Lewis, C. M. (2021, March). Physical Java Memory Models: A Notional Machine. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 383-389).
Weill-Tessier, P., Costache, A. L., & Brown, N. C. (2021, March). Usage of the Java Language by Novices over Time: Implications for Tool and Language Design. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 328-334).
Becker, B. A. (2021). What does saying that'programming is hard'really say, and about whom?. Communications of the ACM, 64(8), 27-29.
Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M. E. (2007). Failure rates in introductory programming. AcM SIGcSE Bulletin, 39(2), 32-36.
Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M. E. (2019). Failure rates in introductory programming: 12 years later. ACM inroads, 10(2), 30-36.
Simon, Luxton-Reilly, A., & Adelakun-Adeyemo, O. (2021, June). Confirmation Bias and Other Flaws in Citing Pass Rate Studies. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 575-581).
Simon, Luxton-Reilly, A., Ajanovski, V. V., Fouh, E., Gonsalvez, C., Leinonen, J., Parkinson, J., ... & Thota, N. (2019). Pass rates in introductory programming and in other STEM disciplines. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 53-71).
Watson, C., & Li, F. W. (2014, June). Failure rates in introductory programming revisited. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education (pp. 39-44).
Aleksić, V., & Ivanović, M. (2016). Introductory programming subject in European higher education. Informatics in Education, 15(2), 163-182.
Davies, S., Polack-Wahl, J. A., & Anewalt, K. (2011, March). A snapshot of current practices in teaching the introductory programming sequence. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 625-630).
Mason, R., Crick, T., Davenport, J. H., & Murphy, E. (2018, February). Language choice in introductory programming courses at Australasian and UK universities. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 852-857).
Arakawa, K., Hao, Q., Greer, T., Ding, L., Hundhausen, C. D., & Peterson, A. (2021, March). In Situ Identification of Student Self-Regulated Learning Struggles in Programming Assignments. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 467-473).
Silva, L., Mendes, A. J., Gomes, A., & Cavalcanti de Macêdo, G. F. (2021, March). Regulation of Learning Interventions in Programming Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Guideline Proposition. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 647-653).
Ly, A., Edwards, J., Liut, M., & Petersen, A. (2021, October). Revisiting Syntax Exercises in CS1. In Proceedings of the 22st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 9-14).
Sullivan, S., Swanson, H., & Edwards, J. (2021, March). Student Attitudes Toward Syntax Exercises in CS1. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 782-788).