Please use the following considerations when doing your partner's peer response for the "Yes Mean Yes" essay.
Peer Partner:
Does the essay have at least 11 superscript notations in the text of the paper?
Do these superscripts correspond to the 11 Endnotes/Footneotes that appear at the end/bottom of the paper?
Do these Endnotes/Footnotes correspond to the Bibliographic entries at the end of the paper?
Is the numbering of the superscripts sequential (1,2,3,4,5, etc)
Were at least 11 citations used in the paper? Were they done correctly?
Is there at least one Discussion Footnote?
Do you understand why the Discussion Footnote information does NOT belong in the text of the paper?
Were there at least 5 CREDIBLE sources cited? Were they listed correctly?
Is this paper at least 85% completed (including sources, references, and citations)?
Was the introduction interesting? Was it effective? Was the thesis stated well?
Did the essay make sense? Was it logical?
Was the essay written well? Was it interesting to read or was it boring?
What suggestions do you have to "kick it up a notch"?
Did your partner defend, challenge or qualify this practice well enough for you to understand it?
Did you partner argue a position on Yes Means Yes? Were you convinced by your partner's argument?
Was the essay written with a "voice" of a college?
Was the Chicago 1 formatting done well?
Were authors introduced properly?
Were sources evaluated and compared?
Did your partner create a discussion between the sources?
Were there the minimum required sources with the current year of publication?
Spelling errors?
Grammatical errors?
Rubric Score (0-9)