Diego A. Forero, MD, PhD

Recommended Articles About Scientific Writing

General Papers

-Forero DA, Lopez-Leon S, Perry G. A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine. Journal of Translational Medicine 2020 Nov 10;18(1):425.

-Bourne PE. Ten simple rules for getting published. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Oct;1(5):e57.

-Zhang W. Ten simple rules for writing research papers. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jan 30;10(1):e1003453.

-Mensh B, Kording K. Ten simple rules for structuring papers. PLoS computational biology. 2017 Sep 28;13(9):e1005619.

-Cook DA. Twelve tips for getting your manuscript published. Med Teach. 2016;38(1):41-50. 

-Vitse CL, Poland GA. Writing a scientific paper-A brief guide for new investigators. Vaccine. 2017 Feb 1;35(5):722-728. 

-Huston P, Choi B. A guide to publishing scientific research in the health sciences. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Sep 7;43(9):169-175. 

-Busse C, August E. How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal. J Cancer Educ. 2020, in press.

-Lawrence TS. Writing a research paper. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2020 Mar 15;106(4):674-6.

-Aga SS, Nissar S. Essential Guide to Manuscript Writing for Academic Dummies: An Editor’s Perspective. Biochemistry Research International. 2022 Sep 1;2022.

-Wirth F, Cadogan CA, Fialová D, Hazen A, Lutters M, Paudyal V, Weidmann AE, Okuyan B, Henman MC. Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy. International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2024, in press.

 -Patience GS, Boffito DC, Patience PA. How do you write and present research well?. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2015 Oct;93(10):1693-6.

-Glover NM, Antoniadi I, George GM, Götzenberger L, Gutzat R, Koorem K, Liancourt P, Rutowicz K, Saharan K, You W, Mayer P. A Pragmatic Approach to Getting Published: 35 Tips for Early Career Researchers. Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 9;7:610.

-Iskander JK, Wolicki SB, Leeb RT, Siegel PZ. Successful Scientific Writing and Publishing: A Step-by-Step Approach. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jun 14;15:E79. 

-Meo SA. Anatomy and physiology of a scientific paper. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018 Nov;25(7):1278-1283.

-Morton PG, Nerges J. Strategies to Turn a Graduate School Paper Into a Publishable Journal Manuscript. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2020 Dec 15;31(4):371-379. 

-Ecarnot F, Seronde MF, Chopard R, Schiele F, Meneveau N. Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. European Geriatric Medicine. 2015 Dec 1;6(6):573-9.

-Thompson LDR. Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted. Head Neck Pathol. 2024 Mar 19;18(1):22.

-Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Some Personal Advice Concerning How to Write Precise, Concise and Eloquent Research Articles. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Mar 18;3:648929. 

-Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. Creating logical flow when writing scientific articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2021 Oct 18;36(40).

-Ehrhart F, Evelo CT. Ten simple rules to make your publication look better. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 20;17(5):e1008938.

-Urban MC, Merow C, Wegrzyn JL, Maitner BS, Corcoran D. How to Publish at Pandemic Speed. BioScience. 2021 Oct;71(10):1001-3.

-Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011 Nov;31(11):1409-17. 

-Gregory AT, Denniss AR. An Introduction to Writing Narrative and Systematic Reviews - Tasks, Tips and Traps for Aspiring Authors. Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jul;27(7):893-898. 

-Pautasso M. Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003149.

-Lingard L. Writing an effective literature review : Part I: Mapping the gap. Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Feb;7(1):47-49. 

-Kolaski K, Logan LR, Ioannidis JPA. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 8;12(1):96. 

-Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. 

-Misra DP, Agarwal V. Systematic Reviews: Challenges for Their Justification, Related Comprehensive Searches, and Implications. J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Mar 19;33(12):e92.

-Ioannidis JP. Systematic Reviews for Basic Scientists: A Different Beast. Physiological Reviews. 2022, in press.

-Khalil H, Peters MD, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Alexander L, McInerney P, Godfrey CM, Munn Z. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:156-160. 

-Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, McInerney P, Godfrey CM, Khalil H. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Mar;19(1):3-10.

-Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, Kenny M. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC medical research methodology. 2016 Dec;16(1):1-0.

-Campbell F, Tricco AC, Munn Z, Pollock D, Saran A, Sutton A, White H, Khalil H. Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different- the "Big Picture" review family. Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):45.

-Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):546-53.

-Forero DA, Lopez-Leon S, González-Giraldo Y, Bagos PG. Ten simple rules for carrying out and writing meta-analyses. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 May 16;15(5):e1006922. 

-Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W, Chowdhury R, Franco OH. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. European journal of epidemiology. 2020 Jan;35(1):49-60.

-Garner P, Hopewell S, Chandler J, et al. When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist. BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3507. 

-Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):95-100.

-Belbasis L, Bellou V, Ioannidis JP. Conducting umbrella reviews. BMJ Medicine. 2022 Nov 1;1(1).

-Kent F, Ajjawi R. Realist Reviews: A Brief How-To. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022 Jun;14(3):279-80.

-Simmonds M, Elliott JH, Synnot A, Turner T. Living Systematic Reviews. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:121-134.

-Nissen T, Wynn R. The clinical case report: a review of its merits and limitations. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Apr 23;7:264.

-Gracia-Ramos AE. Writing case reports and series: Tricks, traps, and triumphs!. Indian Journal of Rheumatology. 2022 Dec 1;17(6):306.

-Forero DA, Moore JH. Considerations for higher efficiency and productivity in research activities. BioData Mining 2016 Nov 9;9:35. 

-Peterson TC, Kleppner SR, Botham CM. Ten simple rules for scientists: Improving your writing productivity. PLoS Computational Biology. 2018 Oct 4;14(10):e1006379.

-Garcia PJ, Curioso WH. Strategies for aspiring biomedical researchers in resource-limited environments. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(8):e274.

-Vicens Q, Bourne PE. Ten simple rules to combine teaching and research. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Apr;5(4):e1000358.

-Sharma RK, Ogle HL. Twelve tips for students who wish to write and publish. Med Teach. 2021 Apr 9:1-6.

-Glasman-Deal H. Science research writing for non-native speakers of English. World Scientific; 2010 (Book).

-Yakhontova T. What Nonnative Authors Should Know When Writing Research Articles in English. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2021 Jul 13;36(35).

-Yakhontova T. Conventions of English Research Discourse and the Writing of Non-Anglophone Authors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Oct 19;35(40):e331.

-Yakhontova T. Punctuation Mistakes in the English Writing of Non-Anglophone Researchers. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 21;35(37):e299.

-Yakhontova T. English writing of non-Anglophone researchers. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2020 Jul 6;35(26).

-Kojima T, Popiel HA. Proper Scholarly Writing for Non-Native English-Speaking Authors: Choosing Active and Passive Voice, Rewording, and Refining Texts. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 14;37(44):e312.

-Rogers SM. Mastering scientific and medical writing. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2007.

-Harrison H, Griffin SJ, Kuhn I, Usher-Smith JA. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):7.

-Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. 

-Smalheiser NR, Fragnito DP, Tirk EE. Anne O'Tate: Value-added PubMed search engine for analysis and text mining. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0248335.

-Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008 Feb;22(2):338-42. 

-Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, López-Cózar ED. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics. 2018 Nov 1;12(4):1160-77.

-Singh VK, Srichandan SS, Lathabai HH. ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?. Scientometrics. 2022 Jan 27:1-28.

-Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, AMA Manual of Style Committee. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-7.

-Huang GC, Truglio J, Potter J, White A, Hunt S. Anti-Bias and Inclusive Language in Scholarly Writing: A Primer for Authors. Academic Medicine. 2022, in press.

Sections of the Manuscripts

-Gusenbauer M. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics. 2019 Jan 15;118(1):177-214.

-Marshall IJ, Wallace BC. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):163.

-Kim J, Lee S. Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015 Mar 1;92:332-45.

-Jürgens B, Herrero-Solana V. Espacenet, Patentscope and Depatisnet: A comparison approach. World Patent Information. 2015 Sep 1;42:4-12.

