Pacing Guide
Implementation Guide
Overview
This unit develops students’ abilities to read closely for textual details and compare authors’ perspectives through an examination of a series of texts about United States education.
The unit activities are organized into five parts, each associated with short texts. The parts build on each other and can each span a range of instructional time depending on scheduling and student ability.
Part 1 introduces students to the idea of reading closely for details through an examination of a range of text types. Part 2 introduces students to a particular process for close reading that involves questioning the text—at first generally and then in text-specific ways—to help them focus on important textual ideas and characteristics. Part 3 develops student pro ficiency by analyzing textual details for making comparisons across texts. Parts 4 and 5 develop students’ abilities to express their analysis, first through writing text-based explanations in Part 4 and then, in Part 5, through facilitating and participating in text-centered discussions.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
RI.9-10.10 : By the end of grade 9, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 9–10 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of grade 10, read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of the grades 9–10 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
RI.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
W.9-10.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research
Materials - ALL CLICKABLE LINKS
Complete Unit
ELA 9-10 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 1 Analyzing Details, Student Version
ELA 9-10 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 1 Analyzing Details, Teacher Version
ELA 9-10 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 1 Questioning Texts, Student Version
ELA 9-10 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 1 Questioning Texts, Teacher Version
Overview
Students learn what it means to read a text closely by attending to and analyzing textual details. Students analyze visual-based texts.
The teacher presents an overview of the unit, discussing the purposes and elements of close reading.
Students are oriented to the idea of attending to details through examining images.
Students use guiding questions to look closely for details in a text.
Students use guiding questions to look closely for details in a multi-media text and write a few sentences explaining something they have learned.
Students use guiding questions to independently explore a multi-media website. (optional)
This Topic is estimated to take 3-4 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
Materials
Texts #1-4
Guiding Questions Handout
Reading Closely Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Introduction to the Unit (combine with lesson 2)
Lesson 2: Looking Closely for Details *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 3: Reading Closely for Details *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 4: Attending to details in Multi-media *Priority Lesson*
Overview
Students learn to use questions to guide their approach to, reading, and deeper analysis of texts. Students read and analyze informational texts.
The teacher models how to use the Questioning Texts Tool to guide a process for close reading, and then pairs practice on a text they have read.
Students listen to a new text and use the Questioning Texts Tool to guide their reading.
The teacher guides the class through an analysis of the text using the Analyzing Details Tool.
Students develop their own text-specific questions with which to analyze the text.
Students write 1-3 sentences explaining their analysis of the text and list supporting textual details
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
Materials
Texts #1-5
Questioning Texts Tool
Analyzing Details Tool
Reading Closely Checklist
Guiding Questions Handout
Lessons
Lesson 1: How skillful Readers Approach Texts *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 2 Approaching a New Text *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 3: Analyzing Text with Text-Specific Questions *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 4: Posing Text-Specific Questions
Lesson 5: Independently Writing *Priority Lesson*
Overview
Students learn to analyze textual detail as a key to discovering meaning. Students read, analyze, and compare texts.
Students listen to and then closely read and analyze a new text.
The teacher guides and supports students in a comparative discussion of the texts.
Students develop a comparative question in groups and individually write a paragraph answering their question.
Students independently read texts using a guiding question
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
Materials
Texts #1-6
Questioning Texts Tool
Analyzing Details Tool
Reading Closely Checklist
Guiding Questions Handout
Lessons
Lesson 1: Analyzing Textual Detail *Priority Lesson*
Lesson 2: Analyzing details across texts *Priority Lesson*
Overview
Students learn how to summarize and explain what they have learned from their reading, questioning, and analysis of texts. Students read and analyze three related texts.
The teacher introduces the nal culminating text-centered writing and comparative discussion.
Students listen to three related texts and discuss them as a class.
Students select (or are assigned) one of the texts to discuss with a small group and then analyze independently.
Students use their analysis to independently write a detail-based explanation of one of the texts.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
RI.9-10.10 : By the end of grade 9, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 9–10 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of grade 10, read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of the grades 9–10 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
RI.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
W.9-10.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research
Materials
Texts #1-9
Questioning Texts Tool
Analyzing Details Tool
Guiding Questions Handout
Lessons
1) Introduction to culminating activity
2) Reading and Discussing related texts
3) Questioning and analyzing texts independently part 1 and part 2
Overview
Students learn the characteristics of an effective text-based discussion and demonstrate skills in leading and participating in one.
