Is Gravity being Induced?

Summary of the Solar Hydrogen Fusion Core Theory

Item by item, I’ve illustrated five disparities between observational evidence that is completely at odds with the contemporary accepted solar model:

The five major observations at odds with the Hydrogen Fusion Core Solar Model:

1. The Coronal Heating Problem; the Hydrogen Fusion Core model violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics; how can you have a hot core, a cool photospheric surface and a hot coronal atmosphere?

2. Sunspot depressions, revealing a darker, cooler interior; how does one square that with a super-hot core?

3. No equatorial bulge; calculations maintain that the mass of the Sun ought to manifest an equatorial bulge. Where is it?

4. The Sun lacks angular momentum. Being in the center of the solar system, why is our Sun not spinning much faster?

5. The ease with which the Sun resonates; how can the Sun possibly produce such amazingly coherent resonance considering the turbulence on an inner core?

Although solar gravitational attraction is undeniably present, as this relates to the Sun, observations present themselves that simply do not concur with the present gravity-mass equivalency model; that there is something fundamentally lacking in our understanding upon which this aspect of our science has been erected.

[Layman's terms: So what just happened here? Everything about the contemporary solar model is based on supposition, not observational evidence. The trap is a fixation with the idea that mass is synonymous with gravity. It blinds the mind to the observations at hand.]