I can organize and structure my writing appropriately with consideration for the genre, purpose, and audience:
Introduction/body/conclusion or beginning/middle/end
Headings/subheadings, breaks, and formatting choices
Supporting assertions/claims, details/evidence/citations, explanation/support, conclusions
Transitions within and between paragraphs
I can thoughtfully choose and create organizational patterns and structures in my writing to enhance my purpose.
Decide what you will use for the beginning, middle, and end of your piece
In formal writing, this could be the introduction, body (including ACED paragraphs), and conclusions
Organize your writing, considering your topic, purpose, audience, and genre
This can be achieved by outlining
You can see sample outlines and organizations of analytical and argumentative papers
Structure your writing with the proper headings, breaks, and formatting considering the structural elements for the genre you are writing
Choose and incorporate the appropriate claims, evidence, and conclusions for your topic and purpose
Use transitions appropriately
Every text should have a beginning, middle, and end. These do not have to be in order of time or reasoning, but you should be purposeful about how you arrange your writing. In an essay or other formal writing, the beginning, middle, and end could be in the format of introduction, body, and conclusion.
Engages the reader by using a real-world connection to your thesis that would relate to or interest most readers. Some good ways to do this are:
Anecdote: Brief narrative related to writing; can be true, ripped from the news headlines, or imagined story of your own creation.
Scenario: Tell audience to picture or imagine a particular situation; can be true or one invented to illustrate a point.
Surprising Statement: Statement that seems impossible or shocking but reveals important truth related to the subject of your writing.
Rhetorical Question: Ask series of significant questions related to topic. Your questions should NOT include the prompt/assignment itself!
Figurative Language: Comparison to something audience will understand using one of comparative literary devices. Do not use a cliché!
Here, you need to incorporate details and background knowledge that will help your reader understand your argument or analysis. You should NOT include evidence for your claim here as you have NOT stated your claim yet.
Analysis: Introduce novel, author, concepts, or summarize important plot developments as necessary to understand your analysis.
Argument: Quickly summarize both sides of the debate, giving background knowledge as necessary; does NOT state side you are arguing.
Located at the END of your introduction, your thesis is ONE sentence that focuses your argument or analysis and clearly states it for the reader using both identification and analysis. It should be well thought out and completed before beginning your draft. Use the thesis frames located in your planning packet for more information.
Together, the thesis statement and body compose the heart of your writing. The body is where you will make your supporting assertions and use research/textual evidence to reinforce your ideas. Each paragraph should have the following elements somewhere. Once you are a sophisticated writer, you can include these elements in the body and not follow such a strict structure.
A 1-2 sentence statement that makes a claim in support of your thesis
Contains a transitional word or phrase when needed
Lets audience know what the paragraph will be about
Includes concrete & abstract
Direct and clearly worded
A quote, paraphrase, or summary from the text/research that reinforces your claim
Specifically related to assertion
No more than 1-2 sentences; no more than 20% of body paragraph
"Sandwiched” to blend in with your own words
Introduce Citation: Give your audience just enough context to understand where the citation came from in the source. If this citation comes AFTER another idea, you will also need a TRANSITION here.
*Before Janie decided to leave her first husband, Hurston lets the reader in on Janie’s thoughts by writing, “Janie’s first dream was dead, so she became a woman” (Hurston 25). ***You may need to transition from one quote/idea to this one here***
Quote/Paraphrase/Summary: Include ONLY the part(s) that best support your assertion.
*Before Janie decided to leave her first husband, Hurston lets the reader in on Janie’s thoughts by writing, “Janie’s first dream was dead, so she became a woman” (Hurston 25).
MLA Parenthetical Citation: Include the author’s last name and page number from the source/text. Place the end punctuation OUTSIDE the closing parenthesis when your citation is at the end of a sentence.
*Before Janie decided to leave her first husband, Hurston reveals Janie’s thoughts by writing, “Janie’s first dream was dead, so she became a woman” (Hurston 25).
Your own words that connect the citation back to the assertion & thesis; includes 2 parts: identification and analysis
Includes identification of citation and connection to assertion/thesis
Includes analysis of citation showing readers conclusions you drew about WHY it is important
Should be about 2x the citations and make up more than 50% of the paragraph
At least 1 sentence that recaps the assertion and transitions to the next paragraph
Lets audience know that paragraph has come to a close
Does NOT restate assertion word for word, but rather connects it to the thesis statement
but do not use the same wording as in your introduction.
