Green spaces in urban areas have been shown to have many health benefits, both mentally and physically. They help cities ecologically, economically as well as the people and animals in them. But there is possibly another benefit - connection to nature. There still needs to be research done on the connection between humans and nature and how green spaces can increase that connection - but we do know that connected to nature increases individual climate action.
Can green spaces in urban areas increase individual climate action?
Before diving in to green spaces and individual climate action, green spaces in urban areas have many benefits on their own that are important to acknowledge. They should be included in cities and will hopefully become more popular and valued over time. They can help people physically, mentally and they can help cities ecologically and economically.
Improve immune systems
Lower heart rates
They can lower or raise blood pressure depending on the need of the person
Help with recovering from hospital stays faster - those who had windows that looked out onto parks recovered faster than those who looked out onto other things
Exposure to green spaces can as a preventative medicine
They have been shown to decrease anxiety
They decrease stress levels
They increase relaxation
Increase connection to nature - which can also help mental health
Our bodies still recognize nature as our home so we tend to feel more comfortable in it
They can help decreases air pollution - which can also help those who have breathing problems
Green spaces lower temperatures in the areas they are in
They also help to regulate humidity
They increase habitats for animals
Green spaces raise the property value around them
They help to increase tourism
Raise the overall quality of the cities
Even though nature decreases anxiety, connectedness to nature can increase climate anxiety. This is because someone is paying more attention to what is going on with climate change.
Climate anxiety is when someone is anxious over the state of climate change and it's effects. It means that a person is in tune with how serious this problem is impacting their mental health. It has been shown to increase levels of anxiety and depression - especially when someone is being directly affected by climate change.
However, climate anxiety is not always a bad thing. Climate anxiety leads to individual climate action. It can lead to being more sustainable yourself, having more conversations with family and friends to increase their awareness and keeping the environmental in mind while voting.
When it comes green spaces and if they contribute to nature connectedness there is a bit of a research gap.
We do know that green spaces and how the quality of them can impact their effects - so it is important to have good quality parks, gardens, etc.
But we need to learn more about how much green spaces in urban areas impact nature connectedness and individual climate action.
I chose to use the analytical framework for this project. The analytical framework focuses on explaining the relationships of different concepts. It helps to logically explain each concept and how they work together.
Because there are so many concepts in my proposal - and rather than explaining each one - I want to explain how they interact and how multi-layered the topic is.
Human nature relationship
Climate anxiety
Individual climate action
Green spaces
How these all interact
I have chosen a qualitative approach for this proposal.
I decided to use surveys, interviews and text analysis for this project.
I would choose my participants by using systematic sampling in green spaces so I can ensure the participants use green spaces.
I chose a qualitative approach because human experience plays a big part in the results. I need to know if people who visit green spaces feel connected to nature and if they take any individual climate action.
Surveys and interviews seem to be the best because they allow for human interaction - asking for further explanation, helping participants to feel safe so that they will answer honestly and I can ensure that the selection is random.
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061
Chang, D. (2023). A field guide to climate anxiety: how to keep your cool on a warming planet, by Sarah Jacquette Ray.
Clayton, S. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of anxiety disorders, 74, 102263.
Cicea, C., & Pirlogea, C. (2011). Green spaces and public health in urban areas. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 6(1), 83-92.
Galway, L. P., Beery, T., Buse, C., & Gislason, M. K. (2021). What drives climate action in Canada’s Provincial North? Exploring the role of connectedness to nature, climate worry, and talking with friends and family. Climate, 9(10), 146.
Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban green space and its impact on human health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(3), 445.
Makhelouf, A. (2009). The effect of green spaces on urban climate and pollution.
Paradis, E., O'Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. (2016). Design: Selection of data collection methods. Journal of graduate medical education, 8(2), 263-264.
Park, S. (2017). A preliminary study on connectivity and perceived values of community green spaces. Sustainability, 9(5), 692.
Schilling, N. (2013). Surveys and interviews. Research methods in linguistics, 96-115.
Song, C., Ikei, H., & Miyazaki, Y. (2016). Physiological effects of nature therapy: A review of the research in Japan. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(8), 781.
Velarde, Ma. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
Yao, L., Liu, J., Wang, R., Yin, K., & Han, B. (2014). Effective green equivalent—A measure of public green spaces for cities. Ecological indicators, 47, 123-127.
Yates, F. (1948). Systematic sampling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 241(834), 345-377.