by H. Williams on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 6:01pm ·
Let us begin with the Latin maxim "scientia potentia est" that when translated from the Latin into English becomes the well known phrase "knowledge is power" ascribed to Sir Francis Bacon.
It is clear to notice how the word 'scientia' (Eng. "knowledge") becomes the etymological root for the English word 'science'.
Therefore, under these parameters the word 'sciences' become a logical absurdity since all sources of knowledge should therefore be ascribed the word 'science'. Moreover, under this assumption, anyone who pursues knowledge is technically a Scientist.
To all you Scientists. Why must we add a qualitative aspect to the pursuit of knowledge when all knowledge invariably adds to an understanding of ourselves and the world/universe around us?
In the end are we not all 'philosophers' (Eng."lovers of wisdom") within a co-operative dynamic?
How does the designation of one sector of knowledge as 'science' serve to create a healthy, balanced and cultured society? Is it merely an archaic label that has remained the dominant paradigm for far too long?
I do believe it to be so, as well as one of the many other reasons for the development of the current polarised and regressive modern western society. If only we could do away with the smoke and mirrors.
© 2012 H Williams. All rights reserved