Work flow to follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (references below).
Work flow to follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (St. Pierre, 2022, p. 5-6).
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Peters, M. D. J., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 (Division of Health Sciences)
St.Pierre, M., Grawe, P., Bergstrom, J., & Neuhaus, C. (2022). 20 years after To Err Is Human: A bibliometric analysis of ‘the IOM report’s’ impact on research on patient safety. Safety Science, 147, 105593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105593
1
2
3
4
St.Pierre, M., Grawe, P., Bergstrom, J., & Neuhaus, C. (2022). 20 years after To Err Is Human: A bibliometric analysis of ‘the IOM report’s’ impact on research on patient safety. Safety Science, 147, 105593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105593
Kasperiuniene, J., & Faiella, F. (2023, 2023//). Bibliometric Analysis of Virtual Reality in School and University Contexts. Computer Supported Qualitative Research, Cham.