-Clarke NS. The basics of patent searching. World Patent Information. 2018 Sep 1;54:S4-10.

-Kornhaber RA, McLean LM, Baber RJ. Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Jul 30;10:4837-46. 

-Moshontz H, Ebersole CR, Weston SJ, Klein RA. A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2021 Apr;15(4):e12590.

-Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2020;58(6):345-349. 

-Baum MA, Braun MN, Hart A, Huffer VI, Meßmer JA, Weigl M, Wennerhold L. The first author takes it all? Solutions for crediting authors more visibly, transparently, and free of bias. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2022, in press.

-Morreim EH, Winer JC. Guest authorship as research misconduct: definitions and possible solutions. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2021, in press.

-Meursinge Reynders RA, ter Riet G, Di Girolamo N, Cavagnetto D, Malički M. Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. Scientific Reports. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):4385.

-Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Write a Cover Letter?. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021 Jul;19(3).

-Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Title. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Oct 22;17(4):e98326. 

-Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jan 28;18(1):e100159. 

-Annesley TM. "It was a cold and rainy night": set the scene with a good introduction. Clin Chem. 2010 May;56(5):708-13. 

-Annesley TM. Who, what, when, where, how, and why: the ingredients in the recipe for a successful Methods section. Clin Chem. 2010 Jun;56(6):897-901. 

-Annesley TM. Show your cards: the results section and the poker game. Clin Chem. 2010 Jul;56(7):1066-70.

-Lang T. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles. Croat Med J. 2004 Aug;45(4):361-70.

-Worthy G. Statistical analysis and reporting: common errors found during peer review and how to avoid them. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 4;145:w14076.

Makin TR, Orban de Xivry JJ. Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript. Elife. 2019 Oct 9;8:e48175. 

-Annesley TM. Bring your best to the table. Clin Chem. 2010 Oct;56(10):1528-34. 

-Hayes-Larson E, Kezios KL, Mooney SJ, Lovasi G. Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:125-132.

-Annesley TM. Put your best figure forward: line graphs and scattergrams. Clin Chem. 2010 Aug;56(8):1229-33.

-Rougier NP, Droettboom M, Bourne PE. Ten simple rules for better figures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Sep 11;10(9):e1003833.

-Jambor H, Antonietti A, Alicea B, Audisio TL, Auer S, Bhardwaj V, Burgess SJ, Ferling I, Gazda MA, Hoeppner LH, Ilangovan V, Lo H, Olson M, Mohamed SY, Sarabipour S, Varma A, Walavalkar K, Wissink EM, Weissgerber TL. Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications. PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 31;19(3):e3001161.

-Schmied C, Jambor HK. Effective image visualization for publications - a workflow using open access tools and concepts. F1000Res. 2020 Nov 26;9:1373. 

-Crameri F, Shephard GE, Heron PJ. The misuse of colour in science communication. Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 28;11(1):5444.

-Marai GE, Pinaud B, Bühler K, Lex A, Morris JH. Ten simple rules to create biological network figures for communication. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Sep 26;15(9):e1007244. 

-Franconeri SL, Padilla LM, Shah P, Zacks JM, Hullman J. The science of visual data communication: What works. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2021 Dec;22(3):110-61.

-Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument. Clin Chem. 2010 Nov;56(11):1671-4.

-Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1064. 

-Ancker JS, Flanagin A. A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):147-57. 

-Dunn AG, Coiera E, Mandl KD, Bourgeois FT. Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Research integrity and peer review. 2016 Dec;1(1):1-8.

-Severin A, Chataway J. Overburdening of peer reviewers. A multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder perspective on causes, effects and potential policy implications. Preprint, bioRxiv, 2021.

-Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Di Franco A, Hameed I, Naik A, Demetres M, Girardi LN, Frati G, Fremes SE, Biondi-Zoccai G. Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer-Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019903. 

-Torgerson DJ, Adamson J, Cockayne S, Dumville J, Petherick E. Submission to multiple journals: a method of reducing time to publication? BMJ. 2005 Feb 5;330(7486):305-7. 

-Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, Garner P. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018467. 

-Patience GS, Galli F, Patience PA, Boffito DC. Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):e0198117. 

-Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Rep. 2013 Sep 10;7:223.

-Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097.

-Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Moher D. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb 9;134:103-112.

-Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. 

-Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. 

-Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill R; ROBIS group. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34.

-Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med. 2015 Jan 6;13:1. 

-Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 24;7(3):e1000251.

-von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296.

-Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M, Garner P, Holgate ST, Howells DW, Karp NA, Lazic SE, Lidster K, MacCallum CJ, Macleod M, Pearl EJ, Petersen OH, Rawle F, Reynolds P, Rooney K, Sena ES, Silberberg SD, Steckler T, Würbel H. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410.

-Hoffmann-Eßer W, Siering U, Neugebauer EA, Brockhaus AC, Lampert U, Eikermann M. Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of the current evidence on how users handle the 2 overall assessments. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0174831.

-Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181.

Emmerich CH, Harris CM. Minimum information and quality standards for conducting, reporting, and organizing in vitro research. Bespalov A., Michel M., and Steckler T. Cham: Springer. 2019;257:177-96.

-Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. 

-Gaur PS, Zimba O, Agarwal V, Gupta L. Reporting Survey Based Studies - a Primer for Authors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Nov 23;35(45):e398. 

-Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57.

-O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51.

-Stevens LM, Mortazavi BJ, Deo RC, Curtis L, Kao DP. Recommendations for Reporting Machine Learning Analyses in Clinical Research.  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Oct;13(10):e006556.

 -Hirsch C, Schildknecht S. In Vitro Research Reproducibility: Keeping Up High Standards. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Dec 10;10:1484. 

-Ravinetto R, Singh JA. Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2022, in press.

-Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. ‘Spin’in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review. PLoS Biology. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e2002173.

-Rinaldi A. To hype, or not to (o) hype: communication of science is often tarnished by sensationalization, for which both scientists and the media are responsible. EMBO reports. 2012 Apr;13(4):303-7.

-Corneille O, Havemann J, Henderson EL, IJzerman H, Hussey I, Orban de Xivry JJ, Jussim L, Holmes NP, Pilacinski A, Beffara B, Carroll H, Outa NO, Lush P, Lotter LD. Beware 'persuasive communication devices' when writing and reading scientific articles. Elife. 2023 May 25;12:e88654.

-Shaw DM, Erren TC. Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 1;11(10):e1004388. 

-Misra DP, Ravindran V, Agarwal V. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement. J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Oct 18;33(46):e287. 

-Penders B. Ten simple rules for responsible referencing. PLoS computational biology. 2018 Apr 12;14(4):e1006036.

-Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Citation. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Apr 27;18(2):e102622. 

Scientific Visibility and Impact

-Sever R. Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional. PLoS Biology. 2023 Oct 3;21(10):e3002234.

-Ng JY, Cobey KD, Ahmed S, Chow V, Maduranayagam SG, Santoro LJ, Sikora L, Marusic A, Shanahan D, Townsend R, Ehrlich A, Iorio A, Moher D. Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 31;18(3):e0282168.

-Lengauer T, Nussinov R. How to write a presubmission inquiry. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Feb 26;11(2):e1004098. 

-Bourne PE, Korngreen A. Ten simple rules for reviewers. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Sep 29;2(9):e110. 

-Ding D, Hallal PC, DiPietro L, Kohl HW. A Quick Guide for Becoming a Better Peer Reviewer. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2023 Sep 13;20(11):989-92.

-Mura C, Bourne PE. Ten simple rules for serving as an editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Mar 2;19(3):e1010911.

-Annesley TM. Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments. Clin Chem. 2011 Apr;57(4):551-4. 

-Guyatt GH, Brian Haynes R. Preparing reports for publication and responding to reviewers' comments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):900-6.

-Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part XII: responding to reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):243. 

-Schumacher HR Jr, Von Feldt JM. Some suggestions for reviewers and for authors to know what reviewers may be looking for. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Aug;20(5):241-3.