• The teacher leads students in a reflective conversation about productive, text centered discussions.
• Students discuss their analysis in groups and independently prepare for leading a text-centered discussion by crafting a comparative text-dependent question.
• Students lead and participate in text centered discussions with other students who have analyzed di5erent texts.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.10 : By the end of grade 9, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 9–10 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of grade 10, read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of the grades 9–10 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
RI.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. W.9-10.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research
Materials
Texts #1-9
Questioning Texts Tool
Analyzing Details Tool
TCD Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Understanding Text-centered discussions
Step Up Aligned Writing Lessons and Resources for Unit
Overview
In this module, students will read, discuss, and analyze contemporary and classic texts, focusing on how complex characters develop through interactions with one another and how authors structure text to accomplish that development. There will be a strong emphasis on reading closely and responding to text dependent questions, annotating text, and developing academic vocabulary in context.
In this module, students read, discuss, and analyze contemporary and classic texts, focusing on how authors develop complex characters and central ideas and considering the effects of authors’ structural choices on the texts. Module 9.1 establishes key protocols and routines for reading, writing, and discussion that continue throughout the year. Students learn to work in a variety of contexts, including whole-class, pairs, small groups, and independently, as they learn to annotate texts and develop academic vocabulary in context. This 10-week module is the longest of the school year, in part to allow time for deliberate teaching and reinforcement of these key practices and habits. Module 9.1 is comprised of three units, referred to as 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3 respectively. Each of the module texts is a complex work with multiple central ideas that complement or echo the central ideas of other texts in the module. In 9.1.1, students read Karen Russell’s short story “St. Lucy’s Home for Girls Raised by Wolves,” paying close attention to the author’s use of language. In the story, feral girls with werewolf parents attend a Jesuit boarding school founded to socialize the girls by teaching them “normal” human behaviors. Russell organizes the text according to five stages of development using epigraphs from an imaginary text, The Jesuit Handbook on Lycanthropic Culture Shock. Students analyze how Russell’s structural choices create tone in the story as well as contribute to the development of the characters and central ideas. The central ideas students discuss in their analysis of “St. Lucy’s Home for Girls Raised by Wolves”—individual identity vs. group identification and the meaning of beauty—also appear in relation to the other module texts. The End-of-Unit Assessment asks students to compose a formal, multiparagraph response analyzing the narrator Claudette’s development in relation to the five stages of Lycanthropic Culture Shock.
In 9.1.2, students read excerpts from fiction and nonfiction texts: Letters to a Young Poet by Rainer Maria Rilke and Black Swan Green by David Mitchell. Students analyze the character of Jason as he is revealed in the two fictional excerpts and examine the parallels between “Solarium” in Black Swan Green and Rilke’s “Letter One.” In “Letter One,” Rilke counsels an aspiring poet on how to look within himself for the source of his inspiration to write. In the chapters “Hangman” and “Solarium” of Black Swan Green, Mitchell introduces the narrator, Jason, through Jason’s description of his stammer. Students’ work with these texts includes analysis of the authors’ use of specific word choices and figurative language to develop central ideas. In Black Swan Green students continue their analysis of character interactions in relation to the development of central ideas. The End-of-Unit Assessment asks students to compose a formal, multi-paragraph response analyzing how Rilke and Mitchell develop a similar idea in their respective texts.
We recommending omitting Unit 3 of this module as it is focused on Romeo and Juliet - a text the students read the previous year.
Standards
RL.9-10.1 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone).
RL.9-10.10 By the end of grade 9, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 9–10 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
RI.9-10.1 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
RI.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language of a court opinion differs from that of a newspaper).
