2012

THE MEDIA & MOVIES ARE UNJUSTLY SCARING THE WORLD ABOUT 2012

FIRST HEAR NASA's Dr. DONALD YEOMANS EXPLAIN 2012 & THE CALENDAR IT IS BASED ON.

THEN

LISTEN TO THE EXPERTISE OF WORLD-RENOWNED PLANETARY ASTRONOMER -

NASA's DR. DAVID MORRISON. HE WILL GIVE YOU ALL THE FACTS.

AFTER THE VIDEOS, PLEASE READ THE ARTICLES BELOW.

THE TOP ARTICLE WILL SET YOU STRAIGHT ABOUT THIS NONSENSE

BELOW IT I HAVE INCLUDED TWO REAL AND GREAT 2012 EVENTS -

THE TRANSIT OF VENUS & THE SUMMER OLYMPICS IN LONDON

THE NEXT TRANSIT OF VENUS AFTER 2012 IS NOT UNTIL 2117

(Shown Near the Bottom of This Page)

----------------------------------------------------

The Great 2012 Scare

November 11, 2009

by The Editors of Sky & Telescope at SkyandTelescope.com

As we told you in this space a month ago, the world is in no danger of ending on December 21, 2012 — contrary to anything you might be hearing recently.

If your friends and family are worried about the impending disaster — supposedly based on an ancient Mayan prophecy — we have the stuff you need to tell them. To make a long story short, December 21, 2012, really is a big flip-the-page date in the ancient Mayans' calendar — but they didn't believe the world would end then. And all the planetary and galactical lineups that doom-mongers are trying to associate with that date are flat-out wrong. Noted archaeoastronomer E. C. Krupp explains all the details, and the history of this mania, in the November 2009 issue of Sky & Telescope. The November issue is no longer available on newsstands, so we're making Krupp's article available as a PDF.

While you're at it, read S&T editor-in-chief Robert Naeye's article about cosmic disasters that actually could happen — but aren't likely to within the lifetime of anyone reading this.

Click Here to Download a 1-Mb PDF of Krupp's Article on the 2012 Scare.

Click Here to Download a 1.5-Mb PDF of Naeye's Article on Real Dangers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Site Map

Transit of Venus

On June 8, 2004, observers around much of the world saw Venus drift across the face of the sun as Venus passed between the sun and earth. What a sight it was!

The next transit of Venus occurs in June 2012. You don't want to miss it. THE NEXT ONE IS NOT UNTIL THE YEAR 2117!

Prepare for 2012

Get path details, contact times, and global weather prospects for the June 5-6, 2012 transit of Venus. See 2012.htm.

(Credit: HM Nautical Almanac Office)

Images of the 2004 Transit

View images and movies from around the world of the 2004 transit and of people witnessing the spectacle. Oh, yeah! See images.htm.

(Credit: Dutch Open Telescope)

Learn More

View a collection of activities, lesson plans, videos, simulations and online resources that explain the transit of Venus and its significance. See educ.htm.

Quick Tip...

Keep your Eclipse Shades or protective eyewear in a safe place to use when major sunspots emerge. You never know when our nearby star will become active, allowing you to view safely the dynamic sun. For daily solar weather reports, see http://www.spaceweather.com.

Images from the Transit of Venus celebration in Mishawaka, Indiana, USA, are at june8.htm.

A transit of Venus is so rare that, up to June 8, 2004, no human then alive had witnessed this celestial event. Simple as transits may seem, they are instrumental in defining our place in the cosmos. Historically, global expeditions timed transits of Venus to quantify the size of the solar system. In the modern era, astronomers use spacecraft and other techniques to seek earth-class planets transiting distant stars. Then next transit of Venus is June 5-6, 2012.

"Transit of Venus dot org" will guide you to instructions for safe viewing; interactive education and hands-on activities; global observing programs for students; background information and tutorials; insights into historical endeavors and the adventures of explorers; the role of spacecraft and the search for extra-solar planets; and miscellaneous items relating to the transit of Venus.

Google's Zeitgeist feature rated the Transit of Venus as the

#1 Most Popular Event of June 2004.

WWW transitofvenus.org

TO FIND THIS...

Get ready to see the June 5-6, 2012, transit of Venus!

    • where the transit will be seen

    • starting and ending times

    • the path of Venus across the sun's disk

    • global maps

    • local circumstances

BELOW IS A GREAT ARTICLE WITH PHOTOS OF THE LAST TRANSIT OF VENUS ON 2004 JUNE 8

BY WILLIAM GOULD

Venus viewed on

the Sun

The brilliance of the planet Venus, the morning or evening star outshone only by the Sun and Moon, made the ancients link it with their goddess of beauty and hence of sexual love. In Mesopotamia, she was Inanna, Ishtar or Astarte; the Greeks called her Aphrodite; Venus is her Roman name. The Capitoline Venus (left) is a Hellenistic sculpture from before 100 BCE.

Introduction | What is a transit? |

The 2004 event | Transit Day |

Reflections on the transit |

Links and notes

On 6 June 2012, astronomers and other observers will have their last opportunity this century to see one of nature’s rarest occurrences – a transit of Venus. After that date, there will not be another until December 2117. In this article, William Gould describes his experiences of viewing the last such event in 2004 and reflects upon the significance of a transit.

Introduction

We are used to seeing the planet Venus as the ancients did: as a brilliant morning or evening "star" glittering in the heavens just before dawn or just after sunset. But Venus is a solid world, not a star; it shines by reflected sunlight and, as the 17th-century physicist Galileo Galilei discovered, it shows phases like the moon as it travels around the Sun.

Venus's path lies inside that of the Earth and it takes 225 days to complete its orbit. When positioned between the Earth and the Sun, the planet has its dark side toward us and cannot be seen. But if the three bodies – Sun, Venus and Earth – line up exactly, then our view of Venus is transformed. For then Venus suddenly becomes visible to us as a tiny black disc moving slowly across the dazzling face of our star (see Ill. 1). This precise alignment doesn't happen very often – only once every century on average. But by a strange quirk of celestial mechanics, transits of Venus currently occur in pairs, the first exactly eight years before the second. Although a transit took place as recently as 2004, there had previously been no transit of Venus since December 1882. After 2012, there will not be another one until December 2117. The 2004 transit of Venus, the first of the current pair, took place on Tuesday 8 June, and I had the privilege of seeing it from no less a location than the grounds of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich.

As a child growing up in the 1950s, I had developed a great interest in astronomy mostly fired by the books and broadcasts of Patrick Moore, the doyen of British star-gazers, now in his 80s. In describing the planet Venus, Patrick and the other authors I read on the subject would always include a description of a transit, finishing up with the information that the next one would be in 2004. I wanted to see it. Thus as 8 June of that year approached, it was a peculiar feeling to look back on those old books and realize that a lifelong dream was, weather permitting, about to come true.

Return to the start of the article

What is a transit?

A transit is somewhat like a solar eclipse, when the Moon blocks out the Sun's light for a few minutes. But Venus, though much larger than the Moon, is more than 100 times further away and appears as just a little black dot, hardly blocking out any sunlight at all. Also, unlike an eclipse, which may last up to two hours from start to finish, a transit of Venus takes much longer, about six hours, to complete. Not very dramatic, then, and easy to miss; and if you do observe it, you might think it's rather like watching paint dry. And how could it be observed properly anyway? Nobody could look at it directly – the brightness and heat of the Sun would make that completely impossible. Even glimpsing the Sun without eye protection would risk permanent damage to the retina of the eye. You could try using special solar viewing glasses made of Mylar to diminish solar glare, but prolonged use of these was not advisable either. A much better bet was to use a telescope to project the Sun's circular image onto a screen and watch the transit that way in complete safety. Of course, it might be on the television – but that wouldn't be the same at all.

If a transit of Venus is so unspectacular and so difficult to observe, why do astronomers get so excited about it? After all, Venus orbits closer to the Sun than the Earth does. Surely its path regularly takes it between us and the Sun. Indeed it does, once every 584 days. But a transit can't happen every time. The plane of Venus's orbit is tilted with respect to that of the Earth's by an angle of more than 3°, so most of the time Venus passes above or below our line of sight to the Sun and we see no transit. Only very occasionally, when both Venus and the Sun come into the same line of sight at one of the two points where the orbital planes of Venus and the Earth intersect, does a transit occur. At these points, called nodes, the alignment is just right for Venus to be seen passing across the Sun's face (see Ill. 2). Mercury, the innermost planet of the Solar System, can undergo transits too, but they are not as rare and attract less general interest because they are much harder to observe. It's the rarity of a transit of Venus, and its predictability, that makes it so fascinating.

Return to the start of the article

The 2004 event

In June 2004 people in the UK would be well placed to see the whole event from beginning to end (see Ill. 3). Hitherto, only five transits of Venus had been witnessed. None of them had been completely visible from western Europe. One, that of 9 December 1874, could not be viewed at all because it took place during the hours of darkness in our part of the world. The others could only be seen partially, ending well after sunset or beginning hours before dawn. When you take the geographical location of the observer into consideration, plus the local weather conditions, the rarity of a transit of Venus becomes even more pronounced. After 2004, Western Europe would not see another complete transit until 11 June 2247! Astronomers all over Britain prayed for a cloudless morning on 8 June.

I made the decision to view the event from Greenwich only a week beforehand. Actually, I could have watched it over the Internet (something that was undreamed of when astronomers last viewed the phenomenon in 1882), but having learned that members of the public would be allowed free access to the grounds of the Royal Observatory on the day and would be able to see the transit safely with telescopes set up by members of the Flamsteed Society, I decided that Greenwich was the place to be.

As the day approached, my excitement mounted. I anxiously kept an eye and ear on the weather forecasts as the days counted down.

2. Venus orbits closer to the Sun than the Earth does, but as this illustration tries to show, the plane of its orbit is tilted at an angle of more than 3° with respect to that of the Earth's. The planes intersect at the node points M and N. Transits can only occur when Venus is at or near M or N at the same time as Earth reaches m or n respectively.

3. Tracking Venus. The 2004 transit of Venus began with first contact, as the leading edge of the disc of Venus touched the eastern (left-hand) limb of the Sun south of the solar equator at 05:13 Universal Tine (06:13 British Summer Time). About 20 minutes later, its trailing edge touched the solar limb at second contact. For six hours the tiny black dot of our sister planet tracked across the Sun's southern hemisphere, When its leading edge touched the Sun's western limb, third contact was made. Fourth and final contact, when Venus's trailing edge touched the south-southwestern part of the solar disc, was reached at 11:26 UT (12:26 BST). and Venus vanished from view to reappear as a morning star later in June.

1. Venus's dark disc shows up against the searing brightness of the Sun's photospehere, or light-emitting surface

4. The grounds of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, offered an excellent vantage point for watching the transit. The place was not crowded, but quite a number of adults and children turned out. The Observatory provided eclipse glasses made of Mylar to give some protection when viewing the Sun directly. The metal strip you can see in the foreground famously marks the line of the Greenwich Meridian. So in taking this picture mid-morning I was standing in the Eastern Hemisphere of the Earth watching the scene in the Western.

Return to the start of the article

Transit Day

Tuesday 8 June 2004 was a perfect summer morning, bright and clear. The transit was due to start just before 6.15 a.m., about an hour and a half after sunrise, and end about 12.25 p.m. Reliant on public transport, I couldn't get to Greenwich before the start, but having risen at about 5.30 and breakfasted by 6.00, I turned on the TV to see how the occasion was being covered.

It wasn't, really. Although both BBC and ITV outside-broadcast teams were at Greenwich, breakfast-time television was preoccupied with other news. Prime minister Tony Blair was visiting the United States and Iraq continued to loom large in the headlines. The 6.30 BBC summary featured a fleeting shot of the start of Venus's passage, with the planet having already taken a little nick out of the rim of the Sun's disc, but that was all. Clearly you had to be there.

I got to Greenwich by 7.45. I made my way to Greenwich Park and climbed the hill to the Royal Observatory, Two journalists ahead of me were discussing the transit. "So what are we likely to see today?" one asked his colleague, "Is the Sun going to go dark, or what?" It wasn't, of course. Just as well, really.

But if the media seemed ill-informed on the subject and apparently showed a lack of excitement, it was not so with the general public at the Royal Observatory. Hundreds of people were already gathered in the Observatory grounds, including families with children (see Ill. 4 and 5). There was a spectacular view south over the park, and more to the point, an uninterrupted view of the Sun. The observatory provided solar viewing glasses, but I did not find them helpful. Having been operated on for congenital cataracts, my eyes have no accommodation, and the Sun's image was just too small for me to make out anything on it. Normally sighted people, however, assured me that they could see the tiny disc of Venus moving across it. Fortunately there were several telescopes equipped with suitable optical filters to allow safe viewing of the solar image through an eyepiece and others set up to project it on a screen. It was an immense thrill when I caught my first sight of the Sun's bright disc with Venus's much smaller disc showing starkly black against it. A little dream half a century old was fulfilled.

5. We were close to one of the Royal Observatory's landmarks. The famous time ball sits above the Octagon Room at Observatory House. At 1:00 p.m. precisely every day, having risen to its topmost position, it begins its drop to signal the hour, allowing mariners on the Thames to set their chronometers.

6. Top. NEVER LOOK AT THE SUN THROUGH AN UNPROTECTED TELESCOPE. Watching the transit of Venus safely requires telescopes fitted with special filters to eliminate harmful solar glare or show the event in light of a specific wavelength. Bottom. A telescope set up outside the Observatory building was fitted with a TV camera that transmitted an image to a rather dusty screen in a nearby tent.