Your conclusion should not simply repeat or restate your thesis; it should amplify the thesis and leave your audience wanting more. Often amplification of the thesis is achieved using pathos. Here are some suggestions for effective conclusions:
Revisit Opening: Remind the audience of your opening. For example, if you used an anecdote or scenario, show readers how the story can be different as a result of reading your writing. If you asked a series of rhetorical questions, answer them for the reader in your conclusion.
Amplify Thesis: Take your thesis and step it up a notch. Make it emotional. For example, in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character of Brutus makes a speech to the Roman citizens in defense of his killing Caesar. His thesis statement is: “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more (Caesar Act II. scene ii. lines 47-49). Shakespeare amplifies Brutus’s thesis by writing: “…as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my countrymen to need my death” (Caesar Act II. scene ii. lines 83-85).
An outline is a formal system used to think about and organize your paper. For example, you can use it to see whether your ideas connect to each other, what order of ideas works best, or whether you have sufficient evidence to support each of your points. Outlines are useful for any paper to help you see the overall picture.
Outlining is not only a suggestion, it is essential for good writing. Many students believe that they understand their ideas enough to write without one, but then one of two things will happen: 1) they will figure out while writing that they did not understand it as much as they thought or 2) they will figure out nothing, and their writing will not be clear enough to follow.
Outlining allows you to do your thinking before writing. Your brain is a crazy place. Don’t just let reader’s loose in there. Writing is part of the learning process; you should be writing to learn, not learning to write. If you are doing this, your thoughts will be messy and it is necessary that you organize them first.
Sources: University of Washington Psychology Writing Center. University of Washington. 1997. http://cls.ccu.edu.tw/pdf/course/handout1.pdf. Accessed 13 Jun. 2017.
Now that you have thought about these questions and done the necessary research, you need to outline. Consider that the traditional outline may not work for you. You are not going to outline every paragraph in a narrative, since they may not have the same structure. How would you even go about outlining a drama? Do poems need outlines?
This all seems too hard.
Should you even bother outlining? YES!
https://litreactor.com/columns/8-ways-to-outline-a-novel
You reduce the amount of work you'll need to do during writing. By planning out ideas first, you can trim down the amount of time spent drafting.
You give yourself a chance to spot potential roadblocks and plot holes. Since outlining gives you a broader view of the work, you may be able to identify story problems or areas that will require creative solutions. Even if outlining doesn't automatically solve these problems, it gives you some time to mull your solutions over prior to hitting the roadblocks.
You can save yourself some hassle. When writing off the cuff, it's entirely possible to paint yourself into a corner. While this isn't a problem per se, it does require that you spend time painting yourself back out again. Outlining can help you eliminate this issue.
You get the creative juices flowing. By starting to think about the various aspects of your story, you're jump-starting the creative processes. Even if you never refer to your outline again, your mind will be primed for writing.
You get the chance to thread ideas through your piece. Outlining helps you choose ways to foreshadow, drop hints, or unify the theme in earlier parts of your work.
Begin with your THESIS. This should be the ONLY complete sentence in your entire outline.
Identify your ASSERTIONS. These become the first part of each body paragraph in your outline. Write just the main idea or key phrase. Save writing the actual assertion for your draft.
Plug in your CITATIONS. There is no need to copy the entire citation from your book/source. That is a waste of time and energy! Only write out your citation completely in your draft. In your outline, record the MLA parenthetical citation and a key word/phrase that will help you locate the citation quickly when you’re drafting.
Add an idea for EXPLANATION. After each citation, include at least one word/phrase that will help you remember the connection you saw between the citation and your assertion. You might want to try for 2 details—1 line for IDENTIFICATION and another one for ANALYSIS.
Repeat steps 2-4 to outline each body paragraph.
