Click here to refresh yourself with general Interventionist Supply Side Policies.
Interventionist Supply Side Policies that be used to encourage economic development include:
Investments in Education and Healthcare programs
Investment in Infrastructure
Transfer Payments and Progressive Tax Systems
Research and Development
Industrial Policies
Protectionism
Fixed Exchange Rate Systems
Supply side policies are policies aimed at increasing the production capabilities of the economy and therefore lead to long term economic growth of the economy. In the above diagrams, we see this as a shift rightwards in the LRAS or AS and an increase in the potential output from Yfe1 to Yfe2. Similarly, we can show this through an shift outwards in the potential output from PPC1 to PPC2.
Interventionist Supply Side policies are policies whereby the government intervenes in the macroeconomy in order to increase the potential output. This may be through direct investments or policies to grow a particular industry.
Economists in favour of Interventionist supply side policies argue that these policies can help achieve the macroeconomic objectives as well as promoting more equity within a society.
Investment in education and healthcare is important for economic development because it can have significant positive impacts on productivity, innovation, and overall quality of life. As we have learnt previously, the free market tends to underproduce these goods as they provide positive externalities of consumption and spillover benefits to society.
Education is an essential factor for economic development as it helps to develop human capital, which is critical for building a skilled labour force that can contribute to economic growth. Education helps individuals to acquire knowledge, skills, and abilities that are necessary for participating in the labour market, and it also fosters innovation and entrepreneurship. Additionally, education is often linked to higher levels of productivity, as individuals with higher levels of education tend to have higher earning potential and are more likely to be employed in high-skilled jobs.
Healthcare is also important for economic development as it contributes to overall wellbeing and productivity. Access to healthcare services can improve the health outcomes of individuals, which can result in a more productive workforce and lower healthcare costs over time. Additionally, investments in healthcare research and development can lead to the creation of new medical technologies and treatments that can improve health outcomes and contribute to economic growth.
Therefore, as the free market underprovides these goods, governments may invest in both education and healthcare (and providing access to these goods) in order to promote economic growth and development.
Human Capital Development: Investing in education and healthcare builds human capital essential for economic growth. Education provides skills and knowledge for productivity and innovation, while access to quality healthcare enhances workforce well-being, reducing absenteeism and boosting productivity.
Increased Productivity and Competitiveness: Education and healthcare investments improve productivity by equipping individuals with skills and health. Skilled and healthy workers are more efficient and adaptable, increasing competitiveness at both individual and national levels and supporting economic growth.
Innovation and Technological Advancement: Education drives innovation by fostering critical thinking and creativity, leading to new ideas and technologies. Healthcare investments support research and advancements in medical fields, enhancing competitiveness and economic diversification.
Poverty Reduction and Social Mobility: Education and healthcare help reduce poverty and promote social mobility. Education provides access to higher-paying jobs, while healthcare removes health barriers that can trap families in poverty. Together, these investments reduce income inequality and support inclusive growth.
High Costs and Budget Constraints: Investing in healthcare and education can be expensive, especially for quality services and broad coverage. Governments may face budget limitations, making it hard to allocate enough resources. Infrastructure, skilled personnel, and operational costs can strain finances, requiring careful management.
Time Lag and Delayed Returns: The economic benefits of investments in healthcare and education are not immediate. It takes time for education investments to yield a skilled workforce and for healthcare investments to improve health outcomes, requiring long-term commitment from policymakers.
Quality and Efficiency Concerns: Ensuring high-quality and efficient healthcare and education is critical. Poor governance, weak regulation, and lack of monitoring can lead to inefficiencies and subpar services. Continuous evaluation and improvement are necessary to maximize investment effectiveness.
Socio-Cultural Barriers and Resistance to Change: Education and healthcare investments may face resistance due to socio-cultural factors, such as traditional beliefs or gender norms. These barriers can hinder access to education for certain groups or limit the adoption of modern healthcare practices. Addressing these requires strategies that account for cultural contexts.