L.9-10.4.a-d Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grades 9–10 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies.
a. Use context (e.g., the overall meaning of a sentence, paragraph, or text; a word’s position or function in a sentence) as a clue to the meaning of a word or phrase.
b. Identify and correctly use patterns of word changes that indicate different meanings or parts of speech (e.g., analyze, analysis, analytical; advocate, advocacy).
c. Consult general and specialized reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation of a word or determine or clarify its precise meaning, its part of speech, or its etymology.
d. Verify the preliminary determination of the meaning of a word or phrase (e.g., by checking the inferred meaning in context or in a dictionary).
Literacy Skills and Habits
Read closely for textual details
Annotate texts to support comprehension and analysis
Engage in productive evidence-based discussions about texts
Collect and organize evidence from texts to support analysis in writing
Make claims about texts using specific textual evidence
Use vocabulary strategies to define unknown words and determine meanings of unknown vocabulary
Independently preview text in preparation for supported analysis
Paraphrase and quote relevant evidence from a text
Overview
In this unit, students will be introduced to skills, practices, and routines that will be used on a regular basis in the ELA classroom throughout the year: close reading, annotating text, collaborative conversation, and evidence-based writing, especially through teacher-led text-dependent questioning. Students will learn an approach to close reading that develops their ability to critically analyze texts for deep meaning and collect and analyze evidence for use in writing and discussion
Standards
CCRA.R.9 Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
RL.9-10.1 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.2 Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. RL.9-10.3 Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or conflicting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone).
RL.9-10.5 Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks) create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.9-10.7 Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment (e.g., Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” and Breughel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus).
W.9- 10.2.a,c,f Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
a. Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information to make important connections and distinctions; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
c. Use appropriate and varied transitions to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.
f. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).
Lessons ** Clickable Links*
Lesson 5: Writing an Objective Summary and Development of Central Ideas
Lesson 13: Conclusion and Author's Choice Regarding Structure
Lesson 14: Analysis of Culture Shock Stages and Presentations
Lesson 15: Adapting to Human Society: Evidence Based Claims Discussion
Lesson 16: Reviewing Evidence Based Claims and Claudette's Five Stages
Overview
In this unit, students will continue to practice and refine routines such as close reading, annotation, identification of evidence, and participation in collaborative discussions. Students will study the authors’ use of language to create meaning and build characters. They will also build vocabulary, write routinely, and, at the end of the unit, develop an essay that synthesizes ideas in the two texts.
Standards
CCRA.R.9 Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
RL.9-10.1 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.2 Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. RL.9-10.3 Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or conflicting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone).
RL.9-10.5 Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks) create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.9-10.7 Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment (e.g., Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” and Breughel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus).
W.9- 10.2.a,c,f Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
a. Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information to make important connections and distinctions; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
c. Use appropriate and varied transitions to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.
f. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).
Lessons *Clickable links*
Step Up Aligned Writing Lessons and Resources for Unit
Overview
This unit develops students’ abilities to make evidence-based claims through activities based on a close reading of an excerpted text from Plato’s Apology.
The unit activities are organized into five parts, each associated with sequential portions of text. The parts build on each other and can each span a range of instructional time depending on scheduling and student ability. The unit intentionally separates the development of critical reading skills from their full expression in writing. A sequence of tools isolates and supports the progressive development of the critical reading skills. Parts 1-2 focus on making evidence-based claims as readers. Part 3 focuses on preparing to express evidence-based claims by organizing evidence and thinking. Parts 4 and 5 focus on expressing evidence-based claims in writing.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
W.9-10.9b: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Materials ALL CLICKABLE LINKS
Complete Plan
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Forming EBC Model, Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Forming EBC Model, Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Making EBC, Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Making EBC, Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Organizing EBC (2 Pts)
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Organizing EBC (2 Pts) Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Organizing EBC (3 Pts)
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Written EBC Model - Plato
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2A Written EBC, Student Version
Overview
Students learn the importance and elements of making evidence-based claims through a close reading of part of the text.
The teacher presents the purpose of the unit and explains the skill of making EBCs.
Students independently read part of the text with a text-dependent question to guide them.
Students follow along as they listen to the text being read aloud and discuss a series of text-dependent questions.
The teacher models a critical reading and thinking process for forming EBCs about texts.
This Topic is estimated to take 2-3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Materials
Forming EBC Handout
Forming EBC Tool EBC
Criteria Checklist I
Making EBC Tool
Lessons
Lesson 1: Introduction to the unit (combine with lesson 2)
Overview
Students develop the ability to make evidence-based claims through a close reading of the text.