I watched the last four hours of the transit, moving from one telescope to another, chatting with astronomy enthusiasts and taking pictures of some of the screen projections and other sights (see Ill 6 and 7). One instrument showed the Sun in hydrogen-alpha light, in which it appeared as a true ball of fire. (To gain some idea of what the transit looked like in H-alpha light, see Ill 10.) Another telescope allowed us to compare the round *dot" of Venus with splodgy sunspots, Earth-sized cooler regions of magnetic disturbance on the solar surface. I looked in on a BBC/Open University presentation hosted by Adam Hart-Davies (see Ill 8). As the transit reached its climax(see ill 9), with first the leading edge of Venus, then its trailing edge, moving off the solar disc, the excitement was palpable. Schoolchildren were encouraged to time these two events as accurately as they could in an effort to re-create scientific experiments from earlier transits.

7. Astronomers speak of "shooting the Sun" – that is, projecting the solar image through a telescope onto a screen. The Solarscope offers a compact way of doing this and showed the transit well.

8. Adam Hart-Davies (centre, in front of large screen) presented a BBC/Open University programme in the "Stardate" series on the transit event. The programme was done in segments throughout the morning and shown at 11:30p.m. that night. Here he and the rest of the crew take a break between takes.

9. The beginning of the end. As the disc of Venus approached third contact, when its leading edge appeared to coincide with the Sun's limb, excitement mounted. Over the next 20 minutes the planet moved inexorably off the Sun's face. At Greenwich Observatory, children and adults counted down the seconds to final contact. Elsewhere schoolchildren all over the country sought to time the moment as accurately as they could. They sent in their timings to Greenwich to try to re-create the old experiment to measure the distance to the Sun.

Return to the start of the article

Reflections on the transit

It reminded me that not long after a transit of Venus had been observed for the first time by Jeremiah Horrocks and William Crabtree in 1639, the phenomenon had been hailed as a practical aid to measuring the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun. Astronomers already recognized this distance as a celestial yardstick, the so-called astronomical unit, but they had no clear idea of its physical value. The English astronomers James Gregory and, more particularly, Edmond Halley, who had witnessed a transit of Mercury in 1677 from St Helena, championed the idea of using a Venus transit to measure the astronomical unit. In two papers placed before the Royal Society (1691 and 1716), Halley suggested a way of doing it. He knew from Kepler's laws of planetary motion that the square of a planet's orbital period around the Sun is proportional to the cube of its mean distance from it. So he had a rough idea of the ratio of Venus's Sun-distance to the Earth's Sun-distance and once he knew ore distance he could work out the other. In fact knowing just one distance would allow him to find the sun-distances of all the known planets by simply applying Kepler's third law.

Put very simply, Halley in essence decided to find the distance from the Earth to the Sun by first finding the distance from the Earth to Venus. He reasoned that if the position of Venus's dark disc against the Sun's face were observed from two or more widely separated locations on the Earth, the apparent angular displacement of the planet's image – what astronomers call its parallax – could, by the application of some simple trigonometry, yield its distance from us. Knowing that, Halley would be able to work out from Kepler's third law the distance between the Earth and the Sun. The problem was that Venus was so far away, its parallax was vanishingly small and impossible to measure directly. Halley hit on the idea of getting astronomers situated in various parts of the world to time the observation of certain stages of the transit (specifically the points where the edges of Venus entered and left the Sun's disc). The time differences would in theory be measurable and could be translated into a parallax displacement (see Ill. 11). The more observations that could be made, the more accurate the result would be. Thus it would be possible to work out how far away from us Venus is and let Kepler's laws do the rest.

10. The transit as seen in hydrogen-alpha (Hα) light. The Sun appears as a huge restless ball of fire, a raging furnace using up its hydrogen fuel in nuclear fusion reactions at a rate of over half a billion tonnes per second. In the process, the Sun is also losing about 4 million tonnes of mass, which is converted to energy (the heat, light and other radiation that sustains life on Earth but can also threaten our existence.

Halley's method for discovering the exact distance from the Earth to the Sun and thus assigning a physical value to the astronomical unit.

11. During a transit, Venus's track across the solar disc does not appear to be in the same position for two Earth-bound observers widely separated in latitude. The above drawings are the front and side views of a transit observation from two points on the Earth. The observer at point P in the right-hand drawing will see the lower track AB. Simultaneously, the observer at point P' will see the upper, somewhat longer track A'B'. The two tracks shown in comparison to each other in the left-hand drawing illustrate the angular displacement known as parallax. The drawing exaggerates the scale, since in reality the parallax is barely measurable directly. However, Halley believed that timing the transit accurately through its various stages, namely its four contact points, would yield measurably different results for our two observers (that is, Venus's passage for observer P' along track A'B' would last minutes longer than its passage along AB for observer P). Duplicating timings at a large number of locations throughout the world and collating and combining the results would lead to an accurate figure for the parallax of Venus and would therefore help supply a precise value for the distance from the Earth to the Sun.

Halley exhorted his astronomical colleagues worldwide to take advantage of the next pair of transits to make the measurements, but, dying in 1742, he never lived to see them himself. In 1761 and 1769 astronomical expeditions from many countries were dispatched to far-flung locations to take timings that would assist in arriving at a correct figure for the Sun-Earth distance. Indeed, viewing the transit of Venus from Tahiti was a prime objective of Captain James Cook's first voyage aboard HMS Endeavour.

A little history

Although Johannes Kepler had predicted that a transit of Venus would occur in December 1631, it went unobserved in Europe, which was in darkness. What Kepler had not worked out was that currently transits of Venus come in pairs. This fact was discovered by a young British curate, Jeremiah Horrocks, who saw part of the transit of 24 Nov (4 Dec NS) 1639 from his home near Preston, Lancashire. Prompted by Horrocks, another amateur, William Crabtree, also glimpsed some of it but was clouded out. Horrocks wrote up his observations in an article "Venus in sole visa" ("Venus viewed on the Sun") – hence the title of the article you are reading now. Horrocks, a gifted scientist, sadly died in 1641, still only in his early 20s.

Unfortunately none of the timings taken then or later, by expeditions in 1874 and 1882, were accurate enough to provide a satisfactory figure. But they did at least give us our first impressions of how vast the Solar System and the Universe beyond it really are. Today scientists can bounce radar signals off the moon, Venus and other solar system bodies to determine their distances from us and use the data to get a very precise value for the astronomical unit. The mean Sun-Earth distance as determined by radar is currently given as 149 597 870.619 kilometres, give or take about 30 metres. That's about 92 975 681 miles.

With such measuring devices as radar at their disposal, astronomers find little practical value in transits anymore, except to test old theories. Scientific progress marches on. I pondered this as I looked around the small Transit of Venus historical exhibition at the Royal Observatory, which included photographs taken in 1882 with unwieldy plate cameras and Cook's quite crude drawings made in 1769. This time, digital imaging would be the order of the day. How great are the changes that take place in science and technology between one pair of transits and the next! As I walked back down the hill through the park to the station enjoying the beauty of a flower-scented summer afternoon, I recalled the words of an American astronomer, William Harkness. In August 1882, heralding the transit of that year, he said to a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science:

We are now on the eve of the second transit of a pair, after which there will be no other till the twenty-first century of our era has dawned upon the earth, and the June flowers are blooming in 2004. When the last transit season occurred the intellectual world was awakening from the slumber of ages, and that wondrous scientific activity which has led to our present advanced knowledge was just beginning. What will be the state of science when the next transit season arrives God only knows. Not even our children's children will live to take part in the astronomy of that day.

It is a question we can ponder today. Transit pairs are so far apart in time that we can hardly imagine how the world will look when the next pair comes along. Modern mechanization was in its infancy in Europe when the transits of the 1760s took place. When the next pair occurred in the late 19th century, the industrial revolution was well into its stride. Today we live in a hi-tech, computerized post-industrial society. But who knows what our science and society will be like when the next pair of transits comes around in 2117 and 2125?

As I have already said, rarity and predictability are the things that make transits interesting. But here's something else to consider: an article I read recently suggested that transits of Venus encourage overseas travel. This could well be true, bearing in mind the importance of location and weather conditions. If you want to see the next transit of Venus in full in June 2012, you will have to go to the Far East, eastern Australia, New Zealand, or – dare I say it – Tahiti. Now there's a thought.

Return to the start of the article

Links and notes

This article does not go very deeply into the technicalities of a transit. It is first and foremost my own account of my visit to Greenwich to watch it. There are, however, several sites where you can delve into the scientific background and also into the history of our observations of the phenomenon, which has been witnessed now only six times. These sites may well tell you more about such things as the "black drop" effect or explain the difference between ascending node and descending node transits. Here are just a few. There are many more.

For a comprehensive and highly readable account of the historical and scientific background to the subject, read David Sellers's book The Transit of Venus and the Quest to find the True Distance of the Sun, available to buy at Amazon.co.uk or to read online.

For a minute description of the statistics of transits, visit Fred Espenak's NASA Eclipse site.

For a wide-ranging treatment in German, with some fun Java applets, visit Jürgen Giesen's site.

One of the clearest explanatory sites is the Transit of Venus page of the Orpington Astronomical Society.

For some spectacular computerized animations visit NASA's Sun-Earth Day 2004 Venus transit site.

Check out further Transit of Venus links by clicking www.transitofvenus.com.

Here are some educational sites:

Transit of Venus, which looks forward to the 2012 event as well as covering that of 2004.

Observing, Photographing and Evaluating the Transit of Venus, June 8th, 2004, an Internet project run from Germany with a range of goals, including promoting contact and collaboration between schools, universities, and amateur astronomers, collating information about this and earlier transits, learning how to photograph the Sun and accurately measure the position of an object, and using the 2004 transit to measure the Sun-Earth distance.

Venus Transit 2004 (VT-2004), another Internet project aimed at transforming curiosity into knowledge and interest in science through a broad set of actions. It was launched by the European Southern Observatory.

To learn more about Venus itself, start by checking out these sites:

The planet Venus

Venus at the Nine Planets site

BBC Science and Nature – Space: Venus

Venus Introduction at solarview,com

Venus – the Earth's Twin

NASA's Solar System Exploration: Planets: Venus: Overview

See also the Wikipedia article on Venus

Illustrations

All but one of the photographs at the Royal Obervatory were taken by me on the day of the transit. The following astronomical photographs taken from various observatories around the world have been added to illustrate various points in the text. I acknowledge the intellectual property rights of all the photographers/artists whose material is represented here.

The masthead incorporates a pciture of Venus as a morning or evening star (source: VT-2004 Project Website: Venus in mythology, where the image is credited to the British Astronomical Association). The image of the Capitoline Venus was taken from this site. The image is part of the MythMedia Project, a collection of art images relating to classical mythology held at the Library of Haifa University, Israel.

1. Photo by Jamie Cooper, Northampton, England, UK (source: VT-2004 Photo Archive)

2. Illustration adapted from Colin A. Ronan, Edmond Halley, Genius in Eclipse. Macdonald & Co. 1989, p. 109

3. Photo by Giovanni Paglioli, Centro Astronomico Neil Armstrong, Salerno, Italy. (Source: VT-2004 Photo archive.

6. (first picture) Agency picture published in the Daily Telegraph (9 June 2004).

9. Three pictures from a montage of transit shots. Many sites that produced a wealth of photographic images of the 2004 transit were taken down shortly after it. I cannot now trace where I got these pictures from. If anyone can identify them, please email me.

10. Photo from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) (Source: Astronomy Magazine Website).

11. Drawing from the Transits of Venus page at phy6.org, a group of educational Websites on astronomy, physics, spaceflight and the Earth's magnetism.

Return to the start of this article

Venus viewed on the Sun. by William Gould © 2004,2007. All rights reserved. Email me about this article.

NASA's Pioneer Venus probe took this photo of Venus's perpetual cloudy layer in 1978. With a diameter of more than 12,100 kilometres, Venus is only a little smaller than the Earth. But its cloud cover is the top of a dense. noxious atmosphere of mostly carbon dioxide with clouds that rain sulphuric acid down upon the rocky, cratered, mountainous, volcanic surface. The atmospheric pressure is more than 90 times that of Earth. Venus is in the grip of a runaway greenhouse effect. Its surface temperature is 470 °C, hot enough to melt lead. Venus's sidereal day is the longest of any planet in the Solar System, lasting 243.02 Earth days, and for reasons we don't know Venus rotates in a clockwise direction instead of anticlockwise, like the other planets except for Uranus which also rotates clockwise like Venus but with only an 8 degree axial tilt which is usually listed as a 98 degree tilt in a counter clockwise direction.Note that the mean solar day on Venus (sunrise to sunrise) is 116.75 earth days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transit of Venus - 2012 June 05

Circumstances for Cities (USA)

From the Western Hemisphere, Venus will transit across the disk of the Sun on 2012 June 05. This rare event will be visible from many locations around the world. Table 2b presents the topocentric contact times (Universal Time) and corresponding altitudes of the Sun for 60 cities throughout the USA. For international (non-USA) locations, see table 2a.

