"since curriculum involves putting a series of beliefs into practice, we need to examine and articulate our beliefs in order to explore ways of enacting those beliefs in classrooms with students."
from “Inquiry as a stance on curriculum” by Kathy G Short taken from Taking the PYP Forward, edited by Simon Davidson and Steven Carber, published by John Catt Educational Ltd, 2009.
By the end of this module, participants will have:
1a: Before you begin, complete this short survey about curriculum design. When you have completed the survey, share your findings with your team on your google+ community:
1b: Curriculum stance - Why do some teachers opt for developing curriculum, while others do not? Connelly and Clandinin (1988), Clandinin and Connelly (1992, 1998), and Shawer (2003) maintained that teachers approach curriculum in different ways: as curriculum transmitters, curriculum-developers, or curriculum makers.
Curriculum transmitters delivered prescribed curriculum materials and topics (the student’s textbook and the teacher’s guide) without introducing new materials or topics and without making significant changes or adaptations.
Curriculum developers developed curriculum through prescribed curriculum materials and topics, introduced new materials and topics, and made significant curriculum changes and adaptations.
Curriculum makers developed curriculum without reference to official curriculum materials and topics.
(Adapted from Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters by Saad F. Shawer, Teacher and Teacher Education Journal, 26(2010) 173-184.)
2a: View the following video:
[There are] concerns about the extent to which the current school curricula are developing the knowledge and skills necessary for work and life in the 21st century. Employers in particular, have expressed concerns about how well prepared school leavers are for today’s workplaces and have emphasised the need for employees who can work collaboratively in teams, use technology effectively and create new solutions to problems. These concerns have led to new levels of effort to identify, develop and assess a broader range of skills and attributes within the school curriculum … : ways of thinking (including creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, decision making and learning); ways of working (including communication and collaboration): tools for working (including information and communications technology and information literacy); and skills for living in the world (including citizenship, life and career, and personal and social responsibility). Inherent in initiatives of this kind is the view that assessment has a pivotal role to play in focussing the attention of schools and school systems on the development of broader life skills and attributes. (taken from video above)
2b: Guidelines (VCAA) to inform curriculum planning and reporting were first published in February 2014, and have been revised to align with the Victorian Curriculum F–10. The revised guidelines provide advice for Victorian schools on the effective use of the curriculum to develop whole-school teaching and learning plans and to report student learning achievement.
The key points set out in the guidelines are:
The Religious Education Curriculum Framework had been through a process of renewal throughout 2015 and 2016. The renewed Religious Education Curriculum Framework has been designed to be interactive and practical.
As a team, using either the VCAA guidelines or the Religious Education Curriculum Framework, choose a section to read to deepen your knowledge of curriculum. As you read consider what new understandings and connections you can make to your understanding of the way curriculum can be enacted.
2c: Read these statements from the guidelines and reflect on
Develop a statement that reflects your team's shared stance towards curriculum and informed by the Victorian Curriculum F–10 and the renewed Religious Education Curriculum Framework.
Who might you now share this statement with and how might you go about that?
Share your statement on the project google+ community and respond to another team’s work using the Ladder of Feedback