-Zimba O, Yuri Gasparyan A. Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021;59(1):3-8.

-Parsons CE, Baglini RB. Peer review: the case for neutral language. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;25(8):639-641. 

-Aczel B, Szaszi B, Holcombe AO. A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Nov 14;6(1):14. 

-Mazaheri G, Avila KU, Roy-Chowdhury AK. Learning to identify image manipulations in scientific publications. Preprint, 2021.

-Ettinger CL, Sadanandappa MK, Görgülü K, Coghlan KL, Hallenbeck KK, Puebla I. A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers. Biology Open. 2022 Jul 15;11(7):bio059310.

-Abdill RJ, Blekhman R. Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints. Elife. 2019 Apr 24;8. 

-Moshontz H, Binion G, Walton H, Brown BT, Syed M. A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2021 Jun;4(2):25152459211019948.

-Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72.

-Bornmann L, Daniel HD. The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep. 2009 Jan;10(1):2-6. 

-Favre J, Germond T, Clavert P, Collin P, Michelet A, Lädermann A. Want a better h-index? - All you need to know about copyright and open access. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Dec;106(8):1475-1480.

-Morales E, McKiernan EC, Niles MT, Schimanski L, Alperin JP. How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0257340. 

-Koltun V, Hafner D. The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 28;16(6):e0253397. 

-Nielsen MW, Andersen JP. Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 16;118(7):e2012208118.

-Zhang L, Sun B, Jiang L, Huang Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact. Research Evaluation. 2021, in press.

-Weis JW, Jacobson JM. Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research. Nat Biotechnol. 2021 May 17. 

-Knight E, Mitchell V. The ‘how’rather than the ‘what’of research impact. Higher Education Research & Development. 2022 Apr 7:1-4.

-Zeng A, Fan Y, Di Z, Wang Y, Havlin S. Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research. Nat Hum Behav. 2021, in press.

-Kwiek M. Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics. 2020 Jul;124(1):57-105.

-Al-Jamimi HA, BinMakhashen GM, Bornmann L. Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics. 2022 Sep 2:1-52.

-Cabezas-Clavijo Á, Torres-Salinas D. Bibliometric reports for institutions: best practices in a responsible metrics scenario. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics. 2021 Jun 30;6:696470.

-Ioannidis JP, Maniadis Z. In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. Plos Biology. 2023 Dec 4;21(12):e3002408.

-Ioannidis JP, Maniadis Z. Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2023, in press.

-Li J, Yin Y, Fortunato S, Wang D. Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2020 Apr 29;17(165):20200135.

-Li W, Zhang S, Zheng Z, Cranmer SJ, Clauset A. Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists. Nature communications. 2022 Aug 20;13(1):1-1.

-Zhao X, Jiang H, Yin J, Liu H, Zhu R, Mei S, Zhu CT. Changing trends in clinical research literature on PubMed database from 1991 to 2020. European journal of medical research. 2022 Dec;27(1):1-1.

-Lund BD. Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind? Account Res. 2021 Apr 11:1-9. 

-Barroga E, Mitoma H. Improving scientific writing skills and publishing capacity by developing university-based editing system and writing programs. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2019 Jan 7;34(1).

-Busse CE, Anderson EW, Endale T, Smith YR, Kaniecki M, Shannon C, August ET. Strengthening research capacity: a systematic review of manuscript writing and publishing interventions for researchers in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ global health. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):e008059.

-El Halabi S, Abbas Z, Adesokun F, Adiukwu F, Ashrafi A, de Filippis R, Handuleh J, Jaguga F, Karaliuniene R, Kilic O, Nagendrappa S. How to overcome barriers to publication in low‐and middle‐income countries: Recommendations from early career psychiatrists and researchers from around the world. Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;13(4):e12495.

-Lang S, Ibba M, Musier-Forsyth K. New paradigm for teaching scientific writing in STEM. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2022, in press.

-Oshiro J, Caubet SL, Viola KE, Huber JM. Going beyond “not enough time”: barriers to preparing manuscripts for academic medical journals. Teaching and learning in medicine. 2020 Jan 1;32(1):71-81.