Students independently read part of the text and look for evidence to support a claim made by the teacher.
Students follow along as they listen to the text being read aloud and discuss a series of text-dependent questions.
In pairs, students look for evidence to support claims made by the teacher.
The class discusses evidence in support of claims found by student pairs. • In pairs, students make an EBC of their own and present it to the class.
This Topic is estimated to take 2-3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Making EBC Tool
Forming EBC Handout
Forming EBC Tool EBC
Criteria Checklist I
TCD Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent reading and finding supporting evidence
Lesson 2: Read aloud and Class discussion
Lesson 3: Find Supporting Evidence in Pairs
Overview
Students expand their ability into organizing evidence to develop and explain claims through a close reading of the text.
Students independently read part of the text and make an EBC.
Students follow along as they listen to part of the text being read aloud.
The teacher models organizing evidence to develop and explain claims using student EBCs.
In pairs, students develop a claim with multiple points and organize supporting evidence.
The class discusses the EBCs developed by student pairs.
This Topic is estimated to take 2-3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Organizing EBC Tool
Forming EBC Tool
EBC Criteria Checklist I
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Forming EBC's
Lesson 3: Model Organizing EBC's
Overview
Students develop the ability to express evidence-based claims in writing through a close reading of the text.
Students independently review the text and develop an EBC.
The teacher introduces and models writing EBCs using a claim from Part 3.
In pairs, students write EBCs using one of their claims from Part 3.
The class discusses the written EBCs of volunteer student pairs.
The class discusses their new EBCs and students read aloud portions of the text.
Students independently write EBCs.
This Topic is estimated to take 2-3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
W.9-10.9b: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively
Materials
Writing EBC Handout
Forming EBC Tool
Organizing EBC Tool
EBC Criteria Checklist II
TCD Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Intendent Reading and Making EBC's
Lesson 3: Writing EBC's in Pairs
Lesson 4: Class Discussion of Written EBC's
Overview
Students develop the ability to express global evidence-based claims in writing through a close reading of the text.
Students review the entire text and make a new EBC.
The teacher analyzes volunteer student evidence-based writing from Part 4 and discusses developing global EBCs.
Students discuss their new claims in pairs and then with the class.
Students independently write a final evidence-based writing piece.
The class discusses final evidence-based writing pieces of student volunteers.
This Topic is estimated to take 2-3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
W.9-10.9b: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
W.9-10.4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Materials
Forming EBC Tool
Organizing EBC Tool
Writing EBC Handout
EBC Criteria Checklist II
Evidence-Based Writing Rubric
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Making EBCs
Lesson 2: Class Discussion of Global EBC's
Lesson 3: Pairs Discuss their EBC's
Overview
This unit develops students’ abilities to make evidence-based claims about literary technique through activities based on a close reading of Ernest Hemingway’s “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.”
The unit activities are organized into fi ve parts, each associated with sequential portions of text. The parts build on each other and can each span a range of instructional time depending on scheduling and student ability. The unit intentionally separates the development of critical reading skills from their full expression in writing. A sequence of tools isolates and supports the progressive development of the critical reading skills. Parts 1-2 focus on making evidence-based claims as readers. Part 3 focuses on preparing to express evidence-based claims by organizing evidence and thinking. Parts 4 and 5 focus on expressing evidence-based claims in writing.
Standards
Materials ALL CLICKABLE LINKS
Complete Unit Plan
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Forming EBC, Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Forming EBC, Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Making EBC, Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Making EBC, Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Organizing EBC (2 Pts) Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Organizing EBC (2 Pts) Teacher Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Organizing EBC (3 Pts) Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Written EBC, Student Version
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 2B Written EBC, Teacher Version
Overview
Students learn the importance and elements of making evidence-based claims through a close reading of part of the text.
The teacher presents the purpose of the unit and explains the skill of making EBCs.
Students independently read part of the text with a text-dependent question to guide them.
Students follow along as they listen to the text being read aloud and discuss a series of text-dependent questions.
