Natives: Tech fluent.
Immigrants: Adapt & learn.
This theory is open to considerable criticism and should be used with great care.
Digital natives refer to learners who have grown up in a world where digital technologies are everywhere. They are typically younger learners, born in the era of widespread digital technology adoption. Digital immigrants are individuals who were born before the widespread adoption of digital technologies. They have had to adapt to the digital world later in life.
Key thinkers in this area:
Marc Prensky (1946-Present)
John Perry Barlow (1947 –2018)
These terms have been criticised for oversimplifying the complexities of individual experiences with technology. Not everyone within a particular age group fits neatly into the categories of digital native or digital immigrant, and individual learner differences, experiences, and exposure to technology can vary widely.
Also, as time progresses, the distinction between digital natives and digital immigrants may become less pronounced, as more individuals from older generations will become increasingly familiar and comfortable with digital technologies.
While the terms have limitations, they have been used to highlight the cultural and experiential gaps that can exist between those who grew up in a digital era and those who had to adapt to it later in life.
Teaching strategies linked to digital natives and digital immigrants
Embed technology into the classroom
Encourage collaborative projects and group activities that promote the sharing of digital tools.
Relate sessions to real-world applications, demonstrating the practical use of knowledge and skills in a digital age.
incorporate digital tools into your teaching.
Flip traditional teaching models by assigning lectures or instructional content as homework, reserving class time for interactive discussions and hands-on activities.
Explicitly teach digital literacy skills, including information literacy, online research, and effective use of digital resources.
Emphasise the importance of digital safeguarding.
Read more here:
Bennett, S. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology., 39(5), 775–786.
Bruyckere. (n.d.). Urban myths about learning and education /. Academic Press,
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon : The Strategic Planning Resource for Education Professionals., 9(5), 1–6.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon : The Strategic Planning Resource for Education Professionals., 9(6), 1–6.
This theory is open to considerable criticism and should be used with great care.
Questions
Is the digital native/digital immigrant divide too simplistic? What are the alternatives?
Do generational differences alone account for technological proficiency?
Is the concept of being a "digital immigrant" fixed or evolving?
Are there limitations to assuming all young people are technologically proficient?
Is technology use solely determined by age, or are there other determining factors?
How does the model consider the evolving nature of technology itself?