NOTE: For many of these references, I have pdfs. This list includes all known papers on the fossil record of amphipods (or fossils attributed to amphipods). If you think I am missing something, please let me know!
Fossil Amphipod references (58)
1. Alonso, J., Arillo, A., Barrón, E., Carmelo Corral, J., Grimalt, J., López, J. F., López, R., Martínez-Delclòs, X., Ortuño, V., Peñalver, E. & Trincão, P. R. (2000). A new fossil resin with biological inclusions in lower Cretaceous deposits from Álava (northern Spain, Basque-Cantabrian Basin). Journal of Paleontology 74, 158–178.
2. Ando, Y., Hachiya, K., Mizuno, Y., Makiguchi, T., Yamaoka, M., Hayashi, T. & Oji, T. (2022). New information of Megaceradocus (Amphipoda) from the lower Miocene Morozaki Group, central Japan, with notes of Callianopsis (Decapoda) in situ burrows. 8th Symposium on Fossil Decapod Crustaceans. Palaeontological Publications 1, 27–28.
3. Bate, C. S. (1859). On the fossil crustacean found in the Magnesian Limestone of Durham by Mr. H. Kirkby, and on a new species of amphipod. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 15, 137–140.
4. Bell, A. (1920). Notes on the later Tertiary Invertebrata. Annual Report of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society 1920, 1–21.
5. Berg, L. (1928). Verkhnesarmatskiye amfipody iz okrestnostey Groznogo [Upper Sarmatian amphipods from the environs of Grozny]. Priroda 2, 180.
6. Bienkowska-Wasiluk, M. (2010). Taphonomy of Oligocene teleost fishes from the outer Carpathians of Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 60, 479–533.
7. Birshtein, Y. A. (1960). Nadotriad Peracarida. In: Chernysheva, N. E. (ed.) Osnovy Paleontologii. Chlenistonogie: Trilobitoobraznye, i Rakoobraznye. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe Naučno-Tehničeskoe Izdatel’stvo Literatury po Geologii i Ohrane Nedr, 432–439.
8. Bousfield, E. L. (1978). A revised classification and phylogeny of amphipod crustaceans. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series IV 16, 343–390.
9. Bousfield, E. L. & Poinar, G. O., Jr. (1994). A new terrestrial amphipod from Tertiary amber deposits of Chiapas Province, southern Mexico. Historical Biology 7, 105–114.
10. Bousfield, E. L. & Poinar, G. O., Jr. (1995). New terrestrial amphipod from the Tertiary amber deposits of the Dominican Republic. Journal of Crustacean Biology 15, 746–755.
11. Broly, P., Serrano-Sánchez, M. D. L., Rodríguez-García, S. & Vega, F. J. (2017). Fossil evidence of extended brood care in new Miocene Peracarida (Crustacea) from Mexico. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 15, 1037–1049.
12. Butticaz, C. (1987). Un petit crustacé fossile des schistes Permien-Autunien. Minéraux et Fossiles 12, 20–21.
13. Coleman, C. O. & Myers, A. A. (2001). New Amphipoda from Baltic amber. Polskie archiwum hydrobiologii [Polish archives of hydrobiology] 47, 457–464.
14. Coleman, C. O. & Ruffo, S. (2002). Another discovery of a niphargid amphipod (Crustacea) in Baltic amber. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 86, 239–244.
15. Coleman, C. O. (2004). Aquatic amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae) in three pieces of Baltic amber. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution (Electronic Supplement) 4, 1–7.
16. Coleman, C. O. (2006). An amphipod of the genus Synurella Wrzesniowski, 1877 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) found in Baltic amber. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 6, 103–108.
17. Copilaş-Ciocianu, D., Borko, Š. & Fišer, C. (2020). The late blooming amphipods: Global change promoted post-Jurassic ecological radiation despite Palaeozoic origin. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution 143, 106664.
18. Copilaş-Ciocianu, D. & Ionesi, V. (2024). New Miocene fossil taxa illuminate the evolution and paleobiogeography of the Ponto-Caspian gammaroid amphipod radiation. Contributions to Zoology 93, 268–288.
19. Courtney-Mustaphi, C. J., Steiner, E., von Fumetti, S. & Heiri, O. (2024). Aquatic invertebrate mandibles and sclerotized remains in Quaternary lake sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 71, 45–83.
20. Deecke, W. (1915). Paläontologische Betrachtungen. VII. Über crustaceen [Paleontological considerations. VII. About crustaceans]. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie 1, 112–126.