A outline has:
Short words and phrases that the writer understands
A thesis
Sub-categories that will become assertions
MLA parenthetical citations and key words from citation
Organization
An outline does NOT have:
Full sentences or nearly full sentences
A full introduction
A full conclusion
Full citations copied from the source (unless necessary)
I. Introduction
a. Idea for opening/hook (optional)
b. Thesis—full sentence
II. Body (repeat for each body paragraph)
a. Assertion—word/phrase
b. Citation—(lastname #) key word/phrase
c. Explanation—word/phrase
d. Summary (optional)
III. Conclusion (optional)
a. Idea for revisiting opening/hook
b. Idea for amplifying thesis
c. Idea for lasting thought
Essay Prompt: What point is Carl Sandburg making about the culture of society? Write an essay that analyzes his commentary on people’s relationship to history.
Thesis: In the poem “Grass,” Carl Sandburg alludes to specific historical battles in order to reinforce the need for new generations to learn from the past.
I. (Assertion Body #1) Historical Context
a. (Citation: Quoted/Paraphrased/Summarized)“Pile the bodies high at Austerlitz and Waterloo” (Sandburg)
i. Napoleonic War
ii. European battles (then Czech Republic and Netherlands)
b. “And pile them high at Gettysburg” (Sandburg).
i. US Civil War
ii. Pennsylvania
c. “And pile them high at Ypres and Verdun” (Sandburg).
i. World War I
ii. European battles
II. (Assertion Body #2) Trains
a. “Two years, ten years, and passengers ask the conductor:/ What place is this? /Where are we now?” (Sandburg).
b. “While it is true that trains are included in the setting because the characters of the story are departing, arriving, or currently riding the train, the trains may be present for underlying reasons. What they symbolize can be indicative of the themes of the story” (“Trains”).
III. (Assertion Body #3) Current Societal View of History
a. Repetition of “Shovel them under” and “Pile them high” (Sandburg).
i. shows disregard and disrespect of the bodies/past
b. Questioning “What place is this? /Where are we now?” (Sandburg).
i. Shows ignorance
Sandburg, Carl. “Grass.” Poetry Foundation. 2017. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/45034. Accessed 12 Jun. 2017.
“Trains in Literature.” Railroad.net: The Railroad Network. 2011. Web. http://www.railroad.net/articles/topics/trains-in-literature.php. Accessed 12 Jun. 2017.
George Santayana once said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Currently in our society, many people believe that learning history is a waste of time. However, we often see themes that suggest it is necessary to understand the past in order to move forward. In the poem “Grass,” Carl Sandburg alludes to specific historical battles in order to reinforce the need for new generations to learn from the past.
In the poem, Sandburg shows what he thinks of how current society disrespects history. When talking about the bodies of the dead, Sandburg repeats the phrases, “Shovel them under,” and, “Pile them high,” (Sandburg). Using words like “shovel” and “pile” detach the reader, making them think more of dirt or meaningless things. This detachment mimics the views of society about history, that it is just something to learn, but not meaningful. Also, when the train is passing through, the passengers ask, “What place is this?/ Where are we now?” (Sandburg), which shows their ignorance to the historical significance of these locations. With ignorance comes detachment, and once again, Sandburg shows how this generation is disconnected from their past. Sandburg is showing that we, as a generation and society, do not only disregard the past, but actively disrespect it, leading to ignorance.
In the poem, Sandburg shows what he thinks of how current society disrespects history. When talking about the bodies of the dead, Sandburg repeats the phrases, “Shovel them under,” and, “Pile them high,” and questions the conductor with “What place is this?/ Where are we now?” (Sandburg). Using words like “shovel” and “pile” detach the reader, making them think more of dirt or meaningless things. This detachment mimics the views of society about history, that it is just something to learn, but not meaningful. The basic, elementary questions the passengers are asking also shows their ignorance to the historical significance of these locations. With ignorance comes detachment, and once again, Sandburg shows how this generation is disconnected from their past. Sandburg is showing that we, as a generation and society, do not only disregard the past, but actively disrespect it, leading to ignorance.
When all is said and done, Sandburg is developing the theme that we need to listen to and learn from our past. If we continue to miss out on learning about history and both figuratively and literally pass through our time without looking at the past, we will be destined to fail as a generation. Our disrespectful tone toward our ancestors and their lessons will soon condemn us to similar fates.
