About the Authors
About the Authors
I am a Psychology major. This course has helped me learn how memory works and how adaptable the brain is. I have learned how to change my old habits and rewire them into habits that are more beneficial for me. Learning how malleable memory is has put a new perspective on learning new information and how with the right practices you can make your memory better and retain more information.
I am a senior majoring in Education with a minor in Psychology. This Memory & Mind course has helped me learn how memory works and why it is important especially when it comes to self. I have learned that it is okay to go easy on myself, especially knowing that you can’t always remember everything and every single detail. Also, as someone who can be afraid of change, I need to remember and realize that it is okay to change, since we are always changing and the world is always changing around us.
I am currently a sophomore Psychology major with a minor in Psychological Health and Wellbeing. This course has helped me to optimize the reconstructive nature of my memory that I had previously thought of as disadvantageous. As a student, verbatim memory has always been ideal for me – since any mistakes in my memory would count as points taken off in an exam. I have started to be less harsh on myself when my memory is not 100% accurate and have learned how to best study and minimize those errors with certain strategies like handwritten notes and elaborative rehearsal.
Topic Explanation
The concept of adaptive malleability posits that memory is not a static recording of the past but a dynamic, reconstructive system designed for flexibility and future prediction. If memory were 100% accurate, we would struggle to recognize objects or people in slightly different contexts; thus, “memory malleability is adaptive” because it allows us to generalize information across experiences.
How & why does memory work this way?
Memory is malleable primarily to facilitate knowledge construction, allowing the brain to build schemas, which are “structures that people use to organize current knowledge and provide a framework for future understanding,” stated by Van Kesteren (2020). To make a dynamic system work for you, the brain engages in a process called semanticization, where specific episodic details (the “who, what, where, when”) fade over time during consolidation, leaving behind a generalized semantic network. This process is supported by predictive coding, a theory stating that our brains evolved to “predict what will happen next” by maintaining a “clear and consistent world model”. When we encounter information that fits this model, we use:
Assimilation: the integration of new information into an existing schema (Van Kesteren, 2020).
Accommodation: the adaptation of an existing schema when new information no longer fits the old model (Van Kesteren, 2020).
Relevant theories
A popular misconception, first proposed by Endel Tulving in 1972, is that episodic memory (spatiotemporal, personal experiences) and semantic memory (generalized knowledge) are “delineated cleanly” into two contrastive systems (De Brigard et al., 2022). However, current research by De Brigard, Umanath, and Irish (2022) reveals “increasingly blurred lines between episodic and semantic encoding and retrieval”. The system relies on different states of consciousness:
Autonoetic consciousness: self-knowing, typically associated with episodic memory.
Noetic consciousness: knowing, associated with semantic memory.
Current findings suggest these are “strongly intertwined during spontaneous cognition,” and that “knowledge structures can and do enhance memories of events”. Memory is a “dynamic system” that is “reconstructed depending on present cues” rather than retrieved as a “solid entity”.
Research example: Narrative vs expository text
The power of schemas in knowledge construction is demonstrated in a meta-analysis by Mar et al. (2021), which found that narratives (stories) are consistently better remembered than expository texts (essays/textbooks).
Story Grammar: narratives follow a familiar structure, including setting, theme, plot, and resolution.
Knowledge-based Inferences: because stories map onto “everyday human experience,” readers can generate inferences that bring coherence to the content.
In contrast, expository texts often communicate “unfamiliar concepts and vocabulary” that do not easily fit into existing daily schemas, making them harder to recall.
How habits can change
Habits are often governed by cognitive scripts, which act like instructions that we follow depending on the situation we are in and are based on past experiences. We often fall victim to the self-consistency fallacy, the assumption that "I have always acted in a certain way; therefore, I must continue to act this way” (Le Cunff, 2025). Habits can change through unlearning the process of shifting from linear, “purpose-driven” goals to “experiments”. Le Cunff (2025) suggests adopting a “fieldwork” mindset, acting as an “anthropologist” of your own life to “discover interesting patterns” and “deactivate your cognitive scripts”. Because retrieval triggers reconsolidation, every time a habit or memory is “reactivated,” it enters a state where it can be “modified and integrated” with new information before being stored again.
Making the system work for you
To optimize this malleable architecture, students should use high-utility identified by Dunlosky et al. (2013):
Elaborative Interrogation: generating an explanation for “why” a fact is true helps “activate schemas” and support the “integration of new information with existing prior knowledge”.
