Applying the CCAP model to gun violence
Ardene Robinson Vollman
Post date: Feb 22, 2021
Ardene Robinson Vollman
Post date: Feb 22, 2021
The Toronto Star story “Under the Gun” (Ngabo & Plana, 2021 Jan 30) about neighbourhood gun violence in Toronto resonates with Chapter 37 in Canadian Community as Partner 5e. In the article, Reverend Sky Starr (the chapter co-author) was featured, speaking to her personal response to gunshots heard in her neighbourhood and her professional concern about the trauma gun violence has on the community.
The story of gun violence in some of Toronto’s hardest-hit neighbourhoods was revealed through an analysis of a year of Twitter alerts from the Toronto Police Service about gunshots, shootings, investigations, and false alarms. In the article, the number of 911 calls about gun violence is shown on a map of Toronto communities, with hot spots indicated in bright red. Ngabo and Plano note: “This map resembles the layout of poverty and wealth in Toronto.”
If we were to use the CCAP model to understand the issues, we would complete a community assessment and find ways to engage the community in planning an intervention, rather than doing “to” or “for” the community at risk of gun violence.
Community assessment: An analysis of these hot spots by Ngabo and Plano reveals these are neighbourhoods inhabited largely by people of colour and immigrants living with poverty. Interviews the reporters conducted with community leaders in the Jane-Finch area found that there is little opportunity, services, and resources for people that live in the area, particularly the youth. Schools reportedly operate in difficult circumstances, there is a lack of employment opportunities (provoking youth gang activity), and there are limited recreation opportunities (and fear to use them because of the threat of violence). The area is more heavily and aggressively policed than communities with fewer gun-related issues, leading to anger, resentment, and outrage in community members.
Community health diagnosis: Residents suffer depression, PTSD, fear, and anxiety due to the stress and trauma they experience.
Community engagement and planning: Community leaders and safety activists call for innovative ways to create community safety and interrupt the “rhythm of gun violence” – by building relationships, connecting with youth, and providing ongoing support for anti-poverty interventions, resources, and services.
Intervention: In their CCCAP5e chapter, Sky Starr and Annette Bailey outline their efforts in the Out of Bounds program to support mothers of children killed by gun violence in the Jane-Finch area of Toronto. The Toronto Star article also featured efforts by the Zero Gun Violence Movement, the Jane and Finch Community Family Centre, and others dedicated to eliminating gun violence through community interventions and support.
Discussion: Gun violence is a public health issue. According to the CBC documentary “The Year of the Gun” (2018) and the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) Position Statement (2018), there are some surprising numbers relating to gun violence in Canada that underscore the concern in this country:
Canada ranks 5th (as of 2010) among 36 OECD nations in the number of gun deaths per capita, behind the USA, Finland, Austria, and France.
Toronto experienced 428 shooting incidents in 2018, which is 2.5 times the number in 2014.
According to Statistics Canada there was a record 33% drop in gun-related crime across the country between 2009 and 2013; but the rate of gun-related crime in Canada has increased by 42% since 2013, due in large part to the increasing number of victims in Toronto.
In 2017, there were 7,700 victims of firearm-involved crimes in Canada.
55% of firearm-related homicides in 2017 were committed using a handgun.
In November 2017, the federal government announced approximately $327.6 million over five years (starting in 2018–19), and $100 million annually thereafter, in new federal funding to tackle the increase in gun-related violence and gang activity in Canada.
Georges Benjamin, Executive Director of the American Public Health Association (APHA), stated in an opinion article in The Guardian (2015): “To reverse the gun violence epidemic—and it’s important that we use the word ‘epidemic’—we need to do the same thing we’d do for any infectious disease outbreak. We should track it, find the root causes, use science to find research gaps, create policy solutions, and use mass public education campaigns to eradicate the threat.”
Swannie Jett, of the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), stated: “[Gun violence] can be prevented through a comprehensive public health approach that keeps families and communities safe. NACCHO supports core public health activities necessary to eradicate gun violence: (1) conductingsurveillanceto track firearm-related deaths, determine causes, and assess intervention methods; (2) identifying risk factors associated with gun violence (e.g., poverty and depression) and resilience or protective factors that guard against violence (e.g., youth access to trusted adults); (3) developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to decrease risk factors and build resilience; and (4) institutionalizing successful prevention strategies.”