Table 2b delta T = 75.0 s ------------------- T r a n s i t C o n t a c t s ------------------- Location Name External Sun Internal Sun Greatest Sun Internal Sun External Sun Ingress Alt Ingress Alt Transit Alt Egress Alt Egress Alt h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° Akron 22:03:56 30 22:21:35 26 -- - -- - -- - Albany 22:03:36 24 22:21:15 21 -- - -- - -- - Allentown 22:03:42 25 22:21:21 22 -- - -- - -- - Atlanta 22:04:17 31 22:21:56 27 -- - -- - -- - Austin 22:05:10 42 22:22:48 38 01:25:31 0 -- - -- - Baltimore 22:03:46 26 22:21:26 22 -- - -- - -- - Baton Rouge 22:04:46 36 22:22:25 32 -- - -- - -- - Birmingham 22:04:24 33 22:22:04 29 -- - -- - -- - Boise 22:05:40 54 22:23:15 51 01:25:39 19 -- - -- - Boston 22:03:31 22 22:21:10 19 -- - -- - -- - Buffalo 22:03:48 28 22:21:26 25 -- - -- - -- - Charleston 22:04:00 29 22:21:39 26 -- - -- - -- - Chicago 22:04:12 34 22:21:49 31 -- - -- - -- - Cincinnati 22:04:07 32 22:21:45 28 -- - -- - -- - Cleveland 22:03:56 30 22:21:35 26 -- - -- - -- - Columbia 22:04:06 28 22:21:46 25 -- - -- - -- - Columbus 22:04:02 31 22:21:40 27 -- - -- - -- - Dallas 22:05:00 41 22:22:38 37 01:25:34 0 -- - -- - Dayton 22:04:05 31 22:21:44 28 -- - -- - -- - Denver 22:05:11 47 22:22:47 44 01:25:36 9 -- - -- - Des Moines 22:04:30 39 22:22:07 35 01:25:49 2 -- - -- - Detroit 22:03:59 31 22:21:37 28 -- - -- - -- - El Paso 22:05:38 49 22:23:16 45 01:25:24 8 -- - -- - Flint 22:04:00 31 22:21:37 28 -- - -- - -- - Grand Rapids 22:04:05 33 22:21:43 30 -- - -- - -- - Harrisburg 22:03:46 26 22:21:25 23 -- - -- - -- - Hartford 22:03:35 23 22:21:14 20 -- - -- - -- - Honolulu 22:09:59 85 22:27:38 89 01:26:12 49 04:26:30 9 04:44:29 5 Houston 22:05:03 40 22:22:42 36 -- - -- - -- - Indianapolis 22:04:11 33 22:21:49 30 -- - -- - -- - Jackson 22:04:38 35 22:22:17 32 -- - -- - -- - Jacksonville 22:04:16 28 22:21:57 24 -- - -- - -- - Kansas City 22:04:37 39 22:22:15 36 01:25:44 2 -- - -- - Lansing 22:04:02 32 22:21:40 29 -- - -- - -- - Lincoln 22:04:41 41 22:22:17 38 01:25:45 4 -- - -- - Little Rock 22:04:39 37 22:22:18 34 -- - -- - -- - Los Angeles 22:06:17 58 22:23:53 55 01:25:24 18 -- - -- - Louisville 22:04:12 33 22:21:50 29 -- - -- - -- - Madison 22:04:15 35 22:21:52 32 01:25:57 0 -- - -- - Memphis 22:04:31 36 22:22:10 32 -- - -- - -- -

Table 2b delta T = 75.0 sec (But Should be about 67 seconds) ------------------- T r a n s i t C o n t a c t s ------------------- Location Name External Sun Internal Sun Greatest Sun Internal Sun External Sun Ingress Alt Ingress Alt Transit Alt Egress Alt Egress Alt h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° h m s ° Miami 22:04:23 26 22:22:05 22 -- - -- - -- - Milwaukee 22:04:11 34 22:21:48 31 -- - -- - -- - Minneapolis 22:04:23 38 22:22:00 35 01:25:56 4 -- - -- - Montgomery 22:04:25 32 22:22:05 29 -- - -- - -- - Nashville 22:04:19 33 22:21:58 30 -- - -- - -- - New Haven 22:03:36 23 22:21:15 20 -- - -- - -- - New Orleans 22:04:44 35 22:22:23 31 -- - -- - -- - New York 22:03:39 24 22:21:18 21 -- - -- - -- - sunset is 8:22 PM Local Time = 0 HR 22 Min UT on June 6 Norfolk 22:03:49 25 22:21:29 22 -- - -- - -- - Oklahoma City 22:04:55 42 22:22:33 38 01:25:36 2 -- - -- - Omaha 22:04:38 40 22:22:14 37 01:25:46 4 -- - -- - Orlando 22:04:20 27 22:22:00 24 -- - -- - -- - Philadelphia 22:03:42 25 22:21:22 21 -- - -- - -- - Phoenix 22:05:55 54 22:23:32 50 01:25:24 13 -- - -- - Pittsburgh 22:03:53 28 22:21:32 25 -- - -- - -- - Portland 22:05:57 57 22:23:31 54 01:25:45 23 -- - -- - Providence 22:03:32 22 22:21:12 19 -- - -- - -- - Raleigh 22:03:57 27 22:21:36 23 -- - -- - -- - Richmond 22:03:51 26 22:21:30 23 -- - -- - -- - Riverside 22:06:14 58 22:23:50 54 01:25:24 17 -- - -- - Rochester 22:03:44 27 22:21:23 24 -- - -- - -- - Sacramento 22:06:15 60 22:23:50 56 01:25:32 21 -- - -- - St. Paul 22:04:23 38 22:22:00 35 01:25:56 4 -- - -- - St. Louis 22:04:25 36 22:22:02 33 -- - -- - -- - St. Petersburg 22:04:25 28 22:22:06 25 -- - -- - -- - Salem 22:06:00 58 22:23:34 55 01:25:44 24 -- - -- - Salt Lake City 22:05:33 52 22:23:08 49 01:25:35 15 -- - -- - San Antonio 22:05:15 42 22:22:54 38 01:25:29 0 -- - -- - San Diego 22:06:18 58 22:23:54 54 01:25:23 16 -- - -- - San Francisco 22:06:21 61 22:23:56 57 01:25:31 22 -- - -- - San Jose 22:06:20 60 22:23:56 57 01:25:30 21 -- - -- - Seattle 22:05:50 56 22:23:24 53 01:25:49 23 -- - -- - Springfield 22:04:21 36 22:21:58 32 -- - -- - -- - Syracuse 22:03:41 26 22:21:20 23 -- - -- - -- - Tallahassee 22:04:24 30 22:22:04 27 -- - -- - -- - Tampa 22:04:24 28 22:22:05 24 -- - -- - -- - Toledo 22:04:01 31 22:21:39 28 -- - -- - -- - Topeka 22:04:41 40 22:22:18 37 01:25:43 3 -- - -- - Tulsa 22:04:48 40 22:22:26 37 01:25:39 1 -- - -- - Washington, DC 22:03:48 26 22:21:27 23 -- - -- - -- -

Transit Predictions & WebMaster: Fred Espenak e-mail: fred.espenak@nasa.gov

Planetary Systems Branch - Code 693

NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 USA

Last revised: 2011 Oct 12 - F. Espenak

2012

TRANSIT

of VENUS

Background

The second of the two 21st-century transits of Venus will not be visible in its entirety from the British Isles. The latter stages of the transit will be in progress during sunrise. This transit favours observers in eastern parts of Asia and Australasia, and parts of the north western America. Sadly, people living in the southern part of South America miss out on both of the 21st-century transits of Venus.

Visibility

Venus will cross the disc of the Sun on 2012 June 5th-6th. The map above shows the visibility of the event. The entire transit will be seen from north-west Canada, Alaska, eastern and northern Asia, the eastern half of Australia, New Zealand and the islands of the Western Pacific Ocean. The Sun will set while the transit is in progress in the grey area encompassing eastern Canada, the United States, central America and the north-western part of South America. The Sun will rise while the transit is in progress in the grey area taking in south-west Asia, eastern Russia, the Middle East, north-eastern parts of Africa and most of Europe, including the British Isles. The yellow lines on the diagram show the position of the terminator, where the Sun is either rising or setting, at the key phases of the transit.

Geocentric Circumstances

The geocentric circumstances of the transit are shown in the diagram to the right. During the transit, the diameter of the Sun is 1891.4 arcseconds and that of Venus is 57.8 arcseconds. In other words, the diameter of Venus is 0.03 that of the Sun, making it look like a rapidly moving sunspot. The whole transit lasts just under six and three quarter hours.

All timings are in Universal Time (UT) which is 5 hours ahead of EST and 4 Hours ahead of EDT.

The Transit from the United Kingdom

To convert to British Summer Time (BST), add one hour to the Universal Time.

In the United Kingdom, the transit ends between one and one and a half hours after sunrise depending on your location. Taking London as an example, sunrise occurs at 03h46m (UT) in the north-eastern sky. The final stages of the transit are in progress at sunrise. Venus starts to cross the solar limb at interior egress at 04h37m (UT), and the transit ends with exterior egress at 04h55m (UT).

The progress of the transit is summarized in the diagram below. The left-hand panel shows the movement of the Venus across the solar disc. The top of the diagram points to the zenith, the point directly overhead. The position of Venus is marked every UT hour. The right-hand panel shows the movement of the Sun in the sky. At the beginning of the transit, the Sun is below the horizon. By the end of the transit the Sun is east north east at an altitude of just over 10°.

Local Circumstances for Great Britain

Summary plots like the one shown above and animations showing the motion of Venus relative to the Sun as seen by someone observing the transit through appropriate eye protection are available for several locations across the UK and Ireland. The summary gif files are ~18Kb and the animations are ~200Kb. To view the animations properly, it may be better to download the animations and view them locally.

Other transits available:

© Crown Copyright

HM Nautical Almanac Office

UK Hydrographic Office

E-mail: hmnao@nao.rl.ac.uk

Last revision was made on 2007 November 5

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transit of Mercury on 1973 Nov 10

The transit or passage of a planet across the disk of the Sun may be thought of as a special kind of eclipse. As seen from Earth, only transits of the inner planets Mercury and Venus are possible. Planetary transits are far more rare than eclipses of the Sun by the Moon. On the average, there are 13 transits of Mercury each century. In comparison, transits of Venus usually occur in pairs with eight years separating the two events. However, more than a century elapses between each transit pair. The first transit ever observed was of the planet Mercury in 1631 by the French astronomer Gassendi. A transit of Venus occurred just one month later but Gassendi's attempt to observe it failed because the transit was not visible from Europe. In 1639, Jerimiah Horrocks and William Crabtree became the first to witness a transit of Venus.

At the present time, all transits of Mercury fall within several days of May 08 and November 10. Since Mercury's orbit is inclined seven degrees to Earth's, it intersects the ecliptic at two points or nodes which cross the Sun each year on those dates. If Mercury passes through inferior conjunction at that time, a transit will occur. During November transits, Mercury is near perihelion and exhibits a disk only 10 arc-seconds in diameter. By comparison, the planet is near aphelion during May transits and appears 12 arc-seconds across. However, the probability of a May transit is smaller by a factor of almost two. Mercury's slower orbital motion at aphelion makes it less likely to cross the node during the critical period. November transits recur at intervals of 7, 13, or 33 years while May transits recur only over the latter two intervals. The following table lists all transits of Mercury from 1901 through 2050. For a more complete and detailed list,

See Seven Century Catalog of Mercury Transits: 1600 CE to 2300 CE.

Transits of Mercury: 1901-2050

Date Universal Separation*

Time (Sun and Mercury)

1907 Nov 14 12:06 759"

1914 Nov 07 12:02 631"

1924 May 08 01:41 85"

1927 Nov 10 05:44 129"

1937 May 11 09:00 955"

1940 Nov 11 23:20 368"

1953 Nov 14 16:54 862"

1957 May 06 01:14 907"

1960 Nov 07 16:53 528"

1970 May 09 08:16 114"

1973 Nov 10 10:32 26"

1986 Nov 13 04:07 471"

1993 Nov 06 03:57 927"

1999 Nov 15 21:41 963" (graze)

2003 May 07 07:52 708"

2006 Nov 08 21:41 423"

2016 May 09 14:57 319"

2019 Nov 11 15:20 76"

2032 Nov 13 08:54 572"

2039 Nov 07 08:46 822"

2049 May 07 14:24 512"

* distance (arc-seconds) between the centers of the Sun and Mercury

To determine whether a transit of Mercury is visible from a specific geographic location, it is simply a matter of calculating the Sun's altitude and azimuth during each phase of the transit using information tabulated in the Seven Century Catalog of Mercury Transit. For the relevant equations and a sample calculation , see Transit Visibility. This web page also has links to several Excel files which perform the calculations automatically when the user inputs the latitude and longitude of any location.

In 1716, Edmond Halley published a paper describing exactly how transits could be used to measure the Sun's distance, thereby establishing the absolute scale of the solar system from Kepler's third law. Unfortunately, his method proved somewhat impractical since contact timings of the required accuracy are difficult to make. Nevertheless, the 1761 and 1769 expeditions to observe the transits of Venus gave astronomers their first good value for the Sun's distance.

Photograph of the Transit of Venus on 1882 Dec 06.

Taken by students at Vassar College (Sky & Telescope Feb. 1961).

Because Venus's orbit is considerably larger than Mercury's orbit, transits of Venus are much rarer. Indeed, only six such events have occurred since the invention of the telescope (1631,1639, 1761,1769, 1874 and 1882). Transits of Venus are only possible during early December and June when Venus's orbital nodes pass across the Sun. Transits of Venus show a clear pattern of recurrence at intervals of 8, 121.5, 8 and 105.5 years. The following table lists all transits of Venus during the 800 year period from 1601 through 2400.

For a more complete and detailed list See Six Millennium Catalog of Venus Transits: 2000 BCE to 4000 CE.

Transits of Venus: 1601-2400

Date Universal Separation

Time (Sun and Venus)

1631 Dec 07 05:19 940"

1639 Dec 04 18:25 522"

1761 Jun 06 05:19 573"

1769 Jun 03 22:25 608"

1874 Dec 09 04:05 832"

1882 Dec 06 17:06 634"

2004 Jun 08 08:19 627"

2012 Jun 06 01:28 553"

2117 Dec 11 02:48 724"

2125 Dec 08 16:01 733"

2247 Jun 11 11:30 693"

2255 Jun 09 04:36 492"

2360 Dec 13 01:40 628"

2368 Dec 10 14:43 835"

To determine whether a transit of Venus is visible from a specific geographic location, it is simply a matter of calculating the Sun's altitude and azimuth during each phase of the transit using information tabulated in the Six Millennium Catalog of Venus Transits. For the relevant equations and a sample calculation , see Transit Visibility. This web page also has links to several Excel files which perform the calculations automatically when the user inputs the latitude and longitude of any location.

The 2004 transit of Venus was visible from Europe, Africa and Asia. However, the final stages of the event were also visible from the eastern USA and Canada. Complete details can be found at 2004 Transit of Venus.

The 2012 transit of Venus will be visible from North America, the Pacific, Asia, Australia, eastern Europe, and eastern Africa. Details can be found at 2004 and 2012 Transits of Venus.