The teacher models a critical reading and thinking process for forming EBCs about texts.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RL.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.3: Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or con9icting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.5: Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, 9ashbacks) create such e5ects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.6: Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate e5ectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Forming EBC Lit Handout
Forming EBC Tool
EBC Criteria Checklist I
Making EBC Tool
Lessons
Lesson 1 - Introduction to the Unit
Overview
Students develop the ability to make evidence-based claims through a close reading of the text.
Students independently read part of the text and look for evidence to support a claim made by the teacher.
Students follow along as they listen to the text being read aloud and discuss a series of text-dependent questions.
In pairs, students look for evidence to support claims made by the teacher.
The class discusses evidence in support of claims found by student pairs.
In pairs, students make an EBC of their own and present it to the class.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.3: Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or con9icting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.5: Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, 9ashbacks) create such e5ects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.6: Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate e5ectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Making EBC Tool
Forming EBC Lit Handout
Forming EBC Tool
EBC Criteria Checklist I
TCD Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Finding Supporting Evidence
Lesson 2: Read Aloud and Class discussion
Lesson 3: Find Supporting Evidence in Pairs
Overview
Students expand their ability into organizing evidence to develop and explain claims through a close reading of the text.
Students independently read part of the text and make an EBC.
Students follow along as they listen to the text being read aloud and discuss a series of text-dependent questions.
The teacher models organizing evidence to develop and explain claims using student EBCs.
In pairs, students develop a claim with multiple points and organize supporting evidence.
The class discusses the EBCs developed by student pairs.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.9-10.3: Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or con9icting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.5: Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, 9ashbacks) create such e5ects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.6: Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate e5ectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Organizing EBC Tool
Forming EBC Tool
Forming EBC Lit Handout EBC
Criteria Checklist I
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Forming EBCs
lesson 2: Read Aloud and Class Discussion
Lesson 3: Model Organizing EBC's
Overview
Students develop the ability to express evidence-based claims in writing through a close reading of the text.
Students independently read the rest of the text and develop an EBC.
The teacher introduces and models writing EBCs using a claim from Part 3.
In pairs, students write EBCs using one of their claims from Part 3.
The class discusses the written EBCs of volunteer student pairs.
The class discusses their new EBCs and students read aloud portions of the text.
Students independently write EBCs.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
RL.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
W.9-10.9a: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, re9ection, and research.
W.9-10.4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
RL.9-10.3: Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or con9icting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
RL.9-10.5: Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, 9ashbacks) create such e5ects as mystery, tension, or surprise.
RL.6: Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the e5ective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
Materials
Writing EBC Handout
Forming EBC Tool
Organizing EBC Tool
EBC Criteria Checklist II
TCD Checklist
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Making EBCs
Lesson 3: Writing EBCs in pairs
Lesson 4: Class Discussion and Written EBCs
Overview
Students develop the ability to express global evidence-based claims in writing through a close reading of the text.
Students review the entire text and make a new EBC.
The teacher analyzes volunteer student evidence-based writing from Part 4 and discusses developing global EBCs.
Students discuss their new claims in pairs and then with the class.
Students independently write a final evidence-based writing piece. • The class discusses final evidence-based writing pieces of student volunteers.
This Topic is estimated to take 3 days.
Standards
Materials
Forming EBC Tool
Organizing EBC Tool
Writing EBC Handout
EBC Criteria Checklist II
Evidence-Based Writing Rubric
Lessons
Lesson 1: Independent Reading and Making EBCs
Lesson 2: Class discussion of global EBCs
Lesson 3: Pairs discuss their EBCs
Overview
Standards
Guiding Questions
Overview
In Unit 9.2.1, students analyze the development and refinement of common central ideas in Edgar Allan Poe’s short story “The Tell-Tale Heart” and Emily Dickinson’s poem “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain.” The narrator of “The Tell-Tale Heart,” disturbed by an old man’s eye, kills the man and hides the body. The speaker in “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,” likens her descent into madness to the stages of a funeral ceremony. These texts offer rich evidence to support claims about point of view, central idea, and text structure, including how point of view and text structure contribute to the development of central ideas. Students will begin to produce evidence-based claims and multi-paragraph writing in unit 9.2.1
Learning Targets and Standards
Lessons
Overview
In Unit 9.2.2, students read the Greek tragedy Oedipus the King. The longest text in the module, Oedipus the King allows students to analyze how multiple central ideas are developed and refined throughout the drama; among the many themes developed in the play is Oedipus’s guilt in relation to the discovery of his past. Students will continue to produce multi-paragraph writing and participate in structured discussions to build mastery of speaking and listening skills in anticipation of the End-of-Unit Assessment in Unit 3, an evidence-based discussion of multiple nonfiction texts.