21. Deržavin, A. N. (1927). K poznaniû verhnesarmatskih amfipod Ponto-Kaspijskoj oblasti [Notes on the Upper Sarmatian amphipods of the Ponto-Caspian region]. Bûlleten Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytaltelei prirody otdel geologicheskii, nov. ser. [Bulletin de la societe des naturalistes de Moscou section geologique] 35, 183–196.
22. Deržavin, A. N. (1941). Iskopaemye bokoplavy él’dara [Eldar fossil amphipods]. Izvestiya Azerbaydzhanskogo Filiala Akademii Nauk SSSR 2, 65–69.
23. Ellenberger, P. (1970). Les niveaux paleontologiques de premiere apparition des mammiferes primordiaux en Afrique du Sud et leur ichnologie. Establissement de zones stratigraphiques detaillees dans le Stormberg du Lesotho (Afrique du Sud) (Trias Superieur a Jurassique) [Paleontological levels of earliest appearance of primordial mammals in South Africa and their ichnology. Establishment of detailed stratigraphic zones in the Stormberg of Lesotho (South Africa) (Upper Triassic to Jurassic)]. Proceedings and Papers of the Second Gondwana Symposium, South Africa 343–370.
24. Eyun, S.-I. (2017). Phylogenomic analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) reveals unexpected similarities with earlier proposed morphological phylogenies. BMC Evolutionary Biology 17, 23.
25. Gueriau, P., Rabet, N. & Du Tien Hat, E. (2018). The Strud crustacean fauna (Late Devonian, Belgium): updated review and palaeoecology of an early continental ecosystem. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 107, 79–90.
26. Heggemann, H., Kohring, R. & Schlüter, T. (1990). Fossil plants and arthropods from the Phra Wihan Formation, presumably Middle Jurassic of northern Thailand. Alcheringa 14, 311–316.
27. Hegna, T. A., Lazo-Wasem, E. A., Serrano-Sánchez, M. D. L., Barragán, R. & Vega, F. J. (2020). A new fossil talitrid amphipod from the lower early Miocene Chiapas amber documented with microCT scanning. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 98, 102462.
28. Hessler, R. R. (1969). Peracarida. In: Moore, R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Part R, Arthropoda 4(1)). Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS: The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, R360–R393.
29. Hurley, D. E. (1973). An annotated checklist of fossil attributed to the Crustacea Amphipoda. New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Records 1, 211–217.
30. Jarzembowski, E. (2011). 10. Malacostracans. In: Batten, D. J. (ed.) English Wealden Fossils. London: The Palaeontological Association, 117–120.
31. Jarzembowski, E. A. (1991). The Weald Clay of the Weald; report of 1988/89 field meeting. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 102, 83–92.
32. Jarzembowski, E. A., Chény, C., Fang, Y. & Wang, B. (2020). First Mesozoic amphipod crustacean from the Lower Cretaceous of SE England. Cretaceous Research 112, 104429.
33. Jażdżewski, K., Grabowski, M. & Kupryjanowicz, J. (2014). Further records of Amphipoda from Baltic Eocene amber with first evidence of prae-copulatory behaviour in a fossil amphipod and remarks on the taxonomic position of Palaeogammarus Zaddach, 1864. Zootaxa 3765, 401–417.
34. Jazdzewski, K. & Kulicka, R. (2000). A note on amphipod crustaceans in a piece of Baltic amber. Annales Zoologici 50, 99–100.
35. Jazdzewski, K. & Kulicka, R. (2002). New fossil amphipod, Palaeogammarus polonicus sp. nov. from the Baltic amber. Acta Geologica Polonica 52, 379–383.
36. Jażdżewski, K. & Kupryjanowicz, J. (2010). One more fossil niphargid (Malacostraca: Amphipoda) from Baltic Amber. Journal of Crustacean Biology 30, 413–416.
37. Just, J. (1974). On Palaeogammarus Zaddach, 1864, with a description of a new species from western Baltic amber (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Crangonycidae). Steenstrupia 3, 93–99.
38. Karaman, G. (1984). Critical remarks to the fossil Amphipoda with descriptions of some new taxa. Poljoprivreda I Sumarstvo 30, 87–104.
39. Karasawa, H. (1997). A monograph of Cenozoic stomatopod, decapod, isopod and amphipod Crustacea from west Japan. Monograph of the Mizunami Fossil Museum 8, 1–81.
40. Kulicka, R. & Kosmowska-Ceranowicz, B. (1999). Rare organic inclusions in the Baltic amber. Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturals de Álava 14, 155–160.