In Canada, the Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) has no official policy statement about gun violence. However, a public forum at Public Health 2017 in Halifax discussed the issue. In a press statement, Ian Culbert, Executive Director of CPHA, said: “We know that violence is often a symptom of larger problems, and so we look at those upstream issues, such as education, income, housing, that can lead to violence, and so that’s a public health approach to violence prevention.” He called for investment in community centres, education, and quality housing.
Along with action on the root causes of gun violence, there is an opportunity for healthy public policy (CCAP5e Chapter 9) and legislation with respect to gun control.
In May 2020 the Canadian federal government banned the use, sale, and importation of more than 1500 brands and models of military assault style weapons following on the heels of the Nova Scotia mass shooting in which one man killed 22 people. An amnesty of two years runs out on April 30, 2022.
Bill C-21 (Firearms), new gun control legislation to amend the Criminal Code and Firearms Act, wasintroduced to Parliament on February 16, 2021. This bill would introduce a voluntary buy-back program for banned firearms, permit municipalities to ban handguns, and increase criminal penalties for gun smuggling and trafficking, and make altering magazine capacity beyond lawful limits a criminal offense. It would also create “red flag” and “yellow flag” laws that would allow individuals, such as concerned relatives or friends, to apply to a court for the immediate removal of someone’s firearm.
Under the new legislation, people who keep their blacklisted weapons would have to abide by strict conditions: they must agree not to use the weapons, import or acquire any more of them, or bequeath them to anyone else.
While lauded by some as a step forward in gun control legislation and prevention of gun violence, other denounce it as “not enough” saying the buy-back program ought to be mandatory as promised during the federal election campaign. There is fear that if owners are permitted to retain banned weapons, even if licensed and registered, they can still be used. “It only takes one!” said a survivor of the Montreal Ecole Polytechnique shooting. Further, several mayors and premiers are advocating for a national ban on handguns rather than leaving it to municipalities, claiming it would be difficult, if not impossible, to police with different laws in different jurisdictions across Canada.
The Bill still needs to go through three readings in Parliament before it becomes law.
Sources
Tunney, C. (2021). Liberals introduce buy-back program for banned firearms but price tag unclear. CBC News, Feb16. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/buy-back-gun-bill-1.5915166
Public Safety Canada (2021 Feb 17). Bill C-21: An Act to amend certain Acts and to make certain consequential amendments (firearms). https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/frrms/c21-en.aspx
References:
Austin, K. & Lane, M. (2018). Position Statement: The prevention of firearm injuries in Canadian youth. Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, Ottawa, Ontario. Paediatrics & Child Health, 23(1): 35-42. https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/the-prevention-of-firearm-injuries-in-canadian-youth
Benjamin, G. (2015). Gun violence is an epidemic. It is time for a public health response [Opinion]. The Guardian, December 4. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/04/gun-violence-epidemic-shooting-deaths-public-health-policy
CBC Docs POV. (2018). Year of the Gun. https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/gun-violence-by-the-numbers
Jett, S. (2016). Gun violence: A public health crisis in America’s streets. NACCHO Voice, Jan 13. https://www.naccho.org/blog/articles/gun-violence-a-public-health-crisis-in-americas-streets
NACCHO. (2013). Policy Statement: Prevention of Firearm-Related Injury and Death. http://www.naccho.org/uploads/downloadable-resources/99-03-firearm-control.pdf
Ngabo, G. & Plana, A. (2021). ‘Everyone that I know, that I grew up with, has PTSD’: What an interactive map of police tweets says about routine gun violence in Toronto. Toronto Star, Jan. 30. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2021/01/30/how-police-tweets-reveal-an-untold-story-of-routine-gun-violence-in-torontos-hardest-hit-communities.html
Prevention Institute. (2017). Summary of recommendations to prevent gun violence. Oakland, CA: Author. https://www.preventioninstitute.org/sites/default/files/publications/Summary%20of%20Recommendations%20to%20Prevent%20Gun%20Violence.pdf