Evaluating the work

Overview

Evaluating dance works requires critical thinking to make a judgement. When coming to conclusions on a work's worth and merit, you must consider the effectiveness of the work in regard to the society in which it was made. Your opinions should always be justified with evidence from the work.

Evaluation can occur through the processes of contextualising, describing and interpreting the work to formulate an analysis. Researching informed criticism can support you in making conscious judgements about a work.

Informed criticism

A dance critic is someone who expresses opinions on the worth and merit of a work. When a critic gives their judgement, they don't simply state their personal taste, but justify why they have come to this opinion. To do this they use research and provide facts and descriptions to support their ideas.

Informed criticism is based on reliable information from sources or from another person's informed opinion. When critically evaluating a dance work it is important to ensure that you are not letting your personal, uninformed opinion cloud your judgement. This will allow you to create a critical response that uses a combination of describing, interpreting and evaluating to decide on a work's worth and merit.

Informed criticism is often presented in the form of a review.

The review

The main purpose of a review is to personally evaluate the quality of a work and to judge the effectiveness of the text to either inform, entertain or persuade a particular audience.


Key Features:

  • most of the text should be written in present tense

  • first person may be used

  • descriptive language for choreographic choices

  • a summary which doesn’t reveal the ending or surprise elements of the work

  • a discussion of the choreographer, artistic director or dance company

  • use of technical words and dance language

  • a recommendation for the audience to view the work.

Jiří Kylián in review

Read the following article critiquing Jiří Kylián's work to see an example of a dance review.

Homage to a Modern Master: Hubbard Street Dedicates Spring to Jiří Kylián

The opening moment of Jiří Kylián’s 'Sarabande' is a mass birth. Six men fall from out of the bottom of six dresses to the floor, hovering on rounded backs like overturned turtles. After a moment, their limbs slam to the ground then lift again. Six mouths open and together issue a sustained and gut-felt yawp. Thus begins Kylián’s vision of the formation of self: playful and posturing, rigorous, but with a sense of abandon. The men in 'Sarabande' grimace and giggle, holler and groan, pounding their bodies, creating the majority of the score themselves. The companion work for all women, 'Falling Angels', is a striking contrast: set to a drum phase piece by Steve Reich, it’s all angles and aggressive athleticism, patterned, sequential and controlled. Like much of Kylián’s work, these two dances delve into both the unexpected and the familiar: the piece about men centers on emotion, the one about women, on strength.

Before Hubbard Street began acquiring works by Jiří Kylián, you could not see the prolific Czech choreographer’s work without traveling to Holland or catching Nederlands Dans Theater on tour along the coasts. No American company had rights to his work and Chicago wasn’t yet a popular destination for international touring companies. Former Hubbard Street director Jim Vincent and current director Glenn Edgerton (former director of NDT) can be thanked for bringing Kylián’s brilliant choreography to stages across the country and now, for dedicating an entire program to his work.

Four pieces comprise the evening, spanning more than twenty years of dance making. Two of the works - 'Petite Mort' and '27’52’' - are longstanding Hubbard Street favorites. The aforementioned other two pieces were acquired specifically for this event. Repetiteur Roslyn Anderson has been working with Kylián since 1979 and came to set 'Falling Angels' on the Hubbard Street women. When asked about the evolution of his work, she says, “We’ve been to hell and back- styles, approach, way of working. He gained confidence as his work developed. There was a more Romantic phase in the late seventies: more décor, more costumes. Now it’s stripped away.”

That reduced, focused aesthetic unifies four very different pieces on the Hubbard Street program. 'Sarabande' and 'Falling Angels' are part of Kylián’s 'Black and White Ballets': six dances with minimal costuming, where light and sound provide the context. '27’52’', titled for the duration of the dance in minutes and seconds, employs the flooring itself as malleable set piece to stunning effect. Minimal stagecraft gives Kylián space to establish precise, yet abstract atmospheres; he is acutely honed in to the contemporary subconscious, and what he finds there is beautiful, erotic, eerie and quite often very funny. After all, the dance named after the French euphemism for orgasm opens with six men dressed in girdle-like briefs wielding foils. But what might first appear to be a wry joke evolves with the lush partnering that follows — extended classical lines spiced with unexpected shapes — into a deeper, more complex view of eroticism.

When asked why these four works, Edgerton gives a very practical answer: they’re easy to pack up and take on tour. If this is the case, the resultant program is a happy accident: unified, yet diverse in technique and moods. It is a marvellous ode to the range of both this company and the choreographer, as well as a seductive introduction to the work of a living master.

Activity

  1. Select 5 articles that review the work 'Sarabande'.

  2. Highlight information that is critiquing or evaluating the work.

  3. Circle any descriptive language.

  4. Using the review scaffold as a guide, write a 400 word evaluation of the work 'Sarabande'. Use the descriptions and evaluations you identified in your selected articles to inspire your writing.

References and images


References and images