41. Maïkovsky, V. (1941). Contribution à l’étude paléontologique et stratigraphique du Bassin potassique d’Alsace. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Strasbourg, 194 pp.
42. McMenamin, M. A. S., Zapata, L. P. & Hussey, M. C. (2013). A Triassic giant amphipod from Nevada, USA. Journal of Crustacean Biology 33, 751–759.
43. Mukai, H. & Takeda, M. (1987). A giant amphipod Crustacea from the Miocene Morozaki Group in the Chita Peninsula, central Japan. Bulletin of the National Science Museum. Series C: Geology & Paleontology 13, 35–39.
44. Pazinato, P. G., Haug, C., Rohn, R., Adami-Rodrigues, K., Ghilardi, R. P., Langer, M. C. & Haug, J. T. (2021). The long trail: A chimera-like fossil crustacean interpreted as Decapoda, Stomatopoda, Amphipoda and finally Isopoda. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 127, 211–229.
45. Petunnikov, G. A. (1914). Rakoobraznye nižnemiocenovyh sloev seleniâ binagady [Crustacea aus den Untermiocän-Schichten bei dem Dorfe Binagady, Gouv. Baku]. Ezhegodnik po geologii i mineralogii Rossii [Annuaire geologique et mineralogique de la Russie] 16, 148–154.
46. Putzer, H. (1938). Die Rhät und Liasablagerungen am Seeberg bei Gotha, am. Röhnbergrüchen und bei Eisenach. 2. Fährte von Corophium nathorsti sp. n. [The Rhaetian and Lias deposits at Seeberg near Gotha, at Röhnbergrüchen and near Eisenach. 2. Track of Corophium nathorsti sp. n.]. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft 71, 420–421.
47. Richter, S. & Scholtz, G. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis of the Malacostraca (Crustacea). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39, 113–136.
48. Robin, N., Gueriau, P., Luque, J., Jarvis, D., Daley, A. C. & Vonk, R. (2021). The oldest peracarid crustacean reveals a Late Devonian freshwater colonization by isopod relatives. Biology Letters 17, 20210226.
49. Salter, J. W. (1863). On some fossil Crustacea from the coal-measures and Devonian rocks of British North America. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 19, 75–80.
50. Serrano-Sánchez, M. D. L., Hegna, T. A., Schaaf, P., Pérez, L., Centeno-García, E. & Vega, F. J. (2015). The aquatic and semiaquatic biota in Miocene amber from the Campo La Granja mine (Chiapas, Mexico): Paleoenvironmental implications. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 62, 243–256.
51. Starr, H., Hegna, T. & McMenamin, M. (2016). Epilogue to the tale of the Triassic amphipod: Rosagammarus McMenamin, Zapata and Hussey, 2013 is a decapod tail (Luning Formation, Nevada, USA). Journal of Crustacean Biology 36, 525–529.
52. Uchman, A. & Pervesler, P. (2006). Surface lebensspuren produced by amphipods and isopods (crustaceans) from the Isonzo Delta tidal flat, Italy. Palaios 21, 384–390.
53. van Straelen, V. (1924). Sur un Amphipode des terrains pétrolifères de Pechelbronn (Alsace). Bulletin de l’Académie Royale de Belgique. Classe des Sciences 325–331.
54. Van Straelen, V. (1931). Crustacea Eumalacostraca (Crustaceis decapodis exclusis). Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia 48, 1–98.
55. Vonk, R. & Schram, F. R. (2007). Rapaleleupia, a new name for Paraleleupia Vonk and Schram, 2003 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ingolfiellidea) preoccupied by Paraleleupia Jeannel, 1949 (Insecta: Coleptera: Staphelinidae: Pselaphinae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 27, 693.
56. Wei, Y.-F., Dong, A.-G., Huang, D.-Y., Du, Y.-W., Hegna, T. A., Lian, X.-N. & Audo, D. (2021). Amphipoda from the Late Neogene of Shanxi, China. Palaeoentomology 4, 085–093.
57. Weitschat, W., Brandt, A., Coleman, C. O., Myers, A. A. & Wichard, W. (2002). Taphocoenosis of an extraordinary arthropod community in Baltic amber. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 86, 189–210.
58. Zaddach, G. (1864). Ein Amphipode im Bernstein, entdeckt durch Herrn Pfarrer von Duisburg und beschrieben von G. Zaddach. Schriften der Königlichen Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg 5, 1–12.