2020 Abuse/Harassment
Its a harassment order, it doesn't take much to get one. The defendant thought they could behave poorly, they learned differently
Its a harassment order, it takes three strikes, not two, this case was remanded
Y.D. vs. E.S. Livingston
If you assault someone and get convicted for it, then it seems reasonable that you are going to be told to stay away from that person, in this case through the use of a 209a order
Rather sad story the defendant suffers from a variety of health issues, including mental health, the plaintiff has gotten a 209a to protect themself, and will probably continue to renew.
On appeal an abuse prevention order is challenged base on new evidence, it is unclear what this new evidence was and how it was viewed by the court, none the less the order is affirmed
The plaintiff files a request for a 258e harassment order which doesn't take much to get, however the lower court judge gave out a 209a abuse prevention order. Based out the events recounted in this opinion there does not appear to have been a basis for the 209a abuse prevention order, none the less this panel affirms the lower court decision
D.D. vs C.D. Dowling
19P1646.mp3The defendant appeals from the issuance of a 209a abuse prevention order. Based on the events recounted in this opinion there does not appear to have been a basis for the 209a abuse prevention order, none the less this panel affirms the lower court decision
The defendant appeals from the issuance of a 209a abuse prevention order, and its extensions. The events that justified the 209a abuse order are not recounted in this opinion so it is not possible to tell if this appeal was properly decided
After the defendant had a improperly issued harassment order vacated, they wanted the record expunged. The lower court decides that since there was no fraud upon the court, just an error of the court, then the defendant's record need not be expunged.
A restraining order was issue, and criminal charges were filed, though it is unclear as to why. The lower court judge did not extend the restraining order because of the protection orders related to the criminal charges, the case was remanded.
Its a Harassment Order which is easy enough to get, but then the lower court judge decides to restrict the defendants freedom of speech, the result is a remand
A poorly written decision, it is difficult to tell what is going on. Since there is a recording you can ferret out more information, but not much. A plaintiff tries to get a restraining order and it is denied, but comes back a few days later in front of another judge and gets one though it is unclear why.
This panel vacates a 209a restraining order and orders that all records be destroyed
The defendant tries to have a 258e harassment order expunged, the panel denies the request
NELSON N. vs. PATSY P Coyne
The lower court issues two mutual restraining orders. The law requires specific findings of fact in such cases. The panel remands since specific findings of fact were not made by the lower court, however they only request the specific findings of fact for one of the restraining orders
Its a Harassment Order which is easy enough to get, but the result is a remand
A defendant appeals the continuance of a 209a restraining order, based on the principle that their was never a basis for issuing the order. The panel appears to claim the continuance of a restraining cannot not be challenged on the basis of an invalid initial order.
The defendant tries to appeal a 209a order, but fails to follow the appropriate procedure
Based on this opinion it is unclear that the lower court should have issue a 209a restraining order
T.C. vs. J.C Nadeau
The defendant tries to appeal a 209a order, but fails to follow the appropriate procedure
M.S vs. M.N. Leoney
At a one year renewal for a 209a restraining order a lower court judge chooses to not make the order permanent, the case is remanded
A plaintiff tries to get a permanent 209a restraining order against someone who is incarcerated. The lower court fails to follow the proper procedures and is told to do it over.
There was a sexual relationship, there was abuse, there is a restraining order
Sometimes an inappropriate threat is not credible. In this case the court claims it is, which would make a reasonable person question their credibility.
The defendent claims there was insufficient evidence to issue the restraining order and to make it permanent, the evidence referenced here suggests that there was sufficient evidence.