I. Introduction
a. Idea for opening/hook (optional)
b. Thesis—full sentence
II. Body
a. Confirmation*(repeat for each confirmation paragraph)
i. Assertion—word/phrase
ii. Citation--(lastname #) key word/phrase
iii. Explanation—word/phrase
iv. Summary (optional)
b. Refutation*(repeat for each refutation paragraph)
i. Assertion—word/phrase
ii. Citation--(lastname #) key word/phrase
iii. Explanation—word/phrase
iv. Summary (optional)
III. Conclusion (optional)
a. Idea for revisiting opening/hook
b. Idea for amplifying thesis
c. Idea for lasting thought
*Confirmation & Refutation can be in any order you want!**
Essay Prompt: Do you agree with what Carl Sandburg says about society in his poem? Do we ignore the past?
Thesis: Although we still learn about history in school, most of society mistakenly disregards and disrespects the past.
I. (Assertion Body #1) Current Societal View of History
a. Repetition of “Shovel them under” and “Pile them high” (Sandburg).
i. shows disregard and disrespect of the bodies/past
b. Questioning “What place is this? /Where are we now?” (Sandburg).
i. Shows ignorance
c. “The 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) report found that only 18 percent of 8th graders were proficient or above in U.S. History and only 23 percent in Civics” (Naseem).
II. (Assertion Body #2) Consequences of Historical Ignorance
a. In order for a society to make decisions about its best interest, it is important that they have a collective memory of its history (McNeill).
III. (Assertion Body #3) Refutation
a. “Some wonder whether schools should focus on history at all, when the ability to recall historic facts or themes might not help students land certain jobs later on. But others say knowing how we came to our current way of life is always essential.” (Soboroff)
b. Debate.org shows 51% of people saying we should not learn history citing reasons such as: it does not help with their job, they will never use it, and it is too ancient (“Should”).
i. Citizens vote
McNeill, William H. “Why Study History?” American Historical Association. 1985. https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/archives/why-study-history-(1985). Accessed 13 Jun. 2017.
Naseem, Saba. “How Much U.S. History Do Americans Actually Know? Less Than You Think.” Smithsonian. 28 May 2015. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-much-us-history-do-americans-actually-know-less-you-think-180955431/. Accessed 13 Jun. 2017.
Sandburg, Carl. “Grass.” Poetry Foundation. 2017. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/45034. Accessed 12 Jun. 2017.
“Should History Be Taught In Schools?” Debate.org. http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-history-be-taught-in-schools. Accessed 13 Jun. 2017.
Soboroff, Jacob. “If Students Fail History, Does it Matter?” CNN. 28, Jul. 2011. http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/07/26/education.history.soboroff/index.html. Accessed 13 Jun. 2017.
George Santayana once said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Currently in our society, many people believe that learning history is a waste of time. However, we often see themes that suggest it is necessary to understand the past in order to move forward. Although we still learn about history in school, most of society mistakenly disregards and disrespects the past.
In the poem, Sandburg shows what he thinks of how current society disrespects history. When talking about the bodies of the dead, Sandburg repeats the phrases, “Shovel them under,” and, “Pile them high,” and questions the conductor with “What place is this?/ Where are we now?” (Sandburg). Using words like “shovel” and “pile” detach the reader, making them think more of dirt or meaningless things. This detachment mimics the views of society about history, that it is just something to learn, but not meaningful. The basic, elementary questions the passengers are asking also shows their ignorance to the historical significance of these locations. This literary example is also proven by “The 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) report [that] found that only 18 percent of 8th graders were proficient or above in U.S. History and only 23 percent in Civics” (Naseem). This astonishingly low number shows the growing amount of ignorance about history. With ignorance comes detachment, and both in literature and in school, the idea that this generation is disconnected from their past repeats. We, as a generation and society, do not only disregard the past, but actively disrespect it, leading to ignorance.
Even despite this evidence, some question the validity of teaching history at all. CNN reported that, “Some wonder whether schools should focus on history at all, when the ability to recall historic facts or themes might not help students land certain jobs later on” (Soboroff). In fact, Debate.org shows 51% of people saying we should not learn history citing reasons such as: it does not help with their job, they will never use it, and it is too ancient (“Should”). To many, it does not seem applicable to be forced to take history in school. However, our jobs as American citizens are to be informed. Alexander Hamilton wrote, “A share in the sovereignty of the state, which is exercised by the citizens at large, in voting at elections is one of the most important rights of the subject, and in a republic ought to stand foremost in the estimation of the law” (Hamilton). The founding fathers expected the people to make decisions about the government, which in turn caused them to give the right to education. If a voter is not educated on the issues, how can he make the right decision? While many people think historical knowledge doesn’t affect their day to day life, they aren’t thinking about the politics, laws, societal norms, and other standards that they have a responsibility to give a voice on. Only by examining the mistakes of the past, can you see which way to lean in the future.
