2016 Abuse/Harassment

Where a restraining order attempted to disallow posts on the internet, the appeal can not go forward if it has become moot

Where a lower court judge found that the basis for extending a restraining order was not met, the restraining order should not have been extended

Harassment Preventation Order Vacated

Harassment Prevention Order Vacated

Abuse Prevention Order Affirmed

Where an abuse prevention order is issued, appealed then vacated with an order to destroy all records of the order, the issue is made moot

An abuse order is made permanent, it is not made clear if there was a basis for the order in the first place

It doesn't appear the abuse prevention order was justified, but the panel upholds the ruling nonetheless

Abuse Prevention Order Vacated

It is unclear why this harassment order was issued, so it is remanded

It is unclear why this harassment order was issued, so it is vacated

Based on the facts presented in this opinion, it is hard to believe an abuse ordered but it was

One party was a poor neighbor in a condo development, so a harassment order was issued

A judge tries to expunge a record, the Appeals Court says NO

BC vs FC Phelan

Kafker, C.J., Hanlon, Neyman

A judge tries to expunge a record, the Appeals Court says NO

It doesn't appear the abuse prevention order was justified, but the panel upholds the ruling nonetheless

A 209a restraining order is not renewed when council explains that the parties had been in "sporadic contact" during the time of the existing order, the panel remands the decision

Harassment Preventation Order Vacated

A third party attempts to intervene in an Abuse Prevention Order being vacated, they fail

Abuse Prevention Order Affirmed

Abuse Prevention Order Affirmed