Transit Predictions

Acknowledgments

Transit predictions were generated on a Macintosh G4 iBook using algorithms developed from the Explanatory Supplement [1974] and Meeus [1989].

All calculations and diagrams presented in this section are those of the author and he assumes full responsibility for their accuracy.

References (Transit Predictions)

Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Ephemeris and the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, 1974, Her Majesty's Nautical Almanac Office, London.

Macdonald , P., 2002, "The transit of Venus on 2004 June 8", J. Brit. Astr. Assoc., 112, 6, pp 319-324.

Meeus, J., 1956,"Transits of Mercury, 1920 to 2080", J.B.A.A., 67, 30.

Meeus, J., 1958,"Transits of Venus, 3000 BC to AD 3000", J.B.A.A., 68, 98.

Meeus, J., 1989, Transits, Willmann-Bell, Inc., Richmond.

Newcomb, S., 1895,"Tables of the Motion of the Earth on its Axis Around the Sun", Astron. Papers Amer. Eph., Vol. 6, Part I.

Newcomb, S., 1898,"Transits of Mercury, 1677-1881", Astron. Papers Amer. Eph., Vol. 6, Part IV.

References (History of Transits)

Berry, Arthur. "A Short History of Astronomy" (1898) Good general information. Includes detailed description of 1761-69 transits.

Chapman, Allan. "Jeremiah Horrocks, the Transit of Venus, and the 'New Astronomy' in early seventeenth-century England". Qtrly. J. Royal Astr. Soc, 31 (1990) pp 333-357. An appraisal of Horrocks' achievement; an attempt to dispel some myths which surround him, and a discussion of his methods.

Ferris, Timothy "Coming of Age in the Milky Way", esp. pp 130-135 A very readable account of 17th century attempts to use the transit of Venus to measure the solar parallax.

Gaythorpe, S.B. "Horrocks Observations of the Transit of Venus 1639 November 24 (O.S.)". J.Brit.Astr.Assoc., 47 (1936-7) pp 60-68. This paper gives a detailed quantitative account of Horrocks' observations and the circumstances in which they were made.

Halley, Edmond. "A new Method of determining the Parallax of the Sun" (Phil.Trans., Royal Soc., Vol xxix, 1716 pp 454-464)

Hetherington, Barry. "An Astronomical Anniversary: The Transit of Venus 1769 June 3". J.Brit.Astr.Assoc., 80 (1969) pp 52-53. A short summary of various expeditions.

Horrocks, Jeremiah. "Venus in sole visa" (1662) translated as "The Transit of Venus over the Sun" and published in "Memoir of the Life and Labors of the Rev.Jeremiah Horrox" by Rev.A.B.Whatton (London, 1859) Horrox is also spelled Horrocks.

Maor, Eli. "June 8, 2004 - Venus In Transit", (1999) Princeton University Press. An excellent account of the history of transit expeditions and their historical importance to astronomy.

Maunder, Michael and Moore, Patrick . "Transit: When Planets Cross the Sun", (1999) Springer-Verlag. Another excellent account of the history of transit expeditions with details not covered in Maors' book. Includes practical information on observing transits.

Newcomb, S., 1898,"Transits of Mercury, 1677-1881", Astron. Papers Amer. Eph., Vol. 6, Part IV.

Pannekoek, Anton. "A History of Astronomy" (1961) Good general information. Includes detailed description of 1761-69 transits.

Porter, J.G. "Transits of Mercury and Venus". J.Brit.Astr.Assoc., 80 (1970) pp 183-189. A very useful discussion of the theory of transits, with some reference to Halley's method of determining the solar parallax.

Ruddy, H.E. "The Transit of Venus, 1874". J.Brit.Astr.Assoc., 64 (1954) pp 304-309. A diary style account of the expedition of Lt. C.Corbet to Kerguelen Island.

Westfall, Richard S. "Jeremiah Horrocks" + "Edmond Halley". Internet, Galileo Project. Key facts relating to these two astronomers. Useful bibliographies.

Links on Transits

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eros and the solar parallax

Posted on January 1, 2012 by Steven van Roode

This year will give us two opportunities to re-enact two classic methods to find the sun’s distance from earth: the transit of Venus and the opposition of Eros.

Throughout the telescopic era, the transit of Venus has played an important role in the determination of the solar parallax (or distance to the sun). The hazardous expeditions sent out in the eighteenth and nineteenth century to observe the transit of Venus had this determination as their main purpose. But after four observations in two centuries, employing state of the art techniques like achromatic telescopes and photography, it dawned on the astronomical community that the actual accuracy of the transit method wasn’t as high as expected. In the mean time, during the nineteenth century, other objects that could help in finding the solar parallax were discovered: asteroids.

The most famous asteroid that was used to find the solar parallax is coming into view this month. 433 Eros, a near-earth asteroid discovered in August 1898, comes to opposition every 2 to 3 years. During its opposition of 1900-1901, a worldwide programme was initiated to make parallax measurements of the asteroid, from which the solar parallax could be deduced. The results were published ten years later by Arthur Hinks. Another programme was executed during a closer approach in 1930-1931 by Harold Spencer Jones. The value of 8.″790 of the solar parallax secured by this programme was held to be definitive until 1968.

The opposition of Eros this month is special, because the asteroid will come close enough to earth to be visible through a small telescope for the first time in 37 years. Its shortest distance to earth this month is comparable to that of the January 1931 opposition. This will provide an unparalleled opportunity for amateur astronomers to conduct a programme to measure the asteroid’s parallax again and compare the results with the professional campaigns of 1901 and 1931. All that is needed is to take simultaneous pictures of Eros from different places on earth, for example before sunrise from Europe and after sunset in America.

Eros moves fast enough that you can detect its motion within an hour, which makes it easy to identify. The finder chart shows the path of Eros through the constellations of Leo and Sextans during the last days of January, until its closest approach of 16.6 millions of miles on January 31. Even a small group of dedicated amateurs can make valuable observations that lead to a value of the solar parallax. How will this measurement of Eros compare to the transit of Venus later this year? If you are interested to participate in this programme, let us know! Contact us at info@transitofvenus.nl. More background information and detailed instructions can be found in this article by Michael Richmond of the Rochester Institute of Technology and me.

2117

TRANSIT

of VENUS

Visibility is NOT for most of the USA although a good part of the Transit is visible from Hawaii

Venus will cross the disc of the Sun on 2117 December 11th.

The map above shows the visibility of the event.

Geocentric Circumstances

The geocentric circumstances of the transit are shown in the diagram to the right. During the transit, the diameter of the Sun is 1948.6 arcseconds and that of Venus is 63.1 arcseconds. In other words, the diameter of Venus is 0.03 that of the Sun, making it look like a rapidly moving sunspot. The minimum separation between the centre of the solar disc and Venus is 723.7 arcseconds. The whole transit lasts just under five and three quarter hours.

All timings are given in Terrestrial Time (TT), as accurate predictions of the Earth's rotation cannot be made for more than a few years into the future.

Other transits available:

© Crown Copyright

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2125 December 8th Transit of Venus

Visibility - Good for the Eastern USA and South America

Venus will cross the disc of the Sun on 2125 December 8th. The map above shows the visibility of the event.

Geocentric Circumstances

The geocentric circumstances of the transit are shown in the diagram above. During the transit, the diameter of the Sun is 1948.0 arcseconds and that of Venus is 63.1 arcseconds. In other words, the diameter of Venus is 0.03 that of the Sun, making it look like a rapidly moving sunspot. The minimum separation between the centre of the solar disc and Venus is 736.4 arcseconds. The whole transit lasts just over five and a half hours.

All timings are given in Terrestrial Time (TT), as accurate predictions of the Earth's rotation cannot be made for more than a few years into the future.

HM Nautical Almanac Office

UK Hydrographic Office

E-mail: hmnao@nao.rl.ac.uk

Last revision was made on 2007 November 5

2012 Summer Olympics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"2012 Olympics" redirects here. For the Winter Youth Olympics, see 2012 Winter Youth Olympics.

"London 2012" redirects here. For the Paralympic Games, see 2012 Summer Paralympics.

Games of the XXX Olympiad

This is the clear version of the official logo.

There are four official base colours, and another version for the

2012 Summer Paralympics.

For more details, see section "Logo" below.

Host city

Nations participating

Athletes participating

Events

Opening ceremony

Closing ceremony

Stadium

London, England, United Kingdom

144 (qualified)

204 (estimated)

10,500 (estimated)

302 in 26 sports

July 27

August 12

Olympic Stadium

]

The 2012 Summer Olympic Games, officially known as the Games of the XXX Olympiad or "London 2012 Olympic Games", are scheduled to take place in London, England, United Kingdom from 27 July to 12 August 2012.[1] London will become the first city to officially host the modern Olympic Games three times,[2][3] having previously done so in 1908 and in 1948.[4][5]

London was selected as the host city on 6 July 2005 during the 117th IOC Session in Singapore, defeating Moscow, New York City, Madrid and Paris after four rounds of voting.[6] The successful bid was headed by former Olympic champion Sebastian Coe.

The Olympics prompted a redevelopment of many of the areas of London in which the games are to be held – particularly themed towards sustainability.[7] While the budgetary considerations have generated some criticism,[8][9] the Games will make use of many venues which were already in place before the bid, including Wembley Stadium, Wembley Arena, Wimbledon All England Club, Lord's Cricket Ground, The O2 Arena, Earls Court Exhibition Centre, Weymouth and Portland National Sailing Academy, and the Excel Centre.

Bidding process

Main article: Bids for the 2012 Summer Olympics

A London 2012 Olympics banner at The Monument in London.

By the bid submission deadline of 15 July 2003, nine cities had submitted bids to host the 2012 Olympics. These cities were Havana, Istanbul, Leipzig, London, Madrid, Moscow, New York City, Paris and Rio de Janeiro.[10]

On 18 May 2004, the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as a result of a scored technical evaluation, reduced the number of cities to five: London, Madrid, Moscow, New York, and Paris.[11]

By 19 November 2004, all five candidate cities had submitted their candidate file to the International Olympic Committee. The IOC inspection team visited the five candidate cities during February and March 2005. The Paris bid suffered two setbacks during the IOC inspection visit: a number of strikes and demonstrations coinciding with the visits and a report coming out that Guy Drut, one of the key members of the Paris bid team and IOC member, would face charges over alleged corrupt party political finances.[12]

On 6 June 2005, the International Olympic Committee released its evaluation reports for the five candidate cities. Although these reports did not contain any scores or rankings, the evaluation report for Paris was considered the most positive, now followed closely by London which had narrowed down most of the gap observed by the initial evaluation in 2004 regarding Paris. Also New York and Madrid obtained very positive evaluation reports.[13]

Throughout the process and up to the vote at the 117th IOC Session, Paris was widely seen as the favourite to win the nomination, particularly as this was its third bid in recent history. Originally London was seen lagging Paris by considerable margin; however, this started to improve with the appointment of Sebastian Coe as new head of London 2012 on 19 May 2004. In late August 2004, some reports started emerging predicting a London and Paris tie in the 2012 bid.[14] In the final run-up to the 117th IOC Session, London and Paris appeared to be increasingly in a neck-and-neck race. On 1 July 2005, Jacques Rogge, when asked who the winner would be, told the assembled press: "I cannot predict it since I don't know how the IOC members will vote. But my gut feeling tells me that it will be very close. Perhaps it will come down to a difference of say ten votes, or maybe less".[15]

On 6 July 2005, the final selection was announced at the Raffles City Convention Centre in Singapore, where the 117th IOC Session was held. Here Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair was the only leader of the five candidate cities' countries to make a personal lobby (he had also been the only one to attend the 2004 Olympics).[16] Moscow was the first city to be eliminated, followed by New York and Madrid. The final two cities left in contention were London and Paris. At the end of the fourth round of voting, London won the right to host the 2012 Games with 54 votes, defeating Paris's 50.[17] Various French publications blamed the Paris loss on French President Jacques Chirac's statements before the vote that "We can't trust people [the British] who have such bad food. After Finland, it's the country with the worst food."[18] Two current members of the International Olympic Committee are from Finland. Several other news sources cited Bertrand Delanoë's complaint regarding Tony Blair's secret late night meetings with numerous (African) IOC representatives as having a more significant impact on final vote.[19] When reporting London's win, British media covered the expectant crowds in both France and Britain (and in the other bid cities), and contrasted the jubilant reaction in London to the reaction of the crowd in Paris, where many had gathered in hope of a French win.[20][21][22] However, the celebrations in London were overshadowed when London's transport system was attacked by terrorists less than 24 hours after the announcement.[23]

In December 2005, it was alleged by Alex Gilady, a senior IOC official, that London had won the right to host the Olympics only because of a voting error. A London 2012 spokesman dismissed this, saying "At the end of the day, it was a secret ballot. This is the opinion of one individual. The result is what matters and we are not going to be drawn into speculation."[24]

2012 Summer Olympics bidding results

NOC

Round 1

22

21

20

19

15

Round 2

27

25

32

16

Round 3

39

33

31

Round 4

54

50

Development and preparation

Since the 2005 bid

Main article: 2012 Summer Olympic development

The London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games was created to oversee the staging of the Games after the success of the bid, and held their first board meeting on 3 October 2005.[25] The committee, chaired by Lord Coe, is in charge of implementing and staging the games, while the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is in charge of the construction of the venues and infrastructure.[25] In April 2006 the Olympic Delivery Authority board was established.[26]

The Government Olympic Executive (GOE), a unit within the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), is the lead Government body for coordinating the London 2012 Olympics. The GOE reports through the DCMS Permanent Secretary to the Minister for Sports and the Olympics. It focuses on oversight of the Games, cross-programme programme management and the London 2012 Olympic Legacy before and after the Games that will benefit London and the UK. The organisation is also responsible for the supervision of the £9.3 billion of public sector funding.[27]