Lesson 10: Collaborative Discussion: Analyzing Oedipus's Reaction and Understanding
Lesson 12: Mid-Unit Assessment: Relationship between Prophesy and Action
Lesson 13: Ordering the Events to Create Mystery and Tension
Lesson 20: Unit Assessment Part 2: Developing Guilt Throughout Play
Overview
In Unit 5.3, Students read “True Crime: The roots of an American obsession,” an article from Newsweek that examines humanity’s relationship with guilt; “How Bernard Madoff Did It,” a book review of The Wizard of Lies; and an excerpt from the nonfiction book, The Wizard of Lies, which examines the downfall of white-collar criminal Bernard Madoff. These three texts complement each other in their treatment of guilt and people’s fascination with crime. In this unit, students focus on peer reviewing and revising their writing. The End-of-Unit Assessment in this unit is an evidence-based discussion, which offers students the opportunity to verbally articulate claims. In this forum, students will be asked to make connections across unit texts, particularly in relation to the development of central ideas.
Lessons
Lesson 1: Development Of Central Ideas Across Texts
Lesson 2: Mosley and the Central Ideas of Vulnerability and Guilt
Lesson 3: How does Mosley Develop His Claim?
Lesson 4: The Qualities of a Strong Written Response
Lesson 5: Mid-Unit Assessment Part 1: Claims and Connections
Lesson 6: Mid-Unit Assessment Part 2: Peer-Review for Strength of Evidence
Lesson 7: Discussion to Ground Comprehension
Lesson 9: Presenting Knowledge and Identifying Central Ideas
Lesson 10: Practicing Academic Discourse
Lesson 12: Analyzing the Development of Central Ideas Across Texts
Lesson 13: Unit Assessment: Critical Dialogue
Overview
This unit develops students’ abilities to analyze arguments from a range of perspectives on terrorism. Students also learn to develop, write and revise their own evidence-based arguments.
The unit activities are organized into five parts, each associated with a sequence of texts and writing activities. The parts build on each other and can each span a range of instructional time depending on scheduling and student ability.
Standards
Materials ALL CLICKABLE LINKS
Complete Unit Plan
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Delineating Arguments Tool- 3C
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Delineating Arguments Tool- 4C
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Forming EBC Tool
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Model Argument, Baseball Sharks
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Model Argument, Course Scheduling
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Model Argument, Facebook
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Model Argument, School Conflict
ELA 9 Developing Core Proficiencies, Unit 4 Model Argument, Twitter
Overview
Students apply their close reading skills to understand a societal issue as a context for various perspectives, positions, and arguments.
The teacher presents an overview of the unit and its societal issue.
Students read and analyze a background text to develop an initial understanding of the issue.
Students read and analyze a second background text to expand and deepen their understanding of the issue.
Students develop text-dependent questions and use them to deepen their analysis.
Students develop and write an evidence-based claim about the nature of the issue.
This Topic is estimated to take 3-4 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.9-10.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and re8ned by speci8c details; provide an objective summary of the text.
RI.9-10.3: Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content
Materials
Text Sets 1 and 2
Guiding Questions Handout
Forming EBC Tool
TCD Checklist
EBA Terms
Lessons
Lesson 1: Introducing the unit (combine with Lesson 2)
Lesson 3: Deepening understanding of the issue
Lesson 4: Questioning to refine understanding
Lesson 5: Writing an evidence-based claim about the nature of the issue
Overview
Students delineate and analyze the position, premises, reasoning, evidence and perspective of arguments.
The teacher introduces the concept of an argumentative position.
The teacher leads an exploration of the elements of argumentation.
Student teams read and delineate arguments.
The teacher leads an exploration of the concept of perspective.
Students analyze and compare perspectives in argumentative texts.