-Rathee S, Lee SL. So you want to be a Super Researcher?. Preprint, 2021.

-Ioannidis JPA, Baas J, Klavans R, Boyack KW. A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 12;17(8):e3000384. 

-Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64841.

-Dehdarirad T. Could early tweet counts predict later citation counts? A gender study in Life Sciences and Biomedicine (2014-2016). PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241723. 

-Karmakar M, Banshal SK, Singh VK. A large-scale comparison of coverage and mentions captured by the two altmetric aggregators: Altmetric. com and PlumX. Scientometrics. 2021 Mar 20:1-25.

-Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC, Bender EM, Blitz A, Cooke DT, Hlci TN, Kidane B, Ouzounian M, Varghese TK Jr, Antonoff MB. Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):296-300. 

-Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Maksaev AA, Kitas GD. Article-level Metrics. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2021 Mar 8;36(11).

-Patience GS, Patience CA, Blais B, Bertrand F. Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon. 2017 May 10;3(5):e00300. 

-Gomez CJ, Herman AC, Parigi P. Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour. 2022 May 30:1-1.

-Fox MF, Nikivincze I. Being highly prolific in academic science: characteristics of individuals and their departments. Higher Education. 2021 Jun;81(6):1237-55.

-Kwiek M, Roszka W. Once Highly Productive, Forever Highly Productive? Full Professors' Research Productivity from a Longitudinal Perspective. Preprint, 2022.

-Pavlovic V, Weissgerber T, Stanisavljevic D, Pekmezovic T, Garovic V, Milic N, CITE Investigators. How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?. Preprint, bioRxiv, 2020.

-Hall N. The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biol. 2014 Jul 30;15(7):424. 

-Tatsioni A, Vavva E, Ioannidis JP. Sources of funding for Nobel Prize-winning work: public or private? FASEB J. 2010 May;24(5):1335-9. 

-Battisti WP, Wager E, Baltzer L, Bridges D, Cairns A, Carswell CI, Citrome L, Gurr JA, Mooney LA, Moore BJ, Peña T, Sanes-Miller CH, Veitch K, Woolley KL, Yarker YE; International Society for Medical Publication Professionals. Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):461-4. 

-Soleimanpour S, Sedghi S, Asghari H, Nemati-Anaraki L. No Study is Ever Flawless: A Scoping Review of Common Errors in Biomedical Manuscripts. Accountability in Research. 2021, in press.

-Moskovitz C. Text Recycling in Scientific Writing. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):813-851. 

-Moskovitz C. Standardizing terminology for text recycling in research writing. Learned Publishing. 2021, in press.

-Cabanac G, Labbé C, Magazinov A. Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals. arXiv preprint, 2021.

-Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Audisio K, Rahouma M, Benedetto U, Kurlansky P, Fremes SE. Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 10:e211807. 

-Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33.

-Toma C, Padureanu L, Toma B. Correction of the scientific production: publisher performance evaluation using a dataset of 4844 PubMed retractions. Publications. 2022 Jun;10(2):18.

-Stavale R, Ferreira GI, Galvão JAM, Zicker F, Novaes MRCG, Oliveira CM, Guilhem D. Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0214272. 

-Morreim EH, Winer JC. Guest authorship as research misconduct: definitions and possible solutions. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2021, in press.

-Bradshaw MS, Payne SH. Detecting fabrication in large-scale molecular omics data. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0260395. 

-O'Brien BC, Artino AR Jr, Costello JA, Driessen E, Maggio LA. Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260558. 

-Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. Citation of retracted publications: a challenging problem. Accountability in Research. 2021, in press.

-Hwang SY, Yon DK, Lee SW, Kim MS, Kim JY, Smith L, Koyanagi A, Solmi M, Carvalho AF, Kim E, Shin JI. Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2023 Sep 19;38.

-Else H, Van Noorden R. The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science. Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):516-519. 

-Christopher J. The raw truth about paper mills. FEBS Lett. 2021 Jul;595(13):1751-1757. 

