As you will see throughout this section, the perfectly competitive model is based on some unrealistic assumptions. However, we should not dismiss this model as the ideas can help us understand why competition in markets can be beneficial and how these ideas link to how market forces can best allocate our scarce resources.
In this first video, we will look at the key assumptions that underpin the model of perfect competition. These are:
Large Number of Firms
Homogenous Goods
Perfect Knowledge
No Barriers to enter or Exit
These assumptions are very important to help us understand the behaviour of perfectly competitive firms and how they can be theoretically beneficial to society
The video will then look at how to draw the model for perfectly competitive firms making a loss, normal & abnormal profits.
The following video will discuss the behaviour of perfectly competitive firms and how they relate to the market. Due to no barriers to enter or exit the market, if perfectly competitive firms are making abnormal profits, firms will enter the market, lowering the price and therefore returning firms to making normal profits. The same is true for firms making a loss, as firms will exit the market and therefore revenues for those firms still in the market will rise, returning to normal profits.
This behaviour is important for us to understand why theoretically, a market that is perfectly competitive is both allocative and productive in the long run, as the P=MC.
In a perfectly competitive market, firms operate under specific conditions that influence their behaviour, particularly in the short run when profits may fall. One important concept to understand is the shut down price—the minimum market price at which a firm will choose to continue operating in the short run. If the market price falls below this level, the firm will temporarily cease production rather than continue to incur greater losses.
Perfect competition assumes that all firms are price takers, meaning they accept the market price as given and cannot influence it through their own output decisions. In the short run, some costs—known as fixed costs—must be paid regardless of whether the firm produces or not. These include costs such as rent, insurance, or depreciation on capital equipment. In contrast, variable costs—such as wages for hourly workers or the cost of raw materials—only arise when output is actually produced. A firm facing a loss in the short run must decide whether it is better to continue producing and covering some of its fixed costs or to shut down and avoid incurring any variable costs.
The key to this decision lies in comparing the market price (P) with the firm's average variable cost (AVC). If the market price is equal to or greater than AVC, the firm is able to cover its variable costs and contribute something—however small—toward its fixed costs. In this case, the firm will remain in operation in the short run, even if it is making an overall loss. However, if the market price falls below AVC, the firm cannot even cover its variable costs. Producing at this price would increase the firm’s losses beyond what it would lose by simply shutting down and paying only its fixed costs. Therefore, the shut down price is the price at which P = AVC. At any price below this, the rational choice for a firm is to shut down production in the short run.
This concept is best illustrated using a cost and revenue diagram for a perfectly competitive firm. The diagram features a horizontal demand curve at the market price, which also represents marginal revenue (MR) and average revenue (AR) for the firm. The firm’s marginal cost (MC) curve slopes upward, intersecting the average variable cost (AVC) and average total cost (ATC) curves at their minimum points. The shut down point occurs where the price line touches the minimum point of the AVC curve. At this point, the firm is indifferent between producing and shutting down because it is exactly covering its variable costs. If the price were to fall below this point, the firm would incur higher losses by producing than by ceasing production altogether.
As we have seen in the video above, Perfectly Competitive firms produce at the point where P=MC. This means that the price consumers are paying is equal to the cost for firms to produce that good. Therefore, perfect competition helps markets achieve allocative efficiency.
As we have seen in the video above, due to there being no barriers to enter or exit, perfectly competitive firms are unable to make abnormal profits in the Long Run. If a perfectly competitive firm is making abnormal profits, other firms will enter the market to benefit from the abnormal profits being made. If the number of firms in the market increases, the market supply will increase, and so prices for consumers will decrease, making consumers better off.
Again, as there are no barriers to enter or exit the market, firms can freely enter the market. As such, the increased competition forces inefficient firms out of the market. This means that only those firms that are the most productive and able to compete and make normal profits in the long run, will remain. Firms that are inefficent with their FOPs will be forced to exit the market.
Due to the market forces determining the price and no barriers to entry and exit, firms and consumers are able to respond to changes in the market. Short Run abnormal profits or losses will cause firms to enter or exit the market and therefore change the market price, incentivising consumers to increase or decrease their consumption.
Perfect competition is based on several idealized assumptions, including perfect information, homogeneous products, and free entry and exit of firms. These assumptions rarely hold true in real-world markets, where information is often imperfect, products may have differentiated features, and entry barriers can restrict competition.
Due to the size of the small size of each firm operating in the market, no firm is able to scale to a size where they can benefit from economies of scale and lower LRATC.
Firms within a perfectly competitive market all produce homogenous goods and therefore consumers are given a restricted choice of goods. Similarly, due to the lack of abnormal profits in the LR, firms are unable to invest in Research and Development to be able to improve or enhance their products, therefore again limiting product variety.