Firms operate with a range of objectives, influenced by their market environment, ownership structure, and stakeholder interests. While profit maximisation is traditionally viewed as the primary aim, alternative objectives such as revenue maximisation, sales maximisation, and satisficing play significant roles in real-world business decision-making. Understanding these objectives, their underpinning logic, and the graphical analysis is essential for achieving the highest marks in A Level Economics.
Profit maximisation is the process by which a firm determines the price and output level that returns the greatest profit. This occurs where the difference between total revenue (TR) and total cost (TC) is at its maximum. In terms of marginal analysis, profit is maximised where marginal revenue (MR) equals marginal cost (MC):
Profit maximisation:MR=MC
Why do firms maximise profit?
Profit maximisation provides the greatest return to shareholders, funds investment and innovation, and enhances the firm’s long-term survival and market value. Many large corporations, such as Apple or pharmaceutical companies, prioritise profit maximisation to finance research and development or to satisfy shareholder expectations
Revenue maximisation occurs when a firm seeks to generate the highest possible total revenue, regardless of costs. The revenue-maximising output is found where marginal revenue (MR) equals zero:
Revenue maximisation:MR=0
Why might firms maximise revenue?
Managers may be incentivised to grow the business’s size or market share, sometimes at the expense of profit, especially if their remuneration is linked to sales performance. Revenue maximisation can also be a strategic move to deter new entrants or to achieve economies of scale
Sales maximisation refers to selling as many units as possible without incurring a loss. The firm produces at the output where average revenue (AR) equals average cost (AC):
Sales maximisation:AR=AC
Why might firms maximise sales?
Firms may pursue sales maximisation to increase market share, achieve economies of scale, or establish a dominant position in the market. Sometimes, managers are motivated by the size of the firm rather than its profitability, especially when their status or pay depends on sales volume.
Satisficing is when firms aim for a satisfactory level of profit or performance rather than the maximum. This often occurs when there is a separation of ownership and control (the principal-agent problem), and managers balance the interests of various stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and shareholders
Efficiency in economics refers to how well an economy or firm uses its resources to produce goods and services that satisfy human wants. An efficient allocation of resources ensures that output is maximised without wasting inputs and that the goods produced reflect what consumers value most. There are several types of efficiency, each focusing on a different aspect of economic performance: allocative efficiency, productive efficiency, dynamic efficiency, and X-inefficiency. These types of efficiency can vary significantly across different market structures. We will look into these concepts more as we look at each of the types of Market Structures.
Allocative efficiency occurs when the allocation of resources results in the production of the combination of goods and services most desired by society. In other words, the economy produces what people want in the right quantities. This happens when the price consumers are willing to pay for a good or service (which reflects its marginal benefit) is equal to the marginal cost of producing it. At this point, known as P = MC, resources are said to be perfectly allocated — no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
This concept is closely linked to the idea of Pareto efficiency. When allocative efficiency is achieved, the economy is operating on its production possibility frontier (PPF) in a way that reflects consumer preferences. Any deviation from this point — producing too much or too little of a good — would mean that society could be better off by reallocating resources. Markets that are perfectly competitive tend to achieve allocative efficiency in the long run, whereas markets with imperfect competition often do not.
Productive efficiency occurs when a firm or economy is producing the maximum possible output from its available resources, at the lowest possible cost. This means that production is taking place on the lowest point of the average cost curve, and no more output can be produced without increasing the use of inputs. In other words, it is not possible to make more of one good without producing less of another.
In the context of a production possibility frontier, productive efficiency means operating on the frontier, rather than inside it. Firms achieve productive efficiency when they adopt the most cost-effective production methods and technologies. In the long run, productive efficiency is important because it allows economies to produce more with the same resources, raising overall living standards. Perfectly competitive markets tend to encourage productive efficiency over time due to the pressure of competition and the need to keep costs low.
Dynamic efficiency refers to a firm or market’s ability to improve efficiency over time through innovation, investment, and technological progress. Unlike static efficiencies, which consider efficiency at a single point in time, dynamic efficiency is forward-looking. It reflects how well firms respond to changing consumer preferences, technological developments, and opportunities for cost reduction.
Firms that are dynamically efficient invest in research and development (R&D), adopt new production processes, and bring new or improved products to market. While this type of efficiency may involve short-term costs (e.g. investing in new capital), it can result in significant long-term gains in productivity and welfare. Dynamic efficiency is most commonly associated with monopolistic and oligopolistic markets, where firms have the supernormal profits necessary to fund innovation. However, the absence of competitive pressure in these markets may also reduce the incentive to innovate.
X-inefficiency arises when firms fail to minimise their costs despite having the resources to do so. This can occur due to a lack of competitive pressure, poor management, or organisational slack. In such cases, firms operate inside their average cost curves, meaning that output could be produced at a lower cost if resources were used more efficiently.
X-inefficiency is most commonly found in monopolies or other markets with limited competition, where firms face little threat of losing market share. Without the discipline of competition, there may be less motivation to cut waste, reduce costs, or improve performance. By contrast, firms in competitive markets are more likely to be X-efficient, as they must control costs to remain viable. Reducing X-inefficiency can lead to significant productivity gains and better use of existing resources.