-Pérez-Neri I, Pineda C, Sandoval H. Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review. Clinical Rheumatology. 2022 May 6:1-8.

-Candal-Pedreira C, Ross JS, Ruano-Ravina A, Egilman DS, Fernández E, Pérez-Ríos M. Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2022 Nov 28;379.

-Abalkina A. Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. Learned Publishing, 2023, in press.

-Day A. Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills.  Scientometrics. 2022 Oct;127(10):5965-87.

-Desaire H, Chua AE, Kim MG, Hua D. Accurately detecting AI text when ChatGPT is told to write like a chemist. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2023, in press.

-Hans A, Schwarzschild A, Cherepanova V, Kazemi H, Saha A, Goldblum M, Geiping J, Goldstein T. Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text. Preprint, 2024.

-Cheng H, Sheng B, Lee A, Chaudhary V, Atanasov AG, Liu N, Qiu Y, Wong TY, Tham YC, Zheng YF. Have AI-Generated Texts from LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms. Preprint, 2024.

-Piniewski M, Jarić I, Koutsoyiannis D, Kundzewicz ZW. Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg?. Scientometrics. 2024, in press.

-Zhang M, Xu J, Xu C, Zheng Q, Liu M, Zhang J, Fu H, Qi WA, Zhang J, Tian J. Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research. Ethics & Behavior. 2024, in press.

-Ruiter-Lopez L, Lopez-Leon S, Forero DA. Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members. Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):691-696.

-Forero DA, Oermann MH, Manca A, Deriu F, Mendieta-Zerón H, Dadkhah M, Bhad R, Deshpande SN, Wang W, Cifuentes MP. Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research. Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):584-589. 

-Cukier S, Helal L, Rice DB, Pupkaite J, Ahmadzai N, Wilson M, Skidmore B, Lalu MM, Moher D. Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2020 May 7;18(1):104. 

-Gutierrez FR, Beall J, Forero DA. Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective. Bioessays. 2015 May;37(5):474-6.

-Dadkhah M, Maliszewski T, Jazi MD. Characteristics of hijacked journals and predatory publishers: our observations in the academic world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2016 Jun 1;37(6):415-8.

-Gasparyan AG, Kitas GD. Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2021;32(1):1-2.

-Grossmann A, Brembs B. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Res. 2021 Jan 12;10:20. 

-Altman M, Cohen PN. Openness and Diversity in Journal Editorial Boards. Preprint, 2021.

-Nishikawa-Pacher A, Heck T, Schoch K. Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions. Research Evaluation. 2023 Apr 1;32(2):228-43.

-Manan MR, Nawaz I, Rahman S, Razzaq A, Zafar F, Qazi A, Liblik K. Diversity, equity, and inclusion on editorial boards of global health journals. Asian Bioethics Review. 2023 Mar 16:1-31.

-Manan MR, Nawaz I, Rahman S, Manan H. Diversity, equity, and inclusion in medical education journals: An evaluation of editorial board composition. Medical Teacher. 2023, in press.

-König LM, Altenmüller MS, Fick J, Crusius J, Genschow O, Sauerland M. How to communicate science to the public? Recommendations for effective written communication derived from a systematic review. Preprint, 2023.

Open Science

-Forero DA, Curioso WH, Patrinos GP. The importance of adherence to international standards for depositing open data in public repositories. BMC Res Notes. 2021 Nov 2;14(1):405.

-Bertram MG, Sundin J, Roche DG, Sánchez-Tójar A, Thoré ES, Brodin T. Open science. Current Biology. 2023 Aug 7;33(15):R792-7.

-Logullo P, de Beyer JA, Kirtley S, Schlüssel MM, Collins GS. Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2023, in press.

-Allen C, Mehler DMA. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biol. 2019 May 1;17(5):e3000246.

-Colavizza G, Hrynaszkiewicz I, Staden I, Whitaker K, McGillivray B. The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0230416.

-Eysenbach G. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e157.

-Bero L. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust. PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 2;16(4):e2005972.

-Langham-Putrow A, Bakker C, Riegelman A. Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253129.