Investment in infrastructure, including energy, transportation, telecommunications, clean water, and sanitation, is important for economic development for several reasons. As we looked at back in economic growth, investment in physical capital to improve both the quantity and quality is needed to achieve long term economic growth. Below is some additional reasons why investment in infrastructure is important for economic development.
Firstly, good infrastructure is a key factor in attracting foreign and domestic investments and due to the free rider problem, these tend to not be provided by the free market. Companies require reliable and efficient infrastructure to produce and distribute goods and services. Without proper infrastructure, transportation costs, communication difficulties, and lack of access to clean water can all increase the costs of production and reduce the competitiveness of a country. Infrastructure development can also improve connectivity between different regions of a country or between countries, which can facilitate trade and investment. Improved connectivity can lead to the creation of new markets, and the flow of goods and services can help to create jobs and generate economic growth.
Good infrastructure may also enhance productivity by reducing the time and costs required to transport goods and services, which can increase efficiency and competitiveness. For example, reliable and affordable energy can improve the production processes of manufacturing firms, while an efficient transportation system can help to reduce delivery times and logistics costs.
Finally, infrastructure investments can also have significant impacts on the quality of life of individuals. Access to clean water and sanitation can improve public health, while reliable and affordable energy can provide access to modern amenities such as lighting, heating, and cooling.
Improved productivity and efficiency: Infrastructure investments enhance productivity and efficiency by providing a solid foundation for economic activities. Access to reliable water and sanitation systems improves public health, reduces waterborne diseases, and enhances workforce productivity. Well-maintained roads and transportation networks facilitate the movement of goods, services, and people, reducing transportation costs and increasing the efficiency of supply chains. Improved productivity translates into increased economic output, business competitiveness, and overall economic growth.
Attraction of investment and business development: Adequate infrastructure attracts investment and supports business development. Reliable water and sanitation infrastructure, for example, is essential for industries such as manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism, which require a steady water supply and proper waste management. Accessible and well-connected road networks make it easier for businesses to transport goods, access markets, and connect with suppliers and customers. Infrastructure investments signal a supportive business environment, fostering investor confidence and attracting both domestic and foreign investment.
Regional integration and trade facilitation: Infrastructure development plays a vital role in promoting regional integration and facilitating international trade. Efficient road networks, ports, and transportation systems improve connectivity between regions and countries, reducing trade barriers and enabling the movement of goods and services. This promotes economic integration, enhances market access for businesses, and encourages trade flows, leading to increased cross-border investments and economic cooperation.
Poverty reduction and improved quality of life: Infrastructure investments in water and sanitation have a direct positive impact on poverty reduction and the well-being of communities. Access to clean water and sanitation facilities improves public health, reduces water-related diseases, and enhances the quality of life. Properly constructed and maintained roads connect rural areas to urban centers, providing better access to essential services, education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Improved infrastructure reduces socio-economic disparities, increases social mobility, and uplifts disadvantaged communities.
Job creation and income generation: Infrastructure projects create job opportunities and generate income, providing a boost to local economies. Large-scale infrastructure projects require a skilled workforce during the construction phase, leading to employment opportunities in various sectors. Additionally, improved infrastructure stimulates economic activity in surrounding areas, creating spin-off effects and generating indirect jobs. The income generated from infrastructure investments circulates within the local economy, supporting local businesses and contributing to economic development.
High upfront costs and financial sustainability: Infrastructure projects often require significant upfront investments, which can strain government budgets and resources. The construction, maintenance, and operation of infrastructure systems entail substantial financial commitments over the long term. Ensuring financial sustainability and managing the costs associated with infrastructure investments can be challenging, particularly for developing countries with limited fiscal capacity and competing priorities.