When all is said and done, even though we learn our history in school, many don’t find value in it, and therefore are destined for ignorance. If we continue to miss out on learning about history and both figuratively and literally pass through our time without looking at the past, we will be destined to fail as a generation. Our disrespectful tone toward our ancestors and their lessons will soon condemn us to similar fates.
Chapters: Do I need them? Will they be numbered? Titled?
Paragraphing: Long? Short? Follow a specific pattern or not?
Line/page breaks: How often? For what purpose?
Headers and sub headers: How can these help my readers?
Use of bold/italicized fonts: Traditional or nontraditional?
Font choice: Same throughout? Vary fonts for a specific purpose?
Images/graphs/charts: How can these help my purpose? Do I need captions?
Order of events: Should I begin at the beginning or jump into the action in the middle? Should I include flashbacks/flashforwards?
Point-of-view: Consistent or various?
Form: Couplet? Quatrain? Free verse? Nontraditional?
Stanzas: Consistent pattern and length or various?
Line breaks: How often? For what purpose?
Rhyme: What type? How often? Predictable pattern or random?
Rhythm: Obvious or subtle?
Use of bold/italicized fonts: Traditional or nontraditional?
Font choice: Same throughout? Vary fonts for a specific purpose?
Speaker: Consistent or various? From your point-of-view or another’s?
Acts and scenes: How many? Where do I break them up?
Stage directions: How often? Very specific/descriptive or not?
Narration: Needed or not? Does the narrator become a character?
Use of bold/italicized fonts: What patterns do I use to help signal the reader?
Dialogue: How many characters involved?
Monologue: Which characters? How often?
Soliloquy: Which characters? How often?
Aside: Which characters? What information will be revealed?
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way—in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,
it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness,
it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity,
it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness,
it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair,
we had everything before us, we had nothing before us,
we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way—
in short,
the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received,
for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.
Transitions are important to consider in your writing. Good transitions help your audience follow your thought process and also show sound planning on your part. As a writer, you need to understand how all the pieces of your puzzle fit together and how/why your shifts occur. You want to consider the organization of your paper PRIOR to writing so your transitions seem natural. If you have a hard time adding them, you might find that your progression is not logical or throughout. Transitions need to be present ANYTIME you shift ideas or move to a new point.
Sally is a student in my class. Sally is a hard worker. Sally gets an A in my class.
These sentences show three different ideas.
Sally is a student in my class. Notably, Sally is a hard worker. For this reason, Sally gets an A in my class.
These sentences show how the transitions help show the relationship between these three different ideas.
Sally is a student in my class. On the other hand, Sally is a hard worker. Even so, Sally gets an A in my class.
These sentences show how the transitions can HURT your ideas because the ones chosen do NOT show the relationship between these three different ideas.
Do you see how the transitions can make the meaning change?
Transitions usually occur at the beginning of a new body paragraph and inside body paragraphs as you compound your evidence. It is important to choose the right transition or it could throw off the meaning of your writing.
Look at the paragraphs below. Change the transitions underlined to see how the meaning changes.
(Does not need a transition because it is the first body paragraph) In the poem, Sandburg shows what he thinks of how current society disrespects history. When talking about the bodies of the dead, Sandburg repeats the phrases, “Shovel them under,” and, “Pile them high,” and questions the conductor with “What place is this?/ Where are we now?” (Sandburg). Using words like “shovel” and “pile” detach the reader, making them think more of dirt or meaningless things. This detachment mimics the views of society about history, that it is just something to learn, but not meaningful. The basic, elementary questions the passengers are asking also shows their ignorance to the historical significance of these locations. This literary example is also proven by “The 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) report [that] found that only 18 percent of 8th graders were proficient or above in U.S. History and only 23 percent in Civics” (Naseem). This astonishingly low number shows the growing amount of ignorance about history. With ignorance comes detachment, and both in literature and in school, the idea that this generation is disconnected from their past repeats. We, as a generation and society, do not only disregard the past, but actively disrespect it, leading to ignorance.
