastating. Appellant’s neighbors felt sympathy for Appellant. Most of Appellant’s doctors felt sympathy for Appellant. The entire broad community in which Appellant lives, knows Appellant was entrapped by the criminal conspiracy who are driving Appellant to her death in order to capitalize on her property. Appellant was being subjected to forced sleep deprivation, Appellant’s records and history were being examined for any possible blemish which may be used to force Appellant to sell as is; in the absence of blemishes, slander was spread about Appellant to poison not only her medical record but even her relationship with her neighbors. Yet Appellant’s neighbors already came to know Appellant as a normal, hardworking, wholesome person and, inadvertently, Appellant earned their friendship. Appellant found out that many people in the community are thwarted and damaged by the same mafia, and are outraged by the injustices it commits. Yet the criminal schemes practiced by the mafia enjoy absolute impunity. This judicial protection of crime spreads corruption and retardation to every aspect of society. That is why no civil engineer or hygienist will ever come to inspect one of the mafia buildings. That is why no local doctor can ever tell their patient her illness is mold-related and will only get worse if she continues to live in her mold infested condo. That is why no attorney will ever help Appellant (A11)[1], (A14)[2].
Appellant’s friends tell Appellant the courts protect this mafia. The courts will only add to Appellant’s damages. Appellant’s friends don’t believe the government protects them. They don’t believe in justice. They know from experience that honest work pays a lot less than any work in the criminal schemes controlled by the local mafia. They are waiting for this appeal to confirm their beliefs. So far it has done so. The simple, meager complaint at the local magistrate’s court has already turned into a massive, costly, and damaging nightmare, while all of Appellant’s evidence is still being ignored.
That is why this beautiful blessed land has drowned in despair and illness. That is why no local animal hospital has IV drip antibiotics. That is why there are no squares and walkways though every block. That is why there are no exercise playgrounds for children and adults on every corner. That is why the local community don’t try to learn, study, hone their professional skills. For the local mafia, and the judicial protection it enjoys, select against honest professional skills. The local mafia, and the judicial protection it enjoys, select against honest competition which makes societies thrive. The local mafia, and the judicial protection it enjoys, select only for compliance with the local feudal setup. The local mafia steals from the city, steals from the State, steals from the Federal government, and steals from individual Americans, and the judicial protection it enjoys supports their criminal schemes and allows them to perpetuate[3].
But this dynamic is not sustainable and is bound to collapse. Thus, it was only natural that the local mafia, entrenched with a group of Nazis, conspired to entrap Appellant for her ethnic background, and to drive Appellant through one of their standard criminal schemes with added brutality. As a matter of course, the magistrate didn’t hesitate to commit fraud on the court to protect the mafia. And the circuit court clerks didn’t hesitate to commit fraud on the court to protect the mafia. This fraud is a familiar instrument at the disposal of the fraudulent court officials in Horry County. It has for years been used as an instrument to victimize targeted citizens. The entire community knows about it.
Yet Appellant also understood something important. She can’t live in a place so blatantly devoid of law and equal protection. So brutally discriminatory. A Nazi concentration camp. A place where crooks are rewarded by the courts to plunder and abuse with complete impunity. Where judges and clerks met out protection to thugs, and penalize honest people. Appellant doesn’t want to live here. All those articles advertising Myrtle Beach as the best place to retire should have stated it openly, - that there are Nazi concentration camps in Myrtle Beach, where disabled citizens of certain ethnicities will be entrapped, abused, plundered, and poisoned in mold chambers, where no attorney will ever help them, and courts, American courts, will lie through their teeth to protect their abusers (M2). If Appellant knew that, she would never have moved there. But Appellant had no idea. Appellant was going to write books and volunteer at the Math lab… Now, Appellant can’t understand what it means, to write books. Now that she has moved there, and she can’t leave, Appellant doesn’t want to live. Appellant’s whole life was forged with integrity. Integrity is Appellant’s deepest solace and greatest strength. Appellant trusted that America protected integrity. But her new place of residence insists otherwise. Appellant is entrapped in a place where Appellant is continuously victimized and Appellant’s property plundered, while the government, the American government, protects Appellant’s abusers and plunderers. Appellant can’t adapt to that life.
And so Appellant’s soul died. Appellant’s health was already badly damaged and continued to decline. One can take only so much abuse. America betrayed Appellant.
Yet Appellant’s fate is only too common in this mafia-controlled place. Life can’t thrive in an aggressive environment where common citizens are subjected to the constant risk of financial, physical, and psychological abuse. When highbrow judiciaries pull up the statistic showing that the residents of Horry County engage in an extraordinary number of legal actions, they fail to acknowledge the basic fact that this statistic is caused by the extraordinary lack of judicial protection afforded to the residents of Horry County, - and the extraordinary judicial protection afforded to the criminal mafia:
The entire local community in which [Appellant] lives, knows of the continuous blatant discrimination, abuse and plunder, of which this appeal exposes only a small portion. If this Court reinforces the same manifest injustice and illegal practices as were reinforced at the trial court, public trust in the State government will be damaged even deeper than it has already been damaged.
(A2, p.2).
[1] Klaus Schadenfreude's answer - on Quora
[2] Consultation with Attorney Watson, Gmail printout - to be added.
[3] See C.A. No.: 4:25-cv-2697-SAL - here
From my emergency motion to certify: