I already have a panel for luminosity masks, why should I buy this?
Because this is not a panel for creating luminosity masks – it does that too but can do far more. The luminosity masks feature is only one small bonus feature part of this full post-processing workflow panel. It is a full workflow panel designed to process B&W images optimally and easily, like for example Silver Efex Pro or Topaz B&W.
I believe in artistic and original individual expression, a filter makes it less personal, less unique, and less artistic.
I believe in that too, I reject filters. This panel is not a one-click filter that gives instant results. Let alone magical results. It is an automated workflow panel with exactly the right and best tools to use in that workflow. And you have to work hard for a good result. This panel helps you with getting that result by offering a proven methodical way, the built-in workflow, and the right and best tools, the often complex presets I created, for the job. Without a personal artistic vision and without wanting to invest time to really get to know B&W photography and how to create beautiful and personal B&W images, this panel is not for you. It’s for the serious and dedicated B&W artist.
I’m very proficient with PS and B&W photography, I can do it all myself. What’s the use of this panel for me?
Well, I am too, and I can do it all manually too, obviously, because this panel is the automated version of my manual workflow in B&W that I developed 12 years ago for Photoshop. And this specific workflow of creating accurate hard selections for specific shapes and planes, creating selective contrast and creating dimensional depth per plane/shape with gradients in especially manmade objects, increasing or decreasing local (micro) contrast with intersected masks with subtle transitions by restoring edges, has been adopted often with personal variations on it, by thousands of photographers worldwide. And yet, I use the panel myself extensively. Why? Because I can do it faster and much more accurately with much more subtlety and consistency than when I do it manually. Furthermore, creating depth in very small objects like thin cables is nearly impossible to do without the panel (Special FX feature) or costs a lot of painstaking effort that can not match the subtlety of the method with the Special FX feature.
I like B&W photography but I am a beginner and don’t know much about Photoshop but I want to learn B&W photography. Is this panel not too complicated for me?
No, this panel also offers something for everyone. There’s a way of working with the panel that’s less intimidating and time-consuming. It will result in less sophisticated images but still very good artistic results, considering the time, effort, and experience you give it. The perceived lesser amount of sophistication is all due to not investing time in creating hard selections – often the activity that scares away even very experienced photographers. The panel offers tools that can bypass the need of creating hard selections. E.g.: Advanced Adjustments darken/lighten locally by just indicating an area with a quick, free-form lasso tool selection, then darken/lighten and the adjusted area then blends in smoothly with the rest of the image. Contrast/detail enhancements are done in a similar way, all you have to do additionally is to choose the right tonal zone the target area is in by simply using the eye-dropper tool, select the zone from the drop-down list, then darken/lighten it and the adjustment will blend smoothly with the rest. You can do all those adjustments even by using the rectangular marquee tool: roughly select the area with the rectangular marquee tool, darken/lighten it and then use the Restore feature to blend it in smoothly with the rest of the image. Everything can basically be done with limited Photoshop knowledge using Advanced or Micro-Zone Adjustments without hard selections. But if you’re experienced and have no issues with creating hard selections, then the results will be even better and the panel will be used to its fullest potential.
I only work with native B&W images that have no color in them. Can I still work with this panel?
Yes, absolutely. The panel is designed to operate independently from color information as it only takes into consideration the actual RAW luminance value of a pixel, not the color information of a pixel. This is the purest way, and in my opinion, the right way, to process images to B&W. The majority of B&W photographers, even the most experienced and internationally recognized artists, use color information as a way to convert and process their images to B&W. That’s their choice. I simply choose to work like the photographers did in the analog darkroom who only had B&W negatives, with only luminance information and no color information to create B&W photographs. I do that because I believe it’s more accurate and offers more artistic, controlled, and deliberate results. See my articles on this topic for more background information here and here. Obviously, you can use color images too with this panel to create B&W images. The panel, and the recommended workflow through the panel, simply ignore the color information and only looks at the luminance values. Except for the new color grading presets.
Does this mean that I can’t process color images with this panel?
No, that’s not correct. You can process color images very accurately, effectively, and beautifully just by using the luminance value information to come to your colorful end result. Later on, you can alter the saturation/hue yourself with either the built-in color-grading or split-toning presets, or do it yourself manually with Photoshop’s color features. Besides, I believe that working in color can be done better by first adjusting the luminance values of a color pixel (to more accurately create depth perception) and only after that, adjusting the color information itself (the hue/saturation) as you will then get a more accurate result in color that takes into account every aspect of an image: tonal value, contrast, depth, and color.
