Market Based Supply Side Policies

Market Based Policies

Understanding Market Based Supply Side Policies

Supply side policies are policies aimed at increasing the production capabilities of the economy and therefore lead to long term economic growth of the economy. Market Based Supply Side policies aim to encourage market forces (Price Mechanism, Competition and forces of demand and supply) or the `free market principles´ to encourage growth and an increase in the potential output of the economy. These policies aim to increase the potential output of the economy and therefore shift the LRAS to the right or the PPC outwards.

In the context of Economic Development, these policies aim to encourage free market competition

Policies to encourage competition

Policies to encourage competition include:

Privatisation
Deregulation
Anti Monopoly Regulation.
Access to Microcredit/Microfinancing
Capital Liberalisation
Trade Liberalisation

Privatisation

Privatization is a market-based supply-side policy that involves transferring ownership and control of public assets and services from the government to the private sector. The goal of privatization is to increase the efficiency, competitiveness, and profitability of public services by introducing private sector competition and market incentives.

Privatization typically involves the sale or lease of public assets and services to private companies, which then assume responsibility for managing and operating those assets or services. Examples of privatization policies may include the sale of state-owned enterprises, such as utilities or transportation systems, to private investors, or the contracting out of government services, such as healthcare or education, to private companies.

Pros

Increased Efficiency and Productivity: Privatisation often boosts efficiency and productivity in former state-owned enterprises. Driven by profit motives, private companies aim to operate efficiently, cut costs, and innovate. Competition in previously monopolistic sectors can enhance productivity, supporting economic growth.

Access to Capital and Investment: Privatisation attracts private capital and investment, enabling access to financial markets for expansion and modernization. This capital infusion can stimulate economic activity, create jobs, and promote sectoral growth.

Enhanced Competition and Market Dynamics: By introducing private players into former monopolistic sectors, privatisation fosters competition. This encourages companies to offer better products and services at competitive prices, driving innovation, technological advancements, and economic development.

Fiscal Benefits and Reduced Government Burden: The sale of state-owned assets provides the government with revenue to reduce debt, invest in infrastructure, or fund social programs. Additionally, privatisation shifts financial and operational responsibilities to the private sector, freeing government resources for other priorities.

Cons

Risk of Monopolies and Market Concentration: Privatisation can sometimes lead to monopolies or oligopolies, particularly in markets with limited competition or weak regulation. This market power concentration often results in higher prices, reduced consumer choice, and stifled innovation. It may also create barriers for new competitors, restricting market access and limiting competition.

Job Losses and Labour Market Challenges: Privatisation can lead to job losses as privatised companies restructure to improve efficiency. This can increase unemployment, widen income inequality, and disrupt local economies. The private sector may also focus less on job creation in certain areas, leading to uneven economic benefits.

Reduction in Government Revenue and Loss of Public Assets: When governments sell state-owned assets, they may lose long-term revenue sources, affecting their ability to fund public services. If privatisation lacks transparency or proper valuation, public assets may be undervalued, leading to a potential loss of public wealth.

Unequal Access to Essential Services: Privatisation can challenge efforts to ensure universal access to essential services, like healthcare and utilities. Private companies may prioritise profitable regions, leaving marginalised areas underserved. This can worsen social inequality and restrict access to essential services for vulnerable groups.

Loss of Strategic Control and Public Interest Considerations: Privatisation can mean losing control over critical sectors, with private companies potentially focusing on profits over public interests. This can hinder social and environmental goals, requiring policies to balance private efficiency with national priorities.

Deregulation

Deregulation is a market-based supply-side policy that involves reducing or eliminating government regulations on businesses and industries. The goal of deregulation is to promote economic growth and efficiency by reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, making it easier and cheaper for them to operate.

Deregulation is typically associated with free-market economics and the belief that the government should have a minimal role in the economy. By reducing regulatory barriers, businesses are able to operate more freely and can be more responsive to market demands, which can lead to increased innovation, investment, and economic growth.

Pros

Increased Competition: Deregulation boosts competition by lowering entry barriers and reducing market restrictions. This encourages companies to innovate, improve efficiency, and offer better products at lower prices, enhancing consumer choice and benefiting the economy.

Innovation and Entrepreneurship: By easing bureaucratic burdens, deregulation fosters innovation and entrepreneurship. Fewer regulatory hurdles make it easier for new businesses to enter the market, promoting creativity and the development of new products and technologies.

Economic Efficiency and Productivity Gains: Deregulation improves economic efficiency by cutting unnecessary regulations, allowing businesses to operate smoothly and allocate resources more effectively, leading to productivity gains and economic growth.

Investment and Job Creation: A deregulated environment attracts both domestic and foreign investment, as simplified regulations reduce risks and costs. This investment supports business expansion, job creation, and economic activity, helping reduce unemployment.

Lower Costs for Businesses: Streamlined regulations reduce compliance costs, allowing businesses to focus on productive activities. This lowers operational costs, boosts profitability, and enhances competitiveness in global markets.

Cons

Market Failures and Lack of Regulation: Deregulation can lead to market failures without regulations to address externalities, ensure competition, protect consumers, and prevent abuse. Without oversight, businesses may engage in anti-competitive practices, exploit consumers, or ignore social and environmental responsibilities.