In August 2011, some security concerns arose surrounding the hosting of the Olympic Games in London,[28] due to the 2011 England riots, with a few countries expressing fear over the safety of the Games,[29] in spite of the International Olympic Committee's assurance that the riots will not affect the Games.[30]

The IOC's Coordination Commission for the 2012 Games completed their ninth visit to London in October 2011. They concluded that London has been making excellent progress and that the 2012 games would leave a lasting legacy. The commission will make their final visit to London in March 2012.[31] London was awarded the 2017 World Championships in Athletics in November 2011. [32]

Venues and infrastructure

Main article: Venues of the 2012 Summer Olympics and Paralympics

Olympic Stadium in June 2011

The 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games will use a mixture of new venues, existing and historic facilities, and temporary facilities, some of them in well-known locations such as Hyde Park and Horse Guards Parade. Some of the new facilities will be reused in their Olympic form, while others, will be resized or relocated.[33]

The majority of venues have been divided into three zones within Greater London: the Olympic Zone, the River Zone and the Central Zone. In addition to these are those venues that, by necessity, are outside the boundaries of Greater London, such as the Weymouth and Portland National Sailing Academy on the Isle of Portland in Dorset which will host the sailing events, some 125 miles (200 km) southwest of the Olympic Park. The football tournament will be staged at several grounds around the UK.[34] Work began on the Park in December 2006 when a sports hall in Eton Manor was pulled down.[35] The athletes' village in Portland was completed in September 2011.[36]

In November 2004 the 500 acre Olympic Park plans were revealed.[37] The plans for the site were passed in September 2004 by Tower Hamlets, Newham, Hackney and Waltham Forest.[38] The redevelopment of the area to build the Olympic Park required compulsory purchase orders of property. The London Development Agency and the London and Continental Railways had a dispute about the orders in November 2005. The LCR accused the LDA of killing off development in the area. The LDA planned alongside the Olympic Park to buy land for the Stratford City development project, which the 180-acre site of the former Stratford Rail Lands into a mixed-use development, including 4,500 new homes, office space, hotels and shops.[39] This resulted in 2011 with the completion of the largest urban shopping centre in Europe being operated by Westfield.[40] By May 2006 86% of the land had been bought as businesses fought eviction, this lead to an enquiry being set up. 206 companies had to relocate by July 2007.[41] In addition, residents who opposed the eviction tried to find way to stop it by setting up campaigns. However they had to leave as 94% of land was bought and the other 6% bought as a £9 billion regeneration project started.[42]

However, there were some issues with the original venues due to not being challenging enough or being financially unviable. For example, the road racing at the Olympics Games was originally scheduled to take place in Regent's Park and on Hampstead Heath. Instead the Olympic road races will start and finish on The Mall in central London and head out into Surrey to the south and include loops around Box Hill.[43] The Olympic Mountain bike event will take place at Hadleigh Farm after the event was moved from Weald Country Park,[44] after the UCI labeled the course at the park "too easy" in July 2008[45] It was touted that the course could be created in Wales.[46] A location in Kent was also considered[47]

The Olympic marathon course, which was set to finish in the Olympic stadium, was moved to the mall.[48] The idea angered some members of the local community, stating that they had been left out of the Olympics despite it taking place in their back garden no events would take place in the boroughs. The change was made as closing Tower bridge would cause "gridlock" to London.[49][50][51] North Greenwich Arena 2 was scrapped in a cost-cutting exercise, with Wembley Arena being used for badminton and rhythmic gymnastics events instead.[52][53][54][55]

Public transport

The Olympic Javelin service

London's public transport was an element of the bid which was scored poorly in the IOC's initial evaluation, however they felt that if the improvements were delivered in time for the Games then London would cope.[56]Transport for London (TfL) carried out numerous improvements in preparation for 2012, including the expansion of the London Overground's East London Line, upgrades to the Docklands Light Railway and the North London Line,[57] and the introduction of a new "Javelin" high-speed rail service,[58] using the Hitachi Corporation's "bullet" trains.[59][60][61] In September 2011 it was discovered that the platforms at Stratford International station were not at the right height for the Javelin trains. The platforms were raised with wood, which could be removed after the Games as the platforms were originally designed for Eurostar trains, and it is hoped that Eurostar will stop at the station after 2012.[62] According to network rail an additional 4,000 train services will run during the Games, with train operators putting on longer trains during the day.[63]

TfL also propose the construction of a £25 million cable car across the River Thames, the "Thames Gateway Cable Car", to link 2012 Olympics venues.[64] It will cross the Thames river between Greenwich Peninsula and the Royal Docks, carrying up to 2,500 passengers an hour 50 metres in the air. It is designed to cut journey times between the O2 arena and the ExCel exhibition centre – both of which are Olympic locations. The privately-funded system could provide a crossing every 30 seconds.[65]

The plan is to have 80% of athletes travel less than 20 minutes to their event[66] and to have 93% of athletes within 30 minutes of their event.[67] The Olympic Park would be served by ten separate railway lines with a combined capacity of 240,000 passengers per hour.[68] In addition the LOCOG planned for 90% of the venues to be served by three or more types of public transport.[67] Two park-and-ride sites were off the M25 with a combined capacity of 12,000 cars 25 minutes away from the Olympic Park. Another park and ride site was planned in Ebbsfleet which would have capacity for 9,000 cars were spectators could board a 10 minute shuttle bus.[67] To get spectators to Eton Dorney, four park and ride schemes were set up. Spectators would be dropped off at Windsor Racecourse with a bridge going over the Thames linking the racecourse to the rowing venue.[69]

A London Underground train decorated to promote London's Olympic bid – this coincided with plans for investment in the city's public transport network

Concerns have been expressed at the logistics of spectators traveling to the events scheduled for outside of London. In particular, the sailing events at Portland are in an area with no direct motorway connection, and with local roads that are heavily congested by existing tourist traffic in the summer.[70] However the Weymouth area did undergo a major upgrade on its road infrastructure. A £77 million relief road connecting Weymouth to Dorchester was built and opened in 2011.[71][72] Some £16 million pounds was put aside for the rest of the improvements.[73] Inaddtion the plans removed 5 roundabouts to ease congestion and replaced them with traffic lights[74][75] But some residents were unhappy that the roundabouts were removed.[76]

In January 2010, the South East England regional transport board criticised plans published by the Olympics Development Authority for not providing plans of a credible long term coach network saying "The ODA has been working on an extensive network of coach services... [but] the lack of reference to this work [in the plan] is both intriguing and at the same time concerning." On 15 February 2010, the ODA announced that FirstGroup was the preferred bidder for the provision of bus and coach services for the games. This will involve the provision of venue shuttle and park and ride services, services connecting peripheral park and ride sites on the M25 with the Olympic Park and Ebbsfleet, and a nationwide network of express coaches to the Olympic Park, and the Weymouth and Portland sailing venue. The services will require around 900 vehicles in total, although some will be sub-contracted.[77][78]

Financing

The costs of mounting the Games are separate from those for building the venues and infrastructure, and redeveloping the land for the Olympic Park. While the Games are privately funded, the venues and Park costs are met largely by public money.

On 15 March 2007, Tessa Jowell announced to the House of Commons a budget of £5.3 billion to cover building the venues and infrastructure for the Games, at the same time announcing the wider regeneration budget for the Lower Lea Valley budget at £1.7 billion.

On top of this, she announced various other costs including an overall additional contingency fund of £2.7 billion, security and policing costs of £600 million, VAT of £800 million and elite sport and Paralympic funding of nearly £400 million. According to these figures, the total for the Games and the regeneration of the East London area, is £9.345 billion. Then Mayor Ken Livingstone pledged the Games Organising Committee would make a profit.[79]

The costs for staging the Games (£2 billion) are funded from the private sector by a combination of sponsorship, merchandising, ticketing and broadcast rights. This budget is raised and managed by the London 2012 Organising Committee. According to Games organisers, the funding for this budget broadly breaks down as:

On 18 August 2007, The Belfast Telegraph reported that jubilation over winning the right to stage the Olympic Games was becoming more muted as realisation dawns on the public of the enormous costs involved in creating facilities for the athletes.[80] Grassroot sport cuts will fund the Olympics, government figures suggested on 19 August 2007.[81]

In November 2007, Edward Leigh MP, criticised the organisers for significantly under-estimating the cost of staging the games, suggesting they had either "acted in bad faith or were incompetent".[82]

On 10 December 2007, Tessa Jowell announced confirmation of the budget announced earlier in 2007. In June 2007, the Ministerial Funders’ Group (established to manage the allocation of contingency to the ODA within the overall budget) met and agreed a first allocation of contingency to the ODA, being £360 million out of the £500 million of initial contingency announced in March, to enable the ODA to manage early cost pressures.

Following its second meeting on 26 November 2007, the Funders’ Group has now agreed a baseline budget and scope proposed by the ODA. The total budgeted base cost to be met by the public sector funding package remains at £6.090 billion including tax and excluding general programme contingency as announced in March. This includes the allocation to the ODA of the remaining £140 million from the initial £500 million contingency announced in March.[83]

There have, however, been concerns over how the Olympics are to be funded. In February 2008, a London Assembly culture and sport committee report expressed concerns over the funding of the games taking away money from London's sports and arts groups.[84] There have also been complaints that funding towards the Olympics has been to the detriment of funding other areas of the UK. In Wales, there has been criticism from Plaid Cymru about the games depriving Wales of money, by using UK-wide funding rather than English funding.[85] The Wales on Sunday newspaper claimed former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair broke his promise to not use National Lottery funding for the Olympic games.[86][87]

As at December 2009, the Delivery Authority had allocated £702 million of Programme and Funders’ contingency, largely to cover the decisions to publicly fund the Village and Media Centre after it became clear private funding could not be secured on acceptable terms during the 2008 to 2010 economic crisis. According to the Government Olympic Executive and Olympic Delivery Authority risk assessments the remaining £1,270 million contingency is sufficient to manage risks to the Delivery Authority’s programme.[88]

Also from May 2010, the Olympic budget will be cut by £27 million as part of the £6.2 billion cuts by the new Conservative-Liberal coalition government.

On 19 July 2011, Hugh Robertson, Sports & Olympic Minister,revealed that he expected the project to be delivered on time and under budget. "With one year to go to London 2012, the Games construction is 88 per cent complete and ahead of time and under budget. That is an extraordinary thing for a Government Minister to be able to say a year out from the Games."[89]

Partners

To help fund the cost of staging the games the London Olympic organisers have agreed partnership deals with major companies. The companies have signed up into four categories; worldwide, tier one, tier two and tier three.

Worldwide partners:[90]

As of 9 September 2011, 44 companies have signed up for domestic sponsorship roles.[91]

Domestic Tier One Partners:[90]

Domestic Tier Two Supporters:[90]

Domestic tier three providers and suppliers:[90]

On 7 September 2011, the LOCOG announced that they had reached their £700 million domestic sponsorship target. They signed their 44th partner Westfield shopping centres who signed as a tier three sponsor.[91]

Ticketing

Organisers estimate that some 8 million tickets would be available for the Olympic Games, and 1.5 million tickets for the Paralympic Games.[citation needed] Ticket sign-up, in Great Britain, was launched on 22 March 2010 and the application website was opened on 15 March 2011 until 26 April 2011. Ticket prices range from £20 for many events to £2,012 for the most expensive seats at the opening ceremony. Ticket allocations for oversubscribed events was decided by a random ballot.[92] For the first time in Olympic history the sailing events will be ticketed.[93] The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOGOC) have admitted that further tickets, up to one million, will be released later in 2011 for events that have failed to sell out in the initial allocation.[94] Over half the people who applied got no tickets in Great Britain. The second round of ticket sales took place over a 10 day period between the 23 June and 3 July 2011, with priority given to those who were unsuccessful in the first allocation process. At this point there were about 1.7 million tickets for football and 600,000 for other sports, including archery, hockey, football, judo, boxing and volleyball, among other sports with 1.5 million tickets priced between £20 and £50. Unfortunately due to the amount of people buying tickets and because the ticketmaster website did not update immediately, 15,000 had their application rejected, but 90% of people did get some tickets; as some events sold out in 15 minutes and by 8 am 10 sports had sold out.[95] People who were successful in the first round of tickets were allowed to buy more during the period 8–17 July 2011. By this point 1.5 million tickets were available for football, 40,000 for Volleyball and 8,000 for freestyle wrestling on a first come first served basis. However by 10 July all the tickets for Volleyball had been sold, as 3.5 million tickets had been sold in total. Another round of tickets was promised to go on sale in 2012.[96] To reduce traffic, ticket holders will be entitled to free use of London's public transportation network on the day of the event.[97] It is estimated that 82% of available Olympic tickets and 63% of Paralympic tickets will be sold. LOCOG aims to raise £375–£400 million in ticket sales. There will also be free events: for example, the marathon, triathlon and road cycling.[98] Tickets for the London Prepares series, the Olympic test events, started to go on sale in May 2011.[99]

There was a huge demand for tickets as 20 million tickets were bought by 1.8 million people, three times the 6.6 million tickets available in the first round lot, with 95% of the applications from Great Britain. More than 50% of the sessions went to a random ballot.[100] A consumer group questioned the point of taking money out of people's bank accounts before they knew what tickets they had successfully purchased.[101] Barclays Bank ended up declining its customers tickets, stating that it was a unusual purchase and looked like fraud, before they and LOCOG tried to process them for a second time.[102] Many athletes and ex-Olympians also questioned the way the tickets were sold, with Triple Olympic Champion Bradley Wiggins labeling the process a shambles.[103] However, Lord Coe and the LOCOG insisted that the process was fair, and that there was no 'perfect' system.[104][105]

In Russia people bought "Olympic vouchers" which one would have to redeem in London during July and August 2012, with people making their own accommodation and travel arrangements.[106] In Brazil, the host of the 2016 Games, the ticket website did not work for three and a half days with people leaving disappointed as all their tickets appeared to sell out in a day, despite people having seemingly bought tickets.[107] And the British government was asked to explain why it bought 9,000 tickets.[108]

