Known as the father of capitalism, Adam Smith articulated insightful theories about human nature, moral sentiments, and economics. His major works include The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) and An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). Many of Smith’s beliefs are based on the philosophy of David Hume, a mentor and close personal friend. Hume presented the idea that sentiments and desires are the root cause of all human behavior and morality, a concept which Smith accepts and expounds upon in great detail. Smith further develops Hume’s philosophy to conclude that individuals acting out of fundamental self-interest promote a competitive market system. Simultaneously, people’s actions are constrained by moral judgments that preserve societal order.
A Balance Between Self-Interest and Benevolence
According to Smith, human nature is designed for the preservation of oneself and society. Individuals are driven by a combination of passions and self-interest, not thoughtful logic or reason. For this reason, capitalism is the most feasible market structure because individuals are best positioned to attend to their own needs. While Smith regards benevolence as the highest moral virtue, a society of benevolent people is not practical. When someone performs a good deed for another person, their conscience, referred to by Smith as the impartial spectator, feels positive about the deed and thus deems it virtuous. It is important to make the distinction that the act of benevolence is seen as virtuous because it makes the actor feel good; the actor does not incur positive feelings because their behavior is inherently virtuous. Though individuals feel positive about helping others, ultimately that is not a strong enough sentiment to overcome innate selfishness. The human disposition for self-interest does not mean that people inflict undue harm on each other on a daily basis. Smith articulates that "justice," or torment by conscience, prevents people from imposing unwarranted damage on others. The impartial spectator will resent the person who committed the act of demerit and make them feel guilty. The guiding sentiment of individual self-interest is constrained by the just treatment of others. This behavior lends itself to a capitalist economic system where the market’s self-organization and self-regulation mimic human nature.
Capitalism as the Best Feasible Market Structure
The foundation of Smith’s economic theory is the concept of spontaneous order, or the notion that individual self-interest works to achieve socially agreeable ends. People work hard to ultimately benefit themselves, though in the process they produce goods and services that other people want and will pay for. This is known as the “invisible hand” of capitalism; selfish pursuits in a competitive market system achieve mutual social benefits even though the individual is not motivated by benevolence. It is because of these fundamental causal relationships that the market can be self-regulating. Prices and quantities of goods are constrained by society's demand and producers' production capabilities, preventing both exorbitant inflation and an unsustainable deficit. As a classical economist, Smith supports capitalism for its ability to sustain equilibrium between aggregate supply and demand. Individual market failure is still possible, but on the whole producers and consumers can fulfill their needs and systemic market failure is avoided. Capitalism is also a self-supporting economic system because it promotes the specialization and division of labor. When tasks are specialized, workers can increase production efficiency by reducing wasted time switching between different work, becoming better at their jobs, and making better use of machinery. The division of labor is limited by the scope of the market. People cannot dedicate themselves to a task for which there is too little demand to be profitable. Overall, the division of labor benefits society by employing more workers and demanding a variety of different skills, allowing greater distribution of the economic gains of production.
For Smith, history means economic progress and capitalism is a driving force in the advancement of living standards. The economic system of feudalism exemplifies the early or “rude” state of society where only people’s basic needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter, were met. The development of production technology ushered in the era of a free market system. The market system brings humanity from early society to its current state where both basic and artificial needs are met. People have the freedom and autonomy to make choices about the goods and services they consume and enjoy higher standards of living. Capitalism promotes this societal progress through the growth of capital. The owners of capital have the greatest incentive to reinvest their capital and the best knowledge of where to do so for it to generate the most revenue. With the growth of aggregate capital comes the increased "civilization" of society that is distinguished by a more material lifestyle. Under primitive economic systems such as mercantilism, there was a slow growth of aggregate capital as a result of the government reinvesting capital into industries where it was not the most profitable. The self-interested behavior of capitalists leads to the expansion of firms with more workers and advanced technology that in turn causes society to progress. In Smith's view, societal advancement is directly related to the increases in wealth. His labor theory of value delineates labor as the origin of wealth with more labor time used to produce a good correlating to its higher value. The division of labor increases quantitative and qualitative levels of production, thus increasing the individual wealth of people and firms. Defined as the qualitative differences in lifestyle, the wealth of a country is the sum of the wealth of its population. Therefore as the division of labor and technology increases, standards of living increase to benefit a country’s inhabitants and the country’s wealth grows.
Smith was not ignorant of the issues posed by a competitive market system, namely the lack of intellectual stimulation that results from the division of labor. Tasks that are reduced to maximize production efficiency are repetitive and mindless for the worker. As a result, workers come to view themselves as a resource of production in a factory system. To combat this, Smith advocates for public education in his philosophy to bolster a sense of individuality and creativity in the workforce. However, our capitalist society today still suffers from this pitfall of the mass leveling of the workforce under the demands for increased efficiency and profit.