Why should I use this panel that I’ve never heard of and not use B&W software that is around much longer, is much better known, and has been proven?
You don’t have to use this panel if you don’t believe in it and are used to the software you’ve been using for years. I can tell you this though: all the software you’re using is usually created by highly skilled software engineers with a passion for image-making. And they create sophisticated software and they deliver. And I’m sure, software technically speaking, their software is much more sophisticated than mine. I on the other hand am a highly-skilled B&W photographer and image-maker, with a passion for automation and for making complicated things easier and faster. That’s an important difference. Furthermore, I stood at the basis of developing and then popularizing a visual style in especially B&W architecture, that is being emulated by thousands of photographers worldwide for more than a decade already. A visual style that has become synonymous with the phrase B&W Fine art architecture these days, and continues to be emulated for years to come. And I put all this knowledge and creativity into my software. I don’t think any of the software engineers of the software you’re using can say the same. And, let me also mention that I’ve won five awards for 5 years in a row at major and prestigious international photography competitions at a professional level with my B&W photographs. In conclusion: first and foremost I’m an artist/photographer who knows what other artists need from a practical and artistic point of view. I don’t see it as a product like the big software firms. To me, it is a tool that I’ve designed to also use it myself and improve my own art in the first place. And that is the decisive difference with other software.
Does the panel also work in older versions of PS?
`Edit February 2022: In February 2022 we released the UXP version of the Artisan Pro panel that is now compatible with all computers: old (Intel-based) Macs, new (M1/M2 Silicon) Macs, and all other PCs. The panel is now only available as an official Adobe plugin via the Adobe Marketplace store.
Edit 14 November 2021: With the recently released version of Artisan Pro X 2022 (v2.1.0) this will work only with versions of PS CC 2020 and later. All older versions of the panel will still work with older versions of PS CC as listed below.
The latest version of B&W Artisan Pro X 2021 (v2.0.0) will work only in PS CC 2019 and higher. But to make full use of the latest features, PS CC2021 is recommended. Older versions of B&W Artisan Pro X will also work on older PS CC versions from 2015.5 and higher. B&W Artisan Pro X 2021 can also work on those older PS CC versions but this hasn’t been tested. It will definitely not work on the older PS CS versions, only CC and it will also not work in Photoshop Elements.
Is the way you work with the panel, not a destructive workflow?
No, there’s a difference between a traditional workflow, the workflow using adjustment layers that Adobe endorses and everyone seems to use, often referred to as a ‘non-destructive workflow’', and a non-traditional workflow such as the workflow supported in the panel and used by me. A non-traditional workflow is not equal to a destructive workflow. I’ve explained this extensively in this article and demonstrated in the 3 live webinars on Artisan Pro X (totaling 9 hours) that you can find in this Youtube playlist. Reading the article and watching the webinars you will see there’s a very intentional reason to deviate from the traditional workflow with adjustment layers. The many subtle incremental changes that are typical for my workflow, using dozens of channels, are not workable using the traditional workflow.
Does Artisan Pro also work on a Mac?
Yes, absolutely. It will work on both Mac OS and Windows systems. We’ve tested it extensively on all recent Mac OS and Windows systems, using various PS CC versions from 2015.5 and higher and we keep a close eye on any new Windows, Mac, or PS updates to ensure it will work on every possible combination. It also works on the latest Apple M1 architecture but with the caveat that there are still ongoing compatibility issues between M1 machines and Adobe software. As long as those issues are still there, this might also affect the Artisan Pro panel as this panel uses Adobe software as the host.
I have purchased the panel but I can't find it in Photoshop! (and I haven't received the download link!)
Probably the most asked question. First of all, since the older CEP panels have become Legacy and Adobe switched to the new UXP platform, our new UXP panels cannot be sold through our own stores but only through the Adobe stores. This means the following:
You can now only find the new UXP panels (now referred to by Adobe as plugins) under PS > Plugins
If you don't see the plugin there at all then maybe you haven't installed it yet upon purchasing in the Adobe store: open Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop App. Navigate to Stock & Marketplace > Plugins > Manage Plugins and make sure you see the plugin there and that it says 'installed'. If you see the plugin but it is not installed yet, click install. There won't be any downloads and download links anymore like in the old situation. Everything goes through the Adobe store now and follows the same procedure as installations/updates for other Adobe products like Photoshop or LR.