Reduced Consumer Protection: Deregulation can weaken consumer protections and lower safeguards against unfair practices. Reduced regulation may result in unsafe products, poor quality control, or deceptive marketing, increasing risks of fraud and reducing consumer trust.

Concentration of Market Power: Deregulation can lead to monopolies or oligopolies, with dominant players potentially stifling competition through anti-competitive behavior. This market concentration reduces consumer choice, raises prices, and stifles innovation.

Social and increased Negative Externalities of Production: Deregulation can reduce attention to social and environmental factors, weakening labour standards and workplace safety. It may also harm the environment through increased pollution and resource depletion, impacting long-term sustainable development, societal well-being and increasing negative externalities of production

Anti Monopoly Regulation

Anti-monopoly regulation aims to promote competition by preventing companies from gaining excessive market power. As a supply-side policy, it seeks to enhance market efficiency, encourage innovation, and protect consumer interests by breaking up monopolies or preventing anti-competitive mergers and practices. By fostering a more competitive market environment, anti-monopoly policies can lead to better productivity and supply, as firms are incentivized to improve their offerings to remain competitive.

Pros

Increased Competition: Breaking up monopolies or preventing excessive market concentration encourages more firms to enter and compete, leading to a more dynamic and responsive market.
Lower Prices for Consumers: With more competitors, prices are often driven down, benefiting consumers with more affordable products and services.
Improved Quality and Innovation: Competitive pressure forces companies to innovate and improve product quality to attract and retain customers, advancing technological and service improvements.
Resource Allocation Efficiency: Competitive markets encourage firms to use resources more effectively, potentially increasing overall productivity and economic growth.

Cons

Potential for Reduced Economies of Scale: Large companies often benefit from economies of scale, which allow them to lower production costs. Breaking up these firms might lead to higher costs per unit.
Regulatory Costs: Monitoring and enforcing anti-monopoly regulations requires significant resources, which can be costly for governments and may create bureaucracy.
Reduced Incentive for Large Investments: Firms may be less inclined to make substantial investments in research, development, or infrastructure if they fear regulatory actions might limit growth or market dominance.
Implementation Challenges: Determining what constitutes "monopoly power" or "anti-competitive behavior" can be complex, leading to potential misjudgments and inconsistent application of rules.

Improved access to Micro Financing and Mobile Banking

Micro financing is when people without regular access to regular financing and banking are able to get smaller loans than what regular financial institutions would give which allows people to get small loans at small risk because the loan won’t gain much interest from its small starting value. This allows people to invest in their business, etc, when previously they wouldn’t be able to and allows them to generate revenue, create business, etc. The can improve development because it allows people of lower income to have opportunities that they wouldn’t normally have at a small risk so they won’t be affected much if they are behind payments and allows them to create jobs, opportunities, generate revenue, etc, which increases GNI, lowers inequality, etc.

Mobile banking are applications which give access to use your resources and bank accounts remotely without the need of a bank and facilitates lower income people to have access to credit and debit options they might not have been able to access before. This might increase development because it gives lower income people more options and freedoms with their finances which facilitates consumption and investment as well as giving them credit options which they can use to invest. It may reduce inequality and can create business

Capital Liberalisation and Economic Development

Capital liberalisation refers to the easing or removal of restrictions on the movement of financial capital across borders. This can include foreign direct investment (FDI), portfolio investment, and other cross-border financial flows. Proponents of capital liberalisation argue that it plays a crucial role in fostering economic development by providing access to foreign capital, improving financial efficiency, and encouraging economic integration. (You can review the benefits of a free floating exchange rate here)

Pros of Capital Liberalisation:

Attracts foreign investment, bridging investment gaps and accelerating economic growth.
Brings expertise, advanced technology, and better management practices, enhancing productivity and competitiveness.
Increases competition among banks and financial institutions, leading to a more developed financial sector.
Facilitates better access to credit for businesses and individuals, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation.
Enables businesses to raise funds from international sources, reducing reliance on domestic savings and government financing.

Cons of Capital Liberalisation:

Unrestricted capital flows can lead to excessive short-term speculative investments, increasing financial volatility.
Sudden capital flight due to economic or political instability can cause currency depreciation, banking crises, and economic downturns.
Financial gains from liberalisation are often concentrated among wealthier individuals and corporations, exacerbating income inequality.

Trade Liberalisation and Economic Development

Trade liberalisation refers to the removal or reduction of trade barriers, such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, to allow free movement of goods and services across borders. It is a key strategy adopted by many countries to accelerate economic development by integrating into the global economy. (You can review the benefits of free trade here)

Pros of Trade Liberalisation:

Allows countries to specialise in goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
Fosters innovation and technological advancement as firms compete in international markets.
Leads to lower prices for consumers by increasing competition and reducing monopolistic inefficiencies.
Provides consumers with a greater variety of goods and services, often of higher quality and lower cost.
Attracts foreign direct investment (FDI), bringing in capital, expertise, and access to global supply chains, further driving economic growth.

Cons of Trade Liberalisation:

Domestic industries that cannot compete with foreign firms may struggle, leading to job losses and deindustrialisation.
Developing economies with weak institutional frameworks may become overly dependent on volatile global markets.
Vulnerability to external shocks, such as fluctuations in commodity prices or financial crises.
Can exacerbate income inequality, as benefits may be concentrated among larger, export-oriented firms, while smaller, less competitive businesses and workers in declining industries may suffer.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse