In this decision it is stated that the parties agreed that one parent would have physical custody.
This most likely never occurred, parents are not likely to give up custody of their children, it is more likely that fraud was committed, where one parent was convinced to give up their rights.
When this agreement did not work out an appeal was filed. The court found no problem with this agreement and upheld it.
In this paternity case the mother initially retained sole physical custody, as the case continued the father gained sole physical custody.
This case makes it apparent how biased the court is for one parent to be the winner rather than treating both parties as equals
In this paternity case the mother initially retained sole physical custody, as the case continued the father gained shared physical custody, both parents spending approximately 50 percent of the time with their child
When one parent attempted to remove the child from the state, the court chose to not allow it