Embedded Files
Introduction
Introduction
In Grand Rapids, Michigan, a quiet revolution in urban well-being is emerging among the parks, gardens, and tree-lined streets. While the city struggles with rising mental health concerns and fast development, the concrete and steel reshape our skyline, this research investigates how proximity to nature influences mental health across Grand Rapids' socioeconomic spectrum. By examining the intersection of green space accessibility and community well-being in diverse neighborhoods, this study aims to uncover insights that could transform urban planning and public health policy in the evolving city.
Research Question: "How does proximity to urban green spaces in Grand Rapids influence mental health outcomes among residents of different socioeconomic neighborhoods?"
Research Question: "How does proximity to urban green spaces in Grand Rapids influence mental health outcomes among residents of different socioeconomic neighborhoods?"
This research tackles a straightforward but important question: do parks and green spaces make people happier and healthier in Grand Rapids, and does it matter which neighborhood you live in? The research could help us understand how close to green spaces people need to live to get the benefits, whether everyone has equal access to these natural mood-boosters, and what this means for city planning. By focusing on Grand Rapids specifically, we can learn lessons that might help other similar-sized Midwestern cities create greener, healthier, and fairer communities for everyone, not just some neighborhoods.
Literary Review
Literary Review
Studies have shown that access to urban green spaces improves mental health by reducing stress, anxiety, and depression. Research indicates that exposure to nature, especially during childhood, can have long-lasting positive effects, as seen in a Danish study connecting low green space exposure to higher rates of psychiatric disorders in adulthood. In Philadelphia, greening vacant lots reduced feelings of depression in low-income neighborhoods, suggesting that creating green spaces in underserved areas can boost community well-being. Additionally, disparities in park access based on race and ethnicity highlight the need for equitable planning in urban green space development.
Literary Review
Literary Review
The quality and variety of green spaces play a key role in their mental health benefits. Research shows that parks with higher vegetation and biodiversity, such as more plant and bird species, are linked to lower levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Studies in Australia and elsewhere have found that these features contribute to better mental well-being. Additionally, spending at least 120 minutes per week in nature has been shown to improve overall health and well-being, suggesting that even small, regular visits to green spaces can have significant mental health benefits.
Literary Review
Literary Review
Green spaces improve mental health through various mechanisms. A review by Kondo and colleagues (2018) found that urban greening interventions positively impact mental health by promoting physical activity, fostering social connections, and reducing environmental stressors like air pollution and noise.
Literary Review
Literary Review
Focusing on Grand Rapids aims to explore how the relationship between green space proximity and mental health differs across neighborhoods with varying socioeconomic status. This approach addresses calls for more context-specific studies on urban green spaces and health. Previous research, including by Kruize et al. (2019) and Houlden et al. (2018), highlights that the health benefits of green spaces are complex and influenced by multiple factors, with varying impacts depending on the type of green space and mental health outcomes. This underscores the need for localized research to guide effective urban planning and public health policies.
Background
Background
The relationship between urban green spaces and mental health has recieved rising attention in recent years, with studies showing that access to nature can reduce stress, anxiety, and depression. But, the impact of green spaces may differ depending on factors such as socioeconomic status and neighborhood conditions. In cities like Grand Rapids, differences in access to green spaces across neighborhoods could affect residents' mental health outcomes in distinctive ways. Understanding how proximity to green spaces influences well-being in different socioeconomic areas is important for creating equitable urban spaces and improving public health.
Theoretical Framework
Theoretical Framework
The Socio-ecological Framework
The Socio-ecological Framework
The Socio-ecological Framework explores how green spaces affect health through four interconnected levels: individual (like age and income), interpersonal (social networks), community (neighborhood features), and societal (urban planning policies). This model, developed by Lachowycz and Jones and expanded by Browning and Rigolon, helps explain why a park isn't just a park—its health benefits depend on factors like how safe it feels, how easy it is to reach, and whether the community sees it as a gathering space. For studying Grand Rapids' green spaces and mental health, this framework is particularly useful because it captures both the city's complex urban makeup and the way park benefits might vary across different neighborhoods.