Even despite this evidence, some question the validity of teaching history at all. CNN reported that, “Some wonder whether schools should focus on history at all, when the ability to recall historic facts or themes might not help students land certain jobs later on” (Soboroff). In fact, Debate.org shows 51% of people saying we should not learn history citing reasons such as: it does not help with their job, they will never use it, and it is too ancient (“Should”). To many, it does not seem applicable to be forced to take history in school. However, our jobs as American citizens are to be informed. Alexander Hamilton wrote, “A share in the sovereignty of the state, which is exercised by the citizens at large, in voting at elections is one of the most important rights of the subject, and in a republic ought to stand foremost in the estimation of the law” (Hamilton). The founding fathers expected the people to make decisions about the government, which in turn caused them to give the right to education. If a voter is not educated on the issues, how can he make the right decision? While many people think historical knowledge doesn’t affect their day to day life, they aren’t thinking about the politics, laws, societal norms, and other standards that they have a responsibility to give a voice on. Only by examining the mistakes of the past, can you see which way to lean in the future.
When you are deciding what transitions to use, you need to first figure out the relationship between your ideas. Once you know that, you can choose transition words and phrases from the list below.
in the first place
not only…but also
as a matter of fact
in like manner
in addition
coupled with
in the same fashion
in the same way
first, second, third
in light of
not to mention
to say nothing of
again
too
and
also
then
equally
identically
uniquely
like
as
equally important
moreover
as well as
together with
of course
likewise
comparatively
correspondingly
similarly
furthermore
additionally
by the same token
although this may be true
in contrast
different from
of course…, but
on the other hand
on the contrary
at the same time
in spite of
even so
even though
be that as it may
then again
but
still
unlike
or
yet
while
albeit
besides
as much as
above all
in reality
after all
although
instead
whereas
despite
conversely
otherwise
however
rather
nevertheless
nonetheless
regardless
notwithstanding
in the event that
granted
so long as
on the condition that
for the purpose of
with this intention
with this in mind
in the hope that
to the end that
for fear that
in order to
if…, then
unless
when
whenever
since
while
because of
as
lest
being that
in view of
in case
provided that
given that
only if
even if
so that
so as to
owing to
due to
inasmuch as
seeing that
at the present time
from time to time
sooner or later
at the same time
up to the present time
to begin with
in due time
until now
as soon as
as long as
in the meantime
in a moment
without delay
in the first place
all of a sudden
at this instant
immediately
after
later
last
until
since
then
before
hence
when
once
about
next
now
now that
formerly
suddenly
shortly
henceforth
whenever
eventually
meanwhile
further
during
in time
prior to
forthwith
straightaway
by the time
whenever
instantly
presently
occasionally
quickly
finally
in other words
to put it differently
as an illustration
in this case
for this reason
to put it another way
that is to say
with attention to
by all means
important to realize
another key point
most compelling evidence
must be remembered
point often overlooked
on the negative side
on the positive side
notably
including
like
to be sure
namely
chiefly
truly
indeed
certainly
surely
markedly
especially
specifically
surprisingly
frequently
in fact
in general
in particular
in detail
to demonstrate
to emphasize
to repeat
to clarify
to explain
such as
for example
for instance
to point out
with this in mind
significantly
in the middle
to the left
to the right
in front of
on this side
in the distance
here and there
in the foreground
in the background
in the center of
adjacent to
opposite to
across
here
there
next
where
from
over
near
above
below
down
up
under
between
further
beyond
nearby
wherever
around
before
alongside
amid
among
beneath
beside
behind
as can be seen
generally speaking
in the final analysis
all information considered
as shown
as noted
in the long run
given these points
after all
in fact
in short
in brief
in essence
on balance
altogether
for the most part
in a word
overall
ordinarily
usually
by and large
to sum up
on the whole
in any event
in either case
all in all
as a result
under those circumstances
in that case
for this reason
henceforth
for
thus
because the
then
hence
consequently
therefore
thereupon
forthwith
accordingly