Time-consuming and complex implementation: Infrastructure projects can be complex, time-consuming, and subject to delays and cost overruns. Planning, design, procurement, and construction processes involve multiple stakeholders, regulatory requirements, and coordination challenges. Inefficient project management, inadequate capacity, and corruption can further complicate implementation, leading to delays, substandard quality, and inefficiencies.
Environmental and social impacts: Infrastructure development can have adverse environmental and social impacts. Construction activities may lead to habitat destruction, deforestation, soil erosion, and increased pollution. Large-scale projects can also result in the displacement of communities, loss of livelihoods, and disruption of traditional lifestyles. Ensuring adequate environmental and social safeguards, conducting thorough impact assessments, and engaging with affected communities are essential to mitigate these negative consequences.
Maintenance and sustainability challenges: Infrastructure investments require ongoing maintenance and operation to remain effective and sustainable. Inadequate maintenance can lead to infrastructure deterioration, reduced service quality, and higher long-term costs. Sustaining infrastructure systems requires robust institutional frameworks, skilled human resources, and sufficient financial resources for regular maintenance and upgrades. Neglecting maintenance can result in a gradual decline in infrastructure performance and limit its positive impact on economic development.
Risk of corruption and mismanagement: Infrastructure projects are susceptible to corruption and mismanagement, particularly in countries with weak governance and oversight mechanisms. Large-scale investments can provide opportunities for rent-seeking, bribery, and embezzlement of public funds. Corruption undermines the efficiency and effectiveness of infrastructure projects, leading to suboptimal outcomes, cost escalations, and compromised quality. Establishing transparent procurement processes, robust monitoring mechanisms, and effective anti-corruption measures is crucial to mitigate these risks.
Transfer payments are payments granted by the government to households or firms, without receiving any goods or service in exchange. This is generally employed to redistribute income in society, helping raise household incomes. A progressive tax system is a system in which households with higher incomes pay a higher average tax rate. This is relative to their incomes, and seeks to bring equity to society as people are being taxed proportional to their income. This can raise a household's overall expendable income, working towards growth and development. Transfer payments funded through a progressive tax system can help improve incomes and therefore break individuals and households out of the poverty trap.
Spillover Effects and Multiplier Impact: Transfer payments stimulate demand for goods and services, leading to increased production and job creation. The income recipients spend circulates in the economy, generating additional economic activity.
Poverty Reduction and Increased Consumer Spending: Transfer payments, like social welfare programs, alleviate poverty and boost the purchasing power of disadvantaged individuals. This drives consumer spending, benefiting sectors catering to low-income populations.
Human Capital Development and Productivity: Targeted transfer payments for education, healthcare, or skills development enhance human capital, improving workforce productivity and adaptability, contributing to economic growth.
Social Stability and Investment in Human Potential: Transfer payments reduce social inequalities, promote social cohesion, and encourage individuals to invest in education, skills, and entrepreneurship, which drives economic progress.
Fiscal Burden and Sustainability: Transfer payments can strain public finances, especially if poorly managed. The cost of financing these programs may lead to unsustainable debt, limiting government investments in other priorities.
Dependency and Disincentives to Work: Poorly designed transfer programs can reduce work incentives, leading to dependency. Without encouragement to seek employment or improve skills, labor force participation may decrease, hindering economic growth.
Inefficiency and Leakages: Administrative inefficiencies, corruption, or poor monitoring can result in transfer payments not reaching intended recipients, reducing their effectiveness and impact.
Disincentive for Earning and Entrepreneurship: High taxes on additional earnings can discourage individuals from working harder, investing, or starting businesses, slowing economic productivity and growth. This can hinder innovation and job creation.
Governments can fund or subsidise research and development by firms or other institutions such as universities. This funding can improve the overall levels of R&D, thus improving efficiencies and the overall levels of productivity by researching new technologies etc. Governments may wish to encourage R&D into a particular area, such as healthcare, that may have a knock on effect to the levels of human capital in the long run, therefore increasing the LRAS.
