The assessment of the group could be divided in two strands; process and product.(Dobson, 2011) However summative assessment is not preferable when evaluating the group’s work and process, but the assessment can be done formatively (assessment for learning or as learning) and form part of the learning process itself.
When assessing learners, we should keep in mind ‘why do we assess?’ The work of the teacher is primarily assessment formative and summative, - alongside seeking to facilitate assessment as learning for- the learners when appropriate.
Learning intentions and criteria for success: this must include a process whereby teachers and learners clarify and share learning intentions and criteria for success.
Learners’ existing understanding: to involve the earners actively in the learning process, the teacher must start from the learners’ existing understanding, building on their own knowledge, connecting new ideas and experience to existing knowledge and experiences.
Learners’ must develop a sense of themselves as learners: the learners must be encouraged to develop a sense of themselves of who they are, understanding in particular their own purpose of learning and how they see it along with owning the learning that takes place.
Self-assessment and peer assessment: the learners can function as instructional resources for one another. They must be taught how to assess their own progress and that of peers’, in line with learning objectives and the criteria of the particular learning task. This is to ensure all learners have the same understanding of the assessment criteria being used-. Secondly, this is to ensure a shared understanding of what constitutes quality work and that feedback given to each other moves learning forward. Some modelling exercises can help, as it is most likely the case that learners must be taught how to collaborate and undertake peer assessment. Peer assessment can become a useful tool in helping learners’ develop their own capacity for objectivity, as well as their understanding of assessment criteria. (Black, 2003)