2025 Abuse/Harassment

An Abuse prevention order is issued, and this appeal follows.  There is sufficient testimony to justify the order, but there is also testimony to draw it in to question.  In this case the judge choose to issue the order.

A harassment order is not issued, the recipient attempts to sue the plaintiff, but the suit is denied

The renewal of an Abuse Prevention Order is challenged, It is affirmed.

A harassment order is issued between two neighbors.  It is affirmed.

A harassment order is issued between two public co-workers.  The issues between the two parties was probably better handled through HR or the police.

A harassment order is issued and then made permanent.  It is held up on appeal, but its permanent nature is rescinded

There does appear to be an allegation, that could justify a 209a Abuse Prevention order, however the panel spends so much ink on matters that do not justify such an order, that it undermines the justification of the order

The plaintiff fails to get an extension of a 209a order, so they get a 258e order.  

A lower court judge decides to not extend a 209a abuse prevention order.  Upon review the panel determines that the order should have been extended

Affirmed

No transcript is provided to the panel so the appeal fails

A 209A restraining order is issued, this appeal makes clear that there was no legal basis for the order, however the order is issued and upheld

A 209A restraining order is issued, this appeal does not make clear if there was a legal basis for the original order, however this is an appeal of the extension

A 258E Harassment Prevention Order is affirmed

A 209A restraining order is issued, upon review it is determined that there was no legal basis for it

A 258E Harassment Prevention Order is vacated

A lower court judge declines to issue a permanent 209A order, the panel remands pointing out that the judge must consider it.

If you listen to the allegations, it is clear that there is a basis for a permanent order, as well as a basis for criminal charges, however there is no mention of criminal charges

There is a process for filing an appeal, not following it will result in a dismissal

A 209A abuse order is challenged, due to alleged fraud upon the court.  The lower court judge chooses to not hear the allegations, since the order was under appeal.  This case makes it clear that a 209A abuse order may be reviewed at any time, the case is remanded