For general chemistry courses taught during the 2020-21 academic year, 19% of lectures were taught face-to-face, 35% were taught using a hybrid model, and 45% were taught remotely. For laboratory courses, 35% were taught face-to-face, 39% hybrid, and 25% were fully remote. N = 650 ACS approved institutions.
For organic chemistry courses taught during the 2020-21 academic year, 21% of lectures were taught face-to-face, 35% were taught using a hybrid model, and 44% were taught remotely. For laboratory courses, 43% were taught face-to-face, 36% hybrid, and 21% remotely. N = 650 ACS approved institutions
In both general chemistry and organic chemistry, more lecture content is taught remotely than in person.
Institution enrollments for 2018 were obtained from (reference).
The mode of delivery for general chemistry lecture courses for the 2020-2021 academic year. N = 650 ACS approved institutions.
The data show that the larger institutions tend to use remote methods for content delivery.
For institutions with fewer than 2000 students, 41% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 35% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 24% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 2000-5000 students, 28% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 50% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 22% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 5000-8000 students, 14% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 39% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 45% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 8000 - 10,000 students, 9% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 43% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 47% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 10,000 to 20,000 students, 11% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 35% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 54% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 20,000 - 40,000 students, 15% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 19% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 66% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with more than 40,000 students, 7% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 14% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 79% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with fewer than 2000 students, 53% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 25% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 20% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 2000-5000 students, 42% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 44% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 13% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 5000-8000 students, 40% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 39% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 20% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 8000 - 10,000 students, 17% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 53% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 17% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 10,000 to 20,000 students, 28% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 45% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 27% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with 20,000 - 40,000 students, 30% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 33% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 37% was delivered remotely.
For institutions with more than 40,000 students, 25% of the content was delivered face-to-face; 29% was delivered using a hybrid model, and 46% was delivered remotely.
The mode of delivery for general chemistry laboratory courses for the 2020-2021 academic year. N = 650 ACS approved institutions.
More institutions utilized content delivery that was face-to-face for general chemistry laboratory sections, which may indicate an emphasis on students developing hands-on lab skills. This trend is also observed for content that was delivered via a hybrid model, where students receive content in person and remotely.
The mode of content delivery for organic chemistry lectures for the 2020-21 academic year. Link to full text description of bar graph.
The mode of content delivery for organic chemistry labs for the 2020-21 academic year. Link to full text description of bar graph.