Industrial policies are when the government targets growth in a particular industry through a number of policies such as subsidies, tax breaks or tax allowances, in order to grow that particular industry. This may be to encourage growth in an infant industry or to encourage small medium enterprise to grow. This in turn may increase employment in the economy as well as economic output from the growing industry, therefore increasing the LRAS. These policies may also be used to protect domestic industries from larger more efficient foreign firms and therefore protect employment and economic output. (This will be looked at more here)
A fixed exchange rate system is a monetary system in which a country’s currency value is tied to another currency, a basket of currencies, or a commodity such as gold. Governments and central banks maintain this exchange rate by intervening in the foreign exchange market through buying or selling their currency to stabilize its value. Fixed exchange rate systems can be used as a strategy to achieve economic development by ensuring stability and fostering investor confidence. (You can review fixed exchange rate systems here)
Pros of Fixed Exchange Rate Systems:
Provides exchange rate stability, reducing uncertainty for businesses engaged in international trade and investment.
Helps to control inflation by preventing excessive currency depreciation.
Encourages foreign direct investment (FDI) by creating a predictable economic environment.
Facilitates international trade by reducing exchange rate risks and transaction costs
Enhances economic discipline by requiring governments to adopt sound fiscal and monetary policies.
Cons of Fixed Exchange Rate Systems:
Requires large foreign exchange reserves to defend the currency, which can be costly and unsustainable.
Reduces monetary policy flexibility, as central banks cannot adjust interest rates freely to respond to economic conditions.
May lead to balance of payments crises if the exchange rate is overvalued or undervalued.
Can result in speculative attacks if investors believe the fixed rate is unsustainable, forcing costly devaluations.
Potentially limits economic growth if the currency is pegged at an uncompetitive rate, making exports less attractive.
Protectionism refers to government policies that restrict international trade to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. These policies can include tariffs, import quotas, subsidies, and other trade barriers. Some governments use protectionist measures to promote economic development by fostering domestic industry growth and reducing dependency on external markets. (You can review Protectionism here)
Pros of Protectionism:
Shields infant industries from foreign competition, allowing them time to develop and become competitive.
Protects domestic jobs by limiting outsourcing and competition from cheaper foreign labor.
Reduces dependence on foreign economies, enhancing economic self-sufficiency and stability.
Can improve a country’s trade balance by reducing imports and encouraging local production.
Helps maintain national security by protecting critical industries from foreign control.
Cons of Protectionism:
Increases prices for consumers as imported goods become more expensive due to tariffs and quotas.
Reduces efficiency and innovation by shielding domestic industries from global competition.
Risks retaliation from other countries, leading to trade wars that can harm economic growth.
Limits consumer choice by restricting access to a variety of foreign goods and services.
Can lead to inefficient resource allocation, as industries may rely on government support rather than improving productivity.
Buffer stock schemes involve the government or a central agency buying and storing commodities during periods of surplus and selling them during shortages to stabilize prices. These schemes are often used in agricultural markets, where prices can be highly volatile due to factors like weather conditions and seasonal fluctuations. By maintaining a stable price level, buffer stock schemes can contribute to economic development in several ways.
Pros of Buffer Stock Schemes:
Helps stabilise farmers' incomes by preventing extreme price fluctuations, reducing poverty in rural areas.
Ensures food security by maintaining adequate stock levels during times of shortage.
Encourages investment in agriculture by providing price certainty, leading to increased productivity and efficiency.
Reduces inflationary pressures caused by sudden spikes in commodity prices.
Can help stabilise export earnings for economies reliant on primary commodity exports.
Cons of Buffer Stock Schemes:
Requires significant financial resources to maintain and manage the stockpiles.
Risk of government mismanagement, leading to inefficiencies and wastage.
May lead to overproduction if farmers are guaranteed minimum prices, causing surplus and storage issues.
Difficult to set an appropriate price level that balances producer and consumer interests.
Can distort market signals, reducing incentives for farmers to adapt to changes in supply and demand conditions.