If you don't see the plugin in Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop App > Stock & Marketplace > Plugins > Manage Plugins and you have purchased the panel successfully, then very likely you have entered the wrong email address upon purchasing the plugin. You always have to use the same email address as for your Adobe account. If you didn't, you won't see the plugin in Adobe Creative Cloud. Adobe won't transfer the plugin to your correct account, perhaps if you keep asking but my experience is that they're not that customer friendly. You can work around this by requesting a full refund from Adobe (I can't do a refund as I am not controlling the Adobe store or have any access to it) and then buying it again with the correct email address. If for whatever reason this doesn't work: send me an email with the Adobe invoice and I'll see what I can do. The best advice is to just use the correct Adobe account details when purchasing the panel. Remember: the plugin follows your Adobe account and Photoshop.
I have made a selection and wanted to apply an adjustment to the area within that selection, but the adjustment goes outside of the edge of the selection. I am sure I'm using the correct preset and have a good selection.
This is no bug, but a user error. Usually, the following happened prior to the reported error:
There’s a max of 53 channels per file (hard-wired in PS), anything more will cause Photoshop to respond unpredictably, at best, or shut down at worst. This will affect the panel too, as the panel heavily uses temporary channels and when it reaches 53 channels, it cannot store information correctly anymore through the temporary channels. If you have 53 or more selections and keep in mind that when you create a layer mask and are working in the layer mask, this will also add a new temporary channel mask, then the area you selected correctly is now using a random different selection that has been stored. Hence the strange result in another area.
When a user forgets to hit apply or cancel whenever the preset requires it, (only some presets have this in the panel like the color/split toning presets and the Global Adjustment > contrast presets), then it will not remove a temporary channel it creates and this will lead to unpredictable results in selections. Though the latter may be a user error, the preset is also not entirely “fool-proof”. Just watch out for temporary channels that have “RE-USE” in the channel name for example. That is one of many temporary channels. In the future, we may change this to make it more foolproof.
2. Nothing works in the plugin, no matter what I do, what am I doing wrong, or does the panel not work correctly?
This is no bug, but a user error.
Most likely you are doing the following:
You are working on an adjustment layer: the plugin will only work on a normal layer as is mentioned in the videos, webinars, and in manuals.
You are working on a smart object: the plugin will only work on a normal layer. Convert the smart object layer to a normal layer and it will work.
I have recently purchased the new Artisan Pro X for UXP panel from the Adobe store and when I watch some of your videos on Youtube they look different from my panel. What's the reason for this?
Except for the latest videos and recorded webinars, released after the launch of the Artisan Pro X 2022 panel (later than February 2022), all videos are from 2021 or older. Hence, the versions of the panel used in those older videos are the versions that were available at the time of recording. The panel has evolved and improved over the years and with the latest release also the entire layout changed, due to Adobe imposing limitations on the size of buttons and fonts used in the panel. There's a document on the Artisan knowledge hub page that maps the old layout to the new layout and is not complicated but it requires some adaptation. In any case, with every subsequent release, only new features are added and none has disappeared. So the older videos are still very relevant when it comes to the use of the panel and certainly the thought process behind it.
I have the latest version of the panel and due to the changed layout, I find it hard to follow the older videos and webinars. Can't you record new videos with the latest layout?
The studio-recorded videos and the recorded webinars are recorded over the past 4 years, totaling more than 18 hours. For every hour I record, it takes me roughly a full day to edit it, say 8 hours. And then I'm only talking about the studio-recorded versions. The live webinars are sessions of often 4 to 5 hours, and the recordings are edited down to 3 hours on average. The preparations for the studio-recorded versions and webinars are often hours. So doing all this again, roughly 160 hours of recording, editing, preparation, announcements, etc. only to match the current layout is in my view a waste of time that I prefer to spend on new videos, new webinars with new content, new ideas, innovations, and new examples. Because after all, as I stated in [1] (...) There's a document on the Artisan knowledge hub page that maps the old layout to the new layout and is not complicated but it requires some adaptation. In any case, with every subsequent release, only new features are added and none has disappeared. So the older videos are still very relevant when it comes to the use of the panel and certainly the thought process behind it. (...) And don't forget that only the latest panel version has a changed layout, all other updates from the past don't have changed layouts, but only added features.