Free tickets were given to Military personnel and children were invited to 'win' tickets.[109] Free tickets were also given to the survivors and families of those who died during 7 July 2005 London bombings.[110]

Countdown

Countdown clock in Trafalgar Square

A digital clock, located in Trafalgar Square, commenced a countdown to the opening ceremony on 14 March 2011. However, less than 24 hours after it was switched on, it suffered a technical failure, and stopped—displaying "500 (days) 7 (hours) 06 (minutes) 56 (seconds)." It was quickly repaired.[111]

Hospitality

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) appointed Prestige Ticketing Limited to operate the London 2012 Prestige Ticketing programme.[112] The Prestige Ticketing on-site hospitality packages includes top-category tickets, fine dining and entertainment.[113] These hospitality tickets were on sale until 15 March 2011.[114]

Scheduling issues

Some representatives of countries which are majority Muslim have complained that the 2012 Olympic Games will take place during the month of Ramadan, which in 2012 occurs from 20 July to 19 August. During Ramadan, Muslims are to fast from sunrise to sunset, which may put Muslim athletes at a disadvanatage during the Games. Some Muslims have called for the Olympics to be rescheduled outside this period.[115]

Security

The British government announced in December 2011 that 13,500 members of the armed forces will be in place for the Olympic games, as well as 10,000 police (who will lead the security of the Games). Naval and air assets, including ships situated in the Thames, Eurofighter jets and surface-to-air missiles, will also be deployed as part of the security operation. The cost of security has also increased from 282m to 553m pounds sterling. This will be the biggest security operation Britain has faced for decades. The figure of 13,500 armed forces personnel is more than Britain currently has deployed in Afghanistan.[116]

Logo

There have been two London 2012 logos: one for the bidding process created by Kino Design and a second as the brand for the Games themselves. The former is a ribbon with blue, yellow, black, green, and red stripes winding through the text "LONDON 2012," making the shape of the River Thames in East London. The latter, designed by Wolff Olins, was unveiled on 4 June 2007 and cost £400,000.[117] This new logo is a representation of the number 2012, with the Olympic Rings embedded within the zero.[118]

The Paralympics logo (far left) and the different official colour combinations for the Wolff Olins main logo design

This will be the first time that the same essential logo is to be used for both the Olympic and Paralympic games.[119]

The standard colours are green, magenta, orange and blue; however the logo has incorporated a variety of colours, including the Union Flag to promote the handover ceremony.[120] The flexibility of the logo has also enabled sponsors to incorporate their corporate colours into a personalised version, such as Lloyds TSB,[121] British Airways,[122] and Adidas.[123]

London 2012 has stated that the new logo is aimed at reaching young people. Sebastian Coe stated that it builds upon everything that the organising committee has said "about reaching out and engaging young people, which is where our challenge is over the next five years." One observer, a managing director of an advertising agency, noted that the logo bore a strong resemblance to the logo for the 1974–1982 children's television programme Tiswas, commenting that appealing to young people is difficult, and that they will see right through attempts to patronise them.[124]

Early public reaction to the logo, as measured by a poll on the BBC website, was largely negative: more than 80% of votes gave the logo the lowest possible rating.[125] Several newspapers have run their own logo competitions, displaying alternative submissions from their readers. The Sun displayed a design by a macaque monkey.[126] It was suggested that the logo resembles the cartoon character Lisa Simpson performing fellatio[127] and others have complained that it looks like a distorted Swastika.[128] In February 2011, Iran complained that the logo appeared to spell out the word "Zion" and threatened to boycott the Olympics.[129] Iran submitted its complaint to the International Olympic Committee, describing the logo as "racist", asking that it be withdrawn and the designers be "confronted". The IOC "quietly" rejected the demands, and Iran announced it would not boycott the Games.[130]

A segment of animated footage released at the same time as the logo was reported to trigger seizures in a small number of people with photosensitive epilepsy. The charity Epilepsy Action received telephone calls from people who had had seizures after watching the sequence on TV. In response, a short segment was removed from the London 2012 website.[131] Ken Livingstone, then London Mayor, said that the company who designed the film should not be paid for what he called a "catastrophic mistake."[132]

A blogger at the BBC said that "London 2012's new logo has got the country talking [although] not in the manner the organisers would have hoped."[133] One employee at a design firm described it as "well thought out" and anticipated it would "become a source of pride for London and the Games."[134]

In October 2008, it was reported that clothing branded with the logo accounted for 20% of sales at Adidas' flagship Oxford Street store, despite occupying just 5% of floor space.[135]

Mascots

Main article: Wenlock and Mandeville

The official mascots for the 2012 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games were unveiled on 19 May 2010;[136] this marks the second time (after Vancouver) that both Olympic and Paralympic mascots were unveiled at the same time. Wenlock and Mandeville are animations depicting two drops of steel from a steelworks in Bolton.[136] They are named Wenlock, after the Shropshire town of Much Wenlock, which held a forerunner of the current Olympic Games, and Mandeville, after Stoke Mandeville, a village in Buckinghamshire where a forerunner to the Paralympic Games were first held.[136] The writer Michael Morpurgo wrote the story concept to the mascots, and an animation was produced;[137] it is intended that this will form part of an ongoing series concerning the mascots in the run-up to the Games in 2012.[136] Two stories have been created about the mascots: Out Of A Rainbow, the story of how Wenlock and Mandeville came to be, and Adventures On A Rainbow, which features the children from Out Of A Rainbow meeting the mascots and trying out many different Olympic and Paralympic sports.[138]

Handover ceremony

Main article: 2008 Summer Olympics closing ceremony

The handover ceremony marked the moment when the previous games in Beijing in 2008 handed over the Olympic Flag to the new host city of London.[139] Mayor of London Boris Johnson received the flag from Mayor of Beijing Guo Jinlong, on behalf of London. The next section was entitled "From London, 'With a whole Lotta love."The handover ceremony featured the urban dance group ZooNation, the Royal Ballet and Candoco, a disabled dance group, all dressed as typical London commuters waiting for a bus by a zebra crossing. Whilst Olympic Champions Chris Hoy, Victoria Pendleton and BMX World Champion Shanaze Reade; however due to Reade's broken wrist from her event Jamie Staff replaced her;[140] cycled around the stadium. A double-decker bus drove around the stadium to music composed by Philip Sheppard eventually stopping and transforming into a privet hedge featuring famous London landmarks such as Tower Bridge, The Gherkin and the London Eye. Jimmy Page and Leona Lewis then performed the Led Zeppelin classic Whole Lotta Love and David Beckham kicked a football into the crowd of athletes accompanied by violinist Elspeth Hanson and cellist Kwesi Edman.[141][142]

For the London 2012 Games, 'Take Up The Challenge' is the leading contender to be the music that will inspire a new generation of athletes. The anthem was composed by Rob Cremona, an Anglo-Maltese trumpeter and multi-instrumentalist from Woking in Surrey. Meanwhile, the handover has been celebrated in a UK-wide series of events. The BBC broadcast "The Visa London 2012 Party" on BBC One and Radio 2, the free concert on The Mall in central London had 40,000 tickets available.[143] In nations and regions around the UK there were live screens that showed the activities from Beijing, the Closing Ceremony and then the concert itself. Local communities around the UK also hosted their own events.

Year to go

First glimpse of the medals in Trafalgar Square.

On 27 July 2011, London celebrated the one year to the start of the games with a special event in Trafalgar Square. There were other events around the city such as Lord Coe and Colin Jackson cast their feet in clay at St Pancras Station, whilst the Aquatics Centre opened, with Tom Daly marking the event with a dive from the 10 metre platform. While in Trafalgar Square Jacques Rogge invited the world to London.[144] Prime Minister David Cameron promised that London's games would be the greatest, whilst Boris Johnson comically called for a snap Olympics. The Royal Mail announced that it would produce special stamps celebrating every gold medal won by a British athlete.[145]

Medals

In December 2010, it was announced that the Royal Mint would produce the medals for the Olympic and Paralympic Games.[146] The Royal Mint expected to produce around 4,700 medals for the games.[147] The medals are 7mm thick and weigh between 375-400g. They are designed by David Watkins. Each medal will have the sport and the discipline engraved on the rim. Like the last few Olympic medal designs the front will once again have Greek goddess of victory, Nike, stepping from Parthenon. The reverse side has the Games logo, and a ribbon depicting the River Thames with a grid symbolising pulling together and radiating energy.[145][148] The medals will have a purple ribbon attached to them which symbolises Royalty and protocol. The Princess Royal unveiled the design of the Olympic medals. In a poll by the Telegraph just 66% of the people who voted liked the design. Designer David Watkins said "I knew it was a take it and love it design. If not – sorry. There was no plan B."[149]

Test events

Main article: London Prepares series

Many test events will be held throughout 2011 and 2012, either through an existing championship such as Wimbledon or as a specially created event held under the banner of London Prepares. Some events are closed to the public, others are ticketed. Basketball and BMX were the first events to be tested within the Olympic Park.[150]

The Games

Participating nations

Athletes from 204 NOCs are expected to participate. The Netherlands Antilles Olympic Committee, which had planned to continue functioning after the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles, had its membership withdrawn by the IOC Executive Committee at the IOC session of June 2011. However, Dutch Antillean athletes who qualify for the 2012 Olympics will be allowed to participate independently under the Olympic flag.[151] Listed below are NOCs who have qualified at least one athlete. As of 26 November 2011, 144 nations have qualified at least one athlete.

Sports

See also: Category:2012 Summer Olympics events

The 2012 Summer Olympic programme features 26 sports and a total of 39 disciplines. The 2012 Paralympic Games programme has 20 sports and 21 disciplines. London's bid featured 28 sports, in line with other recent Summer Olympics, but the IOC voted to drop baseball and softball from the 2012 Games two days after it selected London as the host city. The IOC reinforced its decision to drop both sports during the 2006 Winter Olympics after they lost votes for reconsideration and were scheduled for the last time at Beijing in 2008.[177] Following the decision to drop the two sports, the IOC held a vote on whether or not to replace them. The sports considered were karate, squash, golf, roller sports, and rugby sevens. Karate and squash were the two final nominees, but neither received enough votes to reach the required two-thirds majority.[177] The IOC has given the approval for the addition of golf and rugby sevens for the 2016 games.[178][179]

The International Olympic Committee executive board met on 13 August 2009 and approved the addition of women's boxing to the programme. The International Boxing Federation has proposed that 40 athletes compete in five different weight classes.[180]

Murad Qureshi, a member of the London Assembly, is pushing for a Twenty20 cricket showcase tournament to be included in London.[181] Twenty20 cricket did originally bid for inclusion in 2012, but was not one of the finalist sports.[182] Netball is being drafted as a possible demonstration sport at the 2012 games. This idea was backed by then British prime minister Gordon Brown, suggesting that it would encourage more girls and young women to play sports.[183] The IOC eliminated demonstration sports following the 1992 Summer Olympics.[184] However, special tournaments have been run for non-Olympic sports during the games, such as the Wushu tournament at the 2008 Summer Olympics.[181] There has been speculation that the London Sevens tournament held at Twickenham as part of the IRB Sevens World Series could be put back to coincide with the Olympics.[185]

Following the awarding of the 2012 Olympic Games to London, the government announced that special dispensation would be granted to allow the various shooting events to go ahead, as had been the case previously for the 2002 Commonwealth Games.

Calendar

The final official schedule was released on 15 February 2011.[186]

July / August

25

Wed

25

Wed

26

Thu

26

Thu

27

Fri

OC

27

Fri

28

Sat

1

1

1

2

2

4

1

12

12

28

Sat

29

Sun

1

1

1

1

2

2

4

2

14

26

29

Sun

30

Mon

1

1

1

2

1

4

2

12

38

30

Mon

31

Tue

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

4

2

15

53

31

Tue

1

Wed

1

2

1

2

1

2

3

1

4

1

2

20

73

1

Wed

2

Thu

1

2

2

1

1

2

3

1

4

1

18

91

2

Thu

3

Fri

1

2

1

2

1

1

2

4

2

4

2

22

113

3

Fri

4

Sat

5

2

1

1

1

4

2

4

2

1

1

25

138

4

Sat

5

Sun

7

2

1

1

1

3

2

1

3

1

2

23

161

5

Sun

6

Mon

5

1

1

3

2

2

1

3

18

179

6

Mon

7

Tue

4

3

1

1

4

2

1

1

1

1

2

21

200

7

Tue

8

Wed

4

4

2

1

1

2

1

2

17

217

8

Wed

9

Thu

5

3

4

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

2

22

239

9

Thu

10

Fri

6

2

1

1

1

1

2

2

16

255

10

Fri

11

Sat

8

1

5

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

3

32

287

11

Sat

12

Sun

CC

1

1

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

15

302

12

Sun

Events

4

47

5

2

13

16

18

8

6

10

2

2

18

2

14

2

14

10

15

34

2

4

8

5

2

4

2

15

18

302

Events

Ceremonies

Wrestling

Total events

Cumulative total

July / August

The International Broadcast Centre in June 2011

The London 2012 Olympic Games will be the tenth Olympic Games (counting both Summer and Winter Games) where Panasonic's digital technologies will be used as the official recording format, dating since the Barcelona 1992 Olympic Games. The official international video will be produced and distributed from the International Broadcast Centre (IBC) in London Olympic Park, in 1080/50i High-Definition (HD) format.[187] Panasonic announced that DVCPRO HD will be the official recording format for capturing the Games. Olympic Broadcasting Services London (OBSL), the Host Broadcaster, will use P2 HD series equipment to support the broadcast of the competition. The cameras that will be used are the AG-HPX250, the company’s first P2 HD handheld camcorder with AVC-Intra recording and two new AVCCAM HD handheld camcorders, the AG-AC160 and AG-AC130, with Full HD imagers and a new, wider 21X HD zoom lens.[188]

Continuing the IOC's commitment to providing over-the-air television coverage to as broad a worldwide audience as possible, London 2012 is scheduled to be broadcast by a number of regional broadcasters. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is the home broadcaster for the Olympics and Channel 4 the home broadcaster for the Paralympics. The BBC aims to broadcast by various channels all 5,000 hours of the Olympic Games.[189] Much of the actual broadcasting is originated by the Olympic Broadcasting Services (OBS). The United States television rights currently owned by NBC account for over half the rights revenue for the IOC.[citation needed] Many television broadcasters granted rights to the games have bureaux and studios in London, but since at least the 1988 Olympic Winter Games in Calgary, rights-holder operations are hosted in the dedicated International Broadcast Centre (IBC). London's IBC is planned to be inside the security cordon of the Olympic Park.