As needed, students read and analyze additional arguments related to the unit’s issue.
Students write short essays analyzing an argument.
This Topic is estimated to take 6 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
RI.9-10.8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and speci8c claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and succinct; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
RI.9-10.9: Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, including how they address related themes and concepts.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content
Materials
Text Sets 3-5
Forming EBC Tool
Delineating Arguments Tool
Model Arguments
TCD Checklist
EBA Terms
Lessons
Lesson 1: Understand Argumentative Position
Lesson 2: Identifying Elements of an Argument
Lesson 3: Delineating Argumentation
Lesson 4: Understanding Perspectives
Lesson 5: Comparing Perspectives
Overview
Students evaluate arguments, determine which arguments they and most compelling, and synthesize what they have learned so far to establish their own position
Students evaluate arguments using objective criteria and their own developing perspective of the issue.
Students clarify their own emerging perspective and establish a position on the issue.
If needed, students conduct further research to help develop and support their position.
Students identify and write about an argument that supports their position.
Students identify and write about argument that opposes their position.
This Topic is estimated to take 3-4 days.
Standards
RI.9-10.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
RI.9-10.8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and speci8c claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
RI.9-10.9: Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary signi8cance, including how they address related themes and concepts.
W.9-10.1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and su'cient evidence.
W.9-10.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
Materials
Text Sets 3-5
Forming EBC Tool
Delineating Arguments Tool
EBA Criteria Checklist
TCD Checklist
EBA Terms
Lessons
Lesson 1: Evaluating Arguments
Lesson 2: Developing a Position
Lesson 3: Deepening Understanding
Overview
Students establish and sequence evidence-based claims as premises for a coherent, logical argument around a position related to the unit’s issue.
Students review their notes and analysis to find evidence to develop and support their position.
The teacher discusses logical models for building an argument for students to consider.
Students review and write a sequence of claims to use as premises in their argument.
Students determine evidence to support their premises.
Students review and revise their plans for writing with their peers.
This Topic is estimated to take 3-4 days.
Standards
W.9-10.1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
W.9-10.5: Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most signi8cant for a speci8c purpose and audience.
W.9-10.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
RI.9-10.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively
Materials
Forming EBC Tool
Organizing EBC Tool
Delineating Arguments Tool
TCD Checklist
EBA Terms
Lessons
Lesson 1: Identifying Supporting Evidence
Lesson 2: Determining a Logical Approach
Lesson 3: Developing and Sequencing claims as premises of the argument
Overview
Students use a collaborative process to develop and strengthen their writing in which they use clear criteria and their close reading skills in text-centered discussions about their emerging drafts. Students learn and practice a collaborative, question-based approach to developing and improving writing, using criteria from the unit and guiding questions to begin the drafting and revision process.
Students use the collaborative process to revise their writing with a focus on:
articulating their overall ideas with necessary information;
the unity of their initial drafts, coherence among their ideas and information, and logic of their organizational sequence;;
their selection, use, and integration of evidence
the effectiveness of the connections and transitions they have made, and their use of transitional phrases
the quality and variety of their sentences, the clarity of their vocabulary, and the impact of their word choices
writing conventions; ◊ producing a final quality product.
This Topic is estimated to take 7 days.
Standards
W.9-10.1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
W.9-10.4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
W.9-10.5: Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most signi8cant for a speci8c purpose and audience.
W.9-10.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
SL.9-10.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher led) with diverse partners on grades 9-10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
Materials
Evidence-Based Writing Rubric
Connecting Ideas Handout
Organizing EBC Tool
EBA Criteria Checklist
TCD Checklist
EBA Terms
Lessons
Lesson 1: Strengthening writing collaboratively: Principles and Processes
Lesson 2: Focus on Content: Information and Ideas
Lesson 3: Focus on Organization: Unity, Coherence, and Logical Sequence
Lesson 4: Focus on Support: Integrating and Citing Evidence
Lesson 5: Focus on Linkages: Connections and Transitions
Lesson 6: Focus on Language: Clarity and Impact
Lesson 7: Focus on Conventions: Punctuation, G5rammar, and Spelling
Lesson 8: Focus on Publication: Final Editing and Formatting