References
Browning, M. H., & Rigolon, A. (2019). School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030429
Clair de Lune. (n.d.). 1a76bcd107835f2209b4dcbb832397aa_1200x. Clair de Lune. Retrieved from https://clair-de-lune.co.uk/cdn/shop/articles/1a76bcd107835f2209b4dcbb832397aa_1200x.png?v=1727258092
Cox, D. T. C., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Plummer, K. E., Siriwardena, G. M., Fuller, R. A., Anderson, K., Hancock, S., & Gaston, K. J. (2017). Doses of Neighborhood Nature: The Benefits for Mental Health of Living with Nature. BioScience, 67(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173
Engemann, K., Pedersen, C. B., Arge, L., Tsirogiannis, C., Mortensen, P. B., & Svenning, J. C. (2019). Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(11), 5188-5193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807504116
Google Images. (n.d.). Image retrieved from encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com. Retrieved from https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn
Google Images. (n.d.). Image from Google search results [Photograph]. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsHQvYLwF5cHfMiVr8UuLvlCdU-8FADLnnIA&s
Google Images. (n.d.). Image from Google search results [Photograph]. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ98SkvkPUC6d2e8ZDaJiQrrw-uNqYQyrAppg&s
Houlden, V., Weich, S., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Jarvis, S., & Rees, K. (2018). The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(9), e0203000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203000
Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban green space and its impact on human health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445
Kruize, H., van der Vliet, N., Staatsen, B., Bell, R., Chiabai, A., Muiños, G., Higgins, S., Quiroga, S., Martinez-Juarez, P., Aberg Yngwe, M., Tsichlas, F., Karnaki, P., Lima, M. L., García de Jalón, S., Khan, M., Morris, G., & Stegeman, I. (2019). Urban Green Space: Creating a Triple Win for Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Health Equity through Behavior Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224403
Lachowycz, K., & Jones, A. P. (2013). Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.012
LGBTQ and All. (2021). Shutterstock_1852509394. LGBTQ and All. Retrieved from https://www.lgbtqandall.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/shutterstock_1852509394.png.webp
Nature and mental health graphic [Image]. Website Files. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/62f677d77ca58ce1c1597858/66ce360377779ffe5829e740_66ce34b5f8c598a7422d32cd_Graphic%25201%2520-%2520Nature%2520and%2520Mental%2520Health.jpeg
Nature Sacred. (2014). Mental wellness and the power of nature. Nature Sacred. Retrieved from https://naturesacred.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Mental-Wellness-FINAL-3.jpg
RGstatic. (n.d.). When in need, nature is there for you: The restorative effects of nature in supporting the prevention and treatment of mental health problems. RGstatic. Retrieved from https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/357834194_WHEN_IN_NEED_NATURE_IS_THERE_FOR_YOU_The_Restorative_Effects_of_Nature_in_Supporting_the_Prevention_and_Treatment_of_Mental_Health_Problems/links/61e1aba0c5e31033759433c1/largepreview.png
Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018). Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: An environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.026
Sequoia Behavioral Health. (n.d.). Graphic 1 – Nature and Mental Health [Photograph]. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/62f677d77ca58ce1c1597858/66ce360377779ffe5829e740_66ce34b5f8c598a7422d32cd_Graphic%25201%2520-%2520Nature%2520and%2520Mental%2520Health.jpeg
Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6, 28551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551
South, E. C., Hohl, B. C., Kondo, M. C., MacDonald, J. M., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Effect of Greening Vacant Land on Mental Health of Community-Dwelling Adults: A Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Network Open, 1(3), e180298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0298
White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., Bone, A., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9, 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
Wood, E., Harsant, A., Dallimer, M., Cronin de Chavez, A., McEachan, R. R. C., & Hassall, C. (2018). Not all green space is created equal: Biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320
Page updated
Report abuse