-Bakker M, Veldkamp CLS, van Assen MALM, Crompvoets EAV, Ong HH, Nosek BA, Soderberg CK, Mellor D, Wicherts JM. Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations. PLoS Biol. 2020 Dec 9;18(12):e3000937.  

-Henderson EL, Chambers CD. Ten simple rules for writing a Registered Report. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 27;18(10):e1010571.

-Chambers CD, Tzavella L. The past, present and future of registered reports. Nature human behaviour. 2022 Jan;6(1):29-42.

-Masum H, Rao A, Good BM, Todd MH, Edwards AM, Chan L, Bunin BA, Su AI, Thomas Z, Bourne PE. Ten simple rules for cultivating open science and collaborative R&D. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(9):e1003244.

-Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e184. 

-Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375.

-Zhang L, Wei Y, Huang Y, Sivertsen G. Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics. 2022 May 27:1-27.

-Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G, Contestabile M, Dafoe A, Eich E, Freese J, Glennerster R, Goroff D, Green DP, Hesse B, Humphreys M, Ishiyama J, Karlan D, Kraut A, Lupia A, Mabry P, Madon TA, Malhotra N, Mayo-Wilson E, McNutt M, Miguel E, Paluck EL, Simonsohn U, Soderberg C, Spellman BA, Turitto J, VandenBos G, Vazire S, Wagenmakers EJ, Wilson R, Yarkoni T. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5.

-McKiernan EC. Imagining the "open" university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education. PLoS Biol. 2017 Oct 24;15(10):e1002614.

-Danchev V, Min Y, Borghi J, Baiocchi M, Ioannidis JPA. Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033972.

-Ross-Hellauer T, Görögh E. Guidelines for open peer review implementation. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Feb 27;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0063-9.

-Wilson SL, Way GP, Bittremieux W, Armache JP, Haendel MA, Hoffman MM. Sharing biological data: why, when, and how. FEBS Lett. 2021 Apr;595(7):847-863.

-Meyer MN. Practical tips for ethical data sharing. Advances in methods and practices in psychological science. 2018 Mar;1(1):131-44.

-Dutra Dos Reis N, Müller Ferreira C, Silva MT, Galvão TF. Frequency of receiving requested data for a systematic review and associated factors: A cross-sectional study. Account Res. 2021 Apr 13:1-13.

-Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes AJ, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo CT, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Groth P, Goble C, Grethe JS, Heringa J, 't Hoen PA, Hooft R, Kuhn T, Kok R, Kok J, Lusher SJ, Martone ME, Mons A, Packer AL, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, van Schaik R, Sansone SA, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz MA, Thompson M, van der Lei J, van Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg P, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018.

-Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV, Button KS, Chambers CD, Du Sert NP, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers EJ, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JP. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):1-9.

-Iqbal SA, Wallach JD, Khoury MJ, Schully SD, Ioannidis JP. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature. PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 4;14(1):e1002333. 

-Humphreys L, Lewis NA, Sender K, Won AS. Integrating Qualitative Methods and Open Science: Five Principles for More Trustworthy Research. Journal of Communication. 2021, in press.

-Carroll MW. Creative Commons and the openness of open access. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):789-91. 

-Caldwell AR, Vigotsky AD, Tenan MS, Radel R, Mellor DT, Kreutzer A, Lahart IM, Mills JP, Boisgontier MP; Consortium for Transparency in Exercise Science (COTES) Collaborators. Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices. Sports Med. 2020 Mar;50(3):449-459. 

-Serghiou S, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Boyack KW, Riedel N, Wallach JD, Ioannidis JPA. Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 1;19(3):e3001107. 

-Onie S. Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):35-37.

-Armeni K, Brinkman L, Carlsson R, Eerland A, Fijten R, Fondberg R, Heininga VE, Heunis S, Koh WQ, Masselink M, Moran N, Baoill AÓ, Sarafoglou A, Schettino A, Schwamm H, Sjoerds Z, Teperek M, Van den Akker O, van 't Veer AE, Zurita-Milla R. Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy, 2021, in press.