Social media will be important for the Games. Online technology is being developed for the London 2012 Olympics and YouTube will stream highlights of the Games to countries all over the world as part of an IOC deal.[citation needed]

Olympic flag

On 26 September 2008 the Olympic and Paralympic flags were raised outside City Hall formally mark London becoming host city for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Beijing Gold medalist Christine Ohuruogu raised the Olympic flag, whilst Paralympic Champions, Helene Raynsford and Chris Holmes raised the Paralympic flag.[190][191]

Eco-policy

The Olympic Park will incorporate 45 hectares of wildlife habitat, with a total of 525 bird boxes, and 150 bat boxes. Local waterways and riverbanks are to be enhanced as part of the process.[192]

Renewable energy will also feature at the Olympics. It was originally planned to provide 20% of the energy for the Olympic Park and Village from renewable technologies; however, this may now be as little as 9%.[193] Proposals to meet the original target included large-scale on-site wind turbines and hydroelectric generators in the River Thames. However, these plans were scrapped for safety reasons.[194] The focus has since moved to installing solar panels on some buildings, and providing the opportunity to recover energy from waste.

Food packaging at the Olympics will be made from compostable materials – like starch and cellulose-based bioplastics – where it cannot be re-used or re-cycled. This will include fast food wrappers, sandwich boxes and drink cartons. After they have been used many of these materials will be suitable for anaerobic digestion (AD), allowing them to be made into renewable energy.[195]

Tourism and the 2012 Games

Kate Hoey MP at the launch of Blue Badge 2012 Guided Walks

The 2012 Games park near Stratford is attracting new tourists to the area.[196] The upgraded Greenway cycle and walking path provides an ideal viewing point for the park while the site remains closed to the public.

There are daily public walking tours[197] running alongside the 2012 site led by qualified Blue Badge tourist guides. The guided walks – which leave from Bromley-by-Bow tube station at 11 am – are attended by over 1000 people each month. They are run by guides who are specifically trained to talk about the 2012 Games and the history and traditions of the local area.

In 2010, Blue Badge Guides led 220 visits from colleges and schools to the 2012 Games site and nearby Olympic venues. During summer they guided over 1000 new visitors and tourists a day around East London’s 2012 sites.

In 2011, a new initiative to bring tourists and visitors into the area will involve a public waterbus ‘hop-on hop-off’ route, from Limehouse Basin to waterways near the Olympic Park.[198]

Cultural Olympiad

The Olympic Charter, the set of rules and guidelines for the organization of the Olympic Games and the governing the Olympic Movement states that

"The OCOG shall organise a programme of cultural events which must cover at least the entire period during which the Olympic Village is open."[199]

London's Cultural Olympiad includes 500 events spread over four years and culminating in the London 2012 Festival. The cost of the events is around £40 million and funding has been provided by Arts Council England, Legacy Trust UK and the Olympic Lottery Distributor.[200][201]

Those announced as being involved in the festival, which will run from 21 June to 9 September 2012, include Oscar winning actress Cate Blanchett, director Mike Leigh, musician Damon Albarn and artists including David Hockney, Lucian Freud and Rachel Whiteread.[202][203]

The Cultural Olympiad has been criticised for its refusal to include Cornish language, sport and culture amongst celebrations within its South West region. University College Falmouth had put a bid in for funding from the Legacy Trust for an event, An Gwary Meur (The Great Play), combining theatre and sport, participant and audience, story-telling and physical endeavour. This was backed by a wide range of partners including the Cornish Pilot Gig Association, Cornish Wrestling Association, Cornwall Rowing Association, Cornwall Rugby Football Union, the Cornwall Cultural Partnership and the Cornish Language Partnership. The refusal of this application has been viewed as "a direct barrier to people in Cornwall celebrating their distinct Cornish identity."[204]

Marketing

Stamps

In August 2009 the Royal Mail commissoned artists and illustrators to create 30 stamps which were released in batches of 10 during 2009 to 2011. The 30 stamps symbolise that the Games take place during the 30th Olympiad. Each stamp featured an Olympic or Paralympic sport and in addition had the London 2012 logo on each stamp.[205] The Royal Mail had initially approched photographers to be included as well but this was abandoned as the photos would have to be of dead people as the only living person allowed to feature on stamps in the United Kingdom is the Queen.[206] Stamps with an Olympic theme go back to the very first games in Athens 1890; when the organisers commissoned the sale of stamps in order to balance the books and construct the last four venues. When London first held the Games in 1908 no stamps were commissoned. On that occasion and for the 1912 are the only time when stamps were not issued. When London last held the Games in 1948, just four stamps were issued.[207] On 22 July 2011 the last of the 30 stamps were released.[208]

Merchandise

On 21 July 2009 the LOCOG announced that Hornby Plc had won the license to develop and market a range associated with the Games. The license allowed the company to sell products across its Corgi, Hornby, Scalextric and Airfix brands. Airfix will have kits for all of the main venues,[209] including a 1:500 scale Olympic Stadium.[210] The centre piece of the Scalextric collection will be a cycling Velodrome set.[209] The collection was launched by British cyclist Lizzie Armitstead in Hamleys toy store in June 2011, Hornby staggared the release of the collection with the Scalextric velodrome released in September.[211] In March 2011 the LOCOG commissioned and published a series of traning guides.[212] The merchandise was sold online and in five shops known as "The London 2012 Shop," in Heathrow Airport, Stansted Airport, St Pancras International Station, Paddington Station and in John Lewis on Oxford Street. In addition Addidas sold its London 2012 range in its flagship store on Oxford Street and selective Next stores sold their 2012 range.[213] Sainsburys as Official sponsors of the Paralympics also sold merchandise within their stores.[214]

Criticism of IOC's Policy with Athletes

The IOC has drawn criticism[215][216] for its social media guidelines which, commentators argue, appear to infringe on athletes' right to free speech. The guidelines appear to prohibit athletes from commenting on other participants, promoting their own sponsors, or using the word "Olympic" (with certain specific exceptions) on their personal websites. Further criticism has been levelled at the IOC's creation of a website intended to allow the reporting of suspected breaches of the guidelines.

See also

2012 Summer Olympic Games aka the Games of the XXX Olympiad

The 2012 Summer Olympic Games, officially known as the Games of the XXX Olympiad, are due to take place in London, United Kingdom, from from 2012 July 27 to August 12.[1] London will become the first city to officially host the modern Olympic Gamesthree times,[2][3] having previously done so in 1908 and in 1948.[4][5]

London was elected as the host city on 2005 July 6 during the 117th IOC Session in Singapore, defeating Moscow, New York City, MadridParis[6] and The successful bid was headed by former Olympic champion Sebastian Coe.

after four rounds of voting.

The Olympics prompted a redevelopment of many of the areas of London in which the games are to be held – particularly

themed towards sustainability[7] – while the budgetary considerations have generated some criticism.[8][9]

Bidding Process

Main article: 2012 Summer Olympics bids

A London 2012 Olympics banner at The Monument in London.

By the bid submission deadline of 15 July 2003, nine cities had submitted bids to host the 2012 Olympics. These cities were Havana, Istanbul, Leipzig, London, Madrid, Moscow, New York, Paris and Rio de Janeiro.[10]

On 18 May 2004, the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as a result of a scored technical evaluation, reduced the number of cities to five: London, Madrid, Moscow, New York, and Paris.[11]

By 19 November 2004 all five candidate cities had submitted their candidate file to the International Olympic Committee. The IOC inspection team visited the five candidate cities during February and March 2005. The Paris bid suffered two setbacks during the IOC inspection visit: a number of strikes and demonstrations coinciding with the visits and a report coming out that Guy Drut, one of the key members of the Paris bid team and IOC member, would face charges over alleged corrupt party political finances.[12]

On 6 June 2005 the International Olympic Committee released its evaluation reports for the five candidate cities. Although these reports did not contain any scores or rankings, the evaluation report for Paris was considered the most positive, now followed closely by London which had narrowed down most of the gap observed by the initial evaluation in 2004 regarding Paris. Also New York and Madrid obtained very positive evaluation reports.[13]

Throughout the process and up to the vote at the 117th IOC Session, Paris was widely seen as the favourite to win the nomination, particularly as this was its third bid in recent history. Originally London was seen lagging Paris by considerable margin, however this started to improve with the appointment of Sebastian Coe as new head of London 2012 on 19 May 2004. In late August 2004 some reports started emerging predicting a London and Paris tie in the 2012 bid.[14] In the final run-up to the 117th IOC Session, London and Paris appeared to be increasingly in a neck-and-neck race. On 1 July 2005 Jacques Rogge, when asked who the winner would be, told the assembled press: "I cannot predict it since I don't know how the IOC members will vote. But my gut feeling tells me that it will be very close. Perhaps it will come down to a difference of say ten votes, or maybe less".

On 6 July 2005, the final selection was announced at the Raffles City Convention Centre in Singapore, where the 117th IOC Session was held. Here Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair was the only leader of the five candidate cities' countries to make a personal lobby (he had also been the only one to attend the 2004 Olympics).[15] Moscow was the first city to be eliminated, followed by New York and Madrid. The final two cities left in contention were London and Paris. At the end of the fourth round of voting, London won the right to host the 2012 Games with 54 votes, defeating Paris's 50. Various French publications blamed the Paris loss on French President Jacques Chirac's statements before the vote that "We can't trust people [the British] who have such bad food. After Finland, it's the country with the worst food."[16] Two current members of the International Olympic Committee are from Finland. Several other news sources cited Bertrand Delanoë's complaint regarding Tony Blair's secret late night meetings with numerous (African) IOC representatives as having a more significant impact on final vote.[17] When reporting London's win, British media covered the expectant crowds in both France and England (and in the other bid cities), and contrasted the jubilant reaction in London to the reaction of the crowd in Paris, where many had gathered in hope of a French win.[18][19][20] However, the celebrations in London were overshadowed when London's transport system was attacked less than 24 hours after the announcement.[21]

In December 2005 it was alleged by Alex Gilady, a senior IOC official, that London had won the right to host the Olympics only because of a voting error. A London 2012 spokesman dismissed this, saying "At the end of the day, it was a secret ballot. This is the opinion of one individual. The result is what matters and we are not going to be drawn into speculation."[22]

2012 Summer Olympics bidding results

NOC

Round 1

22

21

20

19

15

Round 2

27

25

32

16

Round 3

39

33

31

Round 4

54

50

Olympic Development and Preparation

Developments Since the 2005 Bid

Main article: 2012 Summer Olympic development

The London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games was created to oversee the staging of the Games after the success of the bid, and held their first board meeting on 7 October 2005. The committee, chaired by Lord Coe, is in charge of implementing and staging the games, while the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is in charge of the construction of the venues and infrastructure.

The Government Olympic Executive (GOE), a unit within the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), is the lead Government body for coordinating the London 2012 Olympics. The GOE reports through the DCMS Permanent Secretary to the Minister for the Olympics, Paralympics and London, Tessa Jowell. It focuses on oversight of the Games, cross-programme programme management and the 2012 legacy before and after the Games that will benefit London and the UK.

Various aspects of the Games have developed since the time of the initial bid.

Venues and Infrastructure

Main article: 2012 Summer Olympics venues

Wembley Stadium, the most expensive stadium ever built at the time,[23] will be a venue for football.

The O2 will be a venue for gymnastics and basketball.

The All England Club at Wimbledon will be a venue for tennis.

The 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games will use a mixture of new venues, existing and historic facilities, and temporary facilities, some of them in well-known locations such as Hyde Park and Horse Guards Parade. In the wake of the problems that plagued the Millennium Dome, the organisers' intention is that there will be no white elephants after the Games and instead that a "2012 legacy" will be delivered. Some of the new facilities will be reused in their Olympic form, while others, including the 80,000 seater main stadium,[24] will be reduced in size and several will be relocated elsewhere in the UK. The plans are part of the regeneration of Stratford in east London which will be the site of the Olympic Park, and of the neighbouring Lower Lea Valley.

This has required the compulsory purchase of some business properties, which are being demolished to make way for Olympic venues and infrastructure improvements. This has caused some controversy, with some of the affected proprietors claiming that the compensation offered is inadequate. In addition, concerns about the development's potential impact on the future of the century-old Manor Garden Allotments have inspired a community campaign, and the demolition of the Clays Lane housing estate was opposed by tenants.

The majority of venues have been divided into three zones within Greater London: the Olympic Zone, the River Zone and the Central Zone. In addition to these are those venues that, by necessity, are outside the boundaries of Greater London, such as the Weymouth and Portland National Sailing Academy on the Isle of Portland in Dorset (which will host the sailing events), Tring in Hertfordshire (which will host the start of the 50 km walk) and other stadia across the UK.

Public Transport

The London Underground will transport spectators to the Olympic venues.

Lord's Cricket Ground will be the venue for archery.

Public transport, an aspect of the bid which scored poorly in the IOC's initial evaluation, needs to see numerous improvements, including the expansion of the London Overground's East London Line, upgrades to the Docklands Light Railway and the North London Line, and the new "Javelin" high-speed rail service, using Hitachi 'bullet' trains.

They also plan to have 80% of athletes travel less than 20 minutes to their event. The Park would be served by 10 separate railway lines with a combined capacity of 240,000 passengers per hour. Park and ride schemes also feature amongst the many plans aimed at reducing traffic levels during the games.

Concerns have been expressed at the logistics of spectators travelling to the venues outside London. In particular, the sailing events on Portland are in an area with no direct motorway connection, and with local roads that are heavily congested by existing tourist traffic in the summer. There is also only limited scope for extra services on the South Western Main Line beyond Southampton, without new infrastructure. Games organisers say that having analysed past Games sailing events, they would expect fewer spectators than have attended recent events such as the Carnival and Tall Ships Race, this despite Great Britain topping the sailing medal table at the previous three Olympics.

Financing

The costs of mounting the Games are separate from those for building the venues and infrastructure, and redeveloping the land for the Olympic Park. While the Games are privately funded, the venues and Park costs are met largely by public money.

On 15 March 2007 Tessa Jowell announced to the House of Commons a budget of £5.3 billion to cover building the venues and infrastructure for the Games, at the same time announcing the wider regeneration budget for the Lower Lea Valley budget at £1.7 billion.

On top of this, she announced various other costs including an overall additional contingency fund of £2.7 billion, security and policing costs of £600 million, VAT of £800 million and elite sport and Paralympic funding of nearly £400 million. According to these figures, the total for the Games and the regeneration of the East London area, is £9.345 billion. Then Mayor Ken Livingstone pledged the Games Organising Committee would make a profit.[25]

The costs for staging the Games (£2 billion) are funded from the private sector by a combination of sponsorship, merchandising, ticketing and broadcast rights. This budget is raised and managed by the London 2012 Organising Committee. According to Games organisers, the funding for this budget broadly breaks down as:

On 18 August 2007 The Belfast Telegraph reported that jubilation over winning the right to stage the Olympic Games was becoming more muted as realisation dawns on the public of the enormous costs involved in creating facilities for the athletes.[26] Grassroot sport cuts will fund the Olympics, government figures suggested on 19 August 2007.[27]

In November 2007, Edward Leigh MP, criticised the organisers for significantly under-estimating the cost of staging the games, suggesting they had either "acted in bad faith or were incompetent".[28]

On 10 December 2007 Tessa Jowell announced confirmation of the budget announced earlier in 2007. In June 2007, the Ministerial Funders’ Group (established to manage the allocation of contingency to the ODA within the overall budget) met and agreed a first allocation of contingency to the ODA, being £360m out of the £500m of initial contingency announced in March, to enable the ODA to manage early cost pressures.

Following its second meeting on 26 November 2007, the Funders’ Group has now agreed a baseline budget and scope proposed by the ODA. The total budgeted base cost to be met by the public sector funding package remains at £6.090bn including tax and excluding general programme contingency as announced in March. This includes the allocation to the ODA of the remaining £140m from the initial £500m contingency announced in March.[29]

There have, however, been concerns over how the Olympics are to be funded. In February 2008, a London Assembly culture and sport committee report expressed concerns over the funding of the games taking away money from London's sports and arts groups.[30] There have also been complaints that funding towards the Olympics has been to the detriment of funding other areas of the UK. In Wales, there has been criticism from Plaid Cymru about the games depriving Wales of money, by using UK-wide funding rather than English funding.[31] The Wales on Sunday newspaper claimed former UK Prime Minister , Tony Blair broke his promise not to use National Lottery funding for the Olympic games.[32][33]

Partners

To help fund the cost of the games the London Olympic organisers have agreed partnership deals with major companies. "Tier One" partners already announced include Lloyds TSB, EDF Energy, BT, British Airways, BP and Adidas."Tier Two" supporters already announced include Deloitte, Cadbury's, Adecco, Cisco and UPS.

Ticketing

Organisers estimate that some 7.7 million tickets would be available for the Olympic Games, and 1.5 million tickets for the Paralympic Games. They will be going on sale in 2011, with at least 50% of these priced under £20. To reduce traffic, ticketholders would be entitled to free use of London's public transportation network on the day of the event.[34] It is estimated that 82% of available Olympic tickets and 63% of Paralympic tickets will be sold. There will also be free events: for example, the marathon, triathlon and road cycling.

Scheduling Issues

Some representatives of Muslim countries have complained that the 2012 Olympic Games will take place during the month of Ramadan, which in 2012 occurs from 20 July to 19 August. During Ramadan, Muslims are to fast from sunrise to sunset, which may put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage during the Games. Some Muslims have called for the Olympics to be rescheduled outside this period.[35]

Logo

There have been two London 2012 logos: one for the bidding process created by Kino Design and a second as the brand for the Games themselves. The latter, designed by Wolff Olins, was unveiled on 4 June 2007 and cost £400,000.[36] This new logo is a representation of the number 2012, with the Olympic Rings embedded within the zero.[37]

This will be the first time that the same essential logo is to be used for both the Olympic and Paralympic games.[38]

The standard colours are green, magenta, orange and blue; however the logo has incorporated a variety of colours, including the Union Flag to promote the handover ceremony.[39] The flexibility of the logo has also enabled sponsors to incorporate their corporate colours into a personalised version, such as Lloyds TSB,[40] British Airways,[41] and Adidas.[42]

London 2012 has stated that the new logo is aimed at reaching young people. Sebastian Coe stated that it builds upon everything that the organising committee has said "about reaching out and engaging young people, which is where our challenge is over the next five years". One observer, a managing director of an advertising agency, noted that the logo bore a strong resemblance to the logo for children's television programme Tiswas, commenting that appealing to young people is difficult, and that they will see right through attempts to patronise them.[43]

Early public reaction to the logo, as measured by a poll on the BBC website, was largely negative: more than 80% of votes gave the logo the lowest possible rating.[44] Several newspapers have run their own logo competitions, displaying alternative submissions from their readers. The Sun displayed a design by a macaque monkey.[45] It was suggested that the logo resembles an image of the cartoon character Lisa Simpson performing fellatio[46] and others have complained that it looks like a distorted Swastika.[47]

The Paralympics logo (far left) and the different official colour combinations for the Wolff Olins main logo design.

A segment of animated footage released at the same time as the logo was reported to trigger seizures in a small number of people with photosensitive epilepsy. The charity Epilepsy Action received telephone calls from people who had had seizures after watching the sequence on TV. In response, a short segment was removed from the London 2012 website.[48] Ken Livingstone, then London Mayor, said that the company who designed the film should not be paid for what he called a "catastrophic mistake".[49]

A blogger at the BBC admitted that "London 2012's new logo has got the country talking [although] not in the manner the organisers would have hoped".[50] One employee at a design firm described it as "well thought out" and anticipated it would "become a source of pride for London and the Games."[51]

In October 2008 it was reported that clothing branded with the logo accounted for 20% of sales at Adidas' flagship Oxford Street store, despite occupying just 5% of floor space.[52]

Handover Ceremony

Main article: 2008 Summer Olympics closing ceremony

The handover ceremony marked the moment when the previous games in Beijing in 2008 handed over the Olympic Flag to the new host city of London.[53] Mayor of London Boris Johnson received the flag from Mayor of Beijing Guo Jinlong, on behalf of London. The handover ceremony featured the urban dance group ZooNation, the Royal Ballet and Candoco, a disabled dance group, all dressed as typical London commuters waiting for a bus by a zebra crossing. A double-decker bus drove around the stadium to music composed by Philip Sheppard eventually stopping and transforming into a privet hedge featuring famous London landmarks such as Tower Bridge, The Gherkin and the London Eye. Jimmy Page and Leona Lewis then performed the Led Zeppelin classic Whole Lotta Love and David Beckham kicked a football into the crowd of athletes accompanied by violinist Elspeth Hanson and cellist Kwesi Edman.[54]

For the London Games, the handover was also celebrated in a UK-wide series of events. The BBC broadcast "The Visa London 2012 Party" on BBC One and Radio 2, the free concert on The Mall in central London had 40,000 tickets available.[55] In nations and regions around the UK there were live screens that showed the activities from Beijing, the Closing Ceremony and then the concert itself. Local communities around the UK also hosted their own events.

Sports

See also: Category:2012 Summer Olympics events

The 2012 Summer Olympic programme features 26 sports and a total of 39 disciplines. The 2012 Paralympic Games programme has 20 sports and 21 disciplines. London's bid featured 28 sports, in line with other recent Summer Olympics, but the IOC voted to drop baseball and softball from the 2012 Games two days after it selected London as the host city. The IOC reinforced its decision to drop both sports during the Turin Games after they lost votes for reconsideration. They will remain Olympic sports, despite being scheduled for the last time at Beijing in 2008.[56] Following the decision to drop the two sports, the IOC held a vote on whether or not to replace them. The sports considered were karate, squash, golf, roller sports and rugby sevens. Karate and squash were the two final nominees, but neither received enough votes to reach the required two-thirds majority.[57] The IOC has given the approval for the addition of golf and sevens rugby for the 2016 games. [58][59]

The International Olympic Committee executive board met on 13 August 2009 and approved the addition of women's boxing to the programme. The International Boxing Federation has proposed that 40 athletes compete in five different weight classes.[60]

Murad Qureshi, a member of the London Assembly, is pushing for a Twenty20 cricket showcase tournament to be included in London.[61] Twenty20 cricket did originally bid for inclusion in 2012, but was not one of the finalist sports.[62] Netball is being drafted as a possible demonstration sport at the 2012 games. This idea was backed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, suggesting that it would encourage more young girls into playing sport.[63] The IOC eliminated demonstration sports following the 1992 Summer Olympics,[64] however, special tournaments have been run for non-Olympic sports during the games, such as the Wushu tournament at the 2008 Summer Olympics.[61] There has been speculation that the London Sevens tournament held at Twickenham as part of the IRB Sevens World Series could be put back to coincide with the Olympics.[65]

Broadcasting

This article needs additional citations for verification.

Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008)

Continuing the IOC's commitment to providing over-the-air television coverage to as broad a worldwide audience as possible, London 2012 is scheduled to be broadcast by a number of regional broadcasters. The United States television rights currently owned by NBC account for over half the rights revenue for the IOC. Many television broadcasters granted rights to the games have bureaux and studios in London, but since at least the 1988 Olympic Winter Games in Calgary, rights-holder operations are hosted in the dedicated International Broadcast Centre (IBC). London's IBC is planned to be inside the security cordon of the Olympic Park.

As rights for the 2012 Games have been packaged with those for the 2010 Winter Olympics, broadcasters will be largely identical for both events. Confirmed broadcasters include:

    • In Europe, members of the European Broadcasting Union will broadcast the Games in their respective countries.[66]

    • In the United Kingdom the BBC will be sole broadcaster of the Games[67] and have made a commitment to show every event live.[68]

    • Italy, SKY Italia originally achieved rights, then was forced by CIO to sell them to a RAI on 17 September 2008 along with the Vancouver 2010 ones, in an Olympics/FIFA World Cup rights exchange,[69] and due to compulsory free broadcasting of the event in the country.

    • In Estonia Eesti Televisioon (ETV) will be broadcasting the games.

    • In Greece, the national broadcaster ERT has the rights to broadcast the games.

    • In Spain, TVE has the rights to broadcast these games.

    • In Sweden, free-to-air SVT and Viasat have the rights to broadcast the games.

    • In the Netherlands, free-to-air public broadcaster NOS have the rights to broadcast the games.

    • In Slovakia, Slovenska televizia and Radio Slovakia will broadcast the games.

    • In Germany and Austria, ARD, ZDF, ProSiebenSat.1 and RTL Group has rights broadcast the games.

    • In Austria, ORF will broadcast the games.

    • In Portugal, RTP will broadcast the games.

    • In the Republic of Ireland, RTÉ will broadcast all of the games.

    • In Poland, TVP will broadcast the games.

    • In the United States, NBC Universal has the rights to the games.[70] Coverage will appear on the flagship NBC, and presumably its sister properties, such as Spanish-language network Telemundo and cable channels USA, CNBC, Bravo and MSNBC.

    • In South Korea, SBS, MBC, and KBS have the rights to broadcast the games.

    • In Canada, CTV, V, TSN and RDS have the rights to broadcast the games.[71]

    • In Brazil, Rede Record has the exclusive rights to broadcast the games free-to-air, but sells the cable rights to Sportv and internet rights to Terra Networks.[72]

    • In Guatemala the four major national networks Channels 3, 7, 11, 13 will broadcast the games

    • In Mexico, the two major national networks Televisa and TV Azteca will broadcast the games.

    • In Panama, two of the major national networks TvMax Channel 9 and RPC Channel 4 will broadcast the games.

    • In Australia, the Nine Network in joint partnership with subscription television partner Foxtel will broadcast the games. This would be the first time in over 25 years that the Seven Network has not aired the summer games, and the second considering both Olympics.

    • In New Zealand, free-to-air Prime Television New Zealand and pay TV parent company SKY Network Television have the rights to these games.[73] This will be the first time the Olympic Games coverage is not carried on a TVNZ network.[citation needed]

    • In the People's Republic of China, China Central Television and China Radio will broadcast the games.

    • In Jamaica, Television Jamaica and CVM Television will live broadcast of 2012 Olympics Games in London.

Social media will be an important for the Games. Online technology is being developed for the London 2012 Olympics and YouTube will stream highlights of the Games to countries all over the world as part of an IOC deal.

Olympic Flag

The flag was raised outside City Hall on Friday, 26 September 2008 to celebrate the start of the cultural Olympiad. The flag will continue to fly outside City Hall until the day of the Olympic opening ceremony. On the same day the Paralympic flag was raised outside City Hall.

Eco-Policy

The Olympic Park will incorporate 45 hectares of wildlife habitat, with a total of 525 bird boxes, and 150 bat boxes. Local waterways and riverbanks are to be enhanced as part of the process.[74]

See Also

References

External Links

Preceded by

Beijing

Summer Olympic Games

Host City

XXX Olympiad (2012)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALSO THE INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION HAS ITS NEXT GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING IN BEIJING, CHINA THIS AUGUST 20 - 31

http://www.astronomy2012.org/dct/page/1

---------------------------------------------------------------

Succeeded by

Rio de Janeiro