Practice Testing: this triggers “elaborative retrieval processes” that create multiple pathways to information, making the memory trace more durable.
Distributed Practice: spacing out study sessions allows for consolidation during sleep, which “generalizes memories” and builds “stronger schemas”.
What students may do that DOES NOT work
Following a coherent story toward some ultimate purpose.
When we focus on “finding a purpose,” we think we are carving a unique path, while in reality, we are only limiting our potential for growth and learning
Instead...these are activities that DO work
Summarization
Boosts learning and involves attending to and extracting the higher-level meaning and gist of the material
More beneficial = almost like note-taking
Organizational processing
Quality of summaries matters
If it includes incorrect information, it is not expected to benefit learning and retention
The higher the quality of summaries that contained more information that was linked to prior knowledge, were associated with better the performance
Sleep - the most important means to consolidate, integrate, and semanticize memories
Letting memories “rest” and then later coming back to them on a regular basis = a good tactic to make strong schemas
Getting enough sleep per night (especially when studying new information)
Regular breaks between studying
Adding emotional value to-be-learned information or actively repeating information through auditory
Tiny experiments to try
Expectation Violation (Schema Update)
Participants: College students/professors
Materials:
12 theme-related words
Apple, banana, bread, cheese, rice, chicken, chair, soup, salad, milk, butter, egg,
1 unexpected word: chair
Paper or a digital form for responses
Timer
Procedure:
1.) Tell participants that they will see a list of words, and tell them to try to remember as much as they can, after asking participants to recall the list
Don’t mention to participants anything about the themes
2.) Present each word one at a time
Keep the order of the words as consistent as possible and include the unexpected word somewhere within the list
3.) After presenting the word list, add in a “distraction task” (counting backwards from 100 by 2s) for one minute
4.) Ask participants to write down the words they can recall
Give participants about 1-2 minutes, or until the entire class is done
5.) Record the number of words recalled
Record if participants recalled the unexpected word or if they falsely recalled a related but missing word
Hypothesis: participants will most likely falsely recall a theme-related word, and show mixed recall of the unexpected word, depending on whether the word stood out or was filtered out
What to look for:
False memories
Unexpected word recall
Schema influence
Expectation Violation & Schema Updating (Story Twist Recall)
Participants: College students/professors
Materials:
A short story (5-7 sentences) that has a strong assumption *in the section below this one
A twist ending that contradicts that assumption
Paper or digital responses
Timer
Procedure:
1.) Tell participants that they will be hearing a short story and to pay attention because they will be asked to retell the story afterward
* not mentioning anything about any twists or assumptions
2.) Read the first part of the story
Make sure the story has a specific interpretation
3.) Present the final sentence that changes the meaning
4.) Include a 15-20 second distraction task (counting backwards from 100 by 3s)
5.) Ask participants to retell the story in their own words
Give participants 1-2 minutes to write what they can remember
6.) Analyze each retelling
Look for:
Schema revision
Distortions
Original assumption traces
Hypothesis: participants will often modify earlier parts of the story to align with the twist and show evidence that memory is reconstructed and not replayed
Story: *AI made story*
Story Stimulus: “The Late-Night Break-In”
Part 1 (Leads to a False Assumption):
It was late at night, and the streets were quiet. A person dressed in dark clothing moved quickly between the buildings, carefully checking each window. They paused at one house, glanced around, and pulled something out of their bag. Within seconds, they forced the window open and slipped inside. Moments later, a loud crash echoed from within the house.
Part 2 (Twist Ending):
Neighbors watched as the firefighter rushed back outside carrying a small child, just as smoke began pouring out of the broken window.
References
De Brigard, F., Umanath, S. & Irish, M. Rethinking the distinction between episodic and semantic memory: Insights from the past, present, and future. Mem Cogn 50, 459–463 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01299-x
Le Cunff, A.-L. (2025). Escaping the tyranny of purpose. Tiny experiments: How to live freely in a goal-obsessed world (Chapter 2). Avery.
Mar, R.A., Li, J., Nguyen, A.T.P. et al. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev, 28, 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT. ChatGPT; OpenAI. https://chatgpt.com/
van Kesteren, M.T.R., Meeter, M. How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain. npj Sci. Learn. 5, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0064-y
35 Psy314 final project ideas in 2026 | scrapbook printing, online scrapbook, scrapbook letters. (2026, May). Pinterest. https://pin.it/